Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Talk:Armor: Difference between revisions

From the Assassin's Creed Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>IlLupo
No edit summary
imported>D. Cello
Line 10: Line 10:
==Altiar's Armour vs Missaglias Armour.==
==Altiar's Armour vs Missaglias Armour.==
I noticed yesterday that both types of armour have the same resistance. The only difference between them is that the Missaglias chest armour gives one less health box than Altiar's chest armour, but the Missaglias vambraces give one more health box (so either way the play ends up with the same health). Should I add this into the article? [[User:IlLupo|IlLupo]] 13:46, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
I noticed yesterday that both types of armour have the same resistance. The only difference between them is that the Missaglias chest armour gives one less health box than Altiar's chest armour, but the Missaglias vambraces give one more health box (so either way the play ends up with the same health). Should I add this into the article? [[User:IlLupo|IlLupo]] 13:46, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
:That's... interesting. Definitely, it's worth mentioning. -- [[User:D. Cello|D. Cello]] 17:31, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:31, 17 June 2010

It is existent but it serves as a weapon upgrade. Maybe we should create a page for unlockable Abilities. 206.229.18.66 13:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

why?

Why is this even here? It is all specualatory and pointless, at least put a tag on it that says that it is speculation--Djj51 02:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


Im sure some1 could expand it a bit other wise its a bit of a waste of space


Altiar's Armour vs Missaglias Armour.

I noticed yesterday that both types of armour have the same resistance. The only difference between them is that the Missaglias chest armour gives one less health box than Altiar's chest armour, but the Missaglias vambraces give one more health box (so either way the play ends up with the same health). Should I add this into the article? IlLupo 13:46, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

That's... interesting. Definitely, it's worth mentioning. -- D. Cello 17:31, June 17, 2010 (UTC)