Talk:Apples of Eden: Difference between revisions
imported>DipsonDP |
imported>Crookandcharlatan |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
:Dipson, there's no way Darby was being serious in that tweet. {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 08:53, January 25, 2016 (UTC) | :Dipson, there's no way Darby was being serious in that tweet. {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 08:53, January 25, 2016 (UTC) | ||
:The Apples thing is indeed a big plot hole without an explanation, and that "joke" gave a proper one. That plot hole basically kills the need for Desmond as Subject 17, why to make a joke about it and assume that? [[User:DipsonDP|DipsonDP]] ([[User talk:DipsonDP|talk]]) 19:09, January 25, 2016 (UTC) | :The Apples thing is indeed a big plot hole without an explanation, and that "joke" gave a proper one. That plot hole basically kills the need for Desmond as Subject 17, why to make a joke about it and assume that? [[User:DipsonDP|DipsonDP]] ([[User talk:DipsonDP|talk]]) 19:09, January 25, 2016 (UTC) | ||
::Because Darby is known for trolling the fans occasionally. If this ever gets stated in one of the games, fine, but I refuse to see ''"Ezio’s apple was a red delicious. The others were a granny smith, a braeburn, a honey crisp, and a fuji, in that order."'' (what even?) as proof that Ezio's apple was somehow more powerful. {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 19:44, January 25, 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:44, 25 January 2016
Misspelled word on template
I've just noticed that on the template for the Apples of Eden, it says "Notable weilders". Shouldn't that be "Notable wielders" instead?
I would try to fix that, but I can't change that part. Slate Orchid 16:34, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
Second Apple
I think there might be a mistake, due to recent developments. This article states that Altair's apple was passed on to Elizabeth I and eventually Ghandi. if this was the original story of the second apple, it is likely that this is has been boycotted, as it is more likely that Desmond will recover the apple in the next game.
- "it is more likely" is speculation. We only handle facts, and unless stated otherwise in the games, it has to stay with facts. -- Master Sima Yi 23:41, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Artifact from Masyaf ended up in the hands of Abstergo, and was already lost in the DIA satelite accident before the events of AC1, as stated in that very game. It's not gonna be recovered, just like it wasn't the same Apple that Ezio had during his life. Kainzorus Prime Walkie-talkie 00:01, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
USE OF ALTAIRS APPLE
I am confused on how Altair's apple could have fallen into the hands of Elizabeth and Ghandi. From what i understand Altair took the apple from Al Mualim in thw middle ages (roughly 1100 & 1200) and spent quite some time studying it before his return. It was revealed to us in the last installment of the series that Altair kept the apple with him beyond his death. If i comprehend correctly, he trapped hisself in his "library" and sealed it up extremely tight! Then Ezio used the artifacts to unseal the chamber (in roughly 1500+) and discovered the intellegence of keeping it hidden away all the years. So after Ezio, who would have been able to open the doors before Queen Elizabeth and Ghandi initiating a possession line that eventually include them??? Solo assassin 03:25, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
About the "who would have been able to open the doors before..." i would say that Ezio helped pretty much, since he was the one who opened it in the first place, but it is not stated that it was ever closed again, so if the library's doors and Masyaf castle's gates stayed open after Ezio left in the end of ACR, anyone could have entered there. About how it reached Queen Elizabeth and Ghandi, it is not hard to imagine how they got, as there can be plenty of possibilities, but the important, at least for the game, is that they got and used the Apple, not necessarly how.
BOS 06:49, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure how Elizabeth got it either. But I doubt Ezio would just leave the doors open; it would make hiding the Seals again very pointless. The Leaping Eagle (talk) 11:25, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
More Abilites to the Apple?
Isn't it worth mentioning to say that with enough humans to believe in what the apple says, it becomes real? I mean, it was one of the solutions the First Civilization had before the First Disaster. 68.6.176.66 06:10, December 21, 2012 (UTC)David
Connor's Apple
I think this page needs some updating. Someone needs to add the apple found by Connor's tribe. —unsigned comment by Bad213Boy (talk · contr)
- Connor and his tribe didn't have any Apples. What they had were Crystal Balls. --VATSA (TALK • GENTEK) 01:52, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
Juicy Apples
Hi,
Darby says that Abstergo refused to use Apples 1, 3 and 5 to replace the one Cross destroyed (2) because they weren't... "tasty" enough, he is implying that the 2 and Ezio's were more powerful than the rest. Link: https://twitter.com/DarbyMcDevitt/status/691500511095300096 DipsonDP (talk) 07:01, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Dipson, there's no way Darby was being serious in that tweet. Crook The Constantine District 08:53, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
- The Apples thing is indeed a big plot hole without an explanation, and that "joke" gave a proper one. That plot hole basically kills the need for Desmond as Subject 17, why to make a joke about it and assume that? DipsonDP (talk) 19:09, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Because Darby is known for trolling the fans occasionally. If this ever gets stated in one of the games, fine, but I refuse to see "Ezio’s apple was a red delicious. The others were a granny smith, a braeburn, a honey crisp, and a fuji, in that order." (what even?) as proof that Ezio's apple was somehow more powerful. Crook The Constantine District 19:44, January 25, 2016 (UTC)