Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-84037-20170106215439/@comment-18014300-20170125234722: Difference between revisions
imported>Sol Pacificus Created page with "<div class="quote"> Roger Murtaugh wrote: Are there any new thoughts about this idea? </div> I was just checking in on the status of this idea as I would like to see it go thr..." |
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I'm all down for this. It's worked very well for Wookieepedia for its entire history. Yes, I keep referencing Wookieepedia, but that's because I think it's already been through most of these issues and questions and have long since solved them. | I'm all down for this. It's worked very well for Wookieepedia for its entire history. Yes, I keep referencing Wookieepedia, but that's because I think it's already been through most of these issues and questions and have long since solved them. | ||
Another thing is that if a subject of an article only appears in one source/media, we still list that appearance, and for the references we still do citations rather than using the references like a an appearance section which we have been doing for articles with only a single-source/appearance. | |||
Latest revision as of 01:48, 26 January 2017
Roger Murtaugh wrote: Are there any new thoughts about this idea?
I was just checking in on the status of this idea as I would like to see it go through, and I haven't heard from it in a bit.
Let me summarize: Appearances for every article, and then for media there will also be appearances, though obviously this is going to take the form of a whole box of everything that appears in that specific work whereas for those individual articles, like characters, it will be about which works they've appeared in.
I'm all down for this. It's worked very well for Wookieepedia for its entire history. Yes, I keep referencing Wookieepedia, but that's because I think it's already been through most of these issues and questions and have long since solved them.
Another thing is that if a subject of an article only appears in one source/media, we still list that appearance, and for the references we still do citations rather than using the references like a an appearance section which we have been doing for articles with only a single-source/appearance.