Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Board Thread:Series general discussion/@comment-24227780-20170906223050/@comment-1888015-20171022202027: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Slate Vesper Created page with "The way I feel about this is that Ubisoft have created this lore-based universe partly on research and partly on creativity. To call one character "historical" or "real" would..." |
imported>Slate Vesper No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The way I feel about this is that Ubisoft have created this lore-based universe partly on research and partly on creativity. To call one character "historical" or "real" would only serve to diminish the value of other such "non-historical" characters, even if they play a more important role in the games. | The way I feel about this is that Ubisoft have created this lore-based universe partly on research and partly on creativity. To call one character "historical" or "real" would only serve to diminish the value of other such "non-historical" characters, even if they play a more important role in the games. | ||
In this regard, ''everyone'' detailed in this universe is a character in their own right and everyone in the | In this regard, ''everyone'' detailed in this universe is a character in their own right and everyone in the series should be treated equally and based on their own merits, fictional or factual. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 22 October 2017
The way I feel about this is that Ubisoft have created this lore-based universe partly on research and partly on creativity. To call one character "historical" or "real" would only serve to diminish the value of other such "non-historical" characters, even if they play a more important role in the games.
In this regard, everyone detailed in this universe is a character in their own right and everyone in the series should be treated equally and based on their own merits, fictional or factual.