Talk:Caligula: Difference between revisions
imported>VatsaAWB m AWB Edit, replaced: SPQR → {{Wiki|SPQR}} |
imported>RebeccaAWB m Adding {{Talkheader}} |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} | |||
==Templar?== | ==Templar?== | ||
Are we 100% certain that the ''AC''-version of Caligula was a Templar? Just because he was assassinated by an Assassin doesn't mean he was a Templar, or even aligned with them (think [[Girolamo Savonarola]]). — [[User:M.C.Tales|M.C.Tales]] 01:54, March 28, 2011 (UTC) | Are we 100% certain that the ''AC''-version of Caligula was a Templar? Just because he was assassinated by an Assassin doesn't mean he was a Templar, or even aligned with them (think [[Girolamo Savonarola]]). — [[User:M.C.Tales|M.C.Tales]] 01:54, March 28, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Oh yeah, that's the reason why [[John Wilkes Booth]] and [[Mary I of England]] are under Templars as well. Of course not! Think {{Wiki|SPQR}}. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 05:16, March 28, 2011 (UTC) | :Oh yeah, that's the reason why [[John Wilkes Booth]] and [[Mary I of England]] are under Templars as well. Of course not! Think {{Wiki|SPQR}}. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 05:16, March 28, 2011 (UTC) | ||
==Templar allies vs. Templar puppets== | |||
Hello everyone, I'm just copy-pasting on individual talk pages a question I posted on the [[Templars]] article talk which did not get any response. | |||
I noticed (just to stick to 5 out of 6 [[Assassin Seals]] targets plus Julius Caesar, as examples) that: | |||
* [[Gaius Julius Caesar]], [[Cleopatra]] and [[Caligula]] are considered Templar ''puppets''; | |||
* while [[Xerxes I of Persia]], [[Alexander the Great]], [[Qin Shi Huang]] are considered Templar ''allies''. | |||
So my question is: where does this piece of information come from? How do we know that the formers were mere Templar-manipulated pawns with little or no personal power, or perhaps were not even aware of being under Templar influence (!), while the latters were able to treat with the Order on an equal position? Is it sourced, or simple speculation? I'd really appreciate any answer. --[[User:Piero.schiavone1994|Piero.schiavone1994]] ([[User talk:Piero.schiavone1994|talk]]) 21:33, December 14, 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:57, 2 July 2019
Templar?[edit source]
Are we 100% certain that the AC-version of Caligula was a Templar? Just because he was assassinated by an Assassin doesn't mean he was a Templar, or even aligned with them (think Girolamo Savonarola). — M.C.Tales 01:54, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, that's the reason why John Wilkes Booth and Mary I of England are under Templars as well. Of course not! Think SPQR. -- Master Sima Yi 05:16, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Templar allies vs. Templar puppets[edit source]
Hello everyone, I'm just copy-pasting on individual talk pages a question I posted on the Templars article talk which did not get any response.
I noticed (just to stick to 5 out of 6 Assassin Seals targets plus Julius Caesar, as examples) that:
- Gaius Julius Caesar, Cleopatra and Caligula are considered Templar puppets;
- while Xerxes I of Persia, Alexander the Great, Qin Shi Huang are considered Templar allies.
So my question is: where does this piece of information come from? How do we know that the formers were mere Templar-manipulated pawns with little or no personal power, or perhaps were not even aware of being under Templar influence (!), while the latters were able to treat with the Order on an equal position? Is it sourced, or simple speculation? I'd really appreciate any answer. --Piero.schiavone1994 (talk) 21:33, December 14, 2016 (UTC)