Welcome to Assassin's Creed Wiki! Log in and join the community.
Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-18014300-20200527214426/@comment-18014300-20200702080004: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sol Pacificus Created page with "I think I can go further on the nitpickiness. I have been wondering if a subsection titled "Etymology" sounds more like etymology of the character rather than etymology of the..." |
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think I can go further on the nitpickiness. I have been wondering if a subsection titled "Etymology" sounds more like etymology of the character rather than etymology of the name of the character... | I think I can go further on the nitpickiness. I have been wondering if a subsection titled "Etymology" sounds more like ''etymology of the character'' rather than ''etymology of the name of the character''... where the former doesn't make any sense. So I'm wondering if a section just titled "etymology" technically makes sense when an article is about an individual. I don't know, I have been feeling like it's kind of awkward, but I'm not sure if my sense of awkwardness over it is valid. | ||
It's weird because obviously when it's an article about the object, it's fine. One doesn't have to specify "etymology of the word for that object", that would be insanely verbose. But why does it feel awkward for me when it's an article about a person? | |||
Latest revision as of 10:03, 2 July 2020
I think I can go further on the nitpickiness. I have been wondering if a subsection titled "Etymology" sounds more like etymology of the character rather than etymology of the name of the character... where the former doesn't make any sense. So I'm wondering if a section just titled "etymology" technically makes sense when an article is about an individual. I don't know, I have been feeling like it's kind of awkward, but I'm not sure if my sense of awkwardness over it is valid.
It's weird because obviously when it's an article about the object, it's fine. One doesn't have to specify "etymology of the word for that object", that would be insanely verbose. But why does it feel awkward for me when it's an article about a person?