Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-18014300-20170619050619/@comment-18014300-20170620014815: Difference between revisions
imported>Sol Pacificus Created page with "<div class="quote"> SupremeAssassin wrote: Well, before I appealed the decision to change the article named Mohawk to Kanienkehaka to refer to Connor's people, it was, of cour..." |
imported>Sol Pacificus No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Bringing up the capitalization of dynasty is a good point since I was always and still am unsure which is grammatically correct. Chinese dynasties always have it lower-case while Egyptian dynasties tend to have it upper-case, but this is inconsistent. Personally I think it's more correct to capitalize it, but it actually looks less awkward to me not to do so. | Bringing up the capitalization of "dynasty" is a good point since I was always and still am unsure which is grammatically correct. Chinese dynasties always have it lower-case while Egyptian dynasties tend to have it upper-case, but this is inconsistent. Personally I think it's more correct to capitalize it, but it actually looks less awkward to me not to do so. | ||
Latest revision as of 03:48, 20 June 2017
SupremeAssassin wrote: Well, before I appealed the decision to change the article named Mohawk to Kanienkehaka to refer to Connor's people, it was, of course, referred to as Mohawk. What does this have to do with your question? Well, calling it the Ptolemaic Dynasty (I prefer we use a capital D, just because it looks nicer, we are, after all, referring to a particular dynasty, and not just a dynasty.) would be fine for now until we know what it's called in the game.
Bringing up the capitalization of "dynasty" is a good point since I was always and still am unsure which is grammatically correct. Chinese dynasties always have it lower-case while Egyptian dynasties tend to have it upper-case, but this is inconsistent. Personally I think it's more correct to capitalize it, but it actually looks less awkward to me not to do so.