Talk:New World Order

This is the discussion page for New World Order. Here, you may discuss improving the article. To discuss the subject itself, use the Forums.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Be polite Assume good faith Do not insult other people

Abstergo's Emails relating to NWO

I am not sure if this recommendation will be of any use but I did not want to start adding/editing the page while it is Assassinist domain, but I was wondering if vidics emails/abstergo's emails and even James Morses emails (or specific events from said emails) could be worked into the article in some way? It's just (by my thinking) that it would give added insight into the mechanisations of Abstergo towards a new world order and glimpses in the the events taking place in the AC universe. Anyways, that is just my suggestion and great work on the article so far. It is looking great. Kaloneous 15:27, July 12, 2011 (UTC)

2012 Mayan doomsday

No, the Maya didn't predict doomsday for 12-21-2012, just the end of the Long Count Calendar. I have National Geographic and Discovery News to prove it. [1] [2] Ghost Leader 12:00, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Indeed. The whole "2012 doomsday" came from the misinterpretation on ancient Mayan texts. A few days ago there was a symposium some with Mayan experts from all over the world (here in Mexico, concretely in the state of Yucatán), where most of the scholars pointed out that those theories where just, well, basically hoaxes. There is nothing that proves any sort of doomsday in their cosmogony. Wookie Assassin. 04:27, December 7, 2011 (UTC)

Illuminati vs Templars

If both existed today who would win? Farsuperior (talk) 04:34, May 4, 2014 (UTC)

Wiki talk pages ought to be about how to improve the page, discussions like these ought to be on the official AC forum. For the record, Hydra would win. --Alientraveller (talk) 12:08, May 4, 2014 (UTC)

Great Work=NWO?

Can we ad Germain's "Great work" and the French Revolution as a plan to create the NWO? As the Sages work for Juno and she wants the NWO.Francesco75 (talk)

Since he was a Templar it should be here. However I'd prefer if there was several versions written in the article as not all Templars fight for the same NWO. A section for extremist like Germain(+ other like him), moderates like Haytham(+ others like him) but not corrupt Templars as they don't fight for a NWO order but either money, power or both. It's why they are the most disliked Templars, because they are selfish and don't care about improving humanity. But I'd rename this page too New World Order(Templars) while creating another NWO page called New World Order(Isu) that deals with Juno, her instruments and the Isu Civilization before the fight against humans. And sign your post. --ACsenior (talk) 17:14, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, i always forget to sign. But we could create the page Great Work as Isu's NWO or Juno's  NWO as all the Isu didn' t want to rule the world. But as the Templars believe in the FoU who have strong chance to be thhe Sage or Juno, can we consider the Templars worked for Juno's NWO without knowing it? Starrick plan in London will be in NWO Templars.Francesco75 (talk) 06:47, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

Fixed it for you then. Germain was a Templar, he showed no signs to be fighting for Juno unlike Roberts. Isu's version

And Juno's version of the NWO order can be on the same page. Using the style I suggested for the Templars. But they did rule the worked before the war against humans. So it does't matter wether they was fighting to rule the world or not. That's just a theory, we don't know who the FoU is. So it can't be put in the article until we actually know no it is. Therefor there is no reason to consider the Templars are working for Juno. And based on John's notes about Templars it seems more like she opposes their version of a NWO. All Templars plans involving a NWO should be in the New World Order(Templars) page. --ACsenior (talk) 13:57, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

I understand, you prefer a classification most by ideology and not only by historical era. As usine the Grand Temple by Byzantin and Colonial Templars or using the capitalism as Germain and Starrick.Francesco75 (talk) 08:13, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

Yes. The article can merge the history of both but an ideals and goals bellow or before it that classify what the specific Isu or Templar member fights for. The history part will have all but in chronological order while the porpoise of the ideals and goals part is to explain their differences in both methods and goals. --ACsenior (talk) 14:03, August 21, 2016 (UTC)