User talk:Vatsa1708 - Revision history

Soranin at 12:44, 18 May 2026

2026-05-18T12:44:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 18 May 2026
Line 351:		Line 351:
	== Affiliation proposal ==		== Affiliation proposal ==

	Hi there, I was thinking that you would be the most appropriate person to approach with regards to affiliation. I come from the [[w:c:watch-dogs\|Watch Dogs wiki]] and think that it could be a good thing if another wiki concerning an Ubisoft product were affiliated.		Hi there, I was thinking that you would be the most appropriate person to approach with regards to affiliation. I come from the [w:c:watch-dogs\|Watch Dogs wiki]] and think that it could be a good thing if another wiki concerning an Ubisoft product were affiliated.

	Maybe for providing quicker linking between the two Ubisoft-centred wikis for readers and maybe quicker linking for editors who may be interested in both titles.		Maybe for providing quicker linking between the two Ubisoft-centred wikis for readers and maybe quicker linking for editors who may be interested in both titles.

Soranin: /* Just wanted to say hi */

2026-05-14T16:17:16Z

Just wanted to say hi

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 14 May 2026
Line 25:		Line 25:
	==Just wanted to say hi==		==Just wanted to say hi==
	Hello Vatsa,		Hello Vatsa,
	My name is Wilc0, I'm a bureaucrat on [[w:c:halo\|Halo Nation]] and want to contribute to the AC Wiki as well, so you will see me a lot from now on. If you need any help with a project or something, just ask!		My name is Wilc0, I'm a bureaucrat on [w:c:halo\|Halo Nation]] and want to contribute to the AC Wiki as well, so you will see me a lot from now on. If you need any help with a project or something, just ask!

	Greetings,		Greetings,

Soranin: Text replacement - "blog" to "[w:c:community:Blog:Wikia_Staff_Blog |blog]"

2026-05-10T18:52:29Z

Text replacement - "blog" to "[w:c:community:Blog:Wikia_Staff_Blog |blog]"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 10 May 2026
Line 140:		Line 140:
	The possible drawbacks are: search suggest will only provide namespace suggestions (no images or categories), and any new articles created during the test will not automatically appear in search suggest (although we can manually add them if that will help).		The possible drawbacks are: search suggest will only provide namespace suggestions (no images or categories), and any new articles created during the test will not automatically appear in search suggest (although we can manually add them if that will help).

	Can I sign this community up to help us test this out? --[[User:Semanticdrifter\|semanticdrifter]] <staff/> <small>([w:c:community:Forum:Community_Central_Forum\|help forum] \| [[w:c:community:Blog:Wikia_Staff_Blog \|blog]])</small> 16:18, October 4, 2013 (UTC)		Can I sign this community up to help us test this out? --[[User:Semanticdrifter\|semanticdrifter]] <staff/> <small>([w:c:community:Forum:Community_Central_Forum\|help forum] \| [w:c:community:Blog:Wikia_Staff_Blog \|blog])</small> 16:18, October 4, 2013 (UTC)

	: Just a heads up that this experiment will be going live this week (took a bit longer to prepare than I anticipated) and is scheduled to run through the end of the year. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. --[[User:Semanticdrifter\|semanticdrifter]] <staff/> <small>([w:c:community:Forum:Community_Central_Forum\|help forum] \| [[w:c:community:Blog:Wikia_Staff_Blog \|blog]])</small> 19:37, November 19, 2013 (UTC)		: Just a heads up that this experiment will be going live this week (took a bit longer to prepare than I anticipated) and is scheduled to run through the end of the year. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. --[[User:Semanticdrifter\|semanticdrifter]] <staff/> <small>([w:c:community:Forum:Community_Central_Forum\|help forum] \| [w:c:community:Blog:Wikia_Staff_Blog \|blog])</small> 19:37, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

	== ilu ==		== ilu ==

Soranin: Text replacement - "help forum" to "[w:c:community:Forum:Community_Central_Forum|help forum]"

2026-05-10T18:51:57Z

Text replacement - "help forum" to "[w:c:community:Forum:Community_Central_Forum|help forum]"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 10 May 2026
Line 140:		Line 140:
	The possible drawbacks are: search suggest will only provide namespace suggestions (no images or categories), and any new articles created during the test will not automatically appear in search suggest (although we can manually add them if that will help).		The possible drawbacks are: search suggest will only provide namespace suggestions (no images or categories), and any new articles created during the test will not automatically appear in search suggest (although we can manually add them if that will help).

	Can I sign this community up to help us test this out? --[[User:Semanticdrifter\|semanticdrifter]] <staff/> <small>([[w:c:community:Forum:Community_Central_Forum\|help forum]] \| [[w:c:community:Blog:Wikia_Staff_Blog \|blog]])</small> 16:18, October 4, 2013 (UTC)		Can I sign this community up to help us test this out? --[[User:Semanticdrifter\|semanticdrifter]] <staff/> <small>([w:c:community:Forum:Community_Central_Forum\|help forum] \| [[w:c:community:Blog:Wikia_Staff_Blog \|blog]])</small> 16:18, October 4, 2013 (UTC)

	: Just a heads up that this experiment will be going live this week (took a bit longer to prepare than I anticipated) and is scheduled to run through the end of the year. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. --[[User:Semanticdrifter\|semanticdrifter]] <staff/> <small>([[w:c:community:Forum:Community_Central_Forum\|help forum]] \| [[w:c:community:Blog:Wikia_Staff_Blog \|blog]])</small> 19:37, November 19, 2013 (UTC)		: Just a heads up that this experiment will be going live this week (took a bit longer to prepare than I anticipated) and is scheduled to run through the end of the year. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. --[[User:Semanticdrifter\|semanticdrifter]] <staff/> <small>([w:c:community:Forum:Community_Central_Forum\|help forum] \| [[w:c:community:Blog:Wikia_Staff_Blog \|blog]])</small> 19:37, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

	== ilu ==		== ilu ==

Soranin at 18:22, 9 May 2026

2026-05-09T18:22:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 9 May 2026
Line 244:		Line 244:
	In order to fix the current problem, reduce future problems, and bring the wiki within the Terms of Use, I will be removing the JS from this site shortly after this message. Please do not adapt, replace, or add any similar code to change the functionality of these sidebar buttons or features. You are, of course, welcome to change your personal JS to adjust your own view of the wiki in any way.		In order to fix the current problem, reduce future problems, and bring the wiki within the Terms of Use, I will be removing the JS from this site shortly after this message. Please do not adapt, replace, or add any similar code to change the functionality of these sidebar buttons or features. You are, of course, welcome to change your personal JS to adjust your own view of the wiki in any way.

	Regards, [[w:User:Kirkburn\|Kirkburn]] ([[w:User_talk:Kirkburn\|talk]]) <staff/> 14:18, October 28, 2013 (UTC)		Regards, [[User:Kirkburn\|Kirkburn]] ([[User_talk:Kirkburn\|talk]]) <staff/> 14:18, October 28, 2013 (UTC)

	You look like a nice kinda Admin, a nice mate.		You look like a nice kinda Admin, a nice mate.

Soranin at 14:59, 9 May 2026

2026-05-09T14:59:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:59, 9 May 2026
Line 174:		Line 174:

	You can ignore me, or you can at least consider it. I will tell you that, statistically, Wikia hosted wikis that have a unique name tend to be more active, notable, and popular than wikis with a bland name only composed of the name of the subject-topic of the wiki with "Wiki" thrown to the back of it. To back up my claim, I will list wikis that are/were ("were" being for the wikis that forked/split and lost popularity) very popular, with their wiki name probably playing a huge part in said popularity:		You can ignore me, or you can at least consider it. I will tell you that, statistically, Wikia hosted wikis that have a unique name tend to be more active, notable, and popular than wikis with a bland name only composed of the name of the subject-topic of the wiki with "Wiki" thrown to the back of it. To back up my claim, I will list wikis that are/were ("were" being for the wikis that forked/split and lost popularity) very popular, with their wiki name probably playing a huge part in said popularity:
	*The Vault / [[w:c:fallout\|Nukapedia]] - a wiki about Fallout that had a jaw-dropping amount of traffic prior to their split; Wikia was probably earning a crap-load of money during those days. And even after the split, the wiki still has a huge amount of traffic, but I highly doubt the wiki would have attracted so much traffic if it wasn't for it's unique name.		*The Vault / [w:c:fallout\|Nukapedia] - a wiki about Fallout that had a jaw-dropping amount of traffic prior to their split; Wikia was probably earning a crap-load of money during those days. And even after the split, the wiki still has a huge amount of traffic, but I highly doubt the wiki would have attracted so much traffic if it wasn't for it's unique name.
	*[[w:c:wow\|WoWWiki]] - Now I know this wiki doesn't really have a super unique name, but something about a simple "WoWWiki" got people going. WoWWiki used to be Wikia's "poster wiki" if you will. The amount of people who visited this site is just... "wow". Though the wiki is pretty much dead now, it was once a place where a person would edit once every one/two minutes.		*[w:c:wow\|WoWWiki] - Now I know this wiki doesn't really have a super unique name, but something about a simple "WoWWiki" got people going. WoWWiki used to be Wikia's "poster wiki" if you will. The amount of people who visited this site is just... "wow". Though the wiki is pretty much dead now, it was once a place where a person would edit once every one/two minutes.
	*[[w:c:starwars\|Wookieepedia]] - I can't leave out Wikia's sci-fi holy grail; Wookieepedia is almost never called "Star Wars Wiki". For this wiki to have been founded so long ago and to still be so active is amazing.		*[w:c:starwars\|Wookieepedia] - I can't leave out Wikia's sci-fi holy grail; Wookieepedia is almost never called "Star Wars Wiki". For this wiki to have been founded so long ago and to still be so active is amazing.
	*Halopedia / [[w:c:halo\|Halo Nation]] - not really hard to believe that a wiki about Halo was once great, with someone editing there every, I guess, four minutes most days. Things went down there that caused a split, and now, though still popular, the wiki is pretty much split in traffic.		*Halopedia / [w:c:halo\|Halo Nation] - not really hard to believe that a wiki about Halo was once great, with someone editing there every, I guess, four minutes most days. Things went down there that caused a split, and now, though still popular, the wiki is pretty much split in traffic.
	*Combine OverWiki / [[w:c:half-life\|Half-Life Wiki]] - though nobody visits it much anymore, the wiki used to be quite popular. But, things happened, they lost one of the best content editors I've seen in my life (a guy named Klow; he added most of the content you see there) and another amazing user who acted as the wiki's tech-admin (a guy name Bramblepath; he came up with the name as well, if I'm correct). After that, the wiki went down the drain in traffic, and they didn't even come up with a long-lasting replacement name.		*Combine OverWiki / [w:c:half-life\|Half-Life Wiki] - though nobody visits it much anymore, the wiki used to be quite popular. But, things happened, they lost one of the best content editors I've seen in my life (a guy named Klow; he added most of the content you see there) and another amazing user who acted as the wiki's tech-admin (a guy name Bramblepath; he came up with the name as well, if I'm correct). After that, the wiki went down the drain in traffic, and they didn't even come up with a long-lasting replacement name.

	Now, I know most of that was kind of like a Wikia history lesson (I got a little carried away; this is a wiki about history anyway lol), but those were once (and some still) very popular, high-traffic wikis.		Now, I know most of that was kind of like a Wikia history lesson (I got a little carried away; this is a wiki about history anyway lol), but those were once (and some still) very popular, high-traffic wikis.

imported>Soranin: /* Parent Filter */

2021-04-17T13:26:47Z

Parent Filter

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:26, 17 April 2021
Line 85:		Line 85:
	[[User:Raylan13\|<b>Raylan13</b>]]<helper /> ([[User talk:Raylan13\|<font size="1">talk</font>]]) 19:38, September 16, 2013 (UTC)		[[User:Raylan13\|<b>Raylan13</b>]]<helper /> ([[User talk:Raylan13\|<font size="1">talk</font>]]) 19:38, September 16, 2013 (UTC)

	: Hey there, I'm working on the Parent Filter initiative for Wikia and have created a basic [[MediaWiki:ParentFilter\|page]] for this wiki. I'll be filling out as much information as I can but would appreciate edits, feedback, and contributions from the community as necessary. Thank you! [[User:Generaltsao\|Generaltsao]] '''@'''<staff/> <small>([[User:Generaltsao\|profile]])•([[User talk:Generaltsao\|talk]])•([[Special:Emailuser/Generaltsao\|email]])</small> 18:24, October 4, 2013 (UTC)		: Hey there, I'm working on the Parent Filter initiative for Wikia and have created a basic MediaWiki:ParentFilter\|page for this wiki. I'll be filling out as much information as I can but would appreciate edits, feedback, and contributions from the community as necessary. Thank you! [[User:Generaltsao\|Generaltsao]] '''@'''<staff/> <small>([[User:Generaltsao\|profile]])•([[User talk:Generaltsao\|talk]])•([[Special:Emailuser/Generaltsao\|email]])</small> 18:24, October 4, 2013 (UTC)

	== Reply to "Point?" ==		== Reply to "Point?" ==

imported>Soranin at 17:37, 21 March 2021

2021-03-21T17:37:55Z

Show changes

imported>Darman36: /* Disambigs */

2016-06-03T00:21:01Z

Disambigs

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 3 June 2016
Line 522:		Line 522:

	:Hi, Darman. I'm not upto date with ACWiki. perhaps one the other [[Assassin's Creed Wiki:Staff\|staff]] will be able to help you. --{{User:vatsa1708/sig}} 06:57, June 2, 2016 (UTC)		:Hi, Darman. I'm not upto date with ACWiki. perhaps one the other [[Assassin's Creed Wiki:Staff\|staff]] will be able to help you. --{{User:vatsa1708/sig}} 06:57, June 2, 2016 (UTC)

			::Will do. Just thought you'd know, since you have the ''Mentore'' tag. Thanks. --[[User:Darman36\|Darman]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|talk]]) 00:21, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

imported>Vatsa1708: /* Disambigs */

2016-06-02T06:57:20Z

Disambigs

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 2 June 2016
Line 520:		Line 520:
	==Disambigs==		==Disambigs==
	Hi Vatsa, Darman here. What's the standard for naming disambig pages? Out of the 50-odd pages in [[:Category: Disambiguations]], just under half use "(disambiguation)" in the page title. To me, it looks kinda weird & redundant seeing "This [is] for John (disambiguation)", when no one is named "John (disambiguation)" Shouldn't they be filed under the disputed noun/name only? --[[User:Darman36\|Darman]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|talk]]) 15:00, June 1, 2016 (UTC)		Hi Vatsa, Darman here. What's the standard for naming disambig pages? Out of the 50-odd pages in [[:Category: Disambiguations]], just under half use "(disambiguation)" in the page title. To me, it looks kinda weird & redundant seeing "This [is] for John (disambiguation)", when no one is named "John (disambiguation)" Shouldn't they be filed under the disputed noun/name only? --[[User:Darman36\|Darman]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|talk]]) 15:00, June 1, 2016 (UTC)

			:Hi, Darman. I'm not upto date with ACWiki. perhaps one the other [[Assassin's Creed Wiki:Staff\|staff]] will be able to help you. --{{User:vatsa1708/sig}} 06:57, June 2, 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:59, 9 May 2026
Line 174:		Line 174:

	You can ignore me, or you can at least consider it. I will tell you that, statistically, Wikia hosted wikis that have a unique name tend to be more active, notable, and popular than wikis with a bland name only composed of the name of the subject-topic of the wiki with "Wiki" thrown to the back of it. To back up my claim, I will list wikis that are/were ("were" being for the wikis that forked/split and lost popularity) very popular, with their wiki name probably playing a huge part in said popularity:		You can ignore me, or you can at least consider it. I will tell you that, statistically, Wikia hosted wikis that have a unique name tend to be more active, notable, and popular than wikis with a bland name only composed of the name of the subject-topic of the wiki with "Wiki" thrown to the back of it. To back up my claim, I will list wikis that are/were ("were" being for the wikis that forked/split and lost popularity) very popular, with their wiki name probably playing a huge part in said popularity:
	*The Vault / [[w:c:fallout\|Nukapedia]] - a wiki about Fallout that had a jaw-dropping amount of traffic prior to their split; Wikia was probably earning a crap-load of money during those days. And even after the split, the wiki still has a huge amount of traffic, but I highly doubt the wiki would have attracted so much traffic if it wasn't for it's unique name.		*The Vault / [w:c:fallout\|Nukapedia] - a wiki about Fallout that had a jaw-dropping amount of traffic prior to their split; Wikia was probably earning a crap-load of money during those days. And even after the split, the wiki still has a huge amount of traffic, but I highly doubt the wiki would have attracted so much traffic if it wasn't for it's unique name.
	*[[w:c:wow\|WoWWiki]] - Now I know this wiki doesn't really have a super unique name, but something about a simple "WoWWiki" got people going. WoWWiki used to be Wikia's "poster wiki" if you will. The amount of people who visited this site is just... "wow". Though the wiki is pretty much dead now, it was once a place where a person would edit once every one/two minutes.		*[w:c:wow\|WoWWiki] - Now I know this wiki doesn't really have a super unique name, but something about a simple "WoWWiki" got people going. WoWWiki used to be Wikia's "poster wiki" if you will. The amount of people who visited this site is just... "wow". Though the wiki is pretty much dead now, it was once a place where a person would edit once every one/two minutes.
	*[[w:c:starwars\|Wookieepedia]] - I can't leave out Wikia's sci-fi holy grail; Wookieepedia is almost never called "Star Wars Wiki". For this wiki to have been founded so long ago and to still be so active is amazing.		*[w:c:starwars\|Wookieepedia] - I can't leave out Wikia's sci-fi holy grail; Wookieepedia is almost never called "Star Wars Wiki". For this wiki to have been founded so long ago and to still be so active is amazing.
	*Halopedia / [[w:c:halo\|Halo Nation]] - not really hard to believe that a wiki about Halo was once great, with someone editing there every, I guess, four minutes most days. Things went down there that caused a split, and now, though still popular, the wiki is pretty much split in traffic.		*Halopedia / [w:c:halo\|Halo Nation] - not really hard to believe that a wiki about Halo was once great, with someone editing there every, I guess, four minutes most days. Things went down there that caused a split, and now, though still popular, the wiki is pretty much split in traffic.
	*Combine OverWiki / [[w:c:half-life\|Half-Life Wiki]] - though nobody visits it much anymore, the wiki used to be quite popular. But, things happened, they lost one of the best content editors I've seen in my life (a guy named Klow; he added most of the content you see there) and another amazing user who acted as the wiki's tech-admin (a guy name Bramblepath; he came up with the name as well, if I'm correct). After that, the wiki went down the drain in traffic, and they didn't even come up with a long-lasting replacement name.		*Combine OverWiki / [w:c:half-life\|Half-Life Wiki] - though nobody visits it much anymore, the wiki used to be quite popular. But, things happened, they lost one of the best content editors I've seen in my life (a guy named Klow; he added most of the content you see there) and another amazing user who acted as the wiki's tech-admin (a guy name Bramblepath; he came up with the name as well, if I'm correct). After that, the wiki went down the drain in traffic, and they didn't even come up with a long-lasting replacement name.

	Now, I know most of that was kind of like a Wikia history lesson (I got a little carried away; this is a wiki about history anyway lol), but those were once (and some still) very popular, high-traffic wikis.		Now, I know most of that was kind of like a Wikia history lesson (I got a little carried away; this is a wiki about history anyway lol), but those were once (and some still) very popular, high-traffic wikis.