User talk:Kulurak - Revision history

imported>Darman36: /Syndicate dates/ New section

2024-06-02T03:25:44Z

Syndicate dates: New section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:25, 2 June 2024
Line 49:		Line 49:
	In any case, I return to the question: supposing that we were to excise the special chapters from their respective volumes, then where would they go? How would we organize them? Having them floating around doesn't make sense to me. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)		In any case, I return to the question: supposing that we were to excise the special chapters from their respective volumes, then where would they go? How would we organize them? Having them floating around doesn't make sense to me. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
	:Hi Cyf, totally understand why you reverted it, and i agree, that they should be just floting there alone. I just wanted it to reflect truth so it does not confuse people that we are stating incorrect info that they are part of Volume, but they cant find it in their copy. It is shame they havent relesed collected Volumes in China including Specials, that would make it more easy and clear :( Ok, so we will just let them "inside" of Volumes like we had until now. --[[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 05:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)		:Hi Cyf, totally understand why you reverted it, and i agree, that they should be just floting there alone. I just wanted it to reflect truth so it does not confuse people that we are stating incorrect info that they are part of Volume, but they cant find it in their copy. It is shame they havent relesed collected Volumes in China including Specials, that would make it more easy and clear :( Ok, so we will just let them "inside" of Volumes like we had until now. --[[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 05:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

			==Syndicate dates==
			Hello Kulurak,<br>Just thought I'd ping you about this since you keep a chronology of what AC media/memories when. Soranin recently posted a bunch of Studio Lounak concept images. Among them are 6 spoof headlines from ''{{Wiki\|The Illustrated Police News}}'' paper that have "print" dates. I haven't checked the missions, but if there's no contradictions, do you think we could use them to to more accurately place a few memories beyond just "1868"? – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 03:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

imported>Kulurak: /* Organizing special chapters in Dynasty */

2021-06-11T05:48:24Z

Organizing special chapters in Dynasty

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:48, 11 June 2021
Line 37:		Line 37:

	== Organizing special chapters in ''Dynasty'' ==		== Organizing special chapters in ''Dynasty'' ==

	Hey Kulurak, I noticed that you removed the special chapters of ''Dynasty'' from their respective volumes again after Blue-castle reaffirmed that they are not in the French publications. While I acknowledge that that is the case, I reverted them again and thought it'd best that I give a clearer explanation as to why, so that we might also think of alternative solutions.		Hey Kulurak, I noticed that you removed the special chapters of ''Dynasty'' from their respective volumes again after Blue-castle reaffirmed that they are not in the French publications. While I acknowledge that that is the case, I reverted them again and thought it'd best that I give a clearer explanation as to why, so that we might also think of alternative solutions.

Line 49:		Line 48:

	In any case, I return to the question: supposing that we were to excise the special chapters from their respective volumes, then where would they go? How would we organize them? Having them floating around doesn't make sense to me. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)		In any case, I return to the question: supposing that we were to excise the special chapters from their respective volumes, then where would they go? How would we organize them? Having them floating around doesn't make sense to me. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
			:Hi Cyf, totally understand why you reverted it, and i agree, that they should be just floting there alone. I just wanted it to reflect truth so it does not confuse people that we are stating incorrect info that they are part of Volume, but they cant find it in their copy. It is shame they havent relesed collected Volumes in China including Specials, that would make it more easy and clear :( Ok, so we will just let them "inside" of Volumes like we had until now. --[[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 05:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Organizing special chapters in Dynasty */ new section

2021-06-10T22:11:11Z

Organizing special chapters in Dynasty: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:11, 11 June 2021
Line 35:		Line 35:
	==ACVMemories template==		==ACVMemories template==
	Oh whoops I could I mistake those for having the same name O.o Thanks for correcting it! [[User:Kennyannydenny\|Kennyannydenny]] ([[User talk:Kennyannydenny\|talk]]) 19:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)		Oh whoops I could I mistake those for having the same name O.o Thanks for correcting it! [[User:Kennyannydenny\|Kennyannydenny]] ([[User talk:Kennyannydenny\|talk]]) 19:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

			== Organizing special chapters in ''Dynasty'' ==

			Hey Kulurak, I noticed that you removed the special chapters of ''Dynasty'' from their respective volumes again after Blue-castle reaffirmed that they are not in the French publications. While I acknowledge that that is the case, I reverted them again and thought it'd best that I give a clearer explanation as to why, so that we might also think of alternative solutions.

			By now we can infer that the special chapters will never be translated and released in other languages. It's not impossible, but it's quite unlikely. We might anticipate that maybe someday they will release a special volume bundling all of them together, but I think that is too speculative at this time to act on. As far as we know, the scenario is that these special chapters ''are'' part of the respective volumes they are listed under, but they have been ''omitted'' from the French publication. This is different from treating them as entirely separate chapters which do not belong with the volumes they are actually listed under.

			My concern is that when you removed the Special 1 from the page "[[Assassin's Creed: Dynasty Volume 1\|''Assassin's Creed: Dynasty'' Volume 1]]" and Special 2 from "[[Assassin's Creed: Dynasty Volume 2\|''Assassin's Creed: Dynasty'' Volume 2]]", then where will they go? For organization purposes, it does not make sense for them to be wholly absent from these respective volume pages. The full title of the first special is "Volume 1: Flower Capital Assassin – Historical Background Explanation" while the full title of the second special is "Volume 2 Extra Content". The former gives detail background information about the story in volume 1 and the latter has bonus, funny comic strips relating to the story in volume 2.

			Notwithstanding this, but creating a whole section in the main "''[[Assassin's Creed: Dynasty]]''" page titled "Chapters not yet in volumes" is just jarringly awkward. It is clear from the content and titles of the specials that they ''are'' part of the volumes they are named under, even if they have been omitted in the French publication. More importantly, it suggests that this is a temporary section and that we expect the volumes to eventually be re-compiled in some other volume, which is not the case. Our expectation (or at least my expectation) is that they will ''never'' be released in French (or even in English) due to the challenges with translation—much of the Volume 1 special utilizes excerpts from centuries-old texts written in Classical Chinese that can only be translated by experts. Even if we wish to avoid misleading readers that the special chapters are in the French publication, this is not the right way to do it. For example, we can keep them organized in the volumes list but give asterisks noting that they are absent in the French editions. This might not be the best solution, but it is better than the awkward organization of "chapters not yet in volumes".

			I understand that you said before that the series has never been released in trade paperback in Chinese, so the French is the best we can go on, but we also need to recognize that this does not mean the French edition is the most authoritative source on how the series is organized and being written and what its content is. Its inability to have translated and published certain chapters does not mean that those chapters are rendered into oblivion and do not belong where they have originally been written to accompany.

			In any case, I return to the question: supposing that we were to excise the special chapters from their respective volumes, then where would they go? How would we organize them? Having them floating around doesn't make sense to me. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

imported>Kennyannydenny: /* Moving pages when obstructed */

2021-02-23T19:03:00Z

Moving pages when obstructed

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 23 February 2021
Line 32:		Line 32:
	I know that you meant no harm, and no permanent harm was done because I caught this early. It is a common mistake when editors are stumped for how to move a page where they are obstructed. So I am just explaining this to you for future reference. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 19:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)		I know that you meant no harm, and no permanent harm was done because I caught this early. It is a common mistake when editors are stumped for how to move a page where they are obstructed. So I am just explaining this to you for future reference. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 19:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
	:Yeah, i apologise for this mistake, i wanted to move it, but i should let you know like you said, so you can move it. I totally forgot about what would happen with talk page. --[[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 20:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)		:Yeah, i apologise for this mistake, i wanted to move it, but i should let you know like you said, so you can move it. I totally forgot about what would happen with talk page. --[[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 20:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

			==ACVMemories template==
			Oh whoops I could I mistake those for having the same name O.o Thanks for correcting it! [[User:Kennyannydenny\|Kennyannydenny]] ([[User talk:Kennyannydenny\|talk]]) 19:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

imported>Kulurak at 20:39, 20 February 2021

2021-02-20T20:39:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 20 February 2021
Line 31:		Line 31:

	I know that you meant no harm, and no permanent harm was done because I caught this early. It is a common mistake when editors are stumped for how to move a page where they are obstructed. So I am just explaining this to you for future reference. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 19:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)		I know that you meant no harm, and no permanent harm was done because I caught this early. It is a common mistake when editors are stumped for how to move a page where they are obstructed. So I am just explaining this to you for future reference. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 19:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
			:Yeah, i apologise for this mistake, i wanted to move it, but i should let you know like you said, so you can move it. I totally forgot about what would happen with talk page. --[[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 20:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Moving pages when obstructed */ new section

2021-02-20T19:31:01Z

Moving pages when obstructed: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 20 February 2021
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Why did you delete the merge banner on the AC series article? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 09:39, December 7, 2018 (UTC)		Why did you delete the merge banner on the AC series article? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 09:39, December 7, 2018 (UTC)

			== Moving pages when obstructed ==

			I noticed that you attempted to move "[[Kō Risa]]" to "[[Lisa Huang]]" manually by exchanging the content in their pages. I assume that you did this after failing to move "Kō Risa" directly because the page "Lisa Huang" already exists. When this occurs, the only way you can conduct the move is to contact an administrator who has the ability to delete the destination page to make way for the move.

			It is strictly forbidden to move pages manually by merely switching their content. This isn't an actual move. The pages remain as they are in the system, only they have been edited in such a way that they reflect one another's pages prior to the edits. In this example, the talk page for "Lisa Huang" would have remained with the page "Kō Risa" which has now become a redirect. Notwithstanding this, all the history for the page would only be visible if one visits the redirect page. When moving a page, we have to make sure that the history and talk pages are preserved, i.e. they move with the page which only happens with an actual system rename of the page. Apart from this, the sheer fact of pages being moved in an inconsistent manner would also be problematic.

			I know that you meant no harm, and no permanent harm was done because I caught this early. It is a common mistake when editors are stumped for how to move a page where they are obstructed. So I am just explaining this to you for future reference. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 19:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Deleted banner */ new section

2018-12-07T09:39:05Z

Deleted banner: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 7 December 2018
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::::::: Yeah, I took some of the data from the post, but based on what I've seen, there's a possibly that the stats vary and may not be the same for everyone, thus the difference in the dmg for some of the weapons.		::::::: Yeah, I took some of the data from the post, but based on what I've seen, there's a possibly that the stats vary and may not be the same for everyone, thus the difference in the dmg for some of the weapons.
	::::::::: Stats in damage are little bit different, because it apply "Master Warrior" (Passive ability. Increase the damage of all your melee attack by 1%. '''This can be acquired multiple times.''') damage buff to damage from skill tree, so it depends how many points everybody have in this skill, that makes that small/big dfference.[[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 17:55, November 19, 2017 (UTC)		::::::::: Stats in damage are little bit different, because it apply "Master Warrior" (Passive ability. Increase the damage of all your melee attack by 1%. '''This can be acquired multiple times.''') damage buff to damage from skill tree, so it depends how many points everybody have in this skill, that makes that small/big dfference.[[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 17:55, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

			== Deleted banner ==

			Why did you delete the merge banner on the AC series article? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 09:39, December 7, 2018 (UTC)

imported>Kulurak at 17:55, 19 November 2017

2017-11-19T17:55:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:55, 19 November 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	::::: I see that you saw that [https://www.reddit.com/r/assassinscreed/comments/7dwpqu/assassins_creed_origins_weapons_list/?st=ja6ha1rx&sh=d5ab781f Reddit post] too with weapons, so now we are just missing 6 weapons as far as i know (Harlequin & Chop-Chop from Ubi Club, 3 items from [[Mercenary Pack]] content + "calamity blade" from season pass (i have it at level 40) + stats to missing ones(i have some of them so will add them (like "The Fang" or like i said "calamity blade"), + i see we have wrong damage for Mustapha's Blade, it does not do 440, but 404). [[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 08:07, November 19, 2017 (UTC)		::::: I see that you saw that [https://www.reddit.com/r/assassinscreed/comments/7dwpqu/assassins_creed_origins_weapons_list/?st=ja6ha1rx&sh=d5ab781f Reddit post] too with weapons, so now we are just missing 6 weapons as far as i know (Harlequin & Chop-Chop from Ubi Club, 3 items from [[Mercenary Pack]] content + "calamity blade" from season pass (i have it at level 40) + stats to missing ones(i have some of them so will add them (like "The Fang" or like i said "calamity blade"), + i see we have wrong damage for Mustapha's Blade, it does not do 440, but 404). [[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 08:07, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
	::::::: Yeah, I took some of the data from the post, but based on what I've seen, there's a possibly that the stats vary and may not be the same for everyone, thus the difference in the dmg for some of the weapons.		::::::: Yeah, I took some of the data from the post, but based on what I've seen, there's a possibly that the stats vary and may not be the same for everyone, thus the difference in the dmg for some of the weapons.
			::::::::: Stats in damage are little bit different, because it apply "Master Warrior" (Passive ability. Increase the damage of all your melee attack by 1%. '''This can be acquired multiple times.''') damage buff to damage from skill tree, so it depends how many points everybody have in this skill, that makes that small/big dfference.[[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 17:55, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

imported>Lady Kyashira: /* Origins Weapons */

2017-11-19T09:18:26Z

Origins Weapons

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:18, 19 November 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::: No worries man. There's no need to rush and add all everything at once. You can just do those at your own free time :) [[User:XOdeyssusx\|XOdeyssusx]] ([[User talk:XOdeyssusx\|talk]]) 12:55, November 18, 2017 (UTC)		::: No worries man. There's no need to rush and add all everything at once. You can just do those at your own free time :) [[User:XOdeyssusx\|XOdeyssusx]] ([[User talk:XOdeyssusx\|talk]]) 12:55, November 18, 2017 (UTC)
	::::: I see that you saw that [https://www.reddit.com/r/assassinscreed/comments/7dwpqu/assassins_creed_origins_weapons_list/?st=ja6ha1rx&sh=d5ab781f Reddit post] too with weapons, so now we are just missing 6 weapons as far as i know (Harlequin & Chop-Chop from Ubi Club, 3 items from [[Mercenary Pack]] content + "calamity blade" from season pass (i have it at level 40) + stats to missing ones(i have some of them so will add them (like "The Fang" or like i said "calamity blade"), + i see we have wrong damage for Mustapha's Blade, it does not do 440, but 404). [[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 08:07, November 19, 2017 (UTC)		::::: I see that you saw that [https://www.reddit.com/r/assassinscreed/comments/7dwpqu/assassins_creed_origins_weapons_list/?st=ja6ha1rx&sh=d5ab781f Reddit post] too with weapons, so now we are just missing 6 weapons as far as i know (Harlequin & Chop-Chop from Ubi Club, 3 items from [[Mercenary Pack]] content + "calamity blade" from season pass (i have it at level 40) + stats to missing ones(i have some of them so will add them (like "The Fang" or like i said "calamity blade"), + i see we have wrong damage for Mustapha's Blade, it does not do 440, but 404). [[User:Kulurak\|Kulurak]] ([[User talk:Kulurak\|talk]]) 08:07, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
			::::::: Yeah, I took some of the data from the post, but based on what I've seen, there's a possibly that the stats vary and may not be the same for everyone, thus the difference in the dmg for some of the weapons.

imported>Kulurak: /* Origins Weapons */

2017-11-19T08:07:33Z