User talk:GuardDog/Archive 1 - Revision history

Soranin: Text replacement - "[[Forum:" to "[Forum:"

2026-05-15T15:30:26Z

Text replacement - "[[Forum:" to "[Forum:"

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 15 May 2026
Line 394:		Line 394:
	Why did you delete article ?		Why did you delete article ?

	:Sign your posts if you write here, [[User:Inconnu-dark\|Inconnu-dark]]. If you read my edit summary for the page you made, fan-based articles like the one you wrote belong on either the blog on your user page, or in the [[Forum:Index\|forums]]. Articles are only for official information. =[[User:GuardDog\|GuardDog]] 18:30, April 9, 2011 (UTC)		:Sign your posts if you write here, [[User:Inconnu-dark\|Inconnu-dark]]. If you read my edit summary for the page you made, fan-based articles like the one you wrote belong on either the blog on your user page, or in the [Forum:Index\|forums]]. Articles are only for official information. =[[User:GuardDog\|GuardDog]] 18:30, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

	Yes I had him but it was a poll on my fic and at the same time whether he would like to see this in a video game or not and the article was to resume history.		Yes I had him but it was a poll on my fic and at the same time whether he would like to see this in a video game or not and the article was to resume history.

imported>Soranin at 13:03, 27 March 2021

2021-03-27T13:03:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 27 March 2021
Line 376:		Line 376:
	== Extreme variety ==		== Extreme variety ==
	Hello, I was wondering if you could help me. I would like to know what is the best gametype for achieving extreme variety. Please tell me ASAP as I'm need to help others. Thank you. [[User:Son of Icthar\|(;,;)]] 17:23, March 22, 2011 (UTC)		Hello, I was wondering if you could help me. I would like to know what is the best gametype for achieving extreme variety. Please tell me ASAP as I'm need to help others. Thank you. [[User:Son of Icthar\|(;,;)]] 17:23, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
	:Since a lot of the [[Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood Multiplayer Bonuses\|Multiplayer Bonuses]] involve basic escaping, stunning and killing, Wanted is the best. I've gotten greater variety there several times, though I have yet to reach extreme variety. Good luck. =[[User:GuardDog\|GuardDog]] 23:12, March 22, 2011 (UTC)		:Since a lot of the Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood Multiplayer Bonuses\|Multiplayer Bonuses involve basic escaping, stunning and killing, Wanted is the best. I've gotten greater variety there several times, though I have yet to reach extreme variety. Good luck. =[[User:GuardDog\|GuardDog]] 23:12, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
	:		:
	:Thank you, I shall hopefully get it at the weekend. I've gotten close before, but ran out of time unfortunately. [[User:Son of Icthar\|(;,;)]] 10:04, March 23, 2011 (UTC)		:Thank you, I shall hopefully get it at the weekend. I've gotten close before, but ran out of time unfortunately. [[User:Son of Icthar\|(;,;)]] 10:04, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

imported>Darman36: No longer purview of wiki

2021-03-24T04:46:30Z

No longer purview of wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 24 March 2021
Line 174:		Line 174:
	GD, I see you put on deletion marks on several, if not all, multi-player weapons. I take it that you have a good reason for doing so. Well, let's hear it. [[User:War Clown\|<span style="font-family:Modern No. 20"><font color="#FFFFFF">'''Jacques le Blanc'''</font></span>]][[User talk:War Clown\|<sup><font color="black">''Reception Area''</font></sup>]] 02:16, December 20, 2010 (UTC)		GD, I see you put on deletion marks on several, if not all, multi-player weapons. I take it that you have a good reason for doing so. Well, let's hear it. [[User:War Clown\|<span style="font-family:Modern No. 20"><font color="#FFFFFF">'''Jacques le Blanc'''</font></span>]][[User talk:War Clown\|<sup><font color="black">''Reception Area''</font></sup>]] 02:16, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

	: I do, and yes, I've marked all of them for deletion. As approved by Cello, as can be seen [[~~Category_talk~~:~~Candidates_for_deletion#Candidate_for_deletion:_.22Short_Sword.22~~\|here]], all Multiplayer weapon pages will be deleted, and instead merged under a single article, [[Multiplayer Weapons]]. =[[User:GuardDog\|GuardDog]] 02:30, December 20, 2010 (UTC)		: I do, and yes, I've marked all of them for deletion. As approved by Cello, as can be seen [[Category talk:Candidates for deletion\|here]], all Multiplayer weapon pages will be deleted, and instead merged under a single article, Multiplayer Weapons. =[[User:GuardDog\|GuardDog]] 02:30, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

	== Colosseum Passion Play ==		== Colosseum Passion Play ==

imported>Soranin at 13:13, 20 March 2021

2021-03-20T13:13:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 20 March 2021
Line 212:		Line 212:
	Right, firtstly: Something that has been bugging me for a little while now is the number of pictures on this wiki that depict Ezio in a variety of different colour robes that, canonically, we don't know he ever wore. It's all well and good to assume that, since the option to dye clothes is in-game he canonically did it, but which colour, and when? The same goes for the armour. I think we need to take a good look at all the pictures on-site that depict Ezio wearing coloured robes and, if possible, replace them with similar photos showing Ezio in white robes (and if possible without armour).		Right, firtstly: Something that has been bugging me for a little while now is the number of pictures on this wiki that depict Ezio in a variety of different colour robes that, canonically, we don't know he ever wore. It's all well and good to assume that, since the option to dye clothes is in-game he canonically did it, but which colour, and when? The same goes for the armour. I think we need to take a good look at all the pictures on-site that depict Ezio wearing coloured robes and, if possible, replace them with similar photos showing Ezio in white robes (and if possible without armour).

	My second point is the number of photos on site that, unfortunately, include some of the, for lack of a better word, "Animus glow". A prime example of what I mean can be seen in [[:File:Beatup2.png\|this photo]], which shows Ezio's target in a white glow. Now, unless the image is being used to depict something explicitly related to the Animus, I think we should once again replace all these photos with something that does not show the Animus glow.		My second point is the number of photos on site that, unfortunately, include some of the, for lack of a better word, "Animus glow". A prime example of what I mean can be seen in :File:Beatup2.png\|this photo, which shows Ezio's target in a white glow. Now, unless the image is being used to depict something explicitly related to the Animus, I think we should once again replace all these photos with something that does not show the Animus glow.

	I know this will probably take some time, and be a large amount of work, but I do think it will be a positive contribution to the wiki, as well as a positive form of mutual interaction between the site's contributors. What do you think? --<span style="color:#BF404D">'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <sub>[[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|Council Chamber]]</sub> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Jasca_Ducato\|Assassination record]]</sup></span> 19:55, January 7, 2011 (UTC)		I know this will probably take some time, and be a large amount of work, but I do think it will be a positive contribution to the wiki, as well as a positive form of mutual interaction between the site's contributors. What do you think? --<span style="color:#BF404D">'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <sub>[[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|Council Chamber]]</sub> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Jasca_Ducato\|Assassination record]]</sup></span> 19:55, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

imported>VatsaAWB: Unlinking "Bugs"

2014-01-25T14:37:19Z

Unlinking "Bugs"

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:37, 25 January 2014
Line 257:		Line 257:
	== Just a few things... ==		== Just a few things... ==

	Hey Guard! Just wanted to run a few things by you before I take action. On the [[Bugs]] page under The Truth section it lists glitches which can occur during play through of the level. I was just questioning whether or not to remove that section completley as it seems just a tad too specific, the bugs listed seem to have only happened to a very limited number of people, even if that. So do you think they deserve a place on the page or will I delete them? Also on the activity page I noticed that someone added a photo-shoped piece of fan art of Altaïr to the gallery on the [[Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad\|Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad    ]] page , should I remove that image or leave it? Thanks for your time! Get back to me when you can! Cheers! [[User:Subject_16*\|<span style="font-family:trajan pro;font-size:14px;color:#CC0000;">'''Sick-steeN'''</span>]] 01:10, January 25, 2011 (UTC)		Hey Guard! Just wanted to run a few things by you before I take action. On the Bugs page under The Truth section it lists glitches which can occur during play through of the level. I was just questioning whether or not to remove that section completley as it seems just a tad too specific, the bugs listed seem to have only happened to a very limited number of people, even if that. So do you think they deserve a place on the page or will I delete them? Also on the activity page I noticed that someone added a photo-shoped piece of fan art of Altaïr to the gallery on the [[Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad\|Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad    ]] page , should I remove that image or leave it? Thanks for your time! Get back to me when you can! Cheers! [[User:Subject_16*\|<span style="font-family:trajan pro;font-size:14px;color:#CC0000;">'''Sick-steeN'''</span>]] 01:10, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

	: I'm not quite with how to manage the Bugs page, as it's difficult to test the validity of any one of them, so might be better to leave them for now - unless you can confirm they don't exist. As for the fanart of Altair, by all means, remove it. As you thought, no fan-edited images are allowed, and only official art or screenshots can be used. =[[User:GuardDog\|GuardDog]] 01:17, January 25, 2011 (UTC)		: I'm not quite with how to manage the Bugs page, as it's difficult to test the validity of any one of them, so might be better to leave them for now - unless you can confirm they don't exist. As for the fanart of Altair, by all means, remove it. As you thought, no fan-edited images are allowed, and only official art or screenshots can be used. =[[User:GuardDog\|GuardDog]] 01:17, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

imported>VatsaAWB: Unlinking "Incident at the Pagan Party"

2012-10-16T05:30:26Z

Unlinking "Incident at the Pagan Party"

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:30, 16 October 2012
Line 382:		Line 382:
	== Good Job ==		== Good Job ==

	Greetings. Thanks to your efforts, the [[Incident at the Pagan Party]] has now been promoted to Featured Status. Please put this on your user page as a sign of your effort.		Greetings. Thanks to your efforts, the Incident at the Pagan Party has now been promoted to Featured Status. Please put this on your user page as a sign of your effort.

	(template)		(template)

imported>VatsaAWB: /* Ezio's Apple page deletion? */AWB Edit, replaced: Sixth Apple → Ezio's Apple

2011-12-18T15:37:31Z

Ezio's Apple page deletion?: AWB Edit, replaced: Sixth Apple → Ezio's Apple

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 18 December 2011
Line 142:		Line 142:
	: Yes, the page is fine, though you should really stop asking people if you did well. Don't expect a pat on the head every time you edit something, it's the purpose of the Wiki. Just keep working, you'll be praised when you deserve it, not when you ask for it. =[[User:GuardDog\|GuardDog]] 02:37, December 1, 2010 (UTC)		: Yes, the page is fine, though you should really stop asking people if you did well. Don't expect a pat on the head every time you edit something, it's the purpose of the Wiki. Just keep working, you'll be praised when you deserve it, not when you ask for it. =[[User:GuardDog\|GuardDog]] 02:37, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

	== [[~~Sixth~~ Apple]] page deletion? ==		== [[Ezio's Apple]] page deletion? ==

	Sorry, I'm not really sure where to get ahold of people for this. I posted on the Deletion discussion page, as well, but the argument is that there are two Apples, because there is no way that Houdini and Napoleon got ahold of the Ezio's Apple (considering since that 16 hints that the Templars killed Houdini for the Apple -- why would they put it back in the Temple?), since Desmond currently has it. If compromise has to be made, perhaps just a sub-heading on the [[First Apple]] page? Because I'm not inclined to believe that this is a really huge error on Ubisoft's part, considering the meticulous attention they've paid to the series thus far. -- [[User:A Black Rabbit\|A Black Rabbit]] 23:53, December 1, 2010 (UTC)		Sorry, I'm not really sure where to get ahold of people for this. I posted on the Deletion discussion page, as well, but the argument is that there are two Apples, because there is no way that Houdini and Napoleon got ahold of the Ezio's Apple (considering since that 16 hints that the Templars killed Houdini for the Apple -- why would they put it back in the Temple?), since Desmond currently has it. If compromise has to be made, perhaps just a sub-heading on the [[First Apple]] page? Because I'm not inclined to believe that this is a really huge error on Ubisoft's part, considering the meticulous attention they've paid to the series thus far. -- [[User:A Black Rabbit\|A Black Rabbit]] 23:53, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

imported>GuardDog: archiving

2011-08-19T17:01:16Z

archiving

Show changes