User talk:Francesco75 - Revision history

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Updating our naming policy */ new section

2021-09-27T08:42:04Z

Updating our naming policy: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:42, 27 September 2021
Line 164:		Line 164:

	Just so you are tracking the reasoning behind using the year 886 rather than 885 for the DLC. Since we are dating the siege to when it historically happened rather than the nebulous timing the game gives that puts the siege between Nov 885 and Oct 886. However since the DLC ties into the Sigrblot festival that means it take place after April/May within the aforementioned timeframe. The order of events are siege starts Nov 885, Sinric is killed late 885/early 886, Sigrblot festival and Toka's arrival April/May 886, and finally Eivor travels to France summer 886. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 18:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)		Just so you are tracking the reasoning behind using the year 886 rather than 885 for the DLC. Since we are dating the siege to when it historically happened rather than the nebulous timing the game gives that puts the siege between Nov 885 and Oct 886. However since the DLC ties into the Sigrblot festival that means it take place after April/May within the aforementioned timeframe. The order of events are siege starts Nov 885, Sinric is killed late 885/early 886, Sigrblot festival and Toka's arrival April/May 886, and finally Eivor travels to France summer 886. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 18:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

			== Updating our naming policy ==

			Hello Francesco, if you have the time, would you be able to help us out with [https://assassinscreed.fandom.com/f/p/4400000000000125272 updating our naming policy]? It's actually a fairly important matter, and I hope we can get as much input as we can. While I'm at it, I want to let you know that you can expect a new topic on wiki-related matters and policy every Sunday going forward (unless I run out of ideas or we have no more issues :P), with each discussion remaining open for two weeks. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 08:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* 885 vs 886 */ new section

2021-08-15T18:43:36Z

885 vs 886: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 15 August 2021
Line 160:		Line 160:

	Hello Francesco, I'm here to invite you again to yet another forum discussion: [https://assassinscreed.fandom.com/f/p/4400000000000032907 "Extent of real-world information in articles"]. This is a really critical topic for our wiki, and I don't think it's getting enough attention at the moment. If you have time, could you please offer your input on it? Thanks! [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:28, October 9, 2020 (UTC)		Hello Francesco, I'm here to invite you again to yet another forum discussion: [https://assassinscreed.fandom.com/f/p/4400000000000032907 "Extent of real-world information in articles"]. This is a really critical topic for our wiki, and I don't think it's getting enough attention at the moment. If you have time, could you please offer your input on it? Thanks! [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:28, October 9, 2020 (UTC)

			== 885 vs 886 ==

			Just so you are tracking the reasoning behind using the year 886 rather than 885 for the DLC. Since we are dating the siege to when it historically happened rather than the nebulous timing the game gives that puts the siege between Nov 885 and Oct 886. However since the DLC ties into the Sigrblot festival that means it take place after April/May within the aforementioned timeframe. The order of events are siege starts Nov 885, Sinric is killed late 885/early 886, Sigrblot festival and Toka's arrival April/May 886, and finally Eivor travels to France summer 886. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 18:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Extent of real-world info in articles */ new section

2020-10-09T22:28:04Z

Extent of real-world info in articles: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 10 October 2020
Line 156:		Line 156:
	Hello again Francesco. I've noticed this error being made very frequently in your writing, and it is that you have a habit of using the words ''fly'' or ''flight'' to mean "run away". The correct word should be ''flee'', past tense ''fled''. Otherwise, your English writing has definitely been improving though. Keep it up. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:51, June 1, 2020 (UTC)		Hello again Francesco. I've noticed this error being made very frequently in your writing, and it is that you have a habit of using the words ''fly'' or ''flight'' to mean "run away". The correct word should be ''flee'', past tense ''fled''. Otherwise, your English writing has definitely been improving though. Keep it up. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:51, June 1, 2020 (UTC)
	:Thank you. It's the grammar corrector which proposed fly. I will remember.[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 16:02, June 1, 2020 (UTC)		:Thank you. It's the grammar corrector which proposed fly. I will remember.[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 16:02, June 1, 2020 (UTC)

			== Extent of real-world info in articles ==

			Hello Francesco, I'm here to invite you again to yet another forum discussion: [https://assassinscreed.fandom.com/f/p/4400000000000032907 "Extent of real-world information in articles"]. This is a really critical topic for our wiki, and I don't think it's getting enough attention at the moment. If you have time, could you please offer your input on it? Thanks! [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:28, October 9, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Francesco75: /* Flee not fly */

2020-06-01T16:02:19Z

Flee not fly

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:02, 1 June 2020
Line 155:		Line 155:

	Hello again Francesco. I've noticed this error being made very frequently in your writing, and it is that you have a habit of using the words ''fly'' or ''flight'' to mean "run away". The correct word should be ''flee'', past tense ''fled''. Otherwise, your English writing has definitely been improving though. Keep it up. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:51, June 1, 2020 (UTC)		Hello again Francesco. I've noticed this error being made very frequently in your writing, and it is that you have a habit of using the words ''fly'' or ''flight'' to mean "run away". The correct word should be ''flee'', past tense ''fled''. Otherwise, your English writing has definitely been improving though. Keep it up. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:51, June 1, 2020 (UTC)
			:Thank you. It's the grammar corrector which proposed fly. I will remember.[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 16:02, June 1, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Flee not fly */ new section

2020-06-01T15:51:44Z

Flee not fly: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 1 June 2020
Line 151:		Line 151:

	Hey, I just opened up a [https://assassinscreed.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:240206 discussion] on our usage of the terms "proto-Assassin" and "proto-Templar". It's a long read, but I think is very important for us to clear this up because our wiki has been rather inconsistent about it, and we could cause some serious problems with it down the line. If you had the time, could you offer your input on it? Thanks. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 00:54, May 4, 2020 (UTC)		Hey, I just opened up a [https://assassinscreed.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:240206 discussion] on our usage of the terms "proto-Assassin" and "proto-Templar". It's a long read, but I think is very important for us to clear this up because our wiki has been rather inconsistent about it, and we could cause some serious problems with it down the line. If you had the time, could you offer your input on it? Thanks. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 00:54, May 4, 2020 (UTC)

			== Flee not fly ==

			Hello again Francesco. I've noticed this error being made very frequently in your writing, and it is that you have a habit of using the words ''fly'' or ''flight'' to mean "run away". The correct word should be ''flee'', past tense ''fled''. Otherwise, your English writing has definitely been improving though. Keep it up. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:51, June 1, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Proto-Assassins & Proto-Templars */ new section

2020-05-04T00:54:28Z

Proto-Assassins & Proto-Templars: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:54, 4 May 2020
Line 147:		Line 147:
	Sorry, I didn't see your messages. When I wrote the new sections, I used an English writing corrector to avoid many mistakes on the tenses and even correcting the part I had written on Paris, French Revolution, and the American Revolution. So I double-check my writing but I don't guarantee there is no mistakes.[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 13:18, January 30, 2020 (UTC)		Sorry, I didn't see your messages. When I wrote the new sections, I used an English writing corrector to avoid many mistakes on the tenses and even correcting the part I had written on Paris, French Revolution, and the American Revolution. So I double-check my writing but I don't guarantee there is no mistakes.[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 13:18, January 30, 2020 (UTC)
	:Yeah, I actually checked back on your latest writing on the article after I wrote the above message, and then I realized that there seems to be barely any errors. After that, I wasn't sure if it was really necessary for me to lock the page like that and felt a little bad about it, but it does relieve some of the stress for me nonetheless. Thanks for letting me know that you're actually making extra efforts I didn't recognize. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:40, January 30, 2020 (UTC)		:Yeah, I actually checked back on your latest writing on the article after I wrote the above message, and then I realized that there seems to be barely any errors. After that, I wasn't sure if it was really necessary for me to lock the page like that and felt a little bad about it, but it does relieve some of the stress for me nonetheless. Thanks for letting me know that you're actually making extra efforts I didn't recognize. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:40, January 30, 2020 (UTC)

			== Proto-Assassins & Proto-Templars ==

			Hey, I just opened up a [https://assassinscreed.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:240206 discussion] on our usage of the terms "proto-Assassin" and "proto-Templar". It's a long read, but I think is very important for us to clear this up because our wiki has been rather inconsistent about it, and we could cause some serious problems with it down the line. If you had the time, could you offer your input on it? Thanks. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 00:54, May 4, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Revisions of "Ezio Auditore" */

2020-01-30T15:41:21Z

Revisions of "Ezio Auditore"

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:41, 30 January 2020
Line 146:		Line 146:

	Sorry, I didn't see your messages. When I wrote the new sections, I used an English writing corrector to avoid many mistakes on the tenses and even correcting the part I had written on Paris, French Revolution, and the American Revolution. So I double-check my writing but I don't guarantee there is no mistakes.[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 13:18, January 30, 2020 (UTC)		Sorry, I didn't see your messages. When I wrote the new sections, I used an English writing corrector to avoid many mistakes on the tenses and even correcting the part I had written on Paris, French Revolution, and the American Revolution. So I double-check my writing but I don't guarantee there is no mistakes.[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 13:18, January 30, 2020 (UTC)
	:Yeah, I actually checked back on your latest writing on the article after I wrote the above message, and then I realized that there seems to be barely any errors. After that, I wasn't sure if it was really necessary for me to lock the page like that and felt a little bad about it, but it does relieve some of the stress for me nonetheless. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:40, January 30, 2020 (UTC)		:Yeah, I actually checked back on your latest writing on the article after I wrote the above message, and then I realized that there seems to be barely any errors. After that, I wasn't sure if it was really necessary for me to lock the page like that and felt a little bad about it, but it does relieve some of the stress for me nonetheless. Thanks for letting me know that you're actually making extra efforts I didn't recognize. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:40, January 30, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Revisions of "Ezio Auditore" */

2020-01-30T15:40:24Z

Revisions of "Ezio Auditore"

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:40, 30 January 2020
Line 146:		Line 146:

	Sorry, I didn't see your messages. When I wrote the new sections, I used an English writing corrector to avoid many mistakes on the tenses and even correcting the part I had written on Paris, French Revolution, and the American Revolution. So I double-check my writing but I don't guarantee there is no mistakes.[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 13:18, January 30, 2020 (UTC)		Sorry, I didn't see your messages. When I wrote the new sections, I used an English writing corrector to avoid many mistakes on the tenses and even correcting the part I had written on Paris, French Revolution, and the American Revolution. So I double-check my writing but I don't guarantee there is no mistakes.[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 13:18, January 30, 2020 (UTC)
			:Yeah, I actually checked back on your latest writing on the article after I wrote the above message, and then I realized that there seems to be barely any errors. After that, I wasn't sure if it was really necessary for me to lock the page like that and felt a little bad about it, but it does relieve some of the stress for me nonetheless. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:40, January 30, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Francesco75: /* Revisions of "Ezio Auditore" */

2020-01-30T13:18:19Z

Revisions of "Ezio Auditore"

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 30 January 2020
Line 139:		Line 139:
	Francesco, I do greatly appreciate your work expanding the article of [[Ezio Auditore da Firenze]] because I've noticed that you've been identifying some very crucial details that have been missing from what was supposedly a featured article. Because I recognize the value of your work on the article, I have never reverted any of them despite the fact that, as I have pointed out in the past, your grammar and spelling needs improvement. I don't wish to be condescending, but it is to the extent that I have to also recognize that your edits tend to be simultaneously disruptive to articles because of how much work needs to be put into correcting their grammatical and spelling errors each time. In particular, I find that you have trouble with English tenses and moods.		Francesco, I do greatly appreciate your work expanding the article of [[Ezio Auditore da Firenze]] because I've noticed that you've been identifying some very crucial details that have been missing from what was supposedly a featured article. Because I recognize the value of your work on the article, I have never reverted any of them despite the fact that, as I have pointed out in the past, your grammar and spelling needs improvement. I don't wish to be condescending, but it is to the extent that I have to also recognize that your edits tend to be simultaneously disruptive to articles because of how much work needs to be put into correcting their grammatical and spelling errors each time. In particular, I find that you have trouble with English tenses and moods.

	In light of both the strengths and weakness of your edits, I have been maintaining all revisions you make to the "Ezio Auditore da Firenze" article while correcting them as I go, but I have a tight schedule outside of the wiki, and I cannot fix everything all at once in one day. I have asked you at least twice now, via edit summaries, to please refrain from making further revisions to the article until I have caught up with your work. This is by no means to say that you cannot work on it further; I would appreciate that you do, but only to please have the patience to wait for me to catch up first. As the article for one of the most popular ~~character~~ in all of ''Assassin's Creed'' and one of the two most important characters, we cannot afford to leave this page riddled with such grammatical errors for an extended period of time.		In light of both the strengths and weakness of your edits, I have been maintaining all revisions you make to the "Ezio Auditore da Firenze" article while correcting them as I go, but I have a tight schedule outside of the wiki, and I cannot fix everything all at once in one day. I have asked you at least twice now, via edit summaries, to please refrain from making further revisions to the article until I have caught up with your work. This is by no means to say that you cannot work on it further; I would appreciate that you do, but only to please have the patience to wait for me to catch up first. As the article for one of the most popular characters in all of ''Assassin's Creed'' and one of the two most important characters, we cannot afford to leave this page riddled with such grammatical errors for an extended period of time.

	However, this morning I woke up to find that, once again, you have gone ahead and expanded/revised another section against my request to wait. I am still on the ''Assassin's Creed II'' sections, and you are now at the ''Revelations'' section. Fixing or updating citations is perfectly fine, but I did not want you touching the writing again until we are on the same section. I know that I took a long time getting back to this article, but you seemed to be content to wait as well until I started working on it again, whereupon you suddenly have advanced ahead through it once more.		However, this morning I woke up to find that, once again, you have gone ahead and expanded/revised another section against my request to wait. I am still on the ''Assassin's Creed II'' sections, and you are now at the ''Revelations'' section. Fixing or updating citations is perfectly fine, but I did not want you touching the writing again until we are on the same section. I know that I took a long time getting back to this article, but you seemed to be content to wait as well until I started working on it again, whereupon you suddenly have advanced ahead through it once more.

	In lieu of your inability to respect my request to wait, I am now forced to lock the page until I have caught up with your edits. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 12:55, January 30, 2020 (UTC)		In lieu of your inability to respect my request to wait, I am now forced to lock the page until I have caught up with your edits. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 12:55, January 30, 2020 (UTC)

			Sorry, I didn't see your messages. When I wrote the new sections, I used an English writing corrector to avoid many mistakes on the tenses and even correcting the part I had written on Paris, French Revolution, and the American Revolution. So I double-check my writing but I don't guarantee there is no mistakes.[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 13:18, January 30, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Revisions of "Ezio Auditore" */

2020-01-30T12:56:48Z

Revisions of "Ezio Auditore"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 30 January 2020
Line 143:		Line 143:
	However, this morning I woke up to find that, once again, you have gone ahead and expanded/revised another section against my request to wait. I am still on the ''Assassin's Creed II'' sections, and you are now at the ''Revelations'' section. Fixing or updating citations is perfectly fine, but I did not want you touching the writing again until we are on the same section. I know that I took a long time getting back to this article, but you seemed to be content to wait as well until I started working on it again, whereupon you suddenly have advanced ahead through it once more.		However, this morning I woke up to find that, once again, you have gone ahead and expanded/revised another section against my request to wait. I am still on the ''Assassin's Creed II'' sections, and you are now at the ''Revelations'' section. Fixing or updating citations is perfectly fine, but I did not want you touching the writing again until we are on the same section. I know that I took a long time getting back to this article, but you seemed to be content to wait as well until I started working on it again, whereupon you suddenly have advanced ahead through it once more.

	In ~~light~~ of your inability to respect my request to wait, I am now forced to lock the page until I have caught up with ~~you~~ edits. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 12:55, January 30, 2020 (UTC)		In lieu of your inability to respect my request to wait, I am now forced to lock the page until I have caught up with your edits. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 12:55, January 30, 2020 (UTC)