User talk:Duelisttri - Revision history

imported>Soranin: /* Timeline */

2021-11-22T14:22:41Z

Timeline

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 22 November 2021
Line 109:		Line 109:
	They are all not confirmed. Cleopatra, Stalin, Booth etc. are said to have been assassinated by Assassins, but they are never stated to have been Templars. Also, Booth could've been assassinated by someone else in AC canon and Corbett just took credit for it. Ruby is also never stated to have been a Templar. If you really have a direct reference that they are Templars and Assassins, show me. If you don't, they will be stay removed from the Timeline page. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 11:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)		They are all not confirmed. Cleopatra, Stalin, Booth etc. are said to have been assassinated by Assassins, but they are never stated to have been Templars. Also, Booth could've been assassinated by someone else in AC canon and Corbett just took credit for it. Ruby is also never stated to have been a Templar. If you really have a direct reference that they are Templars and Assassins, show me. If you don't, they will be stay removed from the Timeline page. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 11:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

	I never stated that Cleopatra and Ruby were Templars. I stated that Ruby was an Assassin who assassinated the Templar Oswald for murdering JFK and took his PE. The [[Glyphs]] article stated that "Oswald was trained in the use of the first 2 'Pieces of Eden' with which he was able to make a 'Phantom' in order to create a distraction". Stalin, Roosevelt and Hitler are all Templars and the WWII was a 'purge' for Europe, 16 said "They engineer the war, they engineer the peace" that's quite a proof. Washington was a Templar: "Pigpen cipher on the photo of Roosevelt reads 'The Masons brought it across the sea. George Washington passed it on'. George Washington was a member of the Masons, along with a number of the founding fathers, who supposedly were the Knights Templar reborn". About [[Thomas Corbett]], check here. Finally, Jesus was crucified by [[File:Glyph_7-3--article_image.jpg\|thumb\|250px]]Templars in order to retrieve the Shroud, the [[Glyphs]] also stated this clear. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 14:31, August 3, 2010 (UTC)		I never stated that Cleopatra and Ruby were Templars. I stated that Ruby was an Assassin who assassinated the Templar Oswald for murdering JFK and took his PE. The [[Glyphs]] article stated that "Oswald was trained in the use of the first 2 'Pieces of Eden' with which he was able to make a 'Phantom' in order to create a distraction". Stalin, Roosevelt and Hitler are all Templars and the WWII was a 'purge' for Europe, 16 said "They engineer the war, they engineer the peace" that's quite a proof. Washington was a Templar: "Pigpen cipher on the photo of Roosevelt reads 'The Masons brought it across the sea. George Washington passed it on'. George Washington was a member of the Masons, along with a number of the founding fathers, who supposedly were the Knights Templar reborn". About ''Thomas Corbett'', check here. Finally, Jesus was crucified by [[File:Glyph_7-3--article_image.jpg\|thumb\|250px]]Templars in order to retrieve the Shroud, the [[Glyphs]] also stated this clear. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 14:31, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

	:Ruby isn't stated in the game to be an Assassin, so therefore it is not known if he really was. It's an assumption, not a fact. He might as well have been a Templar who killed Oswald to prevent him from talking inside, but that is as much as an assumption as he would be an Assassin. Stalin isn't stated to have been a Templar, he was only shown in the 'Assassins victims' glyph, where he appears alongside several others including Tomas Torquemada, who wasn't a Templar, and Cleopatra, who can't have been a Templar as Templars didn't exist until the Third Crusade. They aren't stated to have been Templars, so therefore they aren't. And maybe you are right on Roosevelt and Washington, I don't have anything against that. About Corbett, it is again not stated that he was an Assassin. As I said above, he may just have taken credit for the assassination while it was actually executed by Assassins. Jesus can't have been crucified by the Templars, as they didn't exist before the Third Crusade. Please, don't mix fact with fiction so that we can create a database completely based on facts given in the games, not assumptions. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 15:17, August 3, 2010 (UTC)		:Ruby isn't stated in the game to be an Assassin, so therefore it is not known if he really was. It's an assumption, not a fact. He might as well have been a Templar who killed Oswald to prevent him from talking inside, but that is as much as an assumption as he would be an Assassin. Stalin isn't stated to have been a Templar, he was only shown in the 'Assassins victims' glyph, where he appears alongside several others including Tomas Torquemada, who wasn't a Templar, and Cleopatra, who can't have been a Templar as Templars didn't exist until the Third Crusade. They aren't stated to have been Templars, so therefore they aren't. And maybe you are right on Roosevelt and Washington, I don't have anything against that. About Corbett, it is again not stated that he was an Assassin. As I said above, he may just have taken credit for the assassination while it was actually executed by Assassins. Jesus can't have been crucified by the Templars, as they didn't exist before the Third Crusade. Please, don't mix fact with fiction so that we can create a database completely based on facts given in the games, not assumptions. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 15:17, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

imported>VatsaAWB: Unlinking "Assassin's Creed Wiki:WikiProject/Who Increaseth Knowledge"

2012-10-17T15:14:36Z

Unlinking "Assassin's Creed Wiki:WikiProject/Who Increaseth Knowledge"

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 17 October 2012
Line 96:		Line 96:
	== Invitation to Project Determination ==		== Invitation to Project Determination ==

	Hi! I'm currently asking around to see if anyone is interested in helping out on the Assassin's Creed Wiki's newest WikiProject, ~~[[Assassin's_Creed_Wiki:WikiProject/Who_Increaseth_Knowledge\|~~Project Determination!]] The Project is mostly collecting and noting the numbers that run the AC games, such as the number of health squares that it takes to wear out a piece of armor. If you like this kind of thing, or would like to contribute, come by and check it out! -[[User:Ulyenov\|Ulyenov]] <small>~~[[Assassin's Creed Wiki:WikiProject/Who Increaseth Knowledge\|~~Project Determination]] </small>21:36, July 27, 2010 (UTC)		Hi! I'm currently asking around to see if anyone is interested in helping out on the Assassin's Creed Wiki's newest WikiProject, Project Determination! The Project is mostly collecting and noting the numbers that run the AC games, such as the number of health squares that it takes to wear out a piece of armor. If you like this kind of thing, or would like to contribute, come by and check it out! -[[User:Ulyenov\|Ulyenov]] <small>Project Determination </small>21:36, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

	== It happened in the trailer... ==		== It happened in the trailer... ==

imported>D. Cello: /* Decision */ All others, stay out. Only Duellistri has permission to post here from now on. Comments by any other party will be reverted.

2010-08-26T14:21:28Z

Decision: All others, stay out. Only Duellistri has permission to post here from now on. Comments by any other party will be reverted.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 26 August 2010
Line 181:		Line 181:

	:Yes. Elaborate. --[[User:War Clown\|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS"><font color="black">'''War'''</font><font color="green">'''Clown'''</font></span>]][[User talk:War Clown\|<sup><font color="black">''Wanna Talk?''</font></sup>]] 12:30, August 26, 2010 (UTC)		:Yes. Elaborate. --[[User:War Clown\|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS"><font color="black">'''War'''</font><font color="green">'''Clown'''</font></span>]][[User talk:War Clown\|<sup><font color="black">''Wanna Talk?''</font></sup>]] 12:30, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
			::After reading your... arguments, I must say I've changed my position towards you. You affirm to be busy enough so you can't write 2 words explaining a reversal, but you still can do unedits in a row. Your responses lack content, and this place is not a free ground. You answer to someone, just like everybody else. If I would compare you with someone, it wouldn't be Altaïr, but with [[Masun]]. You act through wrong ways for wrong motives, thinking that's the best for all, when all you take into account is your own needs and nothing else.<br>There is nothing I can do for you, child. Compio questo sacrificio per il bene superiore. Requiescat in Pace... away from here. -- [[User:D. Cello\|D. Cello]] 14:21, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
			{{blocked}}

imported>War Clown: /* Decision */

2010-08-26T12:30:17Z

Decision

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 26 August 2010
Line 179:		Line 179:

	If he misunderstands, then explain it. Don't make short comments like this to defend your actions. --[[user:Altaïr\|Altaïr]] 14:25, August 26, 2010 (UTC)		If he misunderstands, then explain it. Don't make short comments like this to defend your actions. --[[user:Altaïr\|Altaïr]] 14:25, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

			:Yes. Elaborate. --[[User:War Clown\|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS"><font color="black">'''War'''</font><font color="green">'''Clown'''</font></span>]][[User talk:War Clown\|<sup><font color="black">''Wanna Talk?''</font></sup>]] 12:30, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

imported>Altaïr: /* Decision */

2010-08-26T12:26:16Z

Decision

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 26 August 2010
Line 177:		Line 177:

	You're misunderstanding. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 12:23, August 26, 2010 (UTC)		You're misunderstanding. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 12:23, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

			If he misunderstands, then explain it. Don't make short comments like this to defend your actions. --[[user:Altaïr\|Altaïr]] 14:25, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

imported>Duelisttri at 12:23, 26 August 2010

2010-08-26T12:23:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:23, 26 August 2010
Line 175:		Line 175:

	:Responding to the statements you made on the bulleted list, you have to realize that you're not the only one here. Your opinion isn't the only thing that matters. You think a previous version is better, based on your opinion, not on facts. A person adds a whole damn paragraph of information, and you revert it simply because it had a simple typo. Don't deny it, I know what I'm saying. If you can't change your ways, then that ban will be imposed. You think you're Altair? Not even close....--[[User:War Clown\|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS"><font color="black">'''War'''</font><font color="green">'''Clown'''</font></span>]][[User talk:War Clown\|<sup><font color="black">''Wanna Talk?''</font></sup>]] 12:20, August 26, 2010 (UTC)		:Responding to the statements you made on the bulleted list, you have to realize that you're not the only one here. Your opinion isn't the only thing that matters. You think a previous version is better, based on your opinion, not on facts. A person adds a whole damn paragraph of information, and you revert it simply because it had a simple typo. Don't deny it, I know what I'm saying. If you can't change your ways, then that ban will be imposed. You think you're Altair? Not even close....--[[User:War Clown\|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS"><font color="black">'''War'''</font><font color="green">'''Clown'''</font></span>]][[User talk:War Clown\|<sup><font color="black">''Wanna Talk?''</font></sup>]] 12:20, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

			You're misunderstanding. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 12:23, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

imported>War Clown: /* Decision */

2010-08-26T12:20:35Z

Decision

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:20, 26 August 2010
Line 173:		Line 173:

	I'm don't check the activity feed after every edits. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 12:14, August 26, 2010 (UTC)		I'm don't check the activity feed after every edits. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 12:14, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

			:Responding to the statements you made on the bulleted list, you have to realize that you're not the only one here. Your opinion isn't the only thing that matters. You think a previous version is better, based on your opinion, not on facts. A person adds a whole damn paragraph of information, and you revert it simply because it had a simple typo. Don't deny it, I know what I'm saying. If you can't change your ways, then that ban will be imposed. You think you're Altair? Not even close....--[[User:War Clown\|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS"><font color="black">'''War'''</font><font color="green">'''Clown'''</font></span>]][[User talk:War Clown\|<sup><font color="black">''Wanna Talk?''</font></sup>]] 12:20, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

imported>Duelisttri at 12:14, 26 August 2010

2010-08-26T12:14:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:14, 26 August 2010
Line 171:		Line 171:

	But the only reason we say you don't listen/respond is because not long after we have posted a warning message on the page regarding breaking the rules, you'd still break them lateron... Reply or no reply, you still do it. Take the categories and group edits as an example... [[User:The_Theif\|'''<span style="font-family:ariel"><font color="#000080">The </font><font color="#000080">T</font><font color="#0b0076">h</font><font color="#15006c">i</font><font color="#200062">e</font><font color="#2b0059">f </font> </span>''']] 11:56, August 26, 2010 (UTC)		But the only reason we say you don't listen/respond is because not long after we have posted a warning message on the page regarding breaking the rules, you'd still break them lateron... Reply or no reply, you still do it. Take the categories and group edits as an example... [[User:The_Theif\|'''<span style="font-family:ariel"><font color="#000080">The </font><font color="#000080">T</font><font color="#0b0076">h</font><font color="#15006c">i</font><font color="#200062">e</font><font color="#2b0059">f </font> </span>''']] 11:56, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

			I'm don't check the activity feed after every edits. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 12:14, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

imported>ThiefAC: /* Decision */

2010-08-26T11:56:16Z

Decision

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:56, 26 August 2010
Line 167:		Line 167:
	*For the future, my actions will speak for themselves, but it seems I'm [[Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad\|Altaïr]] at the beginning of [[Assassin's Creed\|''Assassin's Creed'']].		*For the future, my actions will speak for themselves, but it seems I'm [[Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad\|Altaïr]] at the beginning of [[Assassin's Creed\|''Assassin's Creed'']].
	That's all, but if there's something you haven't been answered, stick it here. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 10:41, August 26, 2010 (UTC)		That's all, but if there's something you haven't been answered, stick it here. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 10:41, August 26, 2010 (UTC)



			But the only reason we say you don't listen/respond is because not long after we have posted a warning message on the page regarding breaking the rules, you'd still break them lateron... Reply or no reply, you still do it. Take the categories and group edits as an example... [[User:The_Theif\|'''<span style="font-family:ariel"><font color="#000080">The </font><font color="#000080">T</font><font color="#0b0076">h</font><font color="#15006c">i</font><font color="#200062">e</font><font color="#2b0059">f </font> </span>''']] 11:56, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

imported>Duelisttri: /* Decision */

2010-08-26T10:41:52Z

Decision

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 26 August 2010
Line 158:		Line 158:

	Duel, we have a issue. It seems your actions inside the wiki are considered troublesome and counter-constructive for some users. They have gone as far as to make a petition to block your acess here. Now, if I'm gonna do it, I'm doing cause of popular demand, not because I have any feelings toward you whatsoever. What I advise you is: read the charges against you, and stop doing them/act better. I'll give you one more chance cause I'm awesome, but all other users want your head banned. So, what's gonna be? Improvement or demotion? -- [[User:D. Cello\|D. Cello]] 15:10, August 25, 2010 (UTC)		Duel, we have a issue. It seems your actions inside the wiki are considered troublesome and counter-constructive for some users. They have gone as far as to make a petition to block your acess here. Now, if I'm gonna do it, I'm doing cause of popular demand, not because I have any feelings toward you whatsoever. What I advise you is: read the charges against you, and stop doing them/act better. I'll give you one more chance cause I'm awesome, but all other users want your head banned. So, what's gonna be? Improvement or demotion? -- [[User:D. Cello\|D. Cello]] 15:10, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

			OK, I've read all the arguments at Cello's talk page, and here's what I have to say:

			*I revert an article because I simply think the older version is better, I don't give reason because I'm too busy. Every day, after I go home, I watch the activity feed from where I left yesterday and click on every edits of articles until the moment I got home, see if an edit is better than the previous or needs improvement. I especially concentrate on edits of new users, because they usually add assumptions or wrong infos.

			*Yesterday, I was so busy that I can only leave a message on my own talk page: "''Va bene. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 12:23, August 25, 2010 (UTC)''". That is my only contribution/action/move (or whatever you want to call it) of the day, and I live in Vietnam, which means I'm usually offline while you're online, so don't think that I'm ignoring all your voices.

			*For the future, my actions will speak for themselves, but it seems I'm [[Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad\|Altaïr]] at the beginning of [[Assassin's Creed\|''Assassin's Creed'']].
			That's all, but if there's something you haven't been answered, stick it here. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 10:41, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 22 November 2021
Line 109:		Line 109:
	They are all not confirmed. Cleopatra, Stalin, Booth etc. are said to have been assassinated by Assassins, but they are never stated to have been Templars. Also, Booth could've been assassinated by someone else in AC canon and Corbett just took credit for it. Ruby is also never stated to have been a Templar. If you really have a direct reference that they are Templars and Assassins, show me. If you don't, they will be stay removed from the Timeline page. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 11:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)		They are all not confirmed. Cleopatra, Stalin, Booth etc. are said to have been assassinated by Assassins, but they are never stated to have been Templars. Also, Booth could've been assassinated by someone else in AC canon and Corbett just took credit for it. Ruby is also never stated to have been a Templar. If you really have a direct reference that they are Templars and Assassins, show me. If you don't, they will be stay removed from the Timeline page. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 11:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

	I never stated that Cleopatra and Ruby were Templars. I stated that Ruby was an Assassin who assassinated the Templar Oswald for murdering JFK and took his PE. The [[Glyphs]] article stated that "Oswald was trained in the use of the first 2 'Pieces of Eden' with which he was able to make a 'Phantom' in order to create a distraction". Stalin, Roosevelt and Hitler are all Templars and the WWII was a 'purge' for Europe, 16 said "They engineer the war, they engineer the peace" that's quite a proof. Washington was a Templar: "Pigpen cipher on the photo of Roosevelt reads 'The Masons brought it across the sea. George Washington passed it on'. George Washington was a member of the Masons, along with a number of the founding fathers, who supposedly were the Knights Templar reborn". About [[Thomas Corbett]], check here. Finally, Jesus was crucified by [[File:Glyph_7-3--article_image.jpg\|thumb\|250px]]Templars in order to retrieve the Shroud, the [[Glyphs]] also stated this clear. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 14:31, August 3, 2010 (UTC)		I never stated that Cleopatra and Ruby were Templars. I stated that Ruby was an Assassin who assassinated the Templar Oswald for murdering JFK and took his PE. The [[Glyphs]] article stated that "Oswald was trained in the use of the first 2 'Pieces of Eden' with which he was able to make a 'Phantom' in order to create a distraction". Stalin, Roosevelt and Hitler are all Templars and the WWII was a 'purge' for Europe, 16 said "They engineer the war, they engineer the peace" that's quite a proof. Washington was a Templar: "Pigpen cipher on the photo of Roosevelt reads 'The Masons brought it across the sea. George Washington passed it on'. George Washington was a member of the Masons, along with a number of the founding fathers, who supposedly were the Knights Templar reborn". About ''Thomas Corbett'', check here. Finally, Jesus was crucified by [[File:Glyph_7-3--article_image.jpg\|thumb\|250px]]Templars in order to retrieve the Shroud, the [[Glyphs]] also stated this clear. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 14:31, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

	:Ruby isn't stated in the game to be an Assassin, so therefore it is not known if he really was. It's an assumption, not a fact. He might as well have been a Templar who killed Oswald to prevent him from talking inside, but that is as much as an assumption as he would be an Assassin. Stalin isn't stated to have been a Templar, he was only shown in the 'Assassins victims' glyph, where he appears alongside several others including Tomas Torquemada, who wasn't a Templar, and Cleopatra, who can't have been a Templar as Templars didn't exist until the Third Crusade. They aren't stated to have been Templars, so therefore they aren't. And maybe you are right on Roosevelt and Washington, I don't have anything against that. About Corbett, it is again not stated that he was an Assassin. As I said above, he may just have taken credit for the assassination while it was actually executed by Assassins. Jesus can't have been crucified by the Templars, as they didn't exist before the Third Crusade. Please, don't mix fact with fiction so that we can create a database completely based on facts given in the games, not assumptions. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 15:17, August 3, 2010 (UTC)		:Ruby isn't stated in the game to be an Assassin, so therefore it is not known if he really was. It's an assumption, not a fact. He might as well have been a Templar who killed Oswald to prevent him from talking inside, but that is as much as an assumption as he would be an Assassin. Stalin isn't stated to have been a Templar, he was only shown in the 'Assassins victims' glyph, where he appears alongside several others including Tomas Torquemada, who wasn't a Templar, and Cleopatra, who can't have been a Templar as Templars didn't exist until the Third Crusade. They aren't stated to have been Templars, so therefore they aren't. And maybe you are right on Roosevelt and Washington, I don't have anything against that. About Corbett, it is again not stated that he was an Assassin. As I said above, he may just have taken credit for the assassination while it was actually executed by Assassins. Jesus can't have been crucified by the Templars, as they didn't exist before the Third Crusade. Please, don't mix fact with fiction so that we can create a database completely based on facts given in the games, not assumptions. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 15:17, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:56, 26 August 2010
Line 167:		Line 167:
	*For the future, my actions will speak for themselves, but it seems I'm [[Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad\|Altaïr]] at the beginning of [[Assassin's Creed\|''Assassin's Creed'']].		*For the future, my actions will speak for themselves, but it seems I'm [[Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad\|Altaïr]] at the beginning of [[Assassin's Creed\|''Assassin's Creed'']].
	That's all, but if there's something you haven't been answered, stick it here. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 10:41, August 26, 2010 (UTC)		That's all, but if there's something you haven't been answered, stick it here. - [[User:Duelisttri\|Duelisttri]] 10:41, August 26, 2010 (UTC)



			But the only reason we say you don't listen/respond is because not long after we have posted a warning message on the page regarding breaking the rules, you'd still break them lateron... Reply or no reply, you still do it. Take the categories and group edits as an example... [[User:The_Theif\|'''<span style="font-family:ariel"><font color="#000080">The </font><font color="#000080">T</font><font color="#0b0076">h</font><font color="#15006c">i</font><font color="#200062">e</font><font color="#2b0059">f </font> </span>''']] 11:56, August 26, 2010 (UTC)