User talk:Cyanide3 - Revision history

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Portable infoboxes */

2017-03-29T21:51:38Z

Portable infoboxes

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 29 March 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I know you were working on redesigning the infoboxes for portability in this community. This was actually an issue I noticed as far as back as the day the update was implemented, but the bullet points of items in the infoboxes are not aligning properly in the new design when viewing on a desktop. Here are two major examples: [[Siege of Acre]] and [[Pazzi conspiracy]]. The bullet points fail to align properly with their own tiers or when they do align somewhat, it is in a very clumsy manner, resulting in a lack of clarity over which items are nested under what. Other examples include [[Mission to Aragon]], [[Quest for the Chalice]], and [[Third Crusade]]. In some of these cases, the impact is less significant than others, but the problem still remains that the lists are not aligning evenly, causing the infoboxes to look quite sloppy. I think it may be because they're aligning to the center. I have already checked that this is the case in both the MonoBook and the Wikia skins. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:42, March 8, 2017 (UTC)		I know you were working on redesigning the infoboxes for portability in this community. This was actually an issue I noticed as far as back as the day the update was implemented, but the bullet points of items in the infoboxes are not aligning properly in the new design when viewing on a desktop. Here are two major examples: [[Siege of Acre]] and [[Pazzi conspiracy]]. The bullet points fail to align properly with their own tiers or when they do align somewhat, it is in a very clumsy manner, resulting in a lack of clarity over which items are nested under what. Other examples include [[Mission to Aragon]], [[Quest for the Chalice]], and [[Third Crusade]]. In some of these cases, the impact is less significant than others, but the problem still remains that the lists are not aligning evenly, causing the infoboxes to look quite sloppy. I think it may be because they're aligning to the center. I have already checked that this is the case in both the MonoBook and the Wikia skins. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:42, March 8, 2017 (UTC)
	:Hey again! So sorry for the late response, but I was a bit embarrassed to inform you that the problem has actually not at all been solved somehow. Just check out [[Siege of Masyaf]] on a desktop. The listed items in the infobox are all over the place. Some are nested under others, sure, but still none are properly aligned with items of the same tier. Note the "Commanders" section in particular. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 08:33, March 28, 2017 (UTC)		:Hey again! So sorry for the late response, but I was a bit embarrassed to inform you that the problem has actually not at all been solved somehow. Just check out [[Siege of Masyaf]] on a desktop. The listed items in the infobox are all over the place. Some are nested under others, sure, but still none are properly aligned with items of the same tier. Note the "Commanders" section in particular. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 08:33, March 28, 2017 (UTC)
			::How can I provide you with the screenshot? Uploading it directly onto the wiki would not be a good idea. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:51, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Portable infoboxes */

2017-03-28T08:33:28Z

Portable infoboxes

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:33, 28 March 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Hello Cyanide,<br>		Hello Cyanide,<br>
	I know you were working on redesigning the infoboxes for portability in this community. This was actually an issue I noticed as far as back as the day the update was implemented, but the bullet points of items in the infoboxes are not aligning properly in the new design when viewing on a desktop. Here are two major examples: [[Siege of Acre]] and [[Pazzi conspiracy]]. The bullet points fail to align properly with their own tiers or when they do align somewhat, it is in a very clumsy manner, resulting in a lack of clarity over which items are nested under what. Other examples include [[Mission to Aragon]], [[Quest for the Chalice]], and [[Third Crusade]]. In some of these cases, the impact is less significant than others, but the problem still remains that the lists are not aligning evenly, causing the infoboxes to look quite sloppy. I think it may be because they're aligning to the center. I have already checked that this is the case in both the MonoBook and the Wikia skins. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:42, March 8, 2017 (UTC)		I know you were working on redesigning the infoboxes for portability in this community. This was actually an issue I noticed as far as back as the day the update was implemented, but the bullet points of items in the infoboxes are not aligning properly in the new design when viewing on a desktop. Here are two major examples: [[Siege of Acre]] and [[Pazzi conspiracy]]. The bullet points fail to align properly with their own tiers or when they do align somewhat, it is in a very clumsy manner, resulting in a lack of clarity over which items are nested under what. Other examples include [[Mission to Aragon]], [[Quest for the Chalice]], and [[Third Crusade]]. In some of these cases, the impact is less significant than others, but the problem still remains that the lists are not aligning evenly, causing the infoboxes to look quite sloppy. I think it may be because they're aligning to the center. I have already checked that this is the case in both the MonoBook and the Wikia skins. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:42, March 8, 2017 (UTC)
			:Hey again! So sorry for the late response, but I was a bit embarrassed to inform you that the problem has actually not at all been solved somehow. Just check out [[Siege of Masyaf]] on a desktop. The listed items in the infobox are all over the place. Some are nested under others, sure, but still none are properly aligned with items of the same tier. Note the "Commanders" section in particular. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 08:33, March 28, 2017 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "==Portable infoboxes== Hello Cyanide,
I know you were working on redesigning the infoboxes for portability in this community. This was actually an issue I noticed as far a..."

2017-03-08T17:42:55Z

Created page with "==Portable infoboxes== Hello Cyanide, I know you were working on redesigning the infoboxes for portability in this community. This was actually an issue I noticed as far a..."

Páàjì titun

==Portable infoboxes==
Hello Cyanide, 
I know you were working on redesigning the infoboxes for portability in this community. This was actually an issue I noticed as far as back as the day the update was implemented, but the bullet points of items in the infoboxes are not aligning properly in the new design when viewing on a desktop. Here are two major examples: [[Siege of Acre]] and [[Pazzi conspiracy]]. The bullet points fail to align properly with their own tiers or when they do align somewhat, it is in a very clumsy manner, resulting in a lack of clarity over which items are nested under what. Other examples include [[Mission to Aragon]], [[Quest for the Chalice]], and [[Third Crusade]]. In some of these cases, the impact is less significant than others, but the problem still remains that the lists are not aligning evenly, causing the infoboxes to look quite sloppy. I think it may be because they're aligning to the center. I have already checked that this is the case in both the MonoBook and the Wikia skins. [[User:Sol Pacificus|'''Sol Pacificus''']][[User talk:Sol Pacificus|(Cyfiero)]] 17:42, March 8, 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 29 March 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I know you were working on redesigning the infoboxes for portability in this community. This was actually an issue I noticed as far as back as the day the update was implemented, but the bullet points of items in the infoboxes are not aligning properly in the new design when viewing on a desktop. Here are two major examples: [[Siege of Acre]] and [[Pazzi conspiracy]]. The bullet points fail to align properly with their own tiers or when they do align somewhat, it is in a very clumsy manner, resulting in a lack of clarity over which items are nested under what. Other examples include [[Mission to Aragon]], [[Quest for the Chalice]], and [[Third Crusade]]. In some of these cases, the impact is less significant than others, but the problem still remains that the lists are not aligning evenly, causing the infoboxes to look quite sloppy. I think it may be because they're aligning to the center. I have already checked that this is the case in both the MonoBook and the Wikia skins. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:42, March 8, 2017 (UTC)		I know you were working on redesigning the infoboxes for portability in this community. This was actually an issue I noticed as far as back as the day the update was implemented, but the bullet points of items in the infoboxes are not aligning properly in the new design when viewing on a desktop. Here are two major examples: [[Siege of Acre]] and [[Pazzi conspiracy]]. The bullet points fail to align properly with their own tiers or when they do align somewhat, it is in a very clumsy manner, resulting in a lack of clarity over which items are nested under what. Other examples include [[Mission to Aragon]], [[Quest for the Chalice]], and [[Third Crusade]]. In some of these cases, the impact is less significant than others, but the problem still remains that the lists are not aligning evenly, causing the infoboxes to look quite sloppy. I think it may be because they're aligning to the center. I have already checked that this is the case in both the MonoBook and the Wikia skins. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:42, March 8, 2017 (UTC)
	:Hey again! So sorry for the late response, but I was a bit embarrassed to inform you that the problem has actually not at all been solved somehow. Just check out [[Siege of Masyaf]] on a desktop. The listed items in the infobox are all over the place. Some are nested under others, sure, but still none are properly aligned with items of the same tier. Note the "Commanders" section in particular. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 08:33, March 28, 2017 (UTC)		:Hey again! So sorry for the late response, but I was a bit embarrassed to inform you that the problem has actually not at all been solved somehow. Just check out [[Siege of Masyaf]] on a desktop. The listed items in the infobox are all over the place. Some are nested under others, sure, but still none are properly aligned with items of the same tier. Note the "Commanders" section in particular. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 08:33, March 28, 2017 (UTC)
			::How can I provide you with the screenshot? Uploading it directly onto the wiki would not be a good idea. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:51, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

User talk:Cyanide3 - Revision history

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Portable infoboxes */

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Portable infoboxes */

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "==Portable infoboxes== Hello Cyanide, I know you were working on redesigning the infoboxes for portability in this community. This was actually an issue I noticed as far a..."

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "==Portable infoboxes== Hello Cyanide,
I know you were working on redesigning the infoboxes for portability in this community. This was actually an issue I noticed as far a..."