User talk:Bovkaffe - Revision history

Soranin: Text replacement - "[[Forum:" to "[Forum:"

2026-05-14T17:44:11Z

Text replacement - "[[Forum:" to "[Forum:"

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 14 May 2026
Line 264:		Line 264:
	:This has been our policy for several years now. A database may use names interchangeably, and in such cases our articles reflect that. If the Colosseum article uses the English name, that will be because it's database entry in ''Brotherhood'' does so. The only occasion wherein we do not necessarily follow the databases is city names (such as [[Venice]], [[Florence]] etc.) I will be moving the article back once more. If you wish to challenge our policy, please do so in the forums. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 18:35, December 24, 2014 (UTC)		:This has been our policy for several years now. A database may use names interchangeably, and in such cases our articles reflect that. If the Colosseum article uses the English name, that will be because it's database entry in ''Brotherhood'' does so. The only occasion wherein we do not necessarily follow the databases is city names (such as [[Venice]], [[Florence]] etc.) I will be moving the article back once more. If you wish to challenge our policy, please do so in the forums. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 18:35, December 24, 2014 (UTC)

	[[Forum:Naming landmarks\|I made a forum to address this. Be there or be square]]. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 19:55, December 24, 2014 (UTC)		[Forum:Naming landmarks\|I made a forum to address this. Be there or be square]]. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 19:55, December 24, 2014 (UTC)

	== Initiates ==		== Initiates ==

imported>Cristophorus35: /* About the date of Unity's final memories */ new section

2024-04-11T22:08:22Z

About the date of Unity's final memories: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:08, 12 April 2024
Line 746:		Line 746:

	I noticed that you uploaded most of his concept art including the ones for '''Ponthius''', '''Eudoros''', and '''Ptahmose'''. The first two are switched compared to what Jeff Simpson titled their files but that is reflective of how the characters look in game. However the "Ptahmose" concept art seems to actually be Rudjek not Ptahmose but you stayed in line with what Jeff titled the file. I was curious to your thought process on this. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 17:38, May 30, 2020 (UTC)		I noticed that you uploaded most of his concept art including the ones for '''Ponthius''', '''Eudoros''', and '''Ptahmose'''. The first two are switched compared to what Jeff Simpson titled their files but that is reflective of how the characters look in game. However the "Ptahmose" concept art seems to actually be Rudjek not Ptahmose but you stayed in line with what Jeff titled the file. I was curious to your thought process on this. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 17:38, May 30, 2020 (UTC)

			== About the date of Unity's final memories ==

			Hello Bovkaffe, name's Cristophorus. Nice to meet ya!<br/><br/>
			I'm aware that your last activities were in 2018 and it's most probably that you won't reply to this message but I don't lose anything trying, right?<br/>I have a question about the Unity memory "The Temple". You created the page back in 2015 and you dated the scene featuring Napoleon on August 1808; the game doesn't explicitly state that but I can see where the 1808 comes, but the month I can't quite source it. I've consulted several Unity-related books like guides and artbooks, encyclopedias, the novel, but found nothing. What's your source for that date? Do you remember where did you get the month?<br/><br/>
			I don't think I'll get a reply but who knows, right? Anyway, hope you doin' fine.<br/>[[User:Cristophorus35\|Cristophorus35]] ([[User talk:Cristophorus35\|talk]]) 22:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

imported>Soranin: /* IRC */

2022-07-30T07:08:24Z

IRC

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:08, 30 July 2022
Line 290:		Line 290:
	:Not sure how it works.--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 14:28, February 18, 2015 (UTC)		:Not sure how it works.--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 14:28, February 18, 2015 (UTC)

	Go [[Assassin's Creed Wiki:IRC/Pick Your Poison\|here]] and click on the OS you use. Then you enter your name, and you can type in the little bar down at the bottom. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 14:40, February 18, 2015 (UTC)		Go [Assassin's Creed Wiki:IRC/Pick Your Poison\|here] and click on the OS you use. Then you enter your name, and you can type in the little bar down at the bottom. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 14:40, February 18, 2015 (UTC)

	== C' Mon negative feedback? ==		== C' Mon negative feedback? ==

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Jeff Simpson's concept art */ new section

2020-05-30T17:38:38Z

Jeff Simpson's concept art: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, 30 May 2020
Line 742:		Line 742:

	[http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/index.php?title=Virginia_%28state%29&diff=717334&oldid=686430 This] was a particularly notable example. Removing an entire page that had information relevant to the canon and was sourced throughout of 3,653 characters while marking it for deletion is not proper use of the template. The page is not immediately identifiable as spam or vandalism. While I suppose you probably thought it was unnecessary to have an article devoted to the state itself when it receives only brief mention, it's still an actual article, and our policies on whether a subject like this merits an article has not been well-established. In other words, this is just the kind of page where you'd really be nominating the page for deletion, not marking it to be deleted outright, and the content should remain there to be referred to while you discuss the reasons why you think the page should be deleted on the talk page. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:55, April 12, 2018 (UTC)		[http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/index.php?title=Virginia_%28state%29&diff=717334&oldid=686430 This] was a particularly notable example. Removing an entire page that had information relevant to the canon and was sourced throughout of 3,653 characters while marking it for deletion is not proper use of the template. The page is not immediately identifiable as spam or vandalism. While I suppose you probably thought it was unnecessary to have an article devoted to the state itself when it receives only brief mention, it's still an actual article, and our policies on whether a subject like this merits an article has not been well-established. In other words, this is just the kind of page where you'd really be nominating the page for deletion, not marking it to be deleted outright, and the content should remain there to be referred to while you discuss the reasons why you think the page should be deleted on the talk page. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:55, April 12, 2018 (UTC)

			== Jeff Simpson's concept art ==

			I noticed that you uploaded most of his concept art including the ones for '''Ponthius''', '''Eudoros''', and '''Ptahmose'''. The first two are switched compared to what Jeff Simpson titled their files but that is reflective of how the characters look in game. However the "Ptahmose" concept art seems to actually be Rudjek not Ptahmose but you stayed in line with what Jeff titled the file. I was curious to your thought process on this. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 17:38, May 30, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Proper use of deletion template */

2018-04-12T06:56:03Z

Proper use of deletion template

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:56, 12 April 2018
Line 740:		Line 740:

	Bovkaffe, when you mark pages for deletion, please don't remove all of the page's content. The point of marking it as such is to draw attention to it being problematic, but if you use that tag to replace all the content, even if it's pure spam, then it's not always immediately evident what was the issue if ostensibly, the title of the page is fine. Moreover, marking a page for deletion doesn't necessarily mean that the page ''should'' or ''is'' going to be deleted. While that is most often going to be the case, technically the header is supposed to ''nominate'' the page for deletion, followed by a discussion in the talk page. Again, usually with spam articles, this isn't necessary, but in some cases it would be, and if you remove all the content, then others would have to go through its history to see the issues with the page meriting its deletion just to discuss it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:43, April 12, 2018 (UTC)		Bovkaffe, when you mark pages for deletion, please don't remove all of the page's content. The point of marking it as such is to draw attention to it being problematic, but if you use that tag to replace all the content, even if it's pure spam, then it's not always immediately evident what was the issue if ostensibly, the title of the page is fine. Moreover, marking a page for deletion doesn't necessarily mean that the page ''should'' or ''is'' going to be deleted. While that is most often going to be the case, technically the header is supposed to ''nominate'' the page for deletion, followed by a discussion in the talk page. Again, usually with spam articles, this isn't necessary, but in some cases it would be, and if you remove all the content, then others would have to go through its history to see the issues with the page meriting its deletion just to discuss it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:43, April 12, 2018 (UTC)
	:[http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/index.php?title=Virginia_%28state%29&diff=717334&oldid=686430\|This] was a particularly notable example. Removing an entire page that had information relevant to the canon and was sourced throughout of 3,653 characters while marking it for deletion is not proper use of the template. The page is not immediately identifiable as spam or vandalism. While I suppose you probably thought it was unnecessary to have an article devoted to the state itself when it receives only brief mention, it's still an actual article, and our policies on whether a subject like this merits an article has not been well-established. In other words, this is just the kind of page where you'd really be nominating the page for deletion, not marking it to be deleted outright, and the content should remain there to be referred to while you discuss the reasons why you think the page should be deleted on the talk page. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:55, April 12, 2018 (UTC)
			[http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/index.php?title=Virginia_%28state%29&diff=717334&oldid=686430 This] was a particularly notable example. Removing an entire page that had information relevant to the canon and was sourced throughout of 3,653 characters while marking it for deletion is not proper use of the template. The page is not immediately identifiable as spam or vandalism. While I suppose you probably thought it was unnecessary to have an article devoted to the state itself when it receives only brief mention, it's still an actual article, and our policies on whether a subject like this merits an article has not been well-established. In other words, this is just the kind of page where you'd really be nominating the page for deletion, not marking it to be deleted outright, and the content should remain there to be referred to while you discuss the reasons why you think the page should be deleted on the talk page. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:55, April 12, 2018 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Proper use of deletion template */

2018-04-12T06:55:32Z

Proper use of deletion template

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:55, 12 April 2018
Line 737:		Line 737:
	Largely, but you also need to write the author, Ubisoft in this case. Is this a screenshot you took yourself?--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 17:53, January 9, 2018 (UTC)		Largely, but you also need to write the author, Ubisoft in this case. Is this a screenshot you took yourself?--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 17:53, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

	== Proper use of deletion template ==		==Proper use of deletion template==

	Bovkaffe, when you mark pages for deletion, please don't remove all of the page's content. The point of marking it as such is to draw attention to it being problematic, but if you use that tag to replace all the content, even if it's pure spam, then it's not always immediately evident what was the issue if ostensibly, the title of the page is fine. Moreover, marking a page for deletion doesn't necessarily mean that the page ''should'' or ''is'' going to be deleted. While that is most often going to be the case, technically the header is supposed to ''nominate'' the page for deletion, followed by a discussion in the talk page. Again, usually with spam articles, this isn't necessary, but in some cases it would be, and if you remove all the content, then others would have to go through its history to see the issues with the page meriting its deletion just to discuss it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:43, April 12, 2018 (UTC)		Bovkaffe, when you mark pages for deletion, please don't remove all of the page's content. The point of marking it as such is to draw attention to it being problematic, but if you use that tag to replace all the content, even if it's pure spam, then it's not always immediately evident what was the issue if ostensibly, the title of the page is fine. Moreover, marking a page for deletion doesn't necessarily mean that the page ''should'' or ''is'' going to be deleted. While that is most often going to be the case, technically the header is supposed to ''nominate'' the page for deletion, followed by a discussion in the talk page. Again, usually with spam articles, this isn't necessary, but in some cases it would be, and if you remove all the content, then others would have to go through its history to see the issues with the page meriting its deletion just to discuss it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:43, April 12, 2018 (UTC)
			:[http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/index.php?title=Virginia_%28state%29&diff=717334&oldid=686430\|This] was a particularly notable example. Removing an entire page that had information relevant to the canon and was sourced throughout of 3,653 characters while marking it for deletion is not proper use of the template. The page is not immediately identifiable as spam or vandalism. While I suppose you probably thought it was unnecessary to have an article devoted to the state itself when it receives only brief mention, it's still an actual article, and our policies on whether a subject like this merits an article has not been well-established. In other words, this is just the kind of page where you'd really be nominating the page for deletion, not marking it to be deleted outright, and the content should remain there to be referred to while you discuss the reasons why you think the page should be deleted on the talk page. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:55, April 12, 2018 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Proper use of deletion template */ new section

2018-04-12T06:43:06Z

Proper use of deletion template: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:43, 12 April 2018
Line 736:		Line 736:

	Largely, but you also need to write the author, Ubisoft in this case. Is this a screenshot you took yourself?--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 17:53, January 9, 2018 (UTC)		Largely, but you also need to write the author, Ubisoft in this case. Is this a screenshot you took yourself?--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 17:53, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

			== Proper use of deletion template ==

			Bovkaffe, when you mark pages for deletion, please don't remove all of the page's content. The point of marking it as such is to draw attention to it being problematic, but if you use that tag to replace all the content, even if it's pure spam, then it's not always immediately evident what was the issue if ostensibly, the title of the page is fine. Moreover, marking a page for deletion doesn't necessarily mean that the page ''should'' or ''is'' going to be deleted. While that is most often going to be the case, technically the header is supposed to ''nominate'' the page for deletion, followed by a discussion in the talk page. Again, usually with spam articles, this isn't necessary, but in some cases it would be, and if you remove all the content, then others would have to go through its history to see the issues with the page meriting its deletion just to discuss it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:43, April 12, 2018 (UTC)

imported>Bovkaffe: /* Proper image sourcing. */

2018-01-09T17:53:22Z

Proper image sourcing.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 9 January 2018
Line 734:		Line 734:
	http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/File:Djoser_Entrance.jpg		http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/File:Djoser_Entrance.jpg
	Thank you. --[[User:KingNetjerikhet\|KingNetjerikhet]] ([[User talk:KingNetjerikhet\|talk]]) 17:34, January 9, 2018 (UTC)		Thank you. --[[User:KingNetjerikhet\|KingNetjerikhet]] ([[User talk:KingNetjerikhet\|talk]]) 17:34, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

			Largely, but you also need to write the author, Ubisoft in this case. Is this a screenshot you took yourself?--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 17:53, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

imported>KingNetjerikhet at 17:34, 9 January 2018

2018-01-09T17:34:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:34, 9 January 2018
Line 730:		Line 730:

	Thank you very much for pointing me in the direction of that artical. I am reading it now and will address the issues brought to my attention. I am pretty new here as I am sure you have noticed so I do apperciate help like this. Have a good evening. [[User:KingNetjerikhet\|KingNetjerikhet]] ([[User talk:KingNetjerikhet\|talk]]) 17:17, January 9, 2018 (UTC)		Thank you very much for pointing me in the direction of that artical. I am reading it now and will address the issues brought to my attention. I am pretty new here as I am sure you have noticed so I do apperciate help like this. Have a good evening. [[User:KingNetjerikhet\|KingNetjerikhet]] ([[User talk:KingNetjerikhet\|talk]]) 17:17, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

			I was wondering if you would be able to tell me if this is correct:
			http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/File:Djoser_Entrance.jpg
			Thank you. --[[User:KingNetjerikhet\|KingNetjerikhet]] ([[User talk:KingNetjerikhet\|talk]]) 17:34, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

imported>KingNetjerikhet: /* Proper image sourcing. */ new section

2018-01-09T17:17:13Z

Proper image sourcing.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 9 January 2018
Line 726:		Line 726:

	[[User:Cristophorus35\|Cristophorus35]] ([[User talk:Cristophorus35\|talk]]) 00:22, December 27, 2017 (UTC)		[[User:Cristophorus35\|Cristophorus35]] ([[User talk:Cristophorus35\|talk]]) 00:22, December 27, 2017 (UTC)

			== Proper image sourcing. ==

			Thank you very much for pointing me in the direction of that artical. I am reading it now and will address the issues brought to my attention. I am pretty new here as I am sure you have noticed so I do apperciate help like this. Have a good evening. [[User:KingNetjerikhet\|KingNetjerikhet]] ([[User talk:KingNetjerikhet\|talk]]) 17:17, January 9, 2018 (UTC)