User talk:Abelzorus Prime - Revision history

https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=User_talk%3AAbelzorus_Prime User talk:Abelzorus Prime - Revision history 2026-06-11T16:59:22Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.42.3 https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Abelzorus_Prime&diff=1134567&oldid=prev Soranin: /* Warning */ 2026-05-19T15:20:13Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Warning</span></span></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 17:20, 19 May 2026</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l89">Line 89:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 89:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>==Warning==</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>==Warning==</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{Warn1}}</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{Warn1}}</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>You've received an official warning now for your less than favorable attitude on <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[</del>[Thread:195317|this thread]]. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 18:18, June 29, 2015 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>You've received an official warning now for your less than favorable attitude on [Thread:195317|this thread]]. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 18:18, June 29, 2015 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>==Sudden Appearances==</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>==Sudden Appearances==</div></td></tr> </table>

Soranin https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Abelzorus_Prime&diff=680849&oldid=prev imported>Abelzorus Prime: /* Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth." */ 2016-06-24T16:45:11Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth."</span></span></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 18:45, 24 June 2016</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l106">Line 106:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 106:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::It seems you are under the assumption that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way, though I would have to disagree. Especially with Ezio's interpretation falling more Skepticism/Fallibilism than Al Mualims. That's why he said the Creed is not a doctrine for if the Creed required him to believe there is no absolute truth than the fact that there is '''"no absolute truth"''' would be an absolute truth thus making doctrine as he has to believe that in which it would also create a philosophical paradox. So his interpretation of the Creed is an approach, to be wise and question all ideas, not a conclusion which literally '''believeing''' nothing is true would be, that is why these Assassins can still fight to find the truth if they want. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 01:51, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::It seems you are under the assumption that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way, though I would have to disagree. Especially with Ezio's interpretation falling more Skepticism/Fallibilism than Al Mualims. That's why he said the Creed is not a doctrine for if the Creed required him to believe there is no absolute truth than the fact that there is '''"no absolute truth"''' would be an absolute truth thus making doctrine as he has to believe that in which it would also create a philosophical paradox. So his interpretation of the Creed is an approach, to be wise and question all ideas, not a conclusion which literally '''believeing''' nothing is true would be, that is why these Assassins can still fight to find the truth if they want. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 01:51, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::: On the contrary, my whole point is that we shouldn't assume that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way that I oppose your edit. Your edit claims that Assassins do not reject an absolute truth, when as I initially stated in my edit summary, this is dubious because the extent by which Assassins rejected the existence of an absolute truth could have varied between individuals. Aside from this, I asked whether you understood the terms "descriptive" and "normative" because I had supposed that that might've been at the source of the confusion, and I still think it is. Ezio said that the creed is not a doctrine, but an observation of reality, in other words, he holds it to be true scientifically of reality (it is descriptive), but it is not meant to be applied solidly into ethics (it's not a doctrine, it's not normative) and only employed as a stepping stone. It seems therefore our interpretation of his words may be divergent, but regardless it is the fact that these subtle discrepancies can arise that I disagreed with your edit: not because I disagreed with its content ''per se'', but rather that it was too explicit and exact to be stated if not necessary. It's too explicit considering that Assassins throughout the ages might not have interpreted the creed the same way. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 06:27, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::: On the contrary, my whole point is that we shouldn't assume that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way that I oppose your edit. Your edit claims that Assassins do not reject an absolute truth, when as I initially stated in my edit summary, this is dubious because the extent by which Assassins rejected the existence of an absolute truth could have varied between individuals. Aside from this, I asked whether you understood the terms "descriptive" and "normative" because I had supposed that that might've been at the source of the confusion, and I still think it is. Ezio said that the creed is not a doctrine, but an observation of reality, in other words, he holds it to be true scientifically of reality (it is descriptive), but it is not meant to be applied solidly into ethics (it's not a doctrine, it's not normative) and only employed as a stepping stone. It seems therefore our interpretation of his words may be divergent, but regardless it is the fact that these subtle discrepancies can arise that I disagreed with your edit: not because I disagreed with its content ''per se'', but rather that it was too explicit and exact to be stated if not necessary. It's too explicit considering that Assassins throughout the ages might not have interpreted the creed the same way. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 06:27, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">:::::: My point is not that ALL Assassins do not reject absolute truth. You are wrong on that matter! I was just specifically talking about Ezio's interpretation of the Creed and an answers to the Nihilistic paradox which is previously asked. "''Ezio said that the creed is not a doctrine, but an observation of reality, in other words, he holds it to be true scientifically of reality (it is descriptive), but it is not meant to be applied solidly into ethics (it's not a doctrine, it's not normative" '''' ''''<span id="cke_bm_55S" style="display: none;"> </span><span style="display: none;"> </span>''''<span id="cke_bm_55E" style="display: none;"> </span>''<span style="display: none;"> </span></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">:::::: That does contradict anything I'vve said. I'm not saying that all Assassins interpret it the same way. It was clear that the original Levintine one was more nihilistic. It was just one answer to the Assassin's contradiction, and nihilistic but yet idealistic views. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 16:45, June 24, 2016 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

imported>Abelzorus Prime https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Abelzorus_Prime&diff=680848&oldid=prev imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth." */ 2016-06-20T06:29:56Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth."</span></span></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:29, 20 June 2016</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l105">Line 105:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 105:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::It seems you are under the assumption that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way, though I would have to disagree. Especially with Ezio's interpretation falling more Skepticism/Fallibilism than Al Mualims. That's why he said the Creed is not a doctrine for if the Creed required him to believe there is no absolute truth than the fact that there is '''"no absolute truth"''' would be an absolute truth thus making doctrine as he has to believe that in which it would also create a philosophical paradox. So his interpretation of the Creed is an approach, to be wise and question all ideas, not a conclusion which literally '''believeing''' nothing is true would be, that is why these Assassins can still fight to find the truth if they want. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 01:51, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::It seems you are under the assumption that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way, though I would have to disagree. Especially with Ezio's interpretation falling more Skepticism/Fallibilism than Al Mualims. That's why he said the Creed is not a doctrine for if the Creed required him to believe there is no absolute truth than the fact that there is '''"no absolute truth"''' would be an absolute truth thus making doctrine as he has to believe that in which it would also create a philosophical paradox. So his interpretation of the Creed is an approach, to be wise and question all ideas, not a conclusion which literally '''believeing''' nothing is true would be, that is why these Assassins can still fight to find the truth if they want. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 01:51, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::: On the contrary, my whole point is that we shouldn't assume that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way that I oppose your edit. Your edit claims that Assassins do not reject an absolute truth, when as I initially stated in my edit summary, this is dubious because the extent by which Assassins rejected the existence of an absolute truth could have varied between individuals. Aside from this, I asked whether you understood the terms "descriptive" and "normative" because I had supposed that that might've been at the source of the confusion, and I still think it is. Ezio said that the creed is not a doctrine, but an observation of reality, in other words, he holds it to be true scientifically of reality (it is descriptive), but it is not meant to be applied solidly into ethics (it's not a doctrine, it's not normative) and only employed as a stepping stone. It seems therefore our interpretation of his words may be divergent, but regardless it is the fact that these subtle discrepancies can arise that I disagreed with your edit: not because I disagreed with its content ''per se'', but rather that it was too explicit and exact to be stated if not necessary. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 06:27, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::: On the contrary, my whole point is that we shouldn't assume that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way that I oppose your edit. Your edit claims that Assassins do not reject an absolute truth, when as I initially stated in my edit summary, this is dubious because the extent by which Assassins rejected the existence of an absolute truth could have varied between individuals. Aside from this, I asked whether you understood the terms "descriptive" and "normative" because I had supposed that that might've been at the source of the confusion, and I still think it is. Ezio said that the creed is not a doctrine, but an observation of reality, in other words, he holds it to be true scientifically of reality (it is descriptive), but it is not meant to be applied solidly into ethics (it's not a doctrine, it's not normative) and only employed as a stepping stone. It seems therefore our interpretation of his words may be divergent, but regardless it is the fact that these subtle discrepancies can arise that I disagreed with your edit: not because I disagreed with its content ''per se'', but rather that it was too explicit and exact to be stated if not necessary<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">. It's too explicit considering that Assassins throughout the ages might not have interpreted the creed the same way</ins>. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 06:27, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> </table>

imported>Sol Pacificus https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Abelzorus_Prime&diff=680847&oldid=prev imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth." */ 2016-06-20T06:27:20Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth."</span></span></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:27, 20 June 2016</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l105">Line 105:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 105:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::It seems you are under the assumption that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way, though I would have to disagree. Especially with Ezio's interpretation falling more Skepticism/Fallibilism than Al Mualims. That's why he said the Creed is not a doctrine for if the Creed required him to believe there is no absolute truth than the fact that there is '''"no absolute truth"''' would be an absolute truth thus making doctrine as he has to believe that in which it would also create a philosophical paradox. So his interpretation of the Creed is an approach, to be wise and question all ideas, not a conclusion which literally '''believeing''' nothing is true would be, that is why these Assassins can still fight to find the truth if they want. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 01:51, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::It seems you are under the assumption that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way, though I would have to disagree. Especially with Ezio's interpretation falling more Skepticism/Fallibilism than Al Mualims. That's why he said the Creed is not a doctrine for if the Creed required him to believe there is no absolute truth than the fact that there is '''"no absolute truth"''' would be an absolute truth thus making doctrine as he has to believe that in which it would also create a philosophical paradox. So his interpretation of the Creed is an approach, to be wise and question all ideas, not a conclusion which literally '''believeing''' nothing is true would be, that is why these Assassins can still fight to find the truth if they want. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 01:51, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">::::: On the contrary, my whole point is that we shouldn't assume that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way that I oppose your edit. Your edit claims that Assassins do not reject an absolute truth, when as I initially stated in my edit summary, this is dubious because the extent by which Assassins rejected the existence of an absolute truth could have varied between individuals. Aside from this, I asked whether you understood the terms "descriptive" and "normative" because I had supposed that that might've been at the source of the confusion, and I still think it is. Ezio said that the creed is not a doctrine, but an observation of reality, in other words, he holds it to be true scientifically of reality (it is descriptive), but it is not meant to be applied solidly into ethics (it's not a doctrine, it's not normative) and only employed as a stepping stone. It seems therefore our interpretation of his words may be divergent, but regardless it is the fact that these subtle discrepancies can arise that I disagreed with your edit: not because I disagreed with its content ''per se'', but rather that it was too explicit and exact to be stated if not necessary. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 06:27, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

imported>Sol Pacificus https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Abelzorus_Prime&diff=680846&oldid=prev imported>Abelzorus Prime: /* Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth." */ 2016-06-20T02:03:51Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth."</span></span></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 04:03, 20 June 2016</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l104">Line 104:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 104:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::: From your response, we aren't in disagreement, so I fail to understand why we disagreed on the edit. Perhaps it is because I think that is already covered sufficiently in the paragraph, and I think that there remains the possibility that the Assassins still reject the notion of an absolute truth, but believe that there are ''many'' truths, for instance. Or alternatively, the Assassins ''do'' view the ''creed'' as rejecting absolute truth, but don't believe that it is meant to be taken extremely literally (and the subject of the sentence is the creed itself not their interpretation of it). There remains many nuances in interpretation in regards to their stance on Truth, which is why I feared that that was too strong of an assertion. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 01:24, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::: From your response, we aren't in disagreement, so I fail to understand why we disagreed on the edit. Perhaps it is because I think that is already covered sufficiently in the paragraph, and I think that there remains the possibility that the Assassins still reject the notion of an absolute truth, but believe that there are ''many'' truths, for instance. Or alternatively, the Assassins ''do'' view the ''creed'' as rejecting absolute truth, but don't believe that it is meant to be taken extremely literally (and the subject of the sentence is the creed itself not their interpretation of it). There remains many nuances in interpretation in regards to their stance on Truth, which is why I feared that that was too strong of an assertion. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 01:24, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::It seems you are under the assumption that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way, though I would have to disagree. Especially with Ezio's interpretation falling more Skepticism/Fallibilism than Al Mualims. That's why he said the Creed is not a doctrine for if the Creed required him to believe there is no absolute truth than the fact that there is '''"no absolute truth"''' would be an absolute truth thus making doctrine as he has to believe that in which it would also create a philosophical paradox. So his interpretation of the Creed is an approach, to be wise and question all ideas, not a conclusion which literally '''believeing''' nothing is true would be. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 01:51, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::::It seems you are under the assumption that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way, though I would have to disagree. Especially with Ezio's interpretation falling more Skepticism/Fallibilism than Al Mualims. That's why he said the Creed is not a doctrine for if the Creed required him to believe there is no absolute truth than the fact that there is '''"no absolute truth"''' would be an absolute truth thus making doctrine as he has to believe that in which it would also create a philosophical paradox. So his interpretation of the Creed is an approach, to be wise and question all ideas, not a conclusion which literally '''believeing''' nothing is true would be<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, that is why these Assassins can still fight to find the truth if they want</ins>. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 01:51, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> </table>

imported>Abelzorus Prime https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Abelzorus_Prime&diff=680845&oldid=prev imported>Abelzorus Prime: /* Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth." */ 2016-06-20T01:51:30Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth."</span></span></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 03:51, 20 June 2016</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l103">Line 103:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 103:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::I understand where you are coming from but that paragrah is exclusively for Ezio's interpretation of the Creed in which he explains it is not doctrine, and is also an answer to the question if Assassins believe that nothing is true why do they fight for anything? Why aren't they just nihilists? And if nothing is true how can "nothing is true" be true? That specific paragraph shows how Ezio's interpretation counters that argument. He gives an alternative to the obvious [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism Nihilistic] approach and gives an approach which is in the line of thought of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallibilism Fallibilism] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism Skepticism]. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 21:41, June 19, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::I understand where you are coming from but that paragrah is exclusively for Ezio's interpretation of the Creed in which he explains it is not doctrine, and is also an answer to the question if Assassins believe that nothing is true why do they fight for anything? Why aren't they just nihilists? And if nothing is true how can "nothing is true" be true? That specific paragraph shows how Ezio's interpretation counters that argument. He gives an alternative to the obvious [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism Nihilistic] approach and gives an approach which is in the line of thought of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallibilism Fallibilism] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism Skepticism]. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 21:41, June 19, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::: From your response, we aren't in disagreement, so I fail to understand why we disagreed on the edit. Perhaps it is because I think that is already covered sufficiently in the paragraph, and I think that there remains the possibility that the Assassins still reject the notion of an absolute truth, but believe that there are ''many'' truths, for instance. Or alternatively, the Assassins ''do'' view the ''creed'' as rejecting absolute truth, but don't believe that it is meant to be taken extremely literally (and the subject of the sentence is the creed itself not their interpretation of it). There remains many nuances in interpretation in regards to their stance on Truth, which is why I feared that that was too strong of an assertion. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 01:24, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::: From your response, we aren't in disagreement, so I fail to understand why we disagreed on the edit. Perhaps it is because I think that is already covered sufficiently in the paragraph, and I think that there remains the possibility that the Assassins still reject the notion of an absolute truth, but believe that there are ''many'' truths, for instance. Or alternatively, the Assassins ''do'' view the ''creed'' as rejecting absolute truth, but don't believe that it is meant to be taken extremely literally (and the subject of the sentence is the creed itself not their interpretation of it). There remains many nuances in interpretation in regards to their stance on Truth, which is why I feared that that was too strong of an assertion. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 01:24, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">::::It seems you are under the assumption that all Assassins interpret the Creed the same way, though I would have to disagree. Especially with Ezio's interpretation falling more Skepticism/Fallibilism than Al Mualims. That's why he said the Creed is not a doctrine for if the Creed required him to believe there is no absolute truth than the fact that there is '''"no absolute truth"''' would be an absolute truth thus making doctrine as he has to believe that in which it would also create a philosophical paradox. So his interpretation of the Creed is an approach, to be wise and question all ideas, not a conclusion which literally '''believeing''' nothing is true would be. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 01:51, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

imported>Abelzorus Prime https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Abelzorus_Prime&diff=680844&oldid=prev imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth." */ 2016-06-20T01:24:57Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth."</span></span></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 03:24, 20 June 2016</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l102">Line 102:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 102:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::I understand where you are coming from but that paragrah is exclusively for Ezio's interpretation of the Creed in which he explains it is not doctrine, and is also an answer to the question if Assassins believe that nothing is true why do they fight for anything? Why aren't they just nihilists? And if nothing is true how can "nothing is true" be true? That specific paragraph shows how Ezio's interpretation counters that argument. He gives an alternative to the obvious [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism Nihilistic] approach and gives an approach which is in the line of thought of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallibilism Fallibilism] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism Skepticism]. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 21:41, June 19, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::I understand where you are coming from but that paragrah is exclusively for Ezio's interpretation of the Creed in which he explains it is not doctrine, and is also an answer to the question if Assassins believe that nothing is true why do they fight for anything? Why aren't they just nihilists? And if nothing is true how can "nothing is true" be true? That specific paragraph shows how Ezio's interpretation counters that argument. He gives an alternative to the obvious [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism Nihilistic] approach and gives an approach which is in the line of thought of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallibilism Fallibilism] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism Skepticism]. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 21:41, June 19, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">::: From your response, we aren't in disagreement, so I fail to understand why we disagreed on the edit. Perhaps it is because I think that is already covered sufficiently in the paragraph, and I think that there remains the possibility that the Assassins still reject the notion of an absolute truth, but believe that there are ''many'' truths, for instance. Or alternatively, the Assassins ''do'' view the ''creed'' as rejecting absolute truth, but don't believe that it is meant to be taken extremely literally (and the subject of the sentence is the creed itself not their interpretation of it). There remains many nuances in interpretation in regards to their stance on Truth, which is why I feared that that was too strong of an assertion. [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 01:24, June 20, 2016 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

imported>Sol Pacificus https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Abelzorus_Prime&diff=680843&oldid=prev imported>Abelzorus Prime: /* Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth." */ 2016-06-19T21:41:29Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth."</span></span></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 23:41, 19 June 2016</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l100">Line 100:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 100:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I wanted to first double-check whether you understand the meanings of the terms "descriptive" (aka "positive") and "normative" because I think that might be the cause of the confusion. Because "nothing is true" for all technicality does explicitly say "there is no absolute truth" (and hence I fear that there is a stark contradiction), and it is only in its application to the Assassin moral code that it becomes apparent they may not treat this as an indisputable truth. Thank you. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 21:14, June 19, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I wanted to first double-check whether you understand the meanings of the terms "descriptive" (aka "positive") and "normative" because I think that might be the cause of the confusion. Because "nothing is true" for all technicality does explicitly say "there is no absolute truth" (and hence I fear that there is a stark contradiction), and it is only in its application to the Assassin moral code that it becomes apparent they may not treat this as an indisputable truth. Thank you. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 21:14, June 19, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">::I understand where you are coming from but that paragrah is exclusively for Ezio's interpretation of the Creed in which he explains it is not doctrine, and is also an answer to the question if Assassins believe that nothing is true why do they fight for anything? Why aren't they just nihilists? And if nothing is true how can "nothing is true" be true? That specific paragraph shows how Ezio's interpretation counters that argument. He gives an alternative to the obvious [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism Nihilistic] approach and gives an approach which is in the line of thought of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallibilism Fallibilism] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism Skepticism]. [[User:Abelzorus Prime|Abelzorus Prime]] ([[User talk:Abelzorus Prime|talk]]) 21:41, June 19, 2016 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

imported>Abelzorus Prime https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Abelzorus_Prime&diff=680842&oldid=prev imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth." */ new section 2016-06-19T21:14:41Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth.": </span> new section</span></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 23:14, 19 June 2016</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l94">Line 94:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 94:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Yeah... I also miss coming here. T^T Life got the better of me and also the fact that I haven't played an AC game since Black Flag. :( Even my time on my main wiki isn't that high and I mostly show up for a particular blog or two. Problem is that when I start chatting, I lose all track of time despite having so much to do. I've been trying to be able to avoid logging into sites so that my mind can be more focused. It hasn't worked as well as I wanted, but I've had time to do other things offline(and away from PC). I'm going to College soon(took a gap year) and depending on my workload, I might have more opportunities. Home environment can get a bit difficult so I'm looking forward to a change and hopefully getting more social. Basically though, I'm doing okay. Once I get used to new environment abroad, I might do even better. :D<br>{{User:Fairy_Tail_Grand_Master/Sig1}}13:24, June 13, 2016 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Yeah... I also miss coming here. T^T Life got the better of me and also the fact that I haven't played an AC game since Black Flag. :( Even my time on my main wiki isn't that high and I mostly show up for a particular blog or two. Problem is that when I start chatting, I lose all track of time despite having so much to do. I've been trying to be able to avoid logging into sites so that my mind can be more focused. It hasn't worked as well as I wanted, but I've had time to do other things offline(and away from PC). I'm going to College soon(took a gap year) and depending on my workload, I might have more opportunities. Home environment can get a bit difficult so I'm looking forward to a change and hopefully getting more social. Basically though, I'm doing okay. Once I get used to new environment abroad, I might do even better. :D<br>{{User:Fairy_Tail_Grand_Master/Sig1}}13:24, June 13, 2016 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Assassins on "does not reject absolute truth." ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Hello, I wanted to check in on your perspective on this edit. In my initial revert, I noted that I found the claim dubious and hence preferred to leave it ambiguous. You re-added it, modified, so that it would seem to maintain its ambiguity, but rather than not making any claim at all, it still makes a claim, albeit one of a very neutral stance.</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">I wanted to first double-check whether you understand the meanings of the terms "descriptive" (aka "positive") and "normative" because I think that might be the cause of the confusion. Because "nothing is true" for all technicality does explicitly say "there is no absolute truth" (and hence I fear that there is a stark contradiction), and it is only in its application to the Assassin moral code that it becomes apparent they may not treat this as an indisputable truth. Thank you. :) [[User:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">Telepathy</span>]]</sup> 21:14, June 19, 2016 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

imported>Sol Pacificus https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Abelzorus_Prime&diff=680841&oldid=prev imported>Fairy Tail Grand Master at 13:24, 13 June 2016 2016-06-13T13:24:58Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 15:24, 13 June 2016</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l90">Line 90:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 90:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{Warn1}}</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{Warn1}}</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>You've received an official warning now for your less than favorable attitude on [[Thread:195317|this thread]]. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 18:18, June 29, 2015 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>You've received an official warning now for your less than favorable attitude on [[Thread:195317|this thread]]. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 18:18, June 29, 2015 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Sudden Appearances==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Yeah... I also miss coming here. T^T Life got the better of me and also the fact that I haven't played an AC game since Black Flag. :( Even my time on my main wiki isn't that high and I mostly show up for a particular blog or two. Problem is that when I start chatting, I lose all track of time despite having so much to do. I've been trying to be able to avoid logging into sites so that my mind can be more focused. It hasn't worked as well as I wanted, but I've had time to do other things offline(and away from PC). I'm going to College soon(took a gap year) and depending on my workload, I might have more opportunities. Home environment can get a bit difficult so I'm looking forward to a change and hopefully getting more social. Basically though, I'm doing okay. Once I get used to new environment abroad, I might do even better. :D<br>{{User:Fairy_Tail_Grand_Master/Sig1}}13:24, June 13, 2016 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

imported>Fairy Tail Grand Master