imported>QQTrey1: Created page with "I don't see why everyone seemed to dislike AC3. Yes Connors chacter was rather dull and lacked excitement and at times the missions were basicly repeated over and over again. ..."

2013-11-13T03:24:54Z

Created page with "I don't see why everyone seemed to dislike AC3. Yes Connors chacter was rather dull and lacked excitement and at times the missions were basicly repeated over and over again. ..."

Páàjì titun

I don't see why everyone seemed to dislike AC3. Yes Connors chacter was rather dull and lacked excitement and at times the missions were basicly repeated over and over again. I've got a theorie on why people dislike AC3 so much. It was a big jump we were all so used to Ezio, then a big jump to New York and Bostan with Muskets and what not. Be honest, when you first heard that there was a new AC you never would of thought it would be in New York Bostan ect.

Revelations was fine to me besides the den feature, I do think that the devolepers understand that people were unhappy with AC3 and they have seemed to fixed that up in BF. I think we need to have a little bit more faith in the series and in Ubisoft.

User blog comment:The Grand Llama/Losing Luster/@comment-24159074-20131113032454 - Revision history

imported>QQTrey1: Created page with "I don't see why everyone seemed to dislike AC3. Yes Connors chacter was rather dull and lacked excitement and at times the missions were basicly repeated over and over again. ..."