imported>Il Lupo: Created page with "Hello, Vatsa. I'd like to draw your attention to the flurry of articles you made 'FA' earlier. Now, I admit that some of those by all rights should have been made FA because they..."

2011-11-04T06:13:39Z

Created page with "Hello, Vatsa. I'd like to draw your attention to the flurry of articles you made 'FA' earlier. Now, I admit that some of those by all rights should have been made FA because they..."

Páàjì titun

Hello, Vatsa. I'd like to draw your attention to the flurry of articles you made 'FA' earlier. Now, I admit that some of those by all rights should have been made FA because they passed all standards and were voted in properly, but a couple of articles such as the 'Templars' article still had negative voters. Your positive ending of the voting process goes against this rule: 5.Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 3 Istruttore supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article."
As such, it may not have been a good idea to have ended the voting process for it. What do you think?<ac_metadata title="FA Articles"> </ac_metadata>

Thread:Vatsa1708/@comment-3235544-20111104061338 - Revision history

imported>Il Lupo: Created page with "Hello, Vatsa. I'd like to draw your attention to the flurry of articles you made 'FA' earlier. Now, I admit that some of those by all rights should have been made FA because they..."