Template talk:Memory Infobox - Revision history

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Remove appearance field? */

2025-11-14T06:32:19Z

Remove appearance field?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 14 November 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::Helpful how? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		:::Helpful how? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
	::::So I don't have to scroll all the way down to find the info I need when making references for other pages. Also, I should point out that "it's already in the page" isn't really an argument, since the same also applies to pretty much all fields on these types of templates, like for example dates of birth and death in character templates and the field for sources in this very template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 16:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		::::So I don't have to scroll all the way down to find the info I need when making references for other pages. Also, I should point out that "it's already in the page" isn't really an argument, since the same also applies to pretty much all fields on these types of templates, like for example dates of birth and death in character templates and the field for sources in this very template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 16:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
			:::::You shouldn't have to scroll all the way down if it is properly referenced in the lede. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 06:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

imported>Soranin: /* Remove appearance field? */

2025-11-11T16:01:31Z

Remove appearance field?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 11 November 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		::Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
	:::Helpful how? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		:::Helpful how? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
			::::So I don't have to scroll all the way down to find the info I need when making references for other pages. Also, I should point out that "it's already in the page" isn't really an argument, since the same also applies to pretty much all fields on these types of templates, like for example dates of birth and death in character templates and the field for sources in this very template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 16:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Remove appearance field? */

2025-11-11T15:56:04Z

Remove appearance field?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 11 November 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:Any people for/against this? It's been 4 months since May, which is roughly when we started implementing ref tags in memory pages (where/when we can) for site consistency, but this field is still filled out of habit even when the games and any applicable DLCs are already named at the page bottom as a bulleted—and incorrect—Reference. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)		:Any people for/against this? It's been 4 months since May, which is roughly when we started implementing ref tags in memory pages (where/when we can) for site consistency, but this field is still filled out of habit even when the games and any applicable DLCs are already named at the page bottom as a bulleted—and incorrect—Reference. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
	::Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		::Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
			:::Helpful how? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

imported>Soranin: /* Remove appearance field? */

2025-11-11T15:30:43Z

Remove appearance field?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 11 November 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 07:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)		Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 07:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
	:Any people for/against this? It's been 4 months since May, which is roughly when we started implementing ref tags in memory pages (where/when we can) for site consistency, but this field is still filled out of habit even when the games and any applicable DLCs are already named at the page bottom as a bulleted—and incorrect—Reference. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)		:Any people for/against this? It's been 4 months since May, which is roughly when we started implementing ref tags in memory pages (where/when we can) for site consistency, but this field is still filled out of habit even when the games and any applicable DLCs are already named at the page bottom as a bulleted—and incorrect—Reference. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
			::Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

imported>Darman36: /Remove appearance field?/ Bump, 3mths later

2024-10-01T02:46:06Z

Remove appearance field?: Bump, 3mths later

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 1 October 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{OpenTalk}}		{{OpenTalk}}
	Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 07:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)		Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 07:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
			:Any people for/against this? It's been 4 months since May, which is roughly when we started implementing ref tags in memory pages (where/when we can) for site consistency, but this field is still filled out of habit even when the games and any applicable DLCs are already named at the page bottom as a bulleted—and incorrect—Reference. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: oh ha forgot had actually already made this when I responded on the location infobox talk

2024-06-23T06:23:32Z

oh ha forgot had actually already made this when I responded on the location infobox talk

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:23, 23 June 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talkheader}}		{{Talkheader}}
	==Remove appearance field?==		==Remove appearance field?==
			{{OpenTalk}}
	Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 07:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)		Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 07:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: Created page with "{{Talkheader}} ==Remove appearance field?== Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? ~~~~"

2024-06-08T07:41:23Z

Created page with "{{Talkheader}} ==Remove appearance field?== Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? ~~~~"

Páàjì titun

{{Talkheader}}
==Remove appearance field?==
Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 07:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 14 November 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::Helpful how? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		:::Helpful how? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
	::::So I don't have to scroll all the way down to find the info I need when making references for other pages. Also, I should point out that "it's already in the page" isn't really an argument, since the same also applies to pretty much all fields on these types of templates, like for example dates of birth and death in character templates and the field for sources in this very template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 16:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		::::So I don't have to scroll all the way down to find the info I need when making references for other pages. Also, I should point out that "it's already in the page" isn't really an argument, since the same also applies to pretty much all fields on these types of templates, like for example dates of birth and death in character templates and the field for sources in this very template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 16:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
			:::::You shouldn't have to scroll all the way down if it is properly referenced in the lede. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 06:32, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 11 November 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		::Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
	:::Helpful how? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		:::Helpful how? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
			::::So I don't have to scroll all the way down to find the info I need when making references for other pages. Also, I should point out that "it's already in the page" isn't really an argument, since the same also applies to pretty much all fields on these types of templates, like for example dates of birth and death in character templates and the field for sources in this very template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 16:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 11 November 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:Any people for/against this? It's been 4 months since May, which is roughly when we started implementing ref tags in memory pages (where/when we can) for site consistency, but this field is still filled out of habit even when the games and any applicable DLCs are already named at the page bottom as a bulleted—and incorrect—Reference. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)		:Any people for/against this? It's been 4 months since May, which is roughly when we started implementing ref tags in memory pages (where/when we can) for site consistency, but this field is still filled out of habit even when the games and any applicable DLCs are already named at the page bottom as a bulleted—and incorrect—Reference. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
	::Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		::Thanks, Darman, for pointing me in the direction for this discussion. Honestly, I feel like the inclusion of this field in the infobox is helpful for editing. I vote against removing it. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
			:::Helpful how? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 15:56, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Template talk:Memory Infobox - Revision history

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Remove appearance field? */

imported>Soranin: /* Remove appearance field? */

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Remove appearance field? */

imported>Soranin: /* Remove appearance field? */

imported>Darman36: /*Remove appearance field?*/ Bump, 3mths later

imported>Lacrossedeamon: oh ha forgot had actually already made this when I responded on the location infobox talk

imported>Lacrossedeamon: Created page with "{{Talkheader}} ==Remove appearance field?== Just like we removed VA from character infoboxes for being OOU should we also remove Appearance from the infobox as well? ~~~~"

imported>Darman36: /Remove appearance field?/ Bump, 3mths later