Template talk:ACSH - Revision history

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Extra factions */

2025-03-26T21:32:19Z

Extra factions

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 26 March 2025
Line 33:		Line 33:

	:::::::::I think the factions should be linked inside the "Minor targets" box, even though some of them are actual factions more than just a collection of people. [[Template:ACII\|Assassin's Creed 2 template]] solves the "Assassins - House of Auditore" conflict by having them appear twice, first linked and second as regular text. Perhaps a similar option could be used on this one, with proper factions appearing again on the faction navbox unlinked? Although this leads to determine which are proper factions and which are not to have them appear twice. Edit: Would just link them twice be a major problem? - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 20:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		:::::::::I think the factions should be linked inside the "Minor targets" box, even though some of them are actual factions more than just a collection of people. [[Template:ACII\|Assassin's Creed 2 template]] solves the "Assassins - House of Auditore" conflict by having them appear twice, first linked and second as regular text. Perhaps a similar option could be used on this one, with proper factions appearing again on the faction navbox unlinked? Although this leads to determine which are proper factions and which are not to have them appear twice. Edit: Would just link them twice be a major problem? - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 20:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
			::::::::::Historically we have not linked twice but I am of the idea that we should especially since some characters are part of multiple groups such as Yagyu Munetoshi starting out as Nobutsuna's Students but becoming a scout for the League later. Personally I think he should be linked both times but that decision will need input from more editors before implementation. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 21:32, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

imported>The MFDZ at 20:28, 26 March 2025

2025-03-26T20:28:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 26 March 2025
Line 32:		Line 32:
	::::::::Not sure how that would solve your initial concern? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		::::::::Not sure how that would solve your initial concern? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

	:::::::::I think the factions should be linked inside the "Minor targets" box, even though some of them are actual factions more than just a collection of people. [[Template:ACII\|Assassin's Creed 2 template]] solves the "Assassins - House of Auditore" conflict by having them appear twice, first linked and second as regular text. Perhaps a similar option could be used on this one, with proper factions appearing again on the faction navbox unlinked? Although this leads to determine which are proper factions and which are not to have them appear twice. - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 20:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		:::::::::I think the factions should be linked inside the "Minor targets" box, even though some of them are actual factions more than just a collection of people. [[Template:ACII\|Assassin's Creed 2 template]] solves the "Assassins - House of Auditore" conflict by having them appear twice, first linked and second as regular text. Perhaps a similar option could be used on this one, with proper factions appearing again on the faction navbox unlinked? Although this leads to determine which are proper factions and which are not to have them appear twice. Edit: Would just link them twice be a major problem? - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 20:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

imported>The MFDZ at 20:22, 26 March 2025

2025-03-26T20:22:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 26 March 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:::::::We could do both and have them as their own sub-faction within "Minor targets". Navboxes can have at least a few nested subgroups, as my edit to the Draft shows. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 13:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		:::::::We could do both and have them as their own sub-faction within "Minor targets". Navboxes can have at least a few nested subgroups, as my edit to the Draft shows. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 13:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
	::::::::Not sure how that would solve your initial concern? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		::::::::Not sure how that would solve your initial concern? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

			:::::::::I think the factions should be linked inside the "Minor targets" box, even though some of them are actual factions more than just a collection of people. [[Template:ACII\|Assassin's Creed 2 template]] solves the "Assassins - House of Auditore" conflict by having them appear twice, first linked and second as regular text. Perhaps a similar option could be used on this one, with proper factions appearing again on the faction navbox unlinked? Although this leads to determine which are proper factions and which are not to have them appear twice. - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 20:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Extra factions */

2025-03-26T19:25:15Z

Extra factions

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 26 March 2025
Line 30:		Line 30:
	::::::I'd probably go with "Minor targets" rather than just "Targets" to distinguish them from the Shinbafuku. My question is now some of these target groups are proper factions in their own rights like the Godai Shinobi or the Karui Eikyou, do we link them in the "Minor targets" Character group or just the Factions group? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 04:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		::::::I'd probably go with "Minor targets" rather than just "Targets" to distinguish them from the Shinbafuku. My question is now some of these target groups are proper factions in their own rights like the Godai Shinobi or the Karui Eikyou, do we link them in the "Minor targets" Character group or just the Factions group? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 04:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
	:::::::We could do both and have them as their own sub-faction within "Minor targets". Navboxes can have at least a few nested subgroups, as my edit to the Draft shows. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 13:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		:::::::We could do both and have them as their own sub-faction within "Minor targets". Navboxes can have at least a few nested subgroups, as my edit to the Draft shows. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 13:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
			::::::::Not sure how that would solve your initial concern? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

imported>Darman36: /* Extra factions */

2025-03-26T13:50:41Z

Extra factions

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 26 March 2025
Line 26:		Line 26:
	::I like conferring on formatting decisions. I do think we need to decide if the reformed Kakushiba ikki counts as Assassins and if yes who does that all constitute (all members of the settlement, just people in the league node on the objective board, or just usable allies). [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 00:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)		::I like conferring on formatting decisions. I do think we need to decide if the reformed Kakushiba ikki counts as Assassins and if yes who does that all constitute (all members of the settlement, just people in the league node on the objective board, or just usable allies). [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 00:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
	:::Now that this is gradually expanding with info, I see it's getting quite long with all the factions. Do we really need to have separate sections for everyone between the Shinbakufu down to Others? Is there some common trait between all of them beyond "NPC to kill" that we can put them in a larger category and just do "GROUP 1 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}} • GROUP 2 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}}" etc? – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 03:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)		:::Now that this is gradually expanding with info, I see it's getting quite long with all the factions. Do we really need to have separate sections for everyone between the Shinbakufu down to Others? Is there some common trait between all of them beyond "NPC to kill" that we can put them in a larger category and just do "GROUP 1 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}} • GROUP 2 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}}" etc? – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 03:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

	::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)		::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
	:::::I'm more partial to "Targets" over "Objectives", but yeah, that looks a lot better than the current template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 01:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		:::::I'm more partial to "Targets" over "Objectives", but yeah, that looks a lot better than the current template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 01:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
	::::::I'd probably go with "Minor targets" rather than just "Targets" to distinguish them from the Shinbafuku. My question is now some of these target groups are proper factions in their own rights like the Godai Shinobi or the Karui Eikyou, do we link them in the "Minor targets" Character group or just the Factions group? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 04:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		::::::I'd probably go with "Minor targets" rather than just "Targets" to distinguish them from the Shinbafuku. My question is now some of these target groups are proper factions in their own rights like the Godai Shinobi or the Karui Eikyou, do we link them in the "Minor targets" Character group or just the Factions group? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 04:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
			:::::::We could do both and have them as their own sub-faction within "Minor targets". Navboxes can have at least a few nested subgroups, as my edit to the Draft shows. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 13:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Extra factions */

2025-03-26T04:02:06Z

Extra factions

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:02, 26 March 2025
Line 29:		Line 29:
	::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)		::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
	:::::I'm more partial to "Targets" over "Objectives", but yeah, that looks a lot better than the current template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 01:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		:::::I'm more partial to "Targets" over "Objectives", but yeah, that looks a lot better than the current template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 01:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
			::::::I'd probably go with "Minor targets" rather than just "Targets" to distinguish them from the Shinbafuku. My question is now some of these target groups are proper factions in their own rights like the Godai Shinobi or the Karui Eikyou, do we link them in the "Minor targets" Character group or just the Factions group? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 04:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

imported>Soranin: /* Extra factions */

2025-03-26T01:33:41Z

Extra factions

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:33, 26 March 2025
Line 28:		Line 28:

	::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)		::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
			:::::I'm more partial to "Targets" over "Objectives", but yeah, that looks a lot better than the current template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 01:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

imported>The MFDZ at 17:17, 25 March 2025

2025-03-25T17:17:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 25 March 2025
Line 26:		Line 26:
	::I like conferring on formatting decisions. I do think we need to decide if the reformed Kakushiba ikki counts as Assassins and if yes who does that all constitute (all members of the settlement, just people in the league node on the objective board, or just usable allies). [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 00:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)		::I like conferring on formatting decisions. I do think we need to decide if the reformed Kakushiba ikki counts as Assassins and if yes who does that all constitute (all members of the settlement, just people in the league node on the objective board, or just usable allies). [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 00:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
	:::Now that this is gradually expanding with info, I see it's getting quite long with all the factions. Do we really need to have separate sections for everyone between the Shinbakufu down to Others? Is there some common trait between all of them beyond "NPC to kill" that we can put them in a larger category and just do "GROUP 1 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}} • GROUP 2 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}}" etc? – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 03:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)		:::Now that this is gradually expanding with info, I see it's getting quite long with all the factions. Do we really need to have separate sections for everyone between the Shinbakufu down to Others? Is there some common trait between all of them beyond "NPC to kill" that we can put them in a larger category and just do "GROUP 1 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}} • GROUP 2 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}}" etc? – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 03:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

			::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

imported>Darman36: /Extra factions/ Copying edit comment to facilitate conversation

2025-03-25T03:45:44Z

Extra factions: Copying edit comment to facilitate conversation

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 25 March 2025
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:::Remove these with my blessing, as well. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 15:28, 28 January 2025 (UTC)		:::Remove these with my blessing, as well. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 15:28, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

	== Extra factions ==		==Extra factions==

	{{OpenTalk}}		{{OpenTalk}}
	Since we broke out groups like Frankish Nobles, Lost Drengir, Daughters of Lerion in Valhalla should we do the same with the various groups in Shadows. It would help the Others section to not be so crowded. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:59, 19 March 2025 (UTC)		Since we broke out groups like Frankish Nobles, Lost Drengir, Daughters of Lerion in Valhalla should we do the same with the various groups in Shadows. It would help the Others section to not be so crowded. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:59, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
	:You can just do so, there was no need to come to the talk page :p - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 21:04, 19 March 2025 (UTC)		:You can just do so, there was no need to come to the talk page :p - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 21:04, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
	::I like conferring on formatting decisions. I do think we need to decide if the reformed Kakushiba ikki counts as Assassins and if yes who does that all constitute (all members of the settlement, just people in the league node on the objective board, or just usable allies). [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 00:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)		::I like conferring on formatting decisions. I do think we need to decide if the reformed Kakushiba ikki counts as Assassins and if yes who does that all constitute (all members of the settlement, just people in the league node on the objective board, or just usable allies). [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 00:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
			:::Now that this is gradually expanding with info, I see it's getting quite long with all the factions. Do we really need to have separate sections for everyone between the Shinbakufu down to Others? Is there some common trait between all of them beyond "NPC to kill" that we can put them in a larger category and just do "GROUP 1 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}} • GROUP 2 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}}" etc? – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 03:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Extra factions */

2025-03-20T00:04:13Z

Extra factions

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 20 March 2025
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Since we broke out groups like Frankish Nobles, Lost Drengir, Daughters of Lerion in Valhalla should we do the same with the various groups in Shadows. It would help the Others section to not be so crowded. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:59, 19 March 2025 (UTC)		Since we broke out groups like Frankish Nobles, Lost Drengir, Daughters of Lerion in Valhalla should we do the same with the various groups in Shadows. It would help the Others section to not be so crowded. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:59, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
	:You can just do so, there was no need to come to the talk page :p - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 21:04, 19 March 2025 (UTC)		:You can just do so, there was no need to come to the talk page :p - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 21:04, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
			::I like conferring on formatting decisions. I do think we need to decide if the reformed Kakushiba ikki counts as Assassins and if yes who does that all constitute (all members of the settlement, just people in the league node on the objective board, or just usable allies). [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 00:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 26 March 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:::::::We could do both and have them as their own sub-faction within "Minor targets". Navboxes can have at least a few nested subgroups, as my edit to the Draft shows. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 13:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		:::::::We could do both and have them as their own sub-faction within "Minor targets". Navboxes can have at least a few nested subgroups, as my edit to the Draft shows. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 13:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
	::::::::Not sure how that would solve your initial concern? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		::::::::Not sure how that would solve your initial concern? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

			:::::::::I think the factions should be linked inside the "Minor targets" box, even though some of them are actual factions more than just a collection of people. [[Template:ACII\|Assassin's Creed 2 template]] solves the "Assassins - House of Auditore" conflict by having them appear twice, first linked and second as regular text. Perhaps a similar option could be used on this one, with proper factions appearing again on the faction navbox unlinked? Although this leads to determine which are proper factions and which are not to have them appear twice. - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 20:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 26 March 2025
Line 30:		Line 30:
	::::::I'd probably go with "Minor targets" rather than just "Targets" to distinguish them from the Shinbafuku. My question is now some of these target groups are proper factions in their own rights like the Godai Shinobi or the Karui Eikyou, do we link them in the "Minor targets" Character group or just the Factions group? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 04:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		::::::I'd probably go with "Minor targets" rather than just "Targets" to distinguish them from the Shinbafuku. My question is now some of these target groups are proper factions in their own rights like the Godai Shinobi or the Karui Eikyou, do we link them in the "Minor targets" Character group or just the Factions group? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 04:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
	:::::::We could do both and have them as their own sub-faction within "Minor targets". Navboxes can have at least a few nested subgroups, as my edit to the Draft shows. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 13:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		:::::::We could do both and have them as their own sub-faction within "Minor targets". Navboxes can have at least a few nested subgroups, as my edit to the Draft shows. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 13:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
			::::::::Not sure how that would solve your initial concern? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 26 March 2025
Line 26:		Line 26:
	::I like conferring on formatting decisions. I do think we need to decide if the reformed Kakushiba ikki counts as Assassins and if yes who does that all constitute (all members of the settlement, just people in the league node on the objective board, or just usable allies). [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 00:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)		::I like conferring on formatting decisions. I do think we need to decide if the reformed Kakushiba ikki counts as Assassins and if yes who does that all constitute (all members of the settlement, just people in the league node on the objective board, or just usable allies). [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 00:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
	:::Now that this is gradually expanding with info, I see it's getting quite long with all the factions. Do we really need to have separate sections for everyone between the Shinbakufu down to Others? Is there some common trait between all of them beyond "NPC to kill" that we can put them in a larger category and just do "GROUP 1 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}} • GROUP 2 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}}" etc? – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 03:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)		:::Now that this is gradually expanding with info, I see it's getting quite long with all the factions. Do we really need to have separate sections for everyone between the Shinbakufu down to Others? Is there some common trait between all of them beyond "NPC to kill" that we can put them in a larger category and just do "GROUP 1 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}} • GROUP 2 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}}" etc? – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 03:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

	::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)		::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
	:::::I'm more partial to "Targets" over "Objectives", but yeah, that looks a lot better than the current template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 01:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		:::::I'm more partial to "Targets" over "Objectives", but yeah, that looks a lot better than the current template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 01:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
	::::::I'd probably go with "Minor targets" rather than just "Targets" to distinguish them from the Shinbafuku. My question is now some of these target groups are proper factions in their own rights like the Godai Shinobi or the Karui Eikyou, do we link them in the "Minor targets" Character group or just the Factions group? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 04:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		::::::I'd probably go with "Minor targets" rather than just "Targets" to distinguish them from the Shinbafuku. My question is now some of these target groups are proper factions in their own rights like the Godai Shinobi or the Karui Eikyou, do we link them in the "Minor targets" Character group or just the Factions group? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 04:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
			:::::::We could do both and have them as their own sub-faction within "Minor targets". Navboxes can have at least a few nested subgroups, as my edit to the Draft shows. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 13:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:02, 26 March 2025
Line 29:		Line 29:
	::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)		::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
	:::::I'm more partial to "Targets" over "Objectives", but yeah, that looks a lot better than the current template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 01:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)		:::::I'm more partial to "Targets" over "Objectives", but yeah, that looks a lot better than the current template. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 01:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
			::::::I'd probably go with "Minor targets" rather than just "Targets" to distinguish them from the Shinbafuku. My question is now some of these target groups are proper factions in their own rights like the Godai Shinobi or the Karui Eikyou, do we link them in the "Minor targets" Character group or just the Factions group? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 04:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 25 March 2025
Line 26:		Line 26:
	::I like conferring on formatting decisions. I do think we need to decide if the reformed Kakushiba ikki counts as Assassins and if yes who does that all constitute (all members of the settlement, just people in the league node on the objective board, or just usable allies). [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 00:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)		::I like conferring on formatting decisions. I do think we need to decide if the reformed Kakushiba ikki counts as Assassins and if yes who does that all constitute (all members of the settlement, just people in the league node on the objective board, or just usable allies). [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 00:04, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
	:::Now that this is gradually expanding with info, I see it's getting quite long with all the factions. Do we really need to have separate sections for everyone between the Shinbakufu down to Others? Is there some common trait between all of them beyond "NPC to kill" that we can put them in a larger category and just do "GROUP 1 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}} • GROUP 2 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}}" etc? – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 03:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)		:::Now that this is gradually expanding with info, I see it's getting quite long with all the factions. Do we really need to have separate sections for everyone between the Shinbakufu down to Others? Is there some common trait between all of them beyond "NPC to kill" that we can put them in a larger category and just do "GROUP 1 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}} • GROUP 2 {{c\|member 1 • member 2}}" etc? – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 03:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

			::::I think Darman has a good point and we should decide if the option of having them on the same section as "Objectives" or "Targets" or something like that is better. I did a little test on [[User:The MFDZ/Drafts\|here]] to see if the section got too crowded and I think its fine. I also think we should change how certain names appear, such as having the Godai appear by his element (i.e. putting them as <nowiki>[[Rokkaku Yoshimitsu\|Void]]</nowiki>) and removing all "The ____ Yamabushi" since its a bit redundant - [[User:The MFDZ\|The MFDZ]] ([[User talk:The MFDZ\|talk]]) 17:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Template talk:ACSH - Revision history

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Extra factions */

imported>The MFDZ at 20:28, 26 March 2025

imported>The MFDZ at 20:22, 26 March 2025

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Extra factions */

imported>Darman36: /* Extra factions */

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Extra factions */

imported>Soranin: /* Extra factions */

imported>The MFDZ at 17:17, 25 March 2025

imported>Darman36: /*Extra factions*/ Copying edit comment to facilitate conversation

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Extra factions */

imported>Darman36: /Extra factions/ Copying edit comment to facilitate conversation