Talk:Uberto Alberti - Revision history

Soranin: Text replacement - "siniath" to "siniath"

2026-05-10T18:02:26Z

Text replacement - "siniath" to "siniath"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 10 May 2026
Line 31:		Line 31:
	== Templar or ally? ==		== Templar or ally? ==

	Which one is he? He's in the Templar category, but the article's text claims he to be 'just' an ally. [[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[~~w:c:assassinscreed:~~User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 10:17, October 7, 2013 (UTC)		Which one is he? He's in the Templar category, but the article's text claims he to be 'just' an ally. [[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 10:17, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
	:He is a Templar. I don't know why it says "ally" in there. --{{Signature/Jasca Ducato}} 11:37, October 7, 2013 (UTC)		:He is a Templar. I don't know why it says "ally" in there. --{{Signature/Jasca Ducato}} 11:37, October 7, 2013 (UTC)

imported>RebeccaAWB: /* top */Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T15:38:04Z

top: Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	What does ''gonfaloniere'' mean? Lawyer? Official? Government Figure? Fat dude with hat? I tried translating it on Babel Fish, but it showed the exact same thing. [[User:War Clown\|War Clown]] 12:44, July 12, 2010 (UTC)		What does ''gonfaloniere'' mean? Lawyer? Official? Government Figure? Fat dude with hat? I tried translating it on Babel Fish, but it showed the exact same thing. [[User:War Clown\|War Clown]] 12:44, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

imported>Youmademesignup: /* Is Uberto the only named enemy in the series not to be at least partly based on a specific real person? */

2014-01-07T22:43:11Z

Is Uberto the only named enemy in the series not to be at least partly based on a specific real person?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:43, 8 January 2014
Line 46:		Line 46:
	#etc.		#etc.
	:Just to name a few more. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:30, January 7, 2014 (UTC)		:Just to name a few more. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:30, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
			:Well I obviously meant historical, but good call on Haytham et al. [[User:Youmademesignup\|Youmademesignup]] ([[User talk:Youmademesignup\|talk]]) 22:43, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

imported>Jasca Ducato: /* Is Uberto the only named enemy in the series not to be at least partly based on a specific real person? */

2014-01-07T09:30:04Z

Is Uberto the only named enemy in the series not to be at least partly based on a specific real person?

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:30, 7 January 2014
Line 36:		Line 36:

	If so, does that merit mentioning? He's got to be one of the only ones. Don't know if all the AC1 targets were real people (a few seem doubtful), but it certainly seems that everyone since Uberto is based on a specific real person. [[User:Youmademesignup\|Youmademesignup]] ([[User talk:Youmademesignup\|talk]]) 00:57, January 7, 2014 (UTC)		If so, does that merit mentioning? He's got to be one of the only ones. Don't know if all the AC1 targets were real people (a few seem doubtful), but it certainly seems that everyone since Uberto is based on a specific real person. [[User:Youmademesignup\|Youmademesignup]] ([[User talk:Youmademesignup\|talk]]) 00:57, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
			#Daniel Cross
			#Haytham Kenway
			#Kenneth Abraham
			#Lucy Stillman
			#Octavian de Valoius
			#Reginald Birch
			#Warren Vidic
			#etc.
			#etc.
			:Just to name a few more. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:30, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

imported>Youmademesignup: /* Is Uberto the only named enemy in the series not to be at least partly based on a specific real person? */ new section

2014-01-07T00:57:23Z

Is Uberto the only named enemy in the series not to be at least partly based on a specific real person?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 7 January 2014
Line 32:		Line 32:
	Which one is he? He's in the Templar category, but the article's text claims he to be 'just' an ally. [[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 10:17, October 7, 2013 (UTC)		Which one is he? He's in the Templar category, but the article's text claims he to be 'just' an ally. [[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 10:17, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
	:He is a Templar. I don't know why it says "ally" in there. --{{Signature/Jasca Ducato}} 11:37, October 7, 2013 (UTC)		:He is a Templar. I don't know why it says "ally" in there. --{{Signature/Jasca Ducato}} 11:37, October 7, 2013 (UTC)

			== Is Uberto the only named enemy in the series not to be at least partly based on a specific real person? ==

			If so, does that merit mentioning? He's got to be one of the only ones. Don't know if all the AC1 targets were real people (a few seem doubtful), but it certainly seems that everyone since Uberto is based on a specific real person. [[User:Youmademesignup\|Youmademesignup]] ([[User talk:Youmademesignup\|talk]]) 00:57, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

imported>Jasca Ducato: /* Templar or ally? */

2013-10-07T11:37:08Z

Templar or ally?

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 7 October 2013
Line 31:		Line 31:

	Which one is he? He's in the Templar category, but the article's text claims he to be 'just' an ally. [[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 10:17, October 7, 2013 (UTC)		Which one is he? He's in the Templar category, but the article's text claims he to be 'just' an ally. [[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 10:17, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
			:He is a Templar. I don't know why it says "ally" in there. --{{Signature/Jasca Ducato}} 11:37, October 7, 2013 (UTC)

imported>Sadelyrate: /* Templar or ally? */ new section

2013-10-07T10:17:44Z

Templar or ally?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 7 October 2013
Line 27:		Line 27:
	Did things realy work that way back then? That you were guilty untill proven innocent instead of the other way around? --[[User:OreliTHIS\|OreliTHIS] Stab 4 U 06:14, January 7, 2011 (UTC)		Did things realy work that way back then? That you were guilty untill proven innocent instead of the other way around? --[[User:OreliTHIS\|OreliTHIS] Stab 4 U 06:14, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
	:Usually they did. The whole French Revolution was based on that principle. -- [http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/User:D._Cello D. Cello] 14:57, January 7, 2011 (UTC)		:Usually they did. The whole French Revolution was based on that principle. -- [http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/User:D._Cello D. Cello] 14:57, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

			== Templar or ally? ==

			Which one is he? He's in the Templar category, but the article's text claims he to be 'just' an ally. [[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 10:17, October 7, 2013 (UTC)

imported>D. Cello at 14:57, 7 January 2011

2011-01-07T14:57:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 7 January 2011
Line 26:		Line 26:

	Did things realy work that way back then? That you were guilty untill proven innocent instead of the other way around? --[[User:OreliTHIS\|OreliTHIS] Stab 4 U 06:14, January 7, 2011 (UTC)		Did things realy work that way back then? That you were guilty untill proven innocent instead of the other way around? --[[User:OreliTHIS\|OreliTHIS] Stab 4 U 06:14, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
			:Usually they did. The whole French Revolution was based on that principle. -- [http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/User:D._Cello D. Cello] 14:57, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

imported>OreliTHIS at 06:14, 7 January 2011

2011-01-07T06:14:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 7 January 2011
Line 24:		Line 24:

	A Judge, eh? Well, that clears some things up. But he took a bribe from the Templars - that means he's a bad Judge. But these days bribable Judges are quite common though :( [[User:Andro69\|Andro69]] 15:57, July 12, 2010 (UTC)		A Judge, eh? Well, that clears some things up. But he took a bribe from the Templars - that means he's a bad Judge. But these days bribable Judges are quite common though :( [[User:Andro69\|Andro69]] 15:57, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

			Did things realy work that way back then? That you were guilty untill proven innocent instead of the other way around? --[[User:OreliTHIS\|OreliTHIS] Stab 4 U 06:14, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

imported>Andro69 at 15:57, 12 July 2010

2010-07-12T15:57:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 12 July 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Which I thought meant that he was an attorney or something. Your research proved otherwise, so I guess being a Judge made a lot more sense. [[User:War Clown\|War Clown]] 14:20, July 12, 2010 (UTC)		Which I thought meant that he was an attorney or something. Your research proved otherwise, so I guess being a Judge made a lot more sense. [[User:War Clown\|War Clown]] 14:20, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

	A Judge, eh? Well, that clears some things up. But he took a bribe from the Templars - that means he's a bad Judge. xP [[User:Andro69\|Andro69]] 15:54, July 12, 2010 (UTC)		A Judge, eh? Well, that clears some things up. But he took a bribe from the Templars - that means he's a bad Judge. But these days bribable Judges are quite common though :( [[User:Andro69\|Andro69]] 15:57, July 12, 2010 (UTC)