Talk:Raimondi - Revision history

imported>Darman36: Darman36 moved page Talk:Fray Raimondi to Talk:Raimondi without leaving a redirect

2022-01-31T06:20:34Z

Darman36 moved page Talk:Fray Raimondi to Talk:Raimondi without leaving a redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:20, 31 January 2022
(No difference)

imported>Darman36: /* Relevancy */

2022-01-31T06:20:16Z

Relevancy

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:20, 31 January 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I agree with Darman, this seems unnecessary. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 23:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)		:I agree with Darman, this seems unnecessary. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 23:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
	::Darman, I just want to point out that "relevancy", which is the word you have used for the deletion proposal of articles on extras several times now, is not the right word to use in this scenario. Characters who have only received a one-line mention or is a background civilian or mook is still relevant to ''Assassin's Creed'' by virtue of being present in ''Assassin's Creed''. The reasoning you are looking for is not "relevancy" but that the character is too inconsequential to deserve an article. I am undecided on whether we should prohibit articles on characters this minor in role, but I lean against it because we already have articles on many historical figures mentioned merely once in database entries. At a certain point, it also becomes too arbitrary to decide which character meets the criteria for inclusion or not. The real cause to delete this article would be if the character has not even been identified in any source. Can the name Raimondi be verified? (And if it can be verified, like in the credits, then it most certainly deserves to stay). [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 03:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)		::Darman, I just want to point out that "relevancy", which is the word you have used for the deletion proposal of articles on extras several times now, is not the right word to use in this scenario. Characters who have only received a one-line mention or is a background civilian or mook is still relevant to ''Assassin's Creed'' by virtue of being present in ''Assassin's Creed''. The reasoning you are looking for is not "relevancy" but that the character is too inconsequential to deserve an article. I am undecided on whether we should prohibit articles on characters this minor in role, but I lean against it because we already have articles on many historical figures mentioned merely once in database entries. At a certain point, it also becomes too arbitrary to decide which character meets the criteria for inclusion or not. The real cause to delete this article would be if the character has not even been identified in any source. Can the name Raimondi be verified? (And if it can be verified, like in the credits, then it most certainly deserves to stay). [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 03:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
			:::I'll admit I was hasty and will clear the delete template. The credits for ''Lineage'' list a "Monk Raimondi" as being played by a "Stuart Fink". He is not named in ''AC2'' files, nor appears in ''AC: Renaissance''. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 06:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:09, 31 January 2022

2022-01-31T03:09:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 31 January 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	This monk is a secondary character who makes at best a few seconds cameo in ''AC: Lineage'', and all we know is that he existed and copied the letter Giovanni intercepted. We can't even pinpoint his affiliation to House of Medici just because Uberto via Antonio Maffei requested his services for one job for Lorenzo. Also, "Fray" is not part of his name, as it's one of many ways in Italian to say Friar/father/priest. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 15:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)		This monk is a secondary character who makes at best a few seconds cameo in ''AC: Lineage'', and all we know is that he existed and copied the letter Giovanni intercepted. We can't even pinpoint his affiliation to House of Medici just because Uberto via Antonio Maffei requested his services for one job for Lorenzo. Also, "Fray" is not part of his name, as it's one of many ways in Italian to say Friar/father/priest. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 15:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
	:I agree with Darman, this seems unnecessary. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 23:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)		:I agree with Darman, this seems unnecessary. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 23:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
			::Darman, I just want to point out that "relevancy", which is the word you have used for the deletion proposal of articles on extras several times now, is not the right word to use in this scenario. Characters who have only received a one-line mention or is a background civilian or mook is still relevant to ''Assassin's Creed'' by virtue of being present in ''Assassin's Creed''. The reasoning you are looking for is not "relevancy" but that the character is too inconsequential to deserve an article. I am undecided on whether we should prohibit articles on characters this minor in role, but I lean against it because we already have articles on many historical figures mentioned merely once in database entries. At a certain point, it also becomes too arbitrary to decide which character meets the criteria for inclusion or not. The real cause to delete this article would be if the character has not even been identified in any source. Can the name Raimondi be verified? (And if it can be verified, like in the credits, then it most certainly deserves to stay). [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 03:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

imported>Soranin: /* Relevancy */

2021-10-10T23:52:45Z

Relevancy

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 11 October 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==Relevancy==		==Relevancy==
	This monk is a secondary character who makes at best a few seconds cameo in ''AC: Lineage'', and all we know is that he existed and copied the letter Giovanni intercepted. We can't even pinpoint his affiliation to House of Medici just because Uberto via Antonio Maffei requested his services for one job for Lorenzo. Also, "Fray" is not part of his name, as it's one of many ways in Italian to say Friar/father/priest. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 15:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)		This monk is a secondary character who makes at best a few seconds cameo in ''AC: Lineage'', and all we know is that he existed and copied the letter Giovanni intercepted. We can't even pinpoint his affiliation to House of Medici just because Uberto via Antonio Maffei requested his services for one job for Lorenzo. Also, "Fray" is not part of his name, as it's one of many ways in Italian to say Friar/father/priest. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 15:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
			:I agree with Darman, this seems unnecessary. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 23:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

imported>Darman36: Created page with "{{Talkheader}} ==Relevancy== This monk is a secondary character who makes at best a few seconds cameo in ''AC: Lineage'', and all we know is that he existed and copied the let..."

2021-10-10T15:25:28Z

Created page with "{{Talkheader}} ==Relevancy== This monk is a secondary character who makes at best a few seconds cameo in ''AC: Lineage'', and all we know is that he existed and copied the let..."

Páàjì titun

{{Talkheader}}
==Relevancy==
This monk is a secondary character who makes at best a few seconds cameo in ''AC: Lineage'', and all we know is that he existed and copied the letter Giovanni intercepted. We can't even pinpoint his affiliation to House of Medici just because Uberto via Antonio Maffei requested his services for one job for Lorenzo. Also, "Fray" is not part of his name, as it's one of many ways in Italian to say Friar/father/priest. – [[User:Darman36|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 15:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:20, 31 January 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I agree with Darman, this seems unnecessary. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 23:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)		:I agree with Darman, this seems unnecessary. - [[User:Soranin\|Soranin]] ([[User talk:Soranin\|talk]]) 23:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
	::Darman, I just want to point out that "relevancy", which is the word you have used for the deletion proposal of articles on extras several times now, is not the right word to use in this scenario. Characters who have only received a one-line mention or is a background civilian or mook is still relevant to ''Assassin's Creed'' by virtue of being present in ''Assassin's Creed''. The reasoning you are looking for is not "relevancy" but that the character is too inconsequential to deserve an article. I am undecided on whether we should prohibit articles on characters this minor in role, but I lean against it because we already have articles on many historical figures mentioned merely once in database entries. At a certain point, it also becomes too arbitrary to decide which character meets the criteria for inclusion or not. The real cause to delete this article would be if the character has not even been identified in any source. Can the name Raimondi be verified? (And if it can be verified, like in the credits, then it most certainly deserves to stay). [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 03:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)		::Darman, I just want to point out that "relevancy", which is the word you have used for the deletion proposal of articles on extras several times now, is not the right word to use in this scenario. Characters who have only received a one-line mention or is a background civilian or mook is still relevant to ''Assassin's Creed'' by virtue of being present in ''Assassin's Creed''. The reasoning you are looking for is not "relevancy" but that the character is too inconsequential to deserve an article. I am undecided on whether we should prohibit articles on characters this minor in role, but I lean against it because we already have articles on many historical figures mentioned merely once in database entries. At a certain point, it also becomes too arbitrary to decide which character meets the criteria for inclusion or not. The real cause to delete this article would be if the character has not even been identified in any source. Can the name Raimondi be verified? (And if it can be verified, like in the credits, then it most certainly deserves to stay). [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 03:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
			:::I'll admit I was hasty and will clear the delete template. The credits for ''Lineage'' list a "Monk Raimondi" as being played by a "Stuart Fink". He is not named in ''AC2'' files, nor appears in ''AC: Renaissance''. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 06:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)