Talk:Parisian Brotherhood of Assassins - Revision history

imported>RebeccaAWB: Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T14:57:38Z

Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	==Companion App==		==Companion App==
	Those people are assassins from assassin's creed unity companion app.		Those people are assassins from assassin's creed unity companion app.

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Parisian vs. French Brotherhood */

2017-02-20T19:18:21Z

Parisian vs. French Brotherhood

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 20 February 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	''The Essential Guide'' refrains entirely from using "French Brotherhood", instead referring to this branch as "Parisian Brotherhood" at all times even while simultaneously listing the other guilds by the nationality (e.g. "Egyptian Brotherhood", "Chinese Brotherhood", "Indian Brotherhood", "British Brotherhood", "Italian Brotherhood", etc.) As such, it seems like a conscious decision to me to favor "Parisian Brotherhood" over "French Brotherhood", whatever the reason behind it may be, as it should have stood out to the authors of the book given that the context the name is given parallels all the other branch names. Someone added "French Brotherhood" just a little bit earlier, and I must confess that I thought it was just speculative, given that he also changed Japanese Assassins and Mongolian Assassins to the unconfirmed "Japanese Brotherhood" and "Mongolian Brotherhood" (which I nonetheless am fine with for the sake of consistency b/c the former names are conjectural themselves anyways). However, after a quick search, I ''have'' found one instance of "French Brotherhood" being used: over at [[Database: Thomas de Carneillon\|Thomas de Carneillon's database entry]]. Since this does confirm that French Brotherhood can be used for the guild, we might want to move this to French Brotherhood instead. It is odd for it to be named Parisian Brotherhood when it seems to cover the entire country. Nevertheless, one case of "French Brotherhood" in one database entry is not as credible as consistent usage throughout a reference book which also provides the sources for all the other branch names. So what are your thoughts? [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 09:29, February 15, 2017 (UTC)		''The Essential Guide'' refrains entirely from using "French Brotherhood", instead referring to this branch as "Parisian Brotherhood" at all times even while simultaneously listing the other guilds by the nationality (e.g. "Egyptian Brotherhood", "Chinese Brotherhood", "Indian Brotherhood", "British Brotherhood", "Italian Brotherhood", etc.) As such, it seems like a conscious decision to me to favor "Parisian Brotherhood" over "French Brotherhood", whatever the reason behind it may be, as it should have stood out to the authors of the book given that the context the name is given parallels all the other branch names. Someone added "French Brotherhood" just a little bit earlier, and I must confess that I thought it was just speculative, given that he also changed Japanese Assassins and Mongolian Assassins to the unconfirmed "Japanese Brotherhood" and "Mongolian Brotherhood" (which I nonetheless am fine with for the sake of consistency b/c the former names are conjectural themselves anyways). However, after a quick search, I ''have'' found one instance of "French Brotherhood" being used: over at [[Database: Thomas de Carneillon\|Thomas de Carneillon's database entry]]. Since this does confirm that French Brotherhood can be used for the guild, we might want to move this to French Brotherhood instead. It is odd for it to be named Parisian Brotherhood when it seems to cover the entire country. Nevertheless, one case of "French Brotherhood" in one database entry is not as credible as consistent usage throughout a reference book which also provides the sources for all the other branch names. So what are your thoughts? [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 09:29, February 15, 2017 (UTC)
	:I think it's best to stick to the most commonly used official name provided, which in this case is the "Parisian Brotherhood". A single instance is worth noting, but not quite as official as multiple references in an official guidebook. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 15:59, February 20, 2017 (UTC)		:I think it's best to stick to the most commonly used official name provided, which in this case is the "Parisian Brotherhood". A single instance is worth noting, but not quite as official as multiple references in an official guidebook. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 15:59, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
			::Exactly my thoughts. ^^ [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 19:18, February 20, 2017 (UTC)

imported>The Wikia Editor at 14:59, 20 February 2017

2017-02-20T14:59:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:59, 20 February 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:

	''The Essential Guide'' refrains entirely from using "French Brotherhood", instead referring to this branch as "Parisian Brotherhood" at all times even while simultaneously listing the other guilds by the nationality (e.g. "Egyptian Brotherhood", "Chinese Brotherhood", "Indian Brotherhood", "British Brotherhood", "Italian Brotherhood", etc.) As such, it seems like a conscious decision to me to favor "Parisian Brotherhood" over "French Brotherhood", whatever the reason behind it may be, as it should have stood out to the authors of the book given that the context the name is given parallels all the other branch names. Someone added "French Brotherhood" just a little bit earlier, and I must confess that I thought it was just speculative, given that he also changed Japanese Assassins and Mongolian Assassins to the unconfirmed "Japanese Brotherhood" and "Mongolian Brotherhood" (which I nonetheless am fine with for the sake of consistency b/c the former names are conjectural themselves anyways). However, after a quick search, I ''have'' found one instance of "French Brotherhood" being used: over at [[Database: Thomas de Carneillon\|Thomas de Carneillon's database entry]]. Since this does confirm that French Brotherhood can be used for the guild, we might want to move this to French Brotherhood instead. It is odd for it to be named Parisian Brotherhood when it seems to cover the entire country. Nevertheless, one case of "French Brotherhood" in one database entry is not as credible as consistent usage throughout a reference book which also provides the sources for all the other branch names. So what are your thoughts? [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 09:29, February 15, 2017 (UTC)		''The Essential Guide'' refrains entirely from using "French Brotherhood", instead referring to this branch as "Parisian Brotherhood" at all times even while simultaneously listing the other guilds by the nationality (e.g. "Egyptian Brotherhood", "Chinese Brotherhood", "Indian Brotherhood", "British Brotherhood", "Italian Brotherhood", etc.) As such, it seems like a conscious decision to me to favor "Parisian Brotherhood" over "French Brotherhood", whatever the reason behind it may be, as it should have stood out to the authors of the book given that the context the name is given parallels all the other branch names. Someone added "French Brotherhood" just a little bit earlier, and I must confess that I thought it was just speculative, given that he also changed Japanese Assassins and Mongolian Assassins to the unconfirmed "Japanese Brotherhood" and "Mongolian Brotherhood" (which I nonetheless am fine with for the sake of consistency b/c the former names are conjectural themselves anyways). However, after a quick search, I ''have'' found one instance of "French Brotherhood" being used: over at [[Database: Thomas de Carneillon\|Thomas de Carneillon's database entry]]. Since this does confirm that French Brotherhood can be used for the guild, we might want to move this to French Brotherhood instead. It is odd for it to be named Parisian Brotherhood when it seems to cover the entire country. Nevertheless, one case of "French Brotherhood" in one database entry is not as credible as consistent usage throughout a reference book which also provides the sources for all the other branch names. So what are your thoughts? [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 09:29, February 15, 2017 (UTC)
			:I think it's best to stick to the most commonly used official name provided, which in this case is the "Parisian Brotherhood". A single instance is worth noting, but not quite as official as multiple references in an official guidebook. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 15:59, February 20, 2017 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Parisian vs. French Brotherhood */ new section

2017-02-15T09:29:29Z

Parisian vs. French Brotherhood: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:29, 15 February 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:That's what I thought. At any rate, please sign your posts :) {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 17:07, January 24, 2015 (UTC)		:That's what I thought. At any rate, please sign your posts :) {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 17:07, January 24, 2015 (UTC)

			== Parisian vs. French Brotherhood ==

			''The Essential Guide'' refrains entirely from using "French Brotherhood", instead referring to this branch as "Parisian Brotherhood" at all times even while simultaneously listing the other guilds by the nationality (e.g. "Egyptian Brotherhood", "Chinese Brotherhood", "Indian Brotherhood", "British Brotherhood", "Italian Brotherhood", etc.) As such, it seems like a conscious decision to me to favor "Parisian Brotherhood" over "French Brotherhood", whatever the reason behind it may be, as it should have stood out to the authors of the book given that the context the name is given parallels all the other branch names. Someone added "French Brotherhood" just a little bit earlier, and I must confess that I thought it was just speculative, given that he also changed Japanese Assassins and Mongolian Assassins to the unconfirmed "Japanese Brotherhood" and "Mongolian Brotherhood" (which I nonetheless am fine with for the sake of consistency b/c the former names are conjectural themselves anyways). However, after a quick search, I ''have'' found one instance of "French Brotherhood" being used: over at [[Database: Thomas de Carneillon\|Thomas de Carneillon's database entry]]. Since this does confirm that French Brotherhood can be used for the guild, we might want to move this to French Brotherhood instead. It is odd for it to be named Parisian Brotherhood when it seems to cover the entire country. Nevertheless, one case of "French Brotherhood" in one database entry is not as credible as consistent usage throughout a reference book which also provides the sources for all the other branch names. So what are your thoughts? [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 09:29, February 15, 2017 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: Sol Pacificus moved page Talk:French Assassins to Talk:Parisian Brotherhood of Assassins: Since we've moved all Templar branches to their official names (e.g. Roman Rite), we should do the same with the Assassins for consistency. Idk why the Fr...

2017-02-14T17:20:31Z

Sol Pacificus moved page Talk:French Assassins to Talk:Parisian Brotherhood of Assassins: Since we've moved all Templar branches to their official names (e.g. Roman Rite), we should do the same with the Assassins for consistency. Idk why the Fr...

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:20, 14 February 2017
(No difference)

imported>Crookandcharlatan at 17:07, 24 January 2015

2015-01-24T17:07:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 24 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Companion App==
	Those people are assassins from assassin's creed unity companion app.		Those people are assassins from assassin's creed unity companion app.

			:That's what I thought. At any rate, please sign your posts :) {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 17:07, January 24, 2015 (UTC)

119.246.0.222 at 16:51, 24 January 2015

2015-01-24T16:51:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 24 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Those people ~~were~~ assassins from assassin's creed unity companion app.		Those people are assassins from assassin's creed unity companion app.

119.246.0.222 at 16:50, 24 January 2015

2015-01-24T16:50:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 24 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Those people ~~are~~ assassins from assassin's creed unity companion app.		Those people were assassins from assassin's creed unity companion app.

119.246.0.222: Created page with "Those people are assassins from assassin's creed unity companion app."

2015-01-24T16:40:49Z

Created page with "Those people are assassins from assassin's creed unity companion app."

Páàjì titun

Those people are assassins from assassin's creed unity companion app.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 20 February 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	''The Essential Guide'' refrains entirely from using "French Brotherhood", instead referring to this branch as "Parisian Brotherhood" at all times even while simultaneously listing the other guilds by the nationality (e.g. "Egyptian Brotherhood", "Chinese Brotherhood", "Indian Brotherhood", "British Brotherhood", "Italian Brotherhood", etc.) As such, it seems like a conscious decision to me to favor "Parisian Brotherhood" over "French Brotherhood", whatever the reason behind it may be, as it should have stood out to the authors of the book given that the context the name is given parallels all the other branch names. Someone added "French Brotherhood" just a little bit earlier, and I must confess that I thought it was just speculative, given that he also changed Japanese Assassins and Mongolian Assassins to the unconfirmed "Japanese Brotherhood" and "Mongolian Brotherhood" (which I nonetheless am fine with for the sake of consistency b/c the former names are conjectural themselves anyways). However, after a quick search, I ''have'' found one instance of "French Brotherhood" being used: over at [[Database: Thomas de Carneillon\|Thomas de Carneillon's database entry]]. Since this does confirm that French Brotherhood can be used for the guild, we might want to move this to French Brotherhood instead. It is odd for it to be named Parisian Brotherhood when it seems to cover the entire country. Nevertheless, one case of "French Brotherhood" in one database entry is not as credible as consistent usage throughout a reference book which also provides the sources for all the other branch names. So what are your thoughts? [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 09:29, February 15, 2017 (UTC)		''The Essential Guide'' refrains entirely from using "French Brotherhood", instead referring to this branch as "Parisian Brotherhood" at all times even while simultaneously listing the other guilds by the nationality (e.g. "Egyptian Brotherhood", "Chinese Brotherhood", "Indian Brotherhood", "British Brotherhood", "Italian Brotherhood", etc.) As such, it seems like a conscious decision to me to favor "Parisian Brotherhood" over "French Brotherhood", whatever the reason behind it may be, as it should have stood out to the authors of the book given that the context the name is given parallels all the other branch names. Someone added "French Brotherhood" just a little bit earlier, and I must confess that I thought it was just speculative, given that he also changed Japanese Assassins and Mongolian Assassins to the unconfirmed "Japanese Brotherhood" and "Mongolian Brotherhood" (which I nonetheless am fine with for the sake of consistency b/c the former names are conjectural themselves anyways). However, after a quick search, I ''have'' found one instance of "French Brotherhood" being used: over at [[Database: Thomas de Carneillon\|Thomas de Carneillon's database entry]]. Since this does confirm that French Brotherhood can be used for the guild, we might want to move this to French Brotherhood instead. It is odd for it to be named Parisian Brotherhood when it seems to cover the entire country. Nevertheless, one case of "French Brotherhood" in one database entry is not as credible as consistent usage throughout a reference book which also provides the sources for all the other branch names. So what are your thoughts? [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 09:29, February 15, 2017 (UTC)
	:I think it's best to stick to the most commonly used official name provided, which in this case is the "Parisian Brotherhood". A single instance is worth noting, but not quite as official as multiple references in an official guidebook. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 15:59, February 20, 2017 (UTC)		:I think it's best to stick to the most commonly used official name provided, which in this case is the "Parisian Brotherhood". A single instance is worth noting, but not quite as official as multiple references in an official guidebook. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 15:59, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
			::Exactly my thoughts. ^^ [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 19:18, February 20, 2017 (UTC)