Talk:Pantheon - Revision history

imported>RebeccaAWB: Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T14:57:20Z

Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	== Name ==		== Name ==

imported>Crookandcharlatan: /* Name */

2015-07-24T15:41:51Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:41, 24 July 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:...There's a Pantheon in London? Oh man. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 15:39, July 24, 2015 (UTC)		:...There's a Pantheon in London? Oh man. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 15:39, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

			::Not anymore, but it would've existed during Victorian London :P {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 15:41, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

imported>The Crimson Eagle: /* Name */

2015-07-24T15:39:39Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 24 July 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:

	'Aight, so, the solution is gonna be this: '''Pantheon (Rome)''' becomes regular '''Pantheon''' again, while '''Pantheon (Paris)''' becomes '''Panthéon'''. I hope everyone's alright with that - we might revisit this discussion when an article for the Pantheon in London will need to be created (yaaaay). {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 13:26, July 24, 2015 (UTC)		'Aight, so, the solution is gonna be this: '''Pantheon (Rome)''' becomes regular '''Pantheon''' again, while '''Pantheon (Paris)''' becomes '''Panthéon'''. I hope everyone's alright with that - we might revisit this discussion when an article for the Pantheon in London will need to be created (yaaaay). {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 13:26, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

			:...There's a Pantheon in London? Oh man. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 15:39, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

imported>Crookandcharlatan: /* Name */

2015-07-24T13:26:38Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:26, 24 July 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:In my opinion, no. I think we should rename this back to just "Pantheon". --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 00:13, July 24, 2015 (UTC)		:In my opinion, no. I think we should rename this back to just "Pantheon". --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 00:13, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

			'Aight, so, the solution is gonna be this: '''Pantheon (Rome)''' becomes regular '''Pantheon''' again, while '''Pantheon (Paris)''' becomes '''Panthéon'''. I hope everyone's alright with that - we might revisit this discussion when an article for the Pantheon in London will need to be created (yaaaay). {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 13:26, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

imported>Crookandcharlatan: Crookandcharlatan moved page Talk:Pantheon (Rome) to Talk:Pantheon without leaving a redirect

2015-07-24T13:23:12Z

Crookandcharlatan moved page Talk:Pantheon (Rome) to Talk:Pantheon without leaving a redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:23, 24 July 2015
(No difference)

imported>The Crimson Eagle: /* Name */

2015-07-24T00:13:22Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 24 July 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::I have no opinions either way, but ''if'' it stays like this, then the [[Pantheon]] page should become a disambiguation page. -- [[User:Zero-ELEC\|Zero-ELEC]] ([[User talk:Zero-ELEC\|talk]]) 22:56, July 23, 2015 (UTC)		::I have no opinions either way, but ''if'' it stays like this, then the [[Pantheon]] page should become a disambiguation page. -- [[User:Zero-ELEC\|Zero-ELEC]] ([[User talk:Zero-ELEC\|talk]]) 22:56, July 23, 2015 (UTC)

			:In my opinion, no. I think we should rename this back to just "Pantheon". --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 00:13, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

imported>Zero-ELEC: comment

2015-07-23T22:56:06Z

comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 24 July 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:I was honestly just mimicking what had been done for the two Governor's Mansion articles we have. If somebody else could weigh in on this, that'd be great; I'll hold off on reworking all the Pantheon links for now then. {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 22:50, July 23, 2015 (UTC)		:I was honestly just mimicking what had been done for the two Governor's Mansion articles we have. If somebody else could weigh in on this, that'd be great; I'll hold off on reworking all the Pantheon links for now then. {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 22:50, July 23, 2015 (UTC)

			::I have no opinions either way, but ''if'' it stays like this, then the [[Pantheon]] page should become a disambiguation page. -- [[User:Zero-ELEC\|Zero-ELEC]] ([[User talk:Zero-ELEC\|talk]]) 22:56, July 23, 2015 (UTC)

imported>Crookandcharlatan: /* Name */

2015-07-23T22:50:30Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:50, 24 July 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Since this is the original Pantheon, and arguably more famous than the one in Paris, does it really need the parenthesis?--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 22:49, July 23, 2015 (UTC)		Since this is the original Pantheon, and arguably more famous than the one in Paris, does it really need the parenthesis?--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 22:49, July 23, 2015 (UTC)

			:I was honestly just mimicking what had been done for the two Governor's Mansion articles we have. If somebody else could weigh in on this, that'd be great; I'll hold off on reworking all the Pantheon links for now then. {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 22:50, July 23, 2015 (UTC)

imported>Bovkaffe: /* Name */ new section

2015-07-23T22:49:05Z

Name: new section

Páàjì titun

== Name ==

Since this is the original Pantheon, and arguably more famous than the one in Paris, does it really need the parenthesis?--[[User:Bovkaffe|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe|talk]]) 22:49, July 23, 2015 (UTC)