Talk:Napoleon II - Revision history

Soranin: /* Candidate for deletion */

2026-05-19T16:18:21Z

Candidate for deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 19 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talkheader}}		{{Talkheader}}
	==Candidate for deletion==		==Candidate for deletion==
	From my experience with wiki policy, branding an article as unnecessary, if it can be sourced, is never a valid away of determining it should be deleted. The reason is because this judgment is invariably subjective and arbitrary without an established criteria. Wiki are supposed to be inclusionistic, hence why we have stub templates to mark articles which are stubs but may or may not have more information possible for them. Over at Wookieepedia, we have articles as short as [~~[w:c~~:starwars:pendle~~\|pendle]~~] and [~~[w:c~~:starwars:rumbat~~\|rumbat]~~] though I suppose you might make the case that those subjects don't have real-world equivalents. In any case, my point still stands. This sort of labeling is arbitrary. If it is in an AC source, then the same standard across all wikis should be applied, it should stand. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:34, August 3, 2017 (UTC)		From my experience with wiki policy, branding an article as unnecessary, if it can be sourced, is never a valid away of determining it should be deleted. The reason is because this judgment is invariably subjective and arbitrary without an established criteria. Wiki are supposed to be inclusionistic, hence why we have stub templates to mark articles which are stubs but may or may not have more information possible for them. Over at Wookieepedia, we have articles as short as [https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Pendle pendle] and [https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Rumbat rumbat] though I suppose you might make the case that those subjects don't have real-world equivalents. In any case, my point still stands. This sort of labeling is arbitrary. If it is in an AC source, then the same standard across all wikis should be applied, it should stand. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:34, August 3, 2017 (UTC)

	The only issue is that we need to verify if Napoleon II is ever actually mentioned in ''Unity''. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:39, August 3, 2017 (UTC)		The only issue is that we need to verify if Napoleon II is ever actually mentioned in ''Unity''. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:39, August 3, 2017 (UTC)
	:He's briefly mentioned in Napoleon's entry in the [[Historic Personage Sheets]]. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 01:05, August 4, 2017 (UTC)		:He's briefly mentioned in Napoleon's entry in the [[Historic Personage Sheets]]. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 01:05, August 4, 2017 (UTC)

imported>RebeccaAWB: Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T14:50:45Z

Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:50, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	==Candidate for deletion==		==Candidate for deletion==
	From my experience with wiki policy, branding an article as unnecessary, if it can be sourced, is never a valid away of determining it should be deleted. The reason is because this judgment is invariably subjective and arbitrary without an established criteria. Wiki are supposed to be inclusionistic, hence why we have stub templates to mark articles which are stubs but may or may not have more information possible for them. Over at Wookieepedia, we have articles as short as [[w:c:starwars:pendle\|pendle]] and [[w:c:starwars:rumbat\|rumbat]] though I suppose you might make the case that those subjects don't have real-world equivalents. In any case, my point still stands. This sort of labeling is arbitrary. If it is in an AC source, then the same standard across all wikis should be applied, it should stand. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:34, August 3, 2017 (UTC)		From my experience with wiki policy, branding an article as unnecessary, if it can be sourced, is never a valid away of determining it should be deleted. The reason is because this judgment is invariably subjective and arbitrary without an established criteria. Wiki are supposed to be inclusionistic, hence why we have stub templates to mark articles which are stubs but may or may not have more information possible for them. Over at Wookieepedia, we have articles as short as [[w:c:starwars:pendle\|pendle]] and [[w:c:starwars:rumbat\|rumbat]] though I suppose you might make the case that those subjects don't have real-world equivalents. In any case, my point still stands. This sort of labeling is arbitrary. If it is in an AC source, then the same standard across all wikis should be applied, it should stand. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:34, August 3, 2017 (UTC)

imported>The Wikia Editor at 23:05, 3 August 2017

2017-08-03T23:05:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 4 August 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:

	The only issue is that we need to verify if Napoleon II is ever actually mentioned in ''Unity''. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:39, August 3, 2017 (UTC)		The only issue is that we need to verify if Napoleon II is ever actually mentioned in ''Unity''. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:39, August 3, 2017 (UTC)
			:He's briefly mentioned in Napoleon's entry in the [[Historic Personage Sheets]]. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 01:05, August 4, 2017 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus at 21:39, 3 August 2017

2017-08-03T21:39:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 3 August 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Candidate for deletion==		==Candidate for deletion==
	From my experience with wiki policy, branding an article as unnecessary, if it can be sourced, is never a valid away of determining it should be deleted. The reason is because this judgment is invariably subjective and arbitrary without an established criteria. Wiki are supposed to be inclusionistic, hence why we have stub templates to mark articles which are stubs but may or may not have more information possible for them. Over at Wookieepedia, we have articles as short as [[w:c:starwars:pendle\|pendle]] and [[w:c:starwars:rumbat\|rumbat]] though I suppose you might make the case that those subjects don't have real-world equivalents. In any case, my point still stands. This sort of labeling is arbitrary. If it is in an AC source, then the same standard across all wikis should be applied, it should stand. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:34, August 3, 2017 (UTC)		From my experience with wiki policy, branding an article as unnecessary, if it can be sourced, is never a valid away of determining it should be deleted. The reason is because this judgment is invariably subjective and arbitrary without an established criteria. Wiki are supposed to be inclusionistic, hence why we have stub templates to mark articles which are stubs but may or may not have more information possible for them. Over at Wookieepedia, we have articles as short as [[w:c:starwars:pendle\|pendle]] and [[w:c:starwars:rumbat\|rumbat]] though I suppose you might make the case that those subjects don't have real-world equivalents. In any case, my point still stands. This sort of labeling is arbitrary. If it is in an AC source, then the same standard across all wikis should be applied, it should stand. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:34, August 3, 2017 (UTC)

			The only issue is that we need to verify if Napoleon II is ever actually mentioned in ''Unity''. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:39, August 3, 2017 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "==Candidate for deletion== From my experience with wiki policy, branding an article as unnecessary, if it can be sourced, is never a valid away of determining it should be del..."

2017-08-03T21:34:10Z

Created page with "==Candidate for deletion== From my experience with wiki policy, branding an article as unnecessary, if it can be sourced, is never a valid away of determining it should be del..."

Páàjì titun

==Candidate for deletion==
From my experience with wiki policy, branding an article as unnecessary, if it can be sourced, is never a valid away of determining it should be deleted. The reason is because this judgment is invariably subjective and arbitrary without an established criteria. Wiki are supposed to be inclusionistic, hence why we have stub templates to mark articles which are stubs but may or may not have more information possible for them. Over at Wookieepedia, we have articles as short as [[w:c:starwars:pendle|pendle]] and [[w:c:starwars:rumbat|rumbat]] though I suppose you might make the case that those subjects don't have real-world equivalents. In any case, my point still stands. This sort of labeling is arbitrary. If it is in an AC source, then the same standard across all wikis should be applied, it should stand. [[User:Sol Pacificus|'''Sol Pacificus''']][[User talk:Sol Pacificus|(Cyfiero)]] 21:34, August 3, 2017 (UTC)