Talk:Korinthian Helmet - Revision history

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Broader? */

2020-11-07T04:39:18Z

Broader?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:39, 7 November 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Sorry to interrupt but just to remind you that a broader harpe article might also be needed. [[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 23:49, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		Sorry to interrupt but just to remind you that a broader harpe article might also be needed. [[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 23:49, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

	Bump on making another article cause I accidentally just linked to this		Bump on making another article cause I accidentally just linked to this. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 04:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Broader? */

2020-11-07T04:39:05Z

Broader?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:39, 7 November 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::::::Edit: on that note should we add a conjectural [[Parrying dagger]] for Shay's off-hand weapons? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 23:07, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:::::::Edit: on that note should we add a conjectural [[Parrying dagger]] for Shay's off-hand weapons? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 23:07, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	Sorry to interrupt but just to remind you that a broader harpe article might also be needed. [[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 23:49, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		Sorry to interrupt but just to remind you that a broader harpe article might also be needed. [[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 23:49, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

			Bump on making another article cause I accidentally just linked to this

imported>Nanomat: /* Broader? */

2020-05-26T23:49:18Z

Broader?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 27 May 2020
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::::::For the Katana and Wakizashi though shouldn’t they be treated as a singular unit, a Daisho, even if that term doesn’t necessarily get used. Also if it matters the other weapons in Rogue are just referred to in the singular not pluralized iirc. But glad to have cleared up the issue surrounding general and specific gear pages. 23:03, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:::::::For the Katana and Wakizashi though shouldn’t they be treated as a singular unit, a Daisho, even if that term doesn’t necessarily get used. Also if it matters the other weapons in Rogue are just referred to in the singular not pluralized iirc. But glad to have cleared up the issue surrounding general and specific gear pages. 23:03, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	:::::::Edit: on that note should we add a conjectural [[Parrying dagger]] for Shay's off-hand weapons? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 23:07, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:::::::Edit: on that note should we add a conjectural [[Parrying dagger]] for Shay's off-hand weapons? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 23:07, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
			Sorry to interrupt but just to remind you that a broader harpe article might also be needed. [[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 23:49, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Broader? */

2020-05-26T23:07:21Z

Broader?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 27 May 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::::For the [[Katana and Wakizashi]] though, I had actually wondered before if ''Rogue''{{'}}s weapons should be written about as pairs of weapons since the katana and wakizashi, from an in-universe standpoint, are two weapons, not one. One of the reasons why this question came up for me is because it looks like in a lot of cases, the off-hand weapon is just a parrying dagger even if the name of the main-hand weapon is pluralized. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:40, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::::::For the [[Katana and Wakizashi]] though, I had actually wondered before if ''Rogue''{{'}}s weapons should be written about as pairs of weapons since the katana and wakizashi, from an in-universe standpoint, are two weapons, not one. One of the reasons why this question came up for me is because it looks like in a lot of cases, the off-hand weapon is just a parrying dagger even if the name of the main-hand weapon is pluralized. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:40, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	:::::::For the Katana and Wakizashi though shouldn’t they be treated as a singular unit, a Daisho, even if that term doesn’t necessarily get used. Also if it matters the other weapons in Rogue are just referred to in the singular not pluralized iirc. But glad to have cleared up the issue surrounding general and specific gear pages. 23:03, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:::::::For the Katana and Wakizashi though shouldn’t they be treated as a singular unit, a Daisho, even if that term doesn’t necessarily get used. Also if it matters the other weapons in Rogue are just referred to in the singular not pluralized iirc. But glad to have cleared up the issue surrounding general and specific gear pages. 23:03, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
			:::::::Edit: on that note should we add a conjectural [[Parrying dagger]] for Shay's off-hand weapons? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 23:07, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Broader? */

2020-05-26T23:03:12Z

Broader?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 27 May 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::::::Yes, we should also have a pages on [[Katana (Unity)]] and the katana from ''Rogue'' as well. It makes perfect sense though if it was the katana article that threw you off. You see, back in the day, I was undecided if we needed to have separate pages on specific iterations of a weapon type if there were only 2 or even just 1 specific iteration of the weapon. So in that rare situation, I didn't take the initiative to create pages on the specific iterations.		::::::Yes, we should also have a pages on [[Katana (Unity)]] and the katana from ''Rogue'' as well. It makes perfect sense though if it was the katana article that threw you off. You see, back in the day, I was undecided if we needed to have separate pages on specific iterations of a weapon type if there were only 2 or even just 1 specific iteration of the weapon. So in that rare situation, I didn't take the initiative to create pages on the specific iterations.
	::::::For the [[Katana and Wakizashi]] though, I had actually wondered before if ''Rogue''{{'}}s weapons should be written about as pairs of weapons since the katana and wakizashi, from an in-universe standpoint, are two weapons, not one. One of the reasons why this question came up for me is because it looks like in a lot of cases, the off-hand weapon is just a parrying dagger even if the name of the main-hand weapon is pluralized. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:40, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::::::For the [[Katana and Wakizashi]] though, I had actually wondered before if ''Rogue''{{'}}s weapons should be written about as pairs of weapons since the katana and wakizashi, from an in-universe standpoint, are two weapons, not one. One of the reasons why this question came up for me is because it looks like in a lot of cases, the off-hand weapon is just a parrying dagger even if the name of the main-hand weapon is pluralized. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:40, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
			:::::::For the Katana and Wakizashi though shouldn’t they be treated as a singular unit, a Daisho, even if that term doesn’t necessarily get used. Also if it matters the other weapons in Rogue are just referred to in the singular not pluralized iirc. But glad to have cleared up the issue surrounding general and specific gear pages. 23:03, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Broader? */

2020-05-26T22:40:05Z

Broader?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:40, 27 May 2020
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, and it doesn't seem like you've gotten the hang of our method of organizing weapon pages yet, but rest assured, our policy already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, and it doesn't seem like you've gotten the hang of our method of organizing weapon pages yet, but rest assured, our policy already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	:::::Okay then yeah I completely misunderstood because from Soranin's post it sounded like weapons of the same type were going to lose their specific pages to be merged into an overarching article. So to be clear, while we have the [[Katana]] page to cover the weapon type we should also be creating [[Katana (Unity)]] and [[Katana and Wakizashi]] pages to cover those specific iterations of the weapon type? Or am I still misunderstanding this? If we should only be talking about this specific item on this page and not variations of the model then my edit to mention the helmets used in Egypt should probably be reserved for the general article. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 16:17, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:::::Okay then yeah I completely misunderstood because from Soranin's post it sounded like weapons of the same type were going to lose their specific pages to be merged into an overarching article. So to be clear, while we have the [[Katana]] page to cover the weapon type we should also be creating [[Katana (Unity)]] and [[Katana and Wakizashi]] pages to cover those specific iterations of the weapon type? Or am I still misunderstanding this? If we should only be talking about this specific item on this page and not variations of the model then my edit to mention the helmets used in Egypt should probably be reserved for the general article. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 16:17, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
			::::::Yes, we should also have a pages on [[Katana (Unity)]] and the katana from ''Rogue'' as well. It makes perfect sense though if it was the katana article that threw you off. You see, back in the day, I was undecided if we needed to have separate pages on specific iterations of a weapon type if there were only 2 or even just 1 specific iteration of the weapon. So in that rare situation, I didn't take the initiative to create pages on the specific iterations.
			::::::For the [[Katana and Wakizashi]] though, I had actually wondered before if ''Rogue''{{'}}s weapons should be written about as pairs of weapons since the katana and wakizashi, from an in-universe standpoint, are two weapons, not one. One of the reasons why this question came up for me is because it looks like in a lot of cases, the off-hand weapon is just a parrying dagger even if the name of the main-hand weapon is pluralized. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:40, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Broader? */

2020-05-26T16:17:55Z

Broader?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 26 May 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, and it doesn't seem like you've gotten the hang of our method of organizing weapon pages yet, but rest assured, our policy already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, and it doesn't seem like you've gotten the hang of our method of organizing weapon pages yet, but rest assured, our policy already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
			:::::Okay then yeah I completely misunderstood because from Soranin's post it sounded like weapons of the same type were going to lose their specific pages to be merged into an overarching article. So to be clear, while we have the [[Katana]] page to cover the weapon type we should also be creating [[Katana (Unity)]] and [[Katana and Wakizashi]] pages to cover those specific iterations of the weapon type? Or am I still misunderstanding this? If we should only be talking about this specific item on this page and not variations of the model then my edit to mention the helmets used in Egypt should probably be reserved for the general article. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 16:17, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Broader? */

2020-05-26T15:34:00Z

Broader?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:34, 26 May 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, but our policy ~~on weapon pages~~ already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, and it doesn't seem like you've gotten the hang of our method of organizing weapon pages yet, but rest assured, our policy already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Broader? */

2020-05-26T15:31:54Z

Broader?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 26 May 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
			::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, but our policy on weapon pages already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Broader? */

2020-05-26T14:57:10Z

Broader?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 26 May 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Although maybe an article titled '''Korinthian-style helmet''' would be better to address the many iterations of the type. That wouldn’t be consistent with weapon pages though. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 11:45, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:Although maybe an article titled '''Korinthian-style helmet''' would be better to address the many iterations of the type. That wouldn’t be consistent with weapon pages though. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 11:45, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
			:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 26 May 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, and it doesn't seem like you've gotten the hang of our method of organizing weapon pages yet, but rest assured, our policy already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, and it doesn't seem like you've gotten the hang of our method of organizing weapon pages yet, but rest assured, our policy already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
			:::::Okay then yeah I completely misunderstood because from Soranin's post it sounded like weapons of the same type were going to lose their specific pages to be merged into an overarching article. So to be clear, while we have the [[Katana]] page to cover the weapon type we should also be creating [[Katana (Unity)]] and [[Katana and Wakizashi]] pages to cover those specific iterations of the weapon type? Or am I still misunderstanding this? If we should only be talking about this specific item on this page and not variations of the model then my edit to mention the helmets used in Egypt should probably be reserved for the general article. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 16:17, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:34, 26 May 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, but our policy ~~on weapon pages~~ already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, and it doesn't seem like you've gotten the hang of our method of organizing weapon pages yet, but rest assured, our policy already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 26 May 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
			::::No, this specific Korinthian Helmet gets its own page, and there will be another page for Korinthian helmets in general. I know it's confusing, but our policy on weapon pages already accounts for the precise problem you've just raised. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 15:31, May 26, 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 26 May 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Although maybe an article titled '''Korinthian-style helmet''' would be better to address the many iterations of the type. That wouldn’t be consistent with weapon pages though. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 11:45, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		:Although maybe an article titled '''Korinthian-style helmet''' would be better to address the many iterations of the type. That wouldn’t be consistent with weapon pages though. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 11:45, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
	::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)		::Yes for your first question, no for your second question. Just call it {{wiki\|Corinthian helmet\|Korinthian helmet}}. If it's an actual term for the helmet style, there's no reason to convolute it. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 13:32, May 26, 2020 (UTC)
			:::It seems weird to me that a gear piece like [[Crescent Helmet]] will get its own page and also be mentioned here while the specific gear piece Korinthian Helmet won’t get it own page but have to share with the aforementioned helmet and others. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 14:57, May 26, 2020 (UTC)