Talk:Inner Sanctum of the Templar Order - Revision history

imported>Vetinari: /* Removal of vacant slots */

2024-10-11T11:35:35Z

Removal of vacant slots

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 11 October 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Could put it as unknown I suppose but I feel that's prioritizing lack of OOU info over in-universe fact and that's the wrong way around for wiki's MO. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)		:Could put it as unknown I suppose but I feel that's prioritizing lack of OOU info over in-universe fact and that's the wrong way around for wiki's MO. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
	::Unless you can provide an explicit source that they are vacant they shouldn’t be on the page. Inductive reasoning using Hathaway as a starting point is speculative. We don’t need the Animus Hub or whatever to tell us they have been filled; we need something telling us they are vacant. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 11:12, 11 October 2024 (UTC)		::Unless you can provide an explicit source that they are vacant they shouldn’t be on the page. Inductive reasoning using Hathaway as a starting point is speculative. We don’t need the Animus Hub or whatever to tell us they have been filled; we need something telling us they are vacant. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 11:12, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
			:::They're vacant by virtue of those characters being removed; we need something telling us they've been filled. Sure, they've probably been filled by now (Stearns hanging on forever it seems) but how is ''that'' not speculation? We know their process has shown an interim period. The facts are that there's been a gap since those characters died until more info is provided. Wiki-wise I think we're better off with a visual 7 out of 9 display than it looking like we or Ubisoft don't know how to count. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 11:35, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Removal of vacant slots */

2024-10-11T11:12:20Z

Removal of vacant slots

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 11 October 2024
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Accidentally hit edit while typing description, apologies. I would argue it's for Animus Hub or whatever to tell us the positions have been filled and leave the slots visible and empty; Gramatica was doing Ardent's duties for about a year till Hathaway was selected so we know the Nine have functioned with fewer personnel before. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)		Accidentally hit edit while typing description, apologies. I would argue it's for Animus Hub or whatever to tell us the positions have been filled and leave the slots visible and empty; Gramatica was doing Ardent's duties for about a year till Hathaway was selected so we know the Nine have functioned with fewer personnel before. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
	:Could put it as unknown I suppose but I feel that's prioritizing lack of OOU info over in-universe fact and that's the wrong way around for wiki's MO. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)		:Could put it as unknown I suppose but I feel that's prioritizing lack of OOU info over in-universe fact and that's the wrong way around for wiki's MO. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
			::Unless you can provide an explicit source that they are vacant they shouldn’t be on the page. Inductive reasoning using Hathaway as a starting point is speculative. We don’t need the Animus Hub or whatever to tell us they have been filled; we need something telling us they are vacant. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 11:12, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

imported>Vetinari: /* Removal of vacant slots */

2024-10-11T10:08:06Z

Removal of vacant slots

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 11 October 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Removal of vacant slots==		==Removal of vacant slots==
	Accidentally hit edit while typing description, apologies. I would argue it's for Animus Hub or whatever to tell us the positions have been filled and leave the slots visible and empty; Gramatica was doing Ardent's duties for about a year till Hathaway was selected so we know the Nine have functioned with fewer personnel before. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)		Accidentally hit edit while typing description, apologies. I would argue it's for Animus Hub or whatever to tell us the positions have been filled and leave the slots visible and empty; Gramatica was doing Ardent's duties for about a year till Hathaway was selected so we know the Nine have functioned with fewer personnel before. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
			:Could put it as unknown I suppose but I feel that's prioritizing lack of OOU info over in-universe fact and that's the wrong way around for wiki's MO. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

imported>Vetinari at 10:04, 11 October 2024

2024-10-11T10:04:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 11 October 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Berg membership==		==Berg membership==
	As Berg was captured by the Assassins, can we categorize him as a former member or label him as MIA?[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 12:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)		As Berg was captured by the Assassins, can we categorize him as a former member or label him as MIA?[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 12:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

			==Removal of vacant slots==
			Accidentally hit edit while typing description, apologies. I would argue it's for Animus Hub or whatever to tell us the positions have been filled and leave the slots visible and empty; Gramatica was doing Ardent's duties for about a year till Hathaway was selected so we know the Nine have functioned with fewer personnel before. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

imported>Francesco75: /* Berg membership */

2021-08-15T12:35:20Z

Berg membership

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:35, 15 August 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Berg membership==		==Berg membership==
	As Berg was ~~capture~~ by the Assassins, can we categorize him as a former member or ~~labelle~~ him as MIA?[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 12:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)		As Berg was captured by the Assassins, can we categorize him as a former member or label him as MIA?[[User:Francesco75\|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75\|talk]]) 12:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

imported>Francesco75: Created page with "==Berg membership== As Berg was capture by the Assassins, can we categorize him as a former member or labelle him as MIA?~~~~"

2021-08-15T12:34:54Z

Created page with "==Berg membership== As Berg was capture by the Assassins, can we categorize him as a former member or labelle him as MIA?~~~~"

Páàjì titun

==Berg membership==
As Berg was capture by the Assassins, can we categorize him as a former member or labelle him as MIA?[[User:Francesco75|Francesco75]] ([[User talk:Francesco75|talk]]) 12:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 11 October 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Could put it as unknown I suppose but I feel that's prioritizing lack of OOU info over in-universe fact and that's the wrong way around for wiki's MO. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)		:Could put it as unknown I suppose but I feel that's prioritizing lack of OOU info over in-universe fact and that's the wrong way around for wiki's MO. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
	::Unless you can provide an explicit source that they are vacant they shouldn’t be on the page. Inductive reasoning using Hathaway as a starting point is speculative. We don’t need the Animus Hub or whatever to tell us they have been filled; we need something telling us they are vacant. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 11:12, 11 October 2024 (UTC)		::Unless you can provide an explicit source that they are vacant they shouldn’t be on the page. Inductive reasoning using Hathaway as a starting point is speculative. We don’t need the Animus Hub or whatever to tell us they have been filled; we need something telling us they are vacant. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 11:12, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
			:::They're vacant by virtue of those characters being removed; we need something telling us they've been filled. Sure, they've probably been filled by now (Stearns hanging on forever it seems) but how is ''that'' not speculation? We know their process has shown an interim period. The facts are that there's been a gap since those characters died until more info is provided. Wiki-wise I think we're better off with a visual 7 out of 9 display than it looking like we or Ubisoft don't know how to count. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 11:35, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 11 October 2024
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Accidentally hit edit while typing description, apologies. I would argue it's for Animus Hub or whatever to tell us the positions have been filled and leave the slots visible and empty; Gramatica was doing Ardent's duties for about a year till Hathaway was selected so we know the Nine have functioned with fewer personnel before. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)		Accidentally hit edit while typing description, apologies. I would argue it's for Animus Hub or whatever to tell us the positions have been filled and leave the slots visible and empty; Gramatica was doing Ardent's duties for about a year till Hathaway was selected so we know the Nine have functioned with fewer personnel before. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
	:Could put it as unknown I suppose but I feel that's prioritizing lack of OOU info over in-universe fact and that's the wrong way around for wiki's MO. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)		:Could put it as unknown I suppose but I feel that's prioritizing lack of OOU info over in-universe fact and that's the wrong way around for wiki's MO. [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 10:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
			::Unless you can provide an explicit source that they are vacant they shouldn’t be on the page. Inductive reasoning using Hathaway as a starting point is speculative. We don’t need the Animus Hub or whatever to tell us they have been filled; we need something telling us they are vacant. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 11:12, 11 October 2024 (UTC)