Talk:Hunt for the Nine - Revision history

imported>Soranin: /* The Endgame */

2021-04-19T02:06:59Z

The Endgame

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:06, 19 April 2021
Line 17:		Line 17:
	== The Endgame ==		== The Endgame ==

	Does the Endgame need it's own section? I mean, it isn't part of the Hunt for the Nine, so why is it in the article? Should I delete it or what? Thanks,<br />[[User:DJFair\|<span style="color:red">Daniel James</span>]] <sup>([[User_talk:DJFair\|Drop me a line]] -\|- [[Special:Contributions/DJFair\|See my recent work]] -\|- [[~~User_blog~~:DJFair\|Read my Blog]])</sup> 17:25, June 8, 2010 (UTC)		Does the Endgame need it's own section? I mean, it isn't part of the Hunt for the Nine, so why is it in the article? Should I delete it or what? Thanks,<br />[[User:DJFair\|<span style="color:red">Daniel James</span>]] <sup>([[User_talk:DJFair\|Drop me a line]] -\|- [[Special:Contributions/DJFair\|See my recent work]] -\|- [[User:DJFair\|Read my Blog]])</sup> 17:25, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
	:Quoting myself two lines above your post: "the retaking of Masyaf is an epilogue.". It is there to give a sense of closing to this article and should not have more than 10% of the actual [[Retaking of Masyaf]] article. ;D -- [[User:D. Cello\|D. Cello]] 17:29, June 8, 2010 (UTC)		:Quoting myself two lines above your post: "the retaking of Masyaf is an epilogue.". It is there to give a sense of closing to this article and should not have more than 10% of the actual [[Retaking of Masyaf]] article. ;D -- [[User:D. Cello\|D. Cello]] 17:29, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
	:Okay. Thanks. I've added a kind of round-off thingy to it. Hope it's alright, <br />[[User:DJFair\|<span style="color:red">Daniel James</span>]] <sup>([[User_talk:DJFair\|Drop me a line]] -\|- [[Special:Contributions/DJFair\|See my recent work]] -\|- [[~~User_blog~~:DJFair\|Read my Blog]])</sup> 18:17, June 8, 2010 (UTC)		:Okay. Thanks. I've added a kind of round-off thingy to it. Hope it's alright, <br />[[User:DJFair\|<span style="color:red">Daniel James</span>]] <sup>([[User_talk:DJFair\|Drop me a line]] -\|- [[Special:Contributions/DJFair\|See my recent work]] -\|- [[User:DJFair\|Read my Blog]])</sup> 18:17, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

	== Is this page done? ==		== Is this page done? ==

imported>RebeccaAWB: /* top */Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T14:26:50Z

top: Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	Does Majd Addin's funeral not get its own page? its on the project page as its own article but just links to hunt for the nine. [[User:CarloGrimaldi\|CarloGrimaldi]] 06:14, June 3, 2010 (UTC)		Does Majd Addin's funeral not get its own page? its on the project page as its own article but just links to hunt for the nine. [[User:CarloGrimaldi\|CarloGrimaldi]] 06:14, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

imported>War Clown: /* A Target a Section? */

2011-04-07T02:55:17Z

A Target a Section?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:55, 7 April 2011
Line 42:		Line 42:

	What do you think? --[[User:ThiefAC\|'''<span style="font-family:Agency"><font color="#000080"><big>T</big></font><font color="#0b0076">H</font><font color="#15006c">I</font><font color="#200062">E</font><font color="#2b0059">F</font></span>''']] 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)		What do you think? --[[User:ThiefAC\|'''<span style="font-family:Agency"><font color="#000080"><big>T</big></font><font color="#0b0076">H</font><font color="#15006c">I</font><font color="#200062">E</font><font color="#2b0059">F</font></span>''']] 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

			:It looks fine. o_O --[[User:War Clown\|<span style="font-family:Californian FB;font-size:20px;color:#CCCCCC;">'''Juan Blanco'''</span>]][[User talk:War Clown\|<sup><font color="black">'''Reception Area'''</font></sup>]] 02:55, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

imported>ThiefAC: /* A Target a Section? */

2011-04-06T22:17:56Z

A Target a Section?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 7 April 2011
Line 39:		Line 39:
	== A Target a Section? ==		== A Target a Section? ==

	Okay people, this article has come to the point where it is littered in images (which in this case is a pretty good thing), however some parts look like it may be blending with/cutting in to the next target's part. It looks quite messy, so what I propose, is that the spacing between targets increases. (Use a HEADER 2 SECTION, instead of HEADER 3 PART, or space out the HEADER 3 PARTS more).		Okay people, this article has come to the point where it is littered in images (which in this case is a pretty good thing), however some parts look like it may be blending with/cutting in to the next target's part, sometimes the header isn't even noticed due to not standing out enough. It looks quite messy, so what I propose, is that the spacing between targets increases. (Use a HEADER 2 SECTION, instead of HEADER 3 PART, or space out the HEADER 3 PARTS more).

	What do you think? --[[User:ThiefAC\|'''<span style="font-family:Agency"><font color="#000080"><big>T</big></font><font color="#0b0076">H</font><font color="#15006c">I</font><font color="#200062">E</font><font color="#2b0059">F</font></span>''']] 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)		What do you think? --[[User:ThiefAC\|'''<span style="font-family:Agency"><font color="#000080"><big>T</big></font><font color="#0b0076">H</font><font color="#15006c">I</font><font color="#200062">E</font><font color="#2b0059">F</font></span>''']] 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

imported>ThiefAC: Wow, i'm tired.

2011-04-06T22:17:21Z

Wow, i'm tired.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 7 April 2011
Line 39:		Line 39:
	== A Target a Section? ==		== A Target a Section? ==

	Okay people, this article has come to the point where it is littered in images (which in this case is a pretty good thing), some parts look like it may be blending with/cutting in to the next target's part. It looks quite messy, so what I propose, is that the spacing between targets increases. (Use a HEADER 2 SECTION, instead of HEADER 3 PART, or space out the HEADER 3 PARTS more).		Okay people, this article has come to the point where it is littered in images (which in this case is a pretty good thing), however some parts look like it may be blending with/cutting in to the next target's part. It looks quite messy, so what I propose, is that the spacing between targets increases. (Use a HEADER 2 SECTION, instead of HEADER 3 PART, or space out the HEADER 3 PARTS more).

	What do you think? --[[User:ThiefAC\|'''<span style="font-family:Agency"><font color="#000080"><big>T</big></font><font color="#0b0076">H</font><font color="#15006c">I</font><font color="#200062">E</font><font color="#2b0059">F</font></span>''']] 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)		What do you think? --[[User:ThiefAC\|'''<span style="font-family:Agency"><font color="#000080"><big>T</big></font><font color="#0b0076">H</font><font color="#15006c">I</font><font color="#200062">E</font><font color="#2b0059">F</font></span>''']] 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

imported>ThiefAC: /* A Target a Section? */

2011-04-06T22:16:57Z

A Target a Section?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:16, 7 April 2011
Line 39:		Line 39:
	== A Target a Section? ==		== A Target a Section? ==

	Okay people, this article has come to the point where it is littered in images (which in this case is a pretty good thing), some ~~sections, such as Garnier,~~ look like it may be blending with the next target's part. It looks quite messy, so what I propose, is that the spacing between targets increases. (Use a HEADER 2, instead of HEADER 3, or space out the HEADER 3s more).		Okay people, this article has come to the point where it is littered in images (which in this case is a pretty good thing), some parts look like it may be blending with/cutting in to the next target's part. It looks quite messy, so what I propose, is that the spacing between targets increases. (Use a HEADER 2 SECTION, instead of HEADER 3 PART, or space out the HEADER 3 PARTS more).

	What do you think? --[[User:ThiefAC\|'''<span style="font-family:Agency"><font color="#000080"><big>T</big></font><font color="#0b0076">H</font><font color="#15006c">I</font><font color="#200062">E</font><font color="#2b0059">F</font></span>''']] 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)		What do you think? --[[User:ThiefAC\|'''<span style="font-family:Agency"><font color="#000080"><big>T</big></font><font color="#0b0076">H</font><font color="#15006c">I</font><font color="#200062">E</font><font color="#2b0059">F</font></span>''']] 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

imported>ThiefAC: /* A Target a Section? */

2011-04-06T22:15:28Z

A Target a Section?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 7 April 2011
Line 39:		Line 39:
	== A Target a Section? ==		== A Target a Section? ==

	Okay people, this article has come to the point where it is littered in images, some sections, such as Garnier, look like it may be blending with the next target's part. It looks quite messy, so what I propose, is that the spacing between targets increases. (Use a HEADER 2, instead of HEADER 3, or space out the HEADER 3s more).		Okay people, this article has come to the point where it is littered in images (which in this case is a pretty good thing), some sections, such as Garnier, look like it may be blending with the next target's part. It looks quite messy, so what I propose, is that the spacing between targets increases. (Use a HEADER 2, instead of HEADER 3, or space out the HEADER 3s more).

	What do you think? --[[User:ThiefAC\|'''<span style="font-family:Agency"~~><font color="#000080"></font~~><font color="#000080"><big>T</big></font><font color="#0b0076">H</font><font color="#15006c">I</font><font color="#200062">E</font><font color="#2b0059">F</font></span>''']] 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)		What do you think? --[[User:ThiefAC\|'''<span style="font-family:Agency"><font color="#000080"><big>T</big></font><font color="#0b0076">H</font><font color="#15006c">I</font><font color="#200062">E</font><font color="#2b0059">F</font></span>''']] 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

imported>ThiefAC: /* A Target a Section? */ new section

2011-04-06T22:15:01Z

A Target a Section?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 7 April 2011
Line 36:		Line 36:
	I just thought it would make the articles less messy if all the main pictures were the same size. Doesn't mean the rest of the pictures in the article have to be of the same size... Just the main ones. -- [[user:Altaïr\|Altaïr]] 19:24, July 30, 2010 (UTC)		I just thought it would make the articles less messy if all the main pictures were the same size. Doesn't mean the rest of the pictures in the article have to be of the same size... Just the main ones. -- [[user:Altaïr\|Altaïr]] 19:24, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
	:There's no need to discuss it, then. Just find a good size that fits the main ones here and change them ;D -- [[User:D. Cello\|D. Cello]] 17:28, July 30, 2010 (UTC)		:There's no need to discuss it, then. Just find a good size that fits the main ones here and change them ;D -- [[User:D. Cello\|D. Cello]] 17:28, July 30, 2010 (UTC)

			== A Target a Section? ==

			Okay people, this article has come to the point where it is littered in images, some sections, such as Garnier, look like it may be blending with the next target's part. It looks quite messy, so what I propose, is that the spacing between targets increases. (Use a HEADER 2, instead of HEADER 3, or space out the HEADER 3s more).

			What do you think? --[[User:ThiefAC\|'''<span style="font-family:Agency"><font color="#000080"></font><font color="#000080"><big>T</big></font><font color="#0b0076">H</font><font color="#15006c">I</font><font color="#200062">E</font><font color="#2b0059">F</font></span>''']] 22:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

imported>War Clown: moved Talk:Hunt for the nine to Talk:Hunt for the Nine over redirect: It's been said before. Nine's context is substantive, not numeral

2010-08-04T14:48:15Z

moved Talk:Hunt for the nine to Talk:Hunt for the Nine over redirect: It's been said before. Nine's context is substantive, not numeral

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:48, 4 August 2010
(No difference)

imported>Master Sima Yi: moved Talk:Hunt for the Nine to Talk:Hunt for the nine over redirect

2010-08-04T14:36:59Z

moved Talk:Hunt for the Nine to Talk:Hunt for the nine over redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:36, 4 August 2010
(No difference)