Talk:Greek mythology - Revision history

Soranin: Text replacement - "siniath" to "siniath"

2026-05-10T18:00:16Z

Text replacement - "siniath" to "siniath"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 10 May 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==Validity==		==Validity==
	Do we really want/need to keep pages like this and the [[Egyptian mythology]]?		Do we really want/need to keep pages like this and the [[Egyptian mythology]]?
	I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'' amount of work. Which, of course, when the mood strikes is nice and good. I, for one, could put in the work, make this more than just merge-suggestion-worthy, but would it be worth it?[[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[~~w:c:assassinscreed:~~User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 11:16, January 16, 2019 (UTC)		I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'' amount of work. Which, of course, when the mood strikes is nice and good. I, for one, could put in the work, make this more than just merge-suggestion-worthy, but would it be worth it?[[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 11:16, January 16, 2019 (UTC)
	:I've previously made my position on the matter clear; I don't believe we need either mythology article (that's what Wikipedia is for). That being said, the majority believe the articles are warranted. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 11:40, January 16, 2019 (UTC)		:I've previously made my position on the matter clear; I don't believe we need either mythology article (that's what Wikipedia is for). That being said, the majority believe the articles are warranted. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 11:40, January 16, 2019 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Paragraphs */ new section

2020-05-22T17:13:06Z

Paragraphs: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 22 May 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:
	I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'' amount of work. Which, of course, when the mood strikes is nice and good. I, for one, could put in the work, make this more than just merge-suggestion-worthy, but would it be worth it?[[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 11:16, January 16, 2019 (UTC)		I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'' amount of work. Which, of course, when the mood strikes is nice and good. I, for one, could put in the work, make this more than just merge-suggestion-worthy, but would it be worth it?[[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 11:16, January 16, 2019 (UTC)
	:I've previously made my position on the matter clear; I don't believe we need either mythology article (that's what Wikipedia is for). That being said, the majority believe the articles are warranted. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 11:40, January 16, 2019 (UTC)		:I've previously made my position on the matter clear; I don't believe we need either mythology article (that's what Wikipedia is for). That being said, the majority believe the articles are warranted. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 11:40, January 16, 2019 (UTC)

			== Paragraphs ==

			This article has too many instances of one or two line statements littered across its body. I find that this is a recurring problem. Text in an article needs to be organized as paragraphs, and paragraphs are normally 5 to 8 sentences long. Depending on organizational need, it can be occasionally acceptable for a paragraph to be 1 to 2 sentences long only, like if they really can't fit into a well-organized paragraph, but when we are faced with a situation where there are 5 sentences which all seem unrelated to one another, we have to organize them into a paragraph in one way or another. We can't have single sentences scattered about because then it becomes a list of information, not article writing. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:13, May 22, 2020 (UTC)

imported>RebeccaAWB: Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T14:20:45Z

Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	==Validity==		==Validity==
	Do we really want/need to keep pages like this and the [[Egyptian mythology]]?		Do we really want/need to keep pages like this and the [[Egyptian mythology]]?
	I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'' amount of work. Which, of course, when the mood strikes is nice and good. I, for one, could put in the work, make this more than just merge-suggestion-worthy, but would it be worth it?[[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 11:16, January 16, 2019 (UTC)		I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'' amount of work. Which, of course, when the mood strikes is nice and good. I, for one, could put in the work, make this more than just merge-suggestion-worthy, but would it be worth it?[[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 11:16, January 16, 2019 (UTC)
	:I've previously made my position on the matter clear; I don't believe we need either mythology article (that's what Wikipedia is for). That being said, the majority believe the articles are warranted. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 11:40, January 16, 2019 (UTC)		:I've previously made my position on the matter clear; I don't believe we need either mythology article (that's what Wikipedia is for). That being said, the majority believe the articles are warranted. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 11:40, January 16, 2019 (UTC)

imported>Jasca Ducato at 11:40, 16 January 2019

2019-01-16T11:40:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, 16 January 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Do we really want/need to keep pages like this and the [[Egyptian mythology]]?		Do we really want/need to keep pages like this and the [[Egyptian mythology]]?
	I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'' amount of work. Which, of course, when the mood strikes is nice and good. I, for one, could put in the work, make this more than just merge-suggestion-worthy, but would it be worth it?[[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 11:16, January 16, 2019 (UTC)		I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'' amount of work. Which, of course, when the mood strikes is nice and good. I, for one, could put in the work, make this more than just merge-suggestion-worthy, but would it be worth it?[[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 11:16, January 16, 2019 (UTC)
			:I've previously made my position on the matter clear; I don't believe we need either mythology article (that's what Wikipedia is for). That being said, the majority believe the articles are warranted. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 11:40, January 16, 2019 (UTC)

imported>Sadelyrate: /* Validity */

2019-01-16T11:16:54Z

Validity

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:16, 16 January 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Validity==		==Validity==
	Do we really want/need to keep pages like this and the [[Egyptian mythology]]?		Do we really want/need to keep pages like this and the [[Egyptian mythology]]?
	I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'' amount of work. Which, of course, when the mood strikes is nice and good.[[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 11:16, January 16, 2019 (UTC)		I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'' amount of work. Which, of course, when the mood strikes is nice and good. I, for one, could put in the work, make this more than just merge-suggestion-worthy, but would it be worth it?[[User:Sadelyrate\|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate\|siniath]]) 11:16, January 16, 2019 (UTC)

imported>Sadelyrate: Created page with "==Validity== Do we really want/need to keep pages like this and the Egyptian mythology? I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'..."

2019-01-16T11:16:00Z

Created page with "==Validity== Do we really want/need to keep pages like this and the Egyptian mythology? I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'..."

Páàjì titun

==Validity==
Do we really want/need to keep pages like this and the [[Egyptian mythology]]?
I agree that they certainly might be useful, and handy, but they're also ''massive'' amount of work. Which, of course, when the mood strikes is nice and good.[[User:Sadelyrate|Sadelyrate]] ([[w:c:assassinscreed:User talk:Sadelyrate|siniath]]) 11:16, January 16, 2019 (UTC)