Talk:George W. Bush - Revision history

imported>RebeccaAWB: Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T14:18:08Z

Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	==????==		==????==
	Where is this information coming from? [[User:Conor Shepard\|Conor Shepard]] 19:20, February 20, 2011 (UTC)		Where is this information coming from? [[User:Conor Shepard\|Conor Shepard]] 19:20, February 20, 2011 (UTC)

imported>VatsaAWB: Cleaning wanted pages list

2012-05-03T09:07:24Z

Cleaning wanted pages list

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 3 May 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Historical characters ==		== Historical characters ==

	You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "Historical characters". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], {{Wiki\|Dick Cheney}}. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:06, April 20, 2011 (UTC)		You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "Historical characters". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], {{Wiki\|Condoleezza Rice}}, {{Wiki\|Dick Cheney}}. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:06, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

	== Problem ==		== Problem ==

imported>VatsaAWB: AWB Edit

2012-05-03T08:50:47Z

AWB Edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 3 May 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Historical characters ==		== Historical characters ==

	You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "Historical characters". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[Dick Cheney]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:06, April 20, 2011 (UTC)		You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "Historical characters". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], {{Wiki\|Dick Cheney}}. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:06, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

	== Problem ==		== Problem ==

imported>VatsaAWB: AWB Edit

2012-02-21T13:51:04Z

AWB Edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 21 February 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Historical characters ==		== Historical characters ==

	You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "[[Historical characters]]". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[Dick Cheney]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:06, April 20, 2011 (UTC)		You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "Historical characters". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[Dick Cheney]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:06, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

	== Problem ==		== Problem ==

imported>Master Sima Yi: /* Bush & Templars */

2012-02-16T20:30:10Z

Bush & Templars

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 16 February 2012
Line 36:		Line 36:
	:What are you referring to? Are you referring to the discussion above or are you implying that the page should be deleted? Because the page is staying. We are a source for all information related to the ''AC'' canon, and we aren't making an exception because people don't agree with the canon. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 20:13, February 16, 2012 (UTC)		:What are you referring to? Are you referring to the discussion above or are you implying that the page should be deleted? Because the page is staying. We are a source for all information related to the ''AC'' canon, and we aren't making an exception because people don't agree with the canon. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 20:13, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

	::The discussion above. It's not so much discussion about the canon of AC as a person's feelings about a real life individual. That's what I mean about keeping political bias out. Post the facts that we know (that he appears to at a minimum backed by Templars if not an actual member). [[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]] 20:26, February 16, 2012 (UTC)		::The discussion above. It's not so much discussion about the canon of AC as a person's feelings about a real life individual. That's what I mean about keeping political bias out. Post the facts that we know (that he appears to at a minimum backed by Templars if not an actual member). [[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]] 20:26, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

			:::The discussion above was kind of old. I appreciate your good will, but there is no need to reply to dead discussions. ;) All the facts we know are on the page, no speculation. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 20:30, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

imported>Fenris07: /* Bush & Templars */

2012-02-16T20:26:25Z

Bush & Templars

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 16 February 2012
Line 35:		Line 35:

	:What are you referring to? Are you referring to the discussion above or are you implying that the page should be deleted? Because the page is staying. We are a source for all information related to the ''AC'' canon, and we aren't making an exception because people don't agree with the canon. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 20:13, February 16, 2012 (UTC)		:What are you referring to? Are you referring to the discussion above or are you implying that the page should be deleted? Because the page is staying. We are a source for all information related to the ''AC'' canon, and we aren't making an exception because people don't agree with the canon. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 20:13, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

			::The discussion above. It's not so much discussion about the canon of AC as a person's feelings about a real life individual. That's what I mean about keeping political bias out. Post the facts that we know (that he appears to at a minimum backed by Templars if not an actual member). [[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]] 20:26, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

imported>Master Sima Yi: /* Bush & Templars */

2012-02-16T20:13:57Z

Bush & Templars

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 16 February 2012
Line 33:		Line 33:

	While the series does seem to indicate that he is a Templar or at the minimum is backed by Templars, is it possible to keep real life political biases out of these things? It comes across a bit delusional and dishonest. It's a piece of fiction no matter what you think of the real man.[[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]] 20:08, February 16, 2012 (UTC)		While the series does seem to indicate that he is a Templar or at the minimum is backed by Templars, is it possible to keep real life political biases out of these things? It comes across a bit delusional and dishonest. It's a piece of fiction no matter what you think of the real man.[[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]] 20:08, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

			:What are you referring to? Are you referring to the discussion above or are you implying that the page should be deleted? Because the page is staying. We are a source for all information related to the ''AC'' canon, and we aren't making an exception because people don't agree with the canon. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 20:13, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

imported>Fenris07: /* Bush & Templars */

2012-02-16T20:08:45Z

Bush & Templars

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 16 February 2012
Line 32:		Line 32:
	Uhm, it's a game. Don't take it seriously. [[User:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:trajan pro;font-size:15px;color:darkred;">'''Uditore'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:15px;color:pink;">™</span>]] 11:09, August 5, 2011 (UTC)		Uhm, it's a game. Don't take it seriously. [[User:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:trajan pro;font-size:15px;color:darkred;">'''Uditore'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:15px;color:pink;">™</span>]] 11:09, August 5, 2011 (UTC)

	While the series does seem to indicate that he is a Templar or at the minimum is backed by Templars, is it possible to keep real life political biases out of these things? It comes across a bit delusional and dishonest. It's a piece of fiction no matter what you think of the real man.		While the series does seem to indicate that he is a Templar or at the minimum is backed by Templars, is it possible to keep real life political biases out of these things? It comes across a bit delusional and dishonest. It's a piece of fiction no matter what you think of the real man.[[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]] 20:08, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

imported>Fenris07: /* Bush & Templars */

2012-02-16T20:08:23Z

Bush & Templars

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 16 February 2012
Line 32:		Line 32:
	Uhm, it's a game. Don't take it seriously. [[User:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:trajan pro;font-size:15px;color:darkred;">'''Uditore'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:15px;color:pink;">™</span>]] 11:09, August 5, 2011 (UTC)		Uhm, it's a game. Don't take it seriously. [[User:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:trajan pro;font-size:15px;color:darkred;">'''Uditore'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:15px;color:pink;">™</span>]] 11:09, August 5, 2011 (UTC)

	While the series does seem to indicate that he is at the minimum backed by Templars, is it possible to keep real life political biases out of these things? It comes across a bit delusional. It's a piece of fiction no matter what you think of the real man. ~~There is no good reason to drag any of that into this. [[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]] 20:07, February 16, 2012 (UTC) [[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]]~~		While the series does seem to indicate that he is a Templar or at the minimum is backed by Templars, is it possible to keep real life political biases out of these things? It comes across a bit delusional and dishonest. It's a piece of fiction no matter what you think of the real man.

imported>Fenris07: /* Bush & Templars */

2012-02-16T20:07:29Z

Bush & Templars

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 16 February 2012
Line 30:		Line 30:
	Though this page has be edited in an attempt to make George not look so bad, I still see him as a templar. It now says he was used as a puppet by the templars, but my mind still puts him crookedly dealing with them. Even if the Assassin's Creed story never specifically states George is a templar, I think we all know he is far from a good guy. With that said every other notorious indidual in history has been linked with them templars, what make George any different? [[User:Solo assassin\|Solo assassin]] 11:03, August 5, 2011 (UTC)		Though this page has be edited in an attempt to make George not look so bad, I still see him as a templar. It now says he was used as a puppet by the templars, but my mind still puts him crookedly dealing with them. Even if the Assassin's Creed story never specifically states George is a templar, I think we all know he is far from a good guy. With that said every other notorious indidual in history has been linked with them templars, what make George any different? [[User:Solo assassin\|Solo assassin]] 11:03, August 5, 2011 (UTC)

	Uhm, it's a game. Don't take it seriously. [[User:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:trajan pro;font-size:15px;color:darkred;">'''Uditore'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:15px;color:pink;">™</span>]] 11:09, August 5, 2011 (UTC)		Uhm, it's a game. Don't take it seriously. [[User:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:trajan pro;font-size:15px;color:darkred;">'''Uditore'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:15px;color:pink;">™</span>]] 11:09, August 5, 2011 (UTC)

			While the series does seem to indicate that he is at the minimum backed by Templars, is it possible to keep real life political biases out of these things? It comes across a bit delusional. It's a piece of fiction no matter what you think of the real man. There is no good reason to drag any of that into this. [[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]] 20:07, February 16, 2012 (UTC) [[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 16 February 2012
Line 36:		Line 36:
	:What are you referring to? Are you referring to the discussion above or are you implying that the page should be deleted? Because the page is staying. We are a source for all information related to the ''AC'' canon, and we aren't making an exception because people don't agree with the canon. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 20:13, February 16, 2012 (UTC)		:What are you referring to? Are you referring to the discussion above or are you implying that the page should be deleted? Because the page is staying. We are a source for all information related to the ''AC'' canon, and we aren't making an exception because people don't agree with the canon. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 20:13, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

	::The discussion above. It's not so much discussion about the canon of AC as a person's feelings about a real life individual. That's what I mean about keeping political bias out. Post the facts that we know (that he appears to at a minimum backed by Templars if not an actual member). [[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]] 20:26, February 16, 2012 (UTC)		::The discussion above. It's not so much discussion about the canon of AC as a person's feelings about a real life individual. That's what I mean about keeping political bias out. Post the facts that we know (that he appears to at a minimum backed by Templars if not an actual member). [[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]] 20:26, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

			:::The discussion above was kind of old. I appreciate your good will, but there is no need to reply to dead discussions. ;) All the facts we know are on the page, no speculation. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi\|Master Sima Yi]] 20:30, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 16 February 2012
Line 30:		Line 30:
	Though this page has be edited in an attempt to make George not look so bad, I still see him as a templar. It now says he was used as a puppet by the templars, but my mind still puts him crookedly dealing with them. Even if the Assassin's Creed story never specifically states George is a templar, I think we all know he is far from a good guy. With that said every other notorious indidual in history has been linked with them templars, what make George any different? [[User:Solo assassin\|Solo assassin]] 11:03, August 5, 2011 (UTC)		Though this page has be edited in an attempt to make George not look so bad, I still see him as a templar. It now says he was used as a puppet by the templars, but my mind still puts him crookedly dealing with them. Even if the Assassin's Creed story never specifically states George is a templar, I think we all know he is far from a good guy. With that said every other notorious indidual in history has been linked with them templars, what make George any different? [[User:Solo assassin\|Solo assassin]] 11:03, August 5, 2011 (UTC)

	Uhm, it's a game. Don't take it seriously. [[User:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:trajan pro;font-size:15px;color:darkred;">'''Uditore'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:15px;color:pink;">™</span>]] 11:09, August 5, 2011 (UTC)		Uhm, it's a game. Don't take it seriously. [[User:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:trajan pro;font-size:15px;color:darkred;">'''Uditore'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:UDITORE\|<span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:15px;color:pink;">™</span>]] 11:09, August 5, 2011 (UTC)

			While the series does seem to indicate that he is at the minimum backed by Templars, is it possible to keep real life political biases out of these things? It comes across a bit delusional. It's a piece of fiction no matter what you think of the real man. There is no good reason to drag any of that into this. [[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]] 20:07, February 16, 2012 (UTC) [[User:Fenris07\|Fenris07]]