Talk:Fort Independence - Revision history

imported>Soranin at 12:46, 20 April 2021

2021-04-20T12:46:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:46, 20 April 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
	:For a start, there' nothing to suggest that the number of guards you encountered is the same for everybody else, that would need to be confirmed by multiple users who I suspect do not have the time or energy to check such a minor detail. Secondly, I'm not really sure what ''informative benefit'' adding the garrison size would give the article... --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:13, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		:For a start, there' nothing to suggest that the number of guards you encountered is the same for everybody else, that would need to be confirmed by multiple users who I suspect do not have the time or energy to check such a minor detail. Secondly, I'm not really sure what ''informative benefit'' adding the garrison size would give the article... --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:13, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
	:One might as well ask why have an article on a fort at all. It is after all a game about fictional events and largely fictional people. There are articles on the wiki which give the number of town watch. Furthermore my suggestion was a trivia entry, that is not in the main body of the article. Trivia are interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 18:56, February 6, 2014 (UTC) ~~[[Agrable2]]~~		:One might as well ask why have an article on a fort at all. It is after all a game about fictional events and largely fictional people. There are articles on the wiki which give the number of town watch. Furthermore my suggestion was a trivia entry, that is not in the main body of the article. Trivia are interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 18:56, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
	::Precisely. Trivia is interesting. 16 people on a fort isn't interesting, so why bother adding it? [[User:Slate Vesper\|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper\|talk]]) 01:08, February 7, 2014 (UTC)		::Precisely. Trivia is interesting. 16 people on a fort isn't interesting, so why bother adding it? [[User:Slate Vesper\|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper\|talk]]) 01:08, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
	::What is interesting and is not is entirely a matter of perspective. People who are in this wiki and read the trivia section have an interest that is above many who play Assassin's Creed, it was interesting to me and may prove interesting to someone else. There can be no harm in it being there.[[Special:Contributions/128.220.3.61\|128.220.3.61]] 01:46, February 7, 2014 (UTC)		::What is interesting and is not is entirely a matter of perspective. People who are in this wiki and read the trivia section have an interest that is above many who play Assassin's Creed, it was interesting to me and may prove interesting to someone else. There can be no harm in it being there.[[Special:Contributions/128.220.3.61\|128.220.3.61]] 01:46, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

imported>RebeccaAWB: /* top */Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T14:15:28Z

top: Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}

	I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

imported>Jasca Ducato at 11:44, 7 February 2014

2014-02-07T11:44:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:44, 7 February 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::Whether it's interesting or not is besides the point, it's adds nothing to the article. Also, Trivia sections are not "interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them", they are a location for information that ''should'' be in the article, but would not contextually fit with the rest of the text.		:::Whether it's interesting or not is besides the point, it's adds nothing to the article. Also, Trivia sections are not "interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them", they are a location for information that ''should'' be in the article, but would not contextually fit with the rest of the text.

	:::For example; the [[Duncan Walpole]] article mentions his relation to [[Robert Walpole]] in the Trivia section because, currently, such a point would be out of place in the main body. ~~One~~ those grounds, there could be an argument to include you information, but it still does not address the fact that the point adds nothing to the article. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 11:44, February 7, 2014 (UTC)		:::For example; the [[Duncan Walpole]] article mentions his relation to [[Robert Walpole]] in the Trivia section because, currently, such a point would be out of place in the main body. On those grounds, there could be an argument to include you information, but it still does not address the fact that the point adds nothing to the article. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 11:44, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

imported>Jasca Ducato at 11:44, 7 February 2014

2014-02-07T11:44:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:44, 7 February 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
	:For a start, there' nothing to suggest that the number of guards you encountered is the same for everybody else, that would need to be confirmed by multiple users who I suspect do not have the time or energy to check such a minor detail. Secondly, I'm not really sure what ''informative benefit'' adding the garrison size would give the article... --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:13, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		:For a start, there' nothing to suggest that the number of guards you encountered is the same for everybody else, that would need to be confirmed by multiple users who I suspect do not have the time or energy to check such a minor detail. Secondly, I'm not really sure what ''informative benefit'' adding the garrison size would give the article... --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:13, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

	:One might as well ask why have an article on a fort at all. It is after all a game about fictional events and largely fictional people. There are articles on the wiki which give the number of town watch. Furthermore my suggestion was a trivia entry, that is not in the main body of the article. Trivia are interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 18:56, February 6, 2014 (UTC) [[Agrable2]]		:One might as well ask why have an article on a fort at all. It is after all a game about fictional events and largely fictional people. There are articles on the wiki which give the number of town watch. Furthermore my suggestion was a trivia entry, that is not in the main body of the article. Trivia are interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 18:56, February 6, 2014 (UTC) [[Agrable2]]

	::Precisely. Trivia is interesting. 16 people on a fort isn't interesting, so why bother adding it? [[User:Slate Vesper\|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper\|talk]]) 01:08, February 7, 2014 (UTC)		::Precisely. Trivia is interesting. 16 people on a fort isn't interesting, so why bother adding it? [[User:Slate Vesper\|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper\|talk]]) 01:08, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
			::What is interesting and is not is entirely a matter of perspective. People who are in this wiki and read the trivia section have an interest that is above many who play Assassin's Creed, it was interesting to me and may prove interesting to someone else. There can be no harm in it being there.[[Special:Contributions/128.220.3.61\|128.220.3.61]] 01:46, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
			:::Whether it's interesting or not is besides the point, it's adds nothing to the article. Also, Trivia sections are not "interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them", they are a location for information that ''should'' be in the article, but would not contextually fit with the rest of the text.

	::~~What is interesting and is not is entirely~~ a ~~matter~~ of ~~perspective. People who are~~ in ~~this wiki and read~~ the ~~trivia section have~~ an ~~interest that is above many who play Assassin's Creed~~, it ~~was interesting~~ to ~~me and may prove interesting to someone else. There can be no harm in it being there~~.[[Special:Contributions/~~128.220.3.61~~\|~~128.220.3.61~~]] 01:46, February 7, 2014 (UTC)		:::For example; the [[Duncan Walpole]] article mentions his relation to [[Robert Walpole]] in the Trivia section because, currently, such a point would be out of place in the main body. One those grounds, there could be an argument to include you information, but it still does not address the fact that the point adds nothing to the article. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 11:44, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
	::

128.220.3.61 at 01:46, 7 February 2014

2014-02-07T01:46:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 7 February 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::Precisely. Trivia is interesting. 16 people on a fort isn't interesting, so why bother adding it? [[User:Slate Vesper\|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper\|talk]]) 01:08, February 7, 2014 (UTC)		::Precisely. Trivia is interesting. 16 people on a fort isn't interesting, so why bother adding it? [[User:Slate Vesper\|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper\|talk]]) 01:08, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

			::What is interesting and is not is entirely a matter of perspective. People who are in this wiki and read the trivia section have an interest that is above many who play Assassin's Creed, it was interesting to me and may prove interesting to someone else. There can be no harm in it being there.[[Special:Contributions/128.220.3.61\|128.220.3.61]] 01:46, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
			::

imported>Slate Vesper at 01:08, 7 February 2014

2014-02-07T01:08:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 7 February 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:One might as well ask why have an article on a fort at all. It is after all a game about fictional events and largely fictional people. There are articles on the wiki which give the number of town watch. Furthermore my suggestion was a trivia entry, that is not in the main body of the article. Trivia are interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 18:56, February 6, 2014 (UTC) [[Agrable2]]		:One might as well ask why have an article on a fort at all. It is after all a game about fictional events and largely fictional people. There are articles on the wiki which give the number of town watch. Furthermore my suggestion was a trivia entry, that is not in the main body of the article. Trivia are interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 18:56, February 6, 2014 (UTC) [[Agrable2]]

			::Precisely. Trivia is interesting. 16 people on a fort isn't interesting, so why bother adding it? [[User:Slate Vesper\|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper\|talk]]) 01:08, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

imported>Agrable2 at 18:56, 6 February 2014

2014-02-06T18:56:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 6 February 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
	:For a start, there' nothing to suggest that the number of guards you encountered is the same for everybody else, that would need to be confirmed by multiple users who I suspect do not have the time or energy to check such a minor detail. Secondly, I'm not really sure what ''informative benefit'' adding the garrison size would give the article... --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:13, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		:For a start, there' nothing to suggest that the number of guards you encountered is the same for everybody else, that would need to be confirmed by multiple users who I suspect do not have the time or energy to check such a minor detail. Secondly, I'm not really sure what ''informative benefit'' adding the garrison size would give the article... --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:13, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

			:One might as well ask why have an article on a fort at all. It is after all a game about fictional events and largely fictional people. There are articles on the wiki which give the number of town watch. Furthermore my suggestion was a trivia entry, that is not in the main body of the article. Trivia are interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 18:56, February 6, 2014 (UTC) [[Agrable2]]

imported>Jasca Ducato at 09:13, 6 February 2014

2014-02-06T09:13:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:13, 6 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:

	I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
			:For a start, there' nothing to suggest that the number of guards you encountered is the same for everybody else, that would need to be confirmed by multiple users who I suspect do not have the time or energy to check such a minor detail. Secondly, I'm not really sure what ''informative benefit'' adding the garrison size would give the article... --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:13, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

imported>Agrable2: Created page with " I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is n..."

2014-02-06T06:27:14Z

Created page with " I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is n..."

Páàjì titun

I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:46, 20 April 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
	:For a start, there' nothing to suggest that the number of guards you encountered is the same for everybody else, that would need to be confirmed by multiple users who I suspect do not have the time or energy to check such a minor detail. Secondly, I'm not really sure what ''informative benefit'' adding the garrison size would give the article... --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:13, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		:For a start, there' nothing to suggest that the number of guards you encountered is the same for everybody else, that would need to be confirmed by multiple users who I suspect do not have the time or energy to check such a minor detail. Secondly, I'm not really sure what ''informative benefit'' adding the garrison size would give the article... --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:13, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
	:One might as well ask why have an article on a fort at all. It is after all a game about fictional events and largely fictional people. There are articles on the wiki which give the number of town watch. Furthermore my suggestion was a trivia entry, that is not in the main body of the article. Trivia are interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 18:56, February 6, 2014 (UTC) ~~[[Agrable2]]~~		:One might as well ask why have an article on a fort at all. It is after all a game about fictional events and largely fictional people. There are articles on the wiki which give the number of town watch. Furthermore my suggestion was a trivia entry, that is not in the main body of the article. Trivia are interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 18:56, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
	::Precisely. Trivia is interesting. 16 people on a fort isn't interesting, so why bother adding it? [[User:Slate Vesper\|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper\|talk]]) 01:08, February 7, 2014 (UTC)		::Precisely. Trivia is interesting. 16 people on a fort isn't interesting, so why bother adding it? [[User:Slate Vesper\|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper\|talk]]) 01:08, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
	::What is interesting and is not is entirely a matter of perspective. People who are in this wiki and read the trivia section have an interest that is above many who play Assassin's Creed, it was interesting to me and may prove interesting to someone else. There can be no harm in it being there.[[Special:Contributions/128.220.3.61\|128.220.3.61]] 01:46, February 7, 2014 (UTC)		::What is interesting and is not is entirely a matter of perspective. People who are in this wiki and read the trivia section have an interest that is above many who play Assassin's Creed, it was interesting to me and may prove interesting to someone else. There can be no harm in it being there.[[Special:Contributions/128.220.3.61\|128.220.3.61]] 01:46, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:44, 7 February 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		I played through Assassin's Creed III after Boston has been evacuated by the British and upon attempting to take the fort I counted the garrison as sixteen. Surely there is no harm in numbering the garrison. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 06:27, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
	:For a start, there' nothing to suggest that the number of guards you encountered is the same for everybody else, that would need to be confirmed by multiple users who I suspect do not have the time or energy to check such a minor detail. Secondly, I'm not really sure what ''informative benefit'' adding the garrison size would give the article... --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:13, February 6, 2014 (UTC)		:For a start, there' nothing to suggest that the number of guards you encountered is the same for everybody else, that would need to be confirmed by multiple users who I suspect do not have the time or energy to check such a minor detail. Secondly, I'm not really sure what ''informative benefit'' adding the garrison size would give the article... --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:13, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

	:One might as well ask why have an article on a fort at all. It is after all a game about fictional events and largely fictional people. There are articles on the wiki which give the number of town watch. Furthermore my suggestion was a trivia entry, that is not in the main body of the article. Trivia are interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 18:56, February 6, 2014 (UTC) [[Agrable2]]		:One might as well ask why have an article on a fort at all. It is after all a game about fictional events and largely fictional people. There are articles on the wiki which give the number of town watch. Furthermore my suggestion was a trivia entry, that is not in the main body of the article. Trivia are interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them. [[User:Agrable2\|Agrable2]] ([[User talk:Agrable2\|talk]]) 18:56, February 6, 2014 (UTC) [[Agrable2]]

	::Precisely. Trivia is interesting. 16 people on a fort isn't interesting, so why bother adding it? [[User:Slate Vesper\|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper\|talk]]) 01:08, February 7, 2014 (UTC)		::Precisely. Trivia is interesting. 16 people on a fort isn't interesting, so why bother adding it? [[User:Slate Vesper\|Slate Vesper]] ([[User talk:Slate Vesper\|talk]]) 01:08, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
			::What is interesting and is not is entirely a matter of perspective. People who are in this wiki and read the trivia section have an interest that is above many who play Assassin's Creed, it was interesting to me and may prove interesting to someone else. There can be no harm in it being there.[[Special:Contributions/128.220.3.61\|128.220.3.61]] 01:46, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
			:::Whether it's interesting or not is besides the point, it's adds nothing to the article. Also, Trivia sections are not "interesting little tidbits that do not serve any particular informative benefit other than the slight pleasure that comes reading them", they are a location for information that ''should'' be in the article, but would not contextually fit with the rest of the text.

	::~~What is interesting and is not is entirely~~ a ~~matter~~ of ~~perspective. People who are~~ in ~~this wiki and read~~ the ~~trivia section have~~ an ~~interest that is above many who play Assassin's Creed~~, it ~~was interesting~~ to ~~me and may prove interesting to someone else. There can be no harm in it being there~~.[[Special:Contributions/~~128.220.3.61~~\|~~128.220.3.61~~]] 01:46, February 7, 2014 (UTC)		:::For example; the [[Duncan Walpole]] article mentions his relation to [[Robert Walpole]] in the Trivia section because, currently, such a point would be out of place in the main body. One those grounds, there could be an argument to include you information, but it still does not address the fact that the point adds nothing to the article. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 11:44, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
	::