Talk:Ford Motor Company - Revision history

imported>Soranin at 13:40, 8 February 2022

2022-02-08T13:40:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 8 February 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{ArchivedTalk}}
	== Delete page? ==		== Delete page? ==

Line 13:		Line 14:

	Okay I will agree with you on your reasoning for the Ford company as Henry Ford is a recognizable name and I know BP and the CIA isn't something you have an issue with but in the future should they be candidates (which is my fear), they don't have such recognisable figureheads (well figureheads globally recognised at least). I guess anything to do with the cryptic message and Subject 16 is a (for lack of a better word) passionate subject because it is this element to the AC games that I enjoy the most. Anyways, as I said before, the new amendments to the Henry Ford page do keep the story intact so I guess the debate for this page is over. Alas i concede defeat. :P [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 05:01, August 2, 2011 (UTC)		Okay I will agree with you on your reasoning for the Ford company as Henry Ford is a recognizable name and I know BP and the CIA isn't something you have an issue with but in the future should they be candidates (which is my fear), they don't have such recognisable figureheads (well figureheads globally recognised at least). I guess anything to do with the cryptic message and Subject 16 is a (for lack of a better word) passionate subject because it is this element to the AC games that I enjoy the most. Anyways, as I said before, the new amendments to the Henry Ford page do keep the story intact so I guess the debate for this page is over. Alas i concede defeat. :P [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 05:01, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

	~~[[Category:Archived talk pages]]~~

imported>Sol Pacificus at 02:45, 31 January 2022

2022-01-31T02:45:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:45, 31 January 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Delete\|Mainspace page deleted, talkpage forgotten}}~~
	== Delete page? ==		== Delete page? ==

Line 14:		Line 13:

	Okay I will agree with you on your reasoning for the Ford company as Henry Ford is a recognizable name and I know BP and the CIA isn't something you have an issue with but in the future should they be candidates (which is my fear), they don't have such recognisable figureheads (well figureheads globally recognised at least). I guess anything to do with the cryptic message and Subject 16 is a (for lack of a better word) passionate subject because it is this element to the AC games that I enjoy the most. Anyways, as I said before, the new amendments to the Henry Ford page do keep the story intact so I guess the debate for this page is over. Alas i concede defeat. :P [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 05:01, August 2, 2011 (UTC)		Okay I will agree with you on your reasoning for the Ford company as Henry Ford is a recognizable name and I know BP and the CIA isn't something you have an issue with but in the future should they be candidates (which is my fear), they don't have such recognisable figureheads (well figureheads globally recognised at least). I guess anything to do with the cryptic message and Subject 16 is a (for lack of a better word) passionate subject because it is this element to the AC games that I enjoy the most. Anyways, as I said before, the new amendments to the Henry Ford page do keep the story intact so I guess the debate for this page is over. Alas i concede defeat. :P [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 05:01, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

			[[Category:Archived talk pages]]

imported>Soranin at 03:13, 25 April 2021

2021-04-25T03:13:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 25 April 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Delete\|Mainspace page deleted, talkpage forgotten}}
	== Delete page? ==		== Delete page? ==

imported>Kaloneous at 05:01, 2 August 2011

2011-08-02T05:01:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:01, 2 August 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:I get what you are saying and I see from the Henry Ford article that it now covers it more adequately. My thinking was that it adds a bit of trivia to the overall story in the glyphs (that does not get much time in -game anyways). Plus i would be fearful of other pages (like the ones I mentioned above) then being in risk of being deleted too. Just my thoughts anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 02:59, August 2, 2011 (UTC)		:I get what you are saying and I see from the Henry Ford article that it now covers it more adequately. My thinking was that it adds a bit of trivia to the overall story in the glyphs (that does not get much time in -game anyways). Plus i would be fearful of other pages (like the ones I mentioned above) then being in risk of being deleted too. Just my thoughts anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 02:59, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

	You're right that NASA should stay, because it's had a major impact on the game world: it retrieved the Apple from the Moon. CIA and BP are edge cases: we have information for their activities, but whether or not they're too small is a debate for another day. Ford the Company, however, is given a cryptic reference in a personal letter from Ford the person -- a reference that could just as easily go on Henry's page. But if we give Ford Motor Company its own page, how can we make it longer than two sentences and still keep it AC-relevant?		You're right that NASA should stay, because it's had a major impact on the game world: it retrieved the Apple from the Moon. CIA and BP are edge cases: we have information for their activities, but whether or not they're too small is a debate for another day. Ford the Company, however, is given a cryptic reference in a personal letter from Ford the person -- a reference that could just as easily go on Henry's page. But if we give Ford Motor Company its own page, how can we make it longer than two sentences and still keep it AC-relevant?
	[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 04:39, August 2, 2011 (UTC)		[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 04:39, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

			Okay I will agree with you on your reasoning for the Ford company as Henry Ford is a recognizable name and I know BP and the CIA isn't something you have an issue with but in the future should they be candidates (which is my fear), they don't have such recognisable figureheads (well figureheads globally recognised at least). I guess anything to do with the cryptic message and Subject 16 is a (for lack of a better word) passionate subject because it is this element to the AC games that I enjoy the most. Anyways, as I said before, the new amendments to the Henry Ford page do keep the story intact so I guess the debate for this page is over. Alas i concede defeat. :P [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 05:01, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

imported>Smoke3723: /* Delete page? */ Reassuring Kaloneous of precedents

2011-08-02T04:39:16Z

Delete page?: Reassuring Kaloneous of precedents

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:39, 2 August 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:If the organisation is only mentioned once in a Subject 16 puzzle, then they should go on the Abstergo page under "known fronts" or something. We can't duplicate Wikipedia simply because of a name-drop.[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 02:53, August 2, 2011 (UTC)		:If the organisation is only mentioned once in a Subject 16 puzzle, then they should go on the Abstergo page under "known fronts" or something. We can't duplicate Wikipedia simply because of a name-drop.[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 02:53, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
	:I get what you are saying and I see from the Henry Ford article that it now covers it more adequately. My thinking was that it adds a bit of trivia to the overall story in the glyphs (that does not get much time in -game anyways). Plus i would be fearful of other pages (like the ones I mentioned above) then being in risk of being deleted too. Just my thoughts anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 02:59, August 2, 2011 (UTC)		:I get what you are saying and I see from the Henry Ford article that it now covers it more adequately. My thinking was that it adds a bit of trivia to the overall story in the glyphs (that does not get much time in -game anyways). Plus i would be fearful of other pages (like the ones I mentioned above) then being in risk of being deleted too. Just my thoughts anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 02:59, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

			You're right that NASA should stay, because it's had a major impact on the game world: it retrieved the Apple from the Moon. CIA and BP are edge cases: we have information for their activities, but whether or not they're too small is a debate for another day. Ford the Company, however, is given a cryptic reference in a personal letter from Ford the person -- a reference that could just as easily go on Henry's page. But if we give Ford Motor Company its own page, how can we make it longer than two sentences and still keep it AC-relevant?
			[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 04:39, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

imported>Kaloneous at 02:59, 2 August 2011

2011-08-02T02:59:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 2 August 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	I think that it does add more background information to the activities of the Templars and even if this was to be considered a serious candidate for deletion the articles like NASA, the CIA, BP etc would also have to be considered. Even pages like Syria would be called into question. What I mean is that this article (and the aforementioned ones) and more accessible depth for readers for a story that has such immense depth as Assassin's Creed. Just my opinion anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 00:08, August 1, 2011 (UTC)		I think that it does add more background information to the activities of the Templars and even if this was to be considered a serious candidate for deletion the articles like NASA, the CIA, BP etc would also have to be considered. Even pages like Syria would be called into question. What I mean is that this article (and the aforementioned ones) and more accessible depth for readers for a story that has such immense depth as Assassin's Creed. Just my opinion anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 00:08, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

	:If the organisation is only mentioned once in a Subject 16 puzzle, then they should go on the Abstergo page under "known fronts" or something. We can't duplicate Wikipedia simply because of a name-drop.[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 02:53, August 2, 2011 (UTC)		:If the organisation is only mentioned once in a Subject 16 puzzle, then they should go on the Abstergo page under "known fronts" or something. We can't duplicate Wikipedia simply because of a name-drop.[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 02:53, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
			:I get what you are saying and I see from the Henry Ford article that it now covers it more adequately. My thinking was that it adds a bit of trivia to the overall story in the glyphs (that does not get much time in -game anyways). Plus i would be fearful of other pages (like the ones I mentioned above) then being in risk of being deleted too. Just my thoughts anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 02:59, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

imported>Smoke3723: /* Delete page? */ Reply to Kaloneous

2011-08-02T02:53:24Z

Delete page?: Reply to Kaloneous

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:53, 2 August 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:

	I think that it does add more background information to the activities of the Templars and even if this was to be considered a serious candidate for deletion the articles like NASA, the CIA, BP etc would also have to be considered. Even pages like Syria would be called into question. What I mean is that this article (and the aforementioned ones) and more accessible depth for readers for a story that has such immense depth as Assassin's Creed. Just my opinion anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 00:08, August 1, 2011 (UTC)		I think that it does add more background information to the activities of the Templars and even if this was to be considered a serious candidate for deletion the articles like NASA, the CIA, BP etc would also have to be considered. Even pages like Syria would be called into question. What I mean is that this article (and the aforementioned ones) and more accessible depth for readers for a story that has such immense depth as Assassin's Creed. Just my opinion anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 00:08, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

			:If the organisation is only mentioned once in a Subject 16 puzzle, then they should go on the Abstergo page under "known fronts" or something. We can't duplicate Wikipedia simply because of a name-drop.[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 02:53, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

imported>Kaloneous at 00:08, 1 August 2011

2011-08-01T00:08:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:08, 1 August 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	The Ford Motor Company itself doesn't appear enough in the AC universe to justify its own article; the information contained in this article is mentioned on [[Henry Ford]]'s page anyway.		The Ford Motor Company itself doesn't appear enough in the AC universe to justify its own article; the information contained in this article is mentioned on [[Henry Ford]]'s page anyway.
	[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 00:01, August 1, 2011 (UTC)		[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 00:01, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

			I think that it does add more background information to the activities of the Templars and even if this was to be considered a serious candidate for deletion the articles like NASA, the CIA, BP etc would also have to be considered. Even pages like Syria would be called into question. What I mean is that this article (and the aforementioned ones) and more accessible depth for readers for a story that has such immense depth as Assassin's Creed. Just my opinion anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 00:08, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

imported>Smoke3723: Delete page?

2011-08-01T00:01:55Z

Delete page?

Páàjì titun

== Delete page? ==

The Ford Motor Company itself doesn't appear enough in the AC universe to justify its own article; the information contained in this article is mentioned on [[Henry Ford]]'s page anyway.
[[User:Smoke3723|Smoke3723]] 00:01, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 2 August 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	I think that it does add more background information to the activities of the Templars and even if this was to be considered a serious candidate for deletion the articles like NASA, the CIA, BP etc would also have to be considered. Even pages like Syria would be called into question. What I mean is that this article (and the aforementioned ones) and more accessible depth for readers for a story that has such immense depth as Assassin's Creed. Just my opinion anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 00:08, August 1, 2011 (UTC)		I think that it does add more background information to the activities of the Templars and even if this was to be considered a serious candidate for deletion the articles like NASA, the CIA, BP etc would also have to be considered. Even pages like Syria would be called into question. What I mean is that this article (and the aforementioned ones) and more accessible depth for readers for a story that has such immense depth as Assassin's Creed. Just my opinion anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 00:08, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

	:If the organisation is only mentioned once in a Subject 16 puzzle, then they should go on the Abstergo page under "known fronts" or something. We can't duplicate Wikipedia simply because of a name-drop.[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 02:53, August 2, 2011 (UTC)		:If the organisation is only mentioned once in a Subject 16 puzzle, then they should go on the Abstergo page under "known fronts" or something. We can't duplicate Wikipedia simply because of a name-drop.[[User:Smoke3723\|Smoke3723]] 02:53, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
			:I get what you are saying and I see from the Henry Ford article that it now covers it more adequately. My thinking was that it adds a bit of trivia to the overall story in the glyphs (that does not get much time in -game anyways). Plus i would be fearful of other pages (like the ones I mentioned above) then being in risk of being deleted too. Just my thoughts anyways. [[User:Kaloneous\|Kaloneous]] 02:59, August 2, 2011 (UTC)