imported>Piratehunter: Created page with "{{talkheader}} == Renaming == I personally feel that, for numerous purposes, this article should be renamed as: ''Haram al-Sharif'', with a redirect from here. A couple of my r…"

2011-01-15T15:47:04Z

Created page with "{{talkheader}} == Renaming == I personally feel that, for numerous purposes, this article should be renamed as: ''Haram al-Sharif'', with a redirect from here. A couple of my r…"

Páàjì titun

{{talkheader}}

== Renaming ==

I personally feel that, for numerous purposes, this article should be renamed as: ''Haram al-Sharif'', with a redirect from here. A couple of my reasons:

#We have been doing similar things with locations found in Rome (Colosseo, Basilica di San Marco, etc.).
#It was named ''in Arabic'' (the building I mean. The location was originally named in Hebrew). I am someone who finds renaming things such as this, due to linguistic preferences is extremely irrelevant and equally redundant (i.e. I don't pronounce Damascus, as Damascus [it's pronounced Dimashq in Arabic, and it was named in Arabic]). That's just me, but still, I feel things should be named based on the heritage that "owns" it (Arabic).
#It just seems generally more appropriate, and even if we decide not to, I'll add the Arabic name.

Tell me what you think :P --[[User:Piratehunter|'''''P''''''''''i''''''''''r''''''''''a''''''''''t''''''''''e''''''''''h''''''''''u''''''''''n''''''''''t''''''''''e''''''''''r''''']] ([[User talk:Piratehunter|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Piratehunter|Contribs]]) 15:47, January 15, 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Dome of the Rock - Revision history

imported>Piratehunter: Created page with "{{talkheader}} == Renaming == I personally feel that, for numerous purposes, this article should be renamed as: ''Haram al-Sharif'', with a redirect from here. A couple of my r…"