Talk:Calculations - Revision history

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Source for name */

2024-06-29T09:56:55Z

Source for name

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:56, 29 June 2024
Line 23:		Line 23:

	== Source for name ==		== Source for name ==
			{{OpenTalk}}
	Is there an explicit source for this being a proper noun and an official name? Darby's tweet specifically refers to it as an "in-house" name, meaning that the devs used it unofficially among themselves. In all other instances I have seen it used in the series, it was in a descriptive, not nominal, way and not as a proper noun. I could be wrong, so please correct me if there is a source that I missed. As it is, I fear that this is another case where we prematurely canonized a term in an official capacity (like how we treated Kassandra's official epithet as ''misthios'' for the longest time, when it is actually "the Eagle Bearer"). If we take Darby's tweet on this alone, it still does not confirm that it is official or used as a proper noun, and therefore this article needs to be marked as having a conjectural name. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 02:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		Is there an explicit source for this being a proper noun and an official name? Darby's tweet specifically refers to it as an "in-house" name, meaning that the devs used it unofficially among themselves. In all other instances I have seen it used in the series, it was in a descriptive, not nominal, way and not as a proper noun. I could be wrong, so please correct me if there is a source that I missed. As it is, I fear that this is another case where we prematurely canonized a term in an official capacity (like how we treated Kassandra's official epithet as ''misthios'' for the longest time, when it is actually "the Eagle Bearer"). If we take Darby's tweet on this alone, it still does not confirm that it is official or used as a proper noun, and therefore this article needs to be marked as having a conjectural name. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 02:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	:Really? I always had interpreted Jupiter using "calculations" in his ACRev speech ("The Message" / Modern day conversations) to Desmond/Ezio as a noun, not a descriptor. Or are you looking for something more specific, like from a "Making of" or art book?<br><br>(Aside, should we work to fix Kassandra's epithet? If so, only way I can think to filter its transclusion in navboxes is to unlink it for a bit and sort from there) – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:Really? I always had interpreted Jupiter using "calculations" in his ACRev speech ("The Message" / Modern day conversations) to Desmond/Ezio as a noun, not a descriptor. Or are you looking for something more specific, like from a "Making of" or art book?<br><br>(Aside, should we work to fix Kassandra's epithet? If so, only way I can think to filter its transclusion in navboxes is to unlink it for a bit and sort from there) – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

imported>Darman36: /* Source for name */

2021-07-12T06:40:12Z

Source for name

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:40, 12 July 2021
Line 28:		Line 28:
	::I think you might be misunderstanding 'descriptor' here to mean adjective since "calculations" is obviously a noun when Jupiter uses it. By 'descriptive not nominal', I meant that he isn't using the word ''calculations'' as a proper name for the scientific process of predicting the future. He is only using a general word that can be used to refer to it. His hesitation, if it is accurately transcribed here, also seems to suggest that he gave a brief pause to think about the best approximate word that would characterize it without naming it. By Minerva's usage of it as well, it seems that she also adopted this simple word to convey the concept after him, but it is still not shown to be used as a proper noun as opposed to a general noun.		::I think you might be misunderstanding 'descriptor' here to mean adjective since "calculations" is obviously a noun when Jupiter uses it. By 'descriptive not nominal', I meant that he isn't using the word ''calculations'' as a proper name for the scientific process of predicting the future. He is only using a general word that can be used to refer to it. His hesitation, if it is accurately transcribed here, also seems to suggest that he gave a brief pause to think about the best approximate word that would characterize it without naming it. By Minerva's usage of it as well, it seems that she also adopted this simple word to convey the concept after him, but it is still not shown to be used as a proper noun as opposed to a general noun.
	::As for Kassandra's epithet, I have explained before that it is perfectly fine to keep introducing her as "the Spartan ''misthios'' Kassandra" in prose. That isn't incorrect and neither is introducing her as "Kassandra the Eagle Bearer", "the mercenary Kassandra", the "''misthios'' Kassandra", "the mercenary known as the Eagle Bearer, Kassandra", the "mercenary Kassandra the Eagle Bearer", or any other variation that is factually correct. For good writing, we don't have to, and we shouldn't standardize that. But as for navboxes, I'm not sure what you mean? I didn't realize we have been treating "''misthios''" as her epithet in navigation boxes. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		::As for Kassandra's epithet, I have explained before that it is perfectly fine to keep introducing her as "the Spartan ''misthios'' Kassandra" in prose. That isn't incorrect and neither is introducing her as "Kassandra the Eagle Bearer", "the mercenary Kassandra", the "''misthios'' Kassandra", "the mercenary known as the Eagle Bearer, Kassandra", the "mercenary Kassandra the Eagle Bearer", or any other variation that is factually correct. For good writing, we don't have to, and we shouldn't standardize that. But as for navboxes, I'm not sure what you mean? I didn't realize we have been treating "''misthios''" as her epithet in navigation boxes. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
			:::Oh yeah, reviewing Jupiter's speech again (it's accurately transcribed, just checked), he does pause briefly in thought. I think we had decided to latch onto that noun and use it as a title when creating the page in 2013, so this should probably have <nowiki>{{Conjecture}}</nowiki> on it. I can't recall, has this term been used in an official capacity since the page was made?<br><br>No, we aren't using ''misthios'' as an epithet in ACOD's navbox. The "Mercenary" section says "Kassandra the Eagle-Bearer", but her name is unlinked because she's already linked above under "Assassins / Hidden Ones". If you ''had'' wanted to changed how we intro Kassandra, I meant we'd have to unlink "mercenary" from the the AC2, ACB, etc. navboxes where it appears as a faction in order to sort out when it's used on a page or if it's transcluded. But this point is now moot since you said any variation of your above phrases is sufficient for introductions. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 06:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus at 06:14, 12 July 2021

2021-07-12T06:14:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 12 July 2021
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:Really? I always had interpreted Jupiter using "calculations" in his ACRev speech ("The Message" / Modern day conversations) to Desmond/Ezio as a noun, not a descriptor. Or are you looking for something more specific, like from a "Making of" or art book?<br><br>(Aside, should we work to fix Kassandra's epithet? If so, only way I can think to filter its transclusion in navboxes is to unlink it for a bit and sort from there) – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:Really? I always had interpreted Jupiter using "calculations" in his ACRev speech ("The Message" / Modern day conversations) to Desmond/Ezio as a noun, not a descriptor. Or are you looking for something more specific, like from a "Making of" or art book?<br><br>(Aside, should we work to fix Kassandra's epithet? If so, only way I can think to filter its transclusion in navboxes is to unlink it for a bit and sort from there) – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::I think you might be misunderstanding 'descriptor' here to mean adjective since "calculations" is obviously a noun when Jupiter uses it. By 'descriptive not nominal', I meant that he isn't using the word ''calculations'' as a proper name for the scientific process of predicting the future. He is only using a general word that can be used to refer to it. His hesitation, if it is accurately transcribed here, also seems to suggest that he gave a brief pause to think about the best approximate word that would characterize it without naming it. By Minerva's usage of it as well, it seems that she also adopted this simple word to convey the concept after him, but it is still not shown to be used as a proper noun as opposed to a general noun.		::I think you might be misunderstanding 'descriptor' here to mean adjective since "calculations" is obviously a noun when Jupiter uses it. By 'descriptive not nominal', I meant that he isn't using the word ''calculations'' as a proper name for the scientific process of predicting the future. He is only using a general word that can be used to refer to it. His hesitation, if it is accurately transcribed here, also seems to suggest that he gave a brief pause to think about the best approximate word that would characterize it without naming it. By Minerva's usage of it as well, it seems that she also adopted this simple word to convey the concept after him, but it is still not shown to be used as a proper noun as opposed to a general noun.
	:::As for Kassandra's epithet, I have explained before that it is perfectly fine to keep introducing her as "the Spartan ''misthios'' Kassandra" in prose. That isn't incorrect and neither is introducing her as "Kassandra the Eagle Bearer", "the mercenary Kassandra", the "''misthios'' Kassandra", "the mercenary known as the Eagle Bearer, Kassandra", the "mercenary Kassandra the Eagle Bearer", or any other variation that is factually correct. For good writing, we don't have to, and we shouldn't standardize that. But as for navboxes, I'm not sure what you mean? I didn't realize we have been treating "''misthios''" as her epithet in navigation boxes. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		::As for Kassandra's epithet, I have explained before that it is perfectly fine to keep introducing her as "the Spartan ''misthios'' Kassandra" in prose. That isn't incorrect and neither is introducing her as "Kassandra the Eagle Bearer", "the mercenary Kassandra", the "''misthios'' Kassandra", "the mercenary known as the Eagle Bearer, Kassandra", the "mercenary Kassandra the Eagle Bearer", or any other variation that is factually correct. For good writing, we don't have to, and we shouldn't standardize that. But as for navboxes, I'm not sure what you mean? I didn't realize we have been treating "''misthios''" as her epithet in navigation boxes. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus at 06:11, 12 July 2021

2021-07-12T06:11:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:11, 12 July 2021
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:Really? I always had interpreted Jupiter using "calculations" in his ACRev speech ("The Message" / Modern day conversations) to Desmond/Ezio as a noun, not a descriptor. Or are you looking for something more specific, like from a "Making of" or art book?<br><br>(Aside, should we work to fix Kassandra's epithet? If so, only way I can think to filter its transclusion in navboxes is to unlink it for a bit and sort from there) – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:Really? I always had interpreted Jupiter using "calculations" in his ACRev speech ("The Message" / Modern day conversations) to Desmond/Ezio as a noun, not a descriptor. Or are you looking for something more specific, like from a "Making of" or art book?<br><br>(Aside, should we work to fix Kassandra's epithet? If so, only way I can think to filter its transclusion in navboxes is to unlink it for a bit and sort from there) – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::I think you might be misunderstanding 'descriptor' here to mean adjective since "calculations" is obviously a noun when Jupiter uses it. By 'descriptive not nominal', I meant that he isn't using the word ''calculations'' as a proper name for the scientific process of predicting the future. He is only using a general word that can be used to refer to it. His hesitation, if it is accurately transcribed here, also seems to suggest that he gave a brief pause to think about the best approximate word that would characterize it without naming it. By Minerva's usage of it as well, it seems that she also adopted this simple word to convey the concept after him, but it is still not shown to be used as a proper noun as opposed to a general noun.		::I think you might be misunderstanding 'descriptor' here to mean adjective since "calculations" is obviously a noun when Jupiter uses it. By 'descriptive not nominal', I meant that he isn't using the word ''calculations'' as a proper name for the scientific process of predicting the future. He is only using a general word that can be used to refer to it. His hesitation, if it is accurately transcribed here, also seems to suggest that he gave a brief pause to think about the best approximate word that would characterize it without naming it. By Minerva's usage of it as well, it seems that she also adopted this simple word to convey the concept after him, but it is still not shown to be used as a proper noun as opposed to a general noun.
			:::As for Kassandra's epithet, I have explained before that it is perfectly fine to keep introducing her as "the Spartan ''misthios'' Kassandra" in prose. That isn't incorrect and neither is introducing her as "Kassandra the Eagle Bearer", "the mercenary Kassandra", the "''misthios'' Kassandra", "the mercenary known as the Eagle Bearer, Kassandra", the "mercenary Kassandra the Eagle Bearer", or any other variation that is factually correct. For good writing, we don't have to, and we shouldn't standardize that. But as for navboxes, I'm not sure what you mean? I didn't realize we have been treating "''misthios''" as her epithet in navigation boxes. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 06:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: the new talk page screen is bugged and i can't keep scrolling down to keep writing after a while...

2021-07-12T06:08:46Z

the new talk page screen is bugged and i can't keep scrolling down to keep writing after a while...

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:08, 12 July 2021
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Is there an explicit source for this being a proper noun and an official name? Darby's tweet specifically refers to it as an "in-house" name, meaning that the devs used it unofficially among themselves. In all other instances I have seen it used in the series, it was in a descriptive, not nominal, way and not as a proper noun. I could be wrong, so please correct me if there is a source that I missed. As it is, I fear that this is another case where we prematurely canonized a term in an official capacity (like how we treated Kassandra's official epithet as ''misthios'' for the longest time, when it is actually "the Eagle Bearer"). If we take Darby's tweet on this alone, it still does not confirm that it is official or used as a proper noun, and therefore this article needs to be marked as having a conjectural name. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 02:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		Is there an explicit source for this being a proper noun and an official name? Darby's tweet specifically refers to it as an "in-house" name, meaning that the devs used it unofficially among themselves. In all other instances I have seen it used in the series, it was in a descriptive, not nominal, way and not as a proper noun. I could be wrong, so please correct me if there is a source that I missed. As it is, I fear that this is another case where we prematurely canonized a term in an official capacity (like how we treated Kassandra's official epithet as ''misthios'' for the longest time, when it is actually "the Eagle Bearer"). If we take Darby's tweet on this alone, it still does not confirm that it is official or used as a proper noun, and therefore this article needs to be marked as having a conjectural name. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 02:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	:Really? I always had interpreted Jupiter using "calculations" in his ACRev speech ("The Message" / Modern day conversations) to Desmond/Ezio as a noun, not a descriptor. Or are you looking for something more specific, like from a "Making of" or art book?<br><br>(Aside, should we work to fix Kassandra's epithet? If so, only way I can think to filter its transclusion in navboxes is to unlink it for a bit and sort from there) – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:Really? I always had interpreted Jupiter using "calculations" in his ACRev speech ("The Message" / Modern day conversations) to Desmond/Ezio as a noun, not a descriptor. Or are you looking for something more specific, like from a "Making of" or art book?<br><br>(Aside, should we work to fix Kassandra's epithet? If so, only way I can think to filter its transclusion in navboxes is to unlink it for a bit and sort from there) – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
			::I think you might be misunderstanding 'descriptor' here to mean adjective since "calculations" is obviously a noun when Jupiter uses it. By 'descriptive not nominal', I meant that he isn't using the word ''calculations'' as a proper name for the scientific process of predicting the future. He is only using a general word that can be used to refer to it. His hesitation, if it is accurately transcribed here, also seems to suggest that he gave a brief pause to think about the best approximate word that would characterize it without naming it. By Minerva's usage of it as well, it seems that she also adopted this simple word to convey the concept after him, but it is still not shown to be used as a proper noun as opposed to a general noun.

imported>Darman36: /* Source for name */

2021-07-12T02:40:24Z

Source for name

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:40, 12 July 2021
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Is there an explicit source for this being a proper noun and an official name? Darby's tweet specifically refers to it as an "in-house" name, meaning that the devs used it unofficially among themselves. In all other instances I have seen it used in the series, it was in a descriptive, not nominal, way and not as a proper noun. I could be wrong, so please correct me if there is a source that I missed. As it is, I fear that this is another case where we prematurely canonized a term in an official capacity (like how we treated Kassandra's official epithet as ''misthios'' for the longest time, when it is actually "the Eagle Bearer"). If we take Darby's tweet on this alone, it still does not confirm that it is official or used as a proper noun, and therefore this article needs to be marked as having a conjectural name. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 02:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		Is there an explicit source for this being a proper noun and an official name? Darby's tweet specifically refers to it as an "in-house" name, meaning that the devs used it unofficially among themselves. In all other instances I have seen it used in the series, it was in a descriptive, not nominal, way and not as a proper noun. I could be wrong, so please correct me if there is a source that I missed. As it is, I fear that this is another case where we prematurely canonized a term in an official capacity (like how we treated Kassandra's official epithet as ''misthios'' for the longest time, when it is actually "the Eagle Bearer"). If we take Darby's tweet on this alone, it still does not confirm that it is official or used as a proper noun, and therefore this article needs to be marked as having a conjectural name. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 02:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
			:Really? I always had interpreted Jupiter using "calculations" in his ACRev speech ("The Message" / Modern day conversations) to Desmond/Ezio as a noun, not a descriptor. Or are you looking for something more specific, like from a "Making of" or art book?<br><br>(Aside, should we work to fix Kassandra's epithet? If so, only way I can think to filter its transclusion in navboxes is to unlink it for a bit and sort from there) – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 02:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Source for name */ new section

2021-07-12T02:15:07Z

Source for name: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:15, 12 July 2021
Line 21:		Line 21:

	As title, do we need a gallery in article?--[[User:UJ112013\|UJ112013]] ([[User talk:UJ112013\|talk]]) 12:28, February 25, 2018 (UTC)		As title, do we need a gallery in article?--[[User:UJ112013\|UJ112013]] ([[User talk:UJ112013\|talk]]) 12:28, February 25, 2018 (UTC)

			== Source for name ==

			Is there an explicit source for this being a proper noun and an official name? Darby's tweet specifically refers to it as an "in-house" name, meaning that the devs used it unofficially among themselves. In all other instances I have seen it used in the series, it was in a descriptive, not nominal, way and not as a proper noun. I could be wrong, so please correct me if there is a source that I missed. As it is, I fear that this is another case where we prematurely canonized a term in an official capacity (like how we treated Kassandra's official epithet as ''misthios'' for the longest time, when it is actually "the Eagle Bearer"). If we take Darby's tweet on this alone, it still does not confirm that it is official or used as a proper noun, and therefore this article needs to be marked as having a conjectural name. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 02:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

imported>RebeccaAWB: Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T13:57:35Z

Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	== Orelov's vision ==		== Orelov's vision ==

imported>UJ112013 at 12:28, 25 February 2018

2018-02-25T12:28:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 25 February 2018
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:Which part do you think we should put in the article? Because we can't put the whole lot in there. (Well, technically, we could, but it would be a ridiculous eyesore.) --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 18:14, May 8, 2015 (UTC)		:Which part do you think we should put in the article? Because we can't put the whole lot in there. (Well, technically, we could, but it would be a ridiculous eyesore.) --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 18:14, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
	::How about this much? "[[First Civilization\|They]] had these tools, these powerful machines, that could predict POSSIBLE FUTURES. Not what was going to happen, but wha-what COULD happen... probabilities. And... well, they spent a lot of energy trying to decide what was the most likely scenario for the future. Their's and [[Humans\|ours]]." It seems to be a much more accurate assessment of them than Jupiter's comment.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:37, May 8, 2015 (UTC)		::How about this much? "[[First Civilization\|They]] had these tools, these powerful machines, that could predict POSSIBLE FUTURES. Not what was going to happen, but wha-what COULD happen... probabilities. And... well, they spent a lot of energy trying to decide what was the most likely scenario for the future. Their's and [[Humans\|ours]]." It seems to be a much more accurate assessment of them than Jupiter's comment.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:37, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

			==Do we need a gallery?==

			As title, do we need a gallery in article?--[[User:UJ112013\|UJ112013]] ([[User talk:UJ112013\|talk]]) 12:28, February 25, 2018 (UTC)

imported>GZilla311: /* Desmond's Description */

2015-05-08T19:37:14Z

Desmond's Description

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 8 May 2015
Line 15:		Line 15:
	In Subject 17 Memo 2 in the [[Abstergo Entertainment research analyst's personal files]], Desmond describes the [[Calculations]] as [[Clay Kaczmarek]] saw them as he descended into insanity. Should the quotation at the top of the page be replaced with that one? As it is now, it seems to be normal (albeit complex) mathematical equations the way [[Jupiter]] describes it, but that is probably the point anyway, as that's how he thinks of them.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 14:55, May 8, 2015 (UTC)		In Subject 17 Memo 2 in the [[Abstergo Entertainment research analyst's personal files]], Desmond describes the [[Calculations]] as [[Clay Kaczmarek]] saw them as he descended into insanity. Should the quotation at the top of the page be replaced with that one? As it is now, it seems to be normal (albeit complex) mathematical equations the way [[Jupiter]] describes it, but that is probably the point anyway, as that's how he thinks of them.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 14:55, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
	:Which part do you think we should put in the article? Because we can't put the whole lot in there. (Well, technically, we could, but it would be a ridiculous eyesore.) --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 18:14, May 8, 2015 (UTC)		:Which part do you think we should put in the article? Because we can't put the whole lot in there. (Well, technically, we could, but it would be a ridiculous eyesore.) --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 18:14, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
			::How about this much? "[[First Civilization\|They]] had these tools, these powerful machines, that could predict POSSIBLE FUTURES. Not what was going to happen, but wha-what COULD happen... probabilities. And... well, they spent a lot of energy trying to decide what was the most likely scenario for the future. Their's and [[Humans\|ours]]." It seems to be a much more accurate assessment of them than Jupiter's comment.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:37, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 8 May 2015
Line 15:		Line 15:
	In Subject 17 Memo 2 in the [[Abstergo Entertainment research analyst's personal files]], Desmond describes the [[Calculations]] as [[Clay Kaczmarek]] saw them as he descended into insanity. Should the quotation at the top of the page be replaced with that one? As it is now, it seems to be normal (albeit complex) mathematical equations the way [[Jupiter]] describes it, but that is probably the point anyway, as that's how he thinks of them.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 14:55, May 8, 2015 (UTC)		In Subject 17 Memo 2 in the [[Abstergo Entertainment research analyst's personal files]], Desmond describes the [[Calculations]] as [[Clay Kaczmarek]] saw them as he descended into insanity. Should the quotation at the top of the page be replaced with that one? As it is now, it seems to be normal (albeit complex) mathematical equations the way [[Jupiter]] describes it, but that is probably the point anyway, as that's how he thinks of them.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 14:55, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
	:Which part do you think we should put in the article? Because we can't put the whole lot in there. (Well, technically, we could, but it would be a ridiculous eyesore.) --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 18:14, May 8, 2015 (UTC)		:Which part do you think we should put in the article? Because we can't put the whole lot in there. (Well, technically, we could, but it would be a ridiculous eyesore.) --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 18:14, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
			::How about this much? "[[First Civilization\|They]] had these tools, these powerful machines, that could predict POSSIBLE FUTURES. Not what was going to happen, but wha-what COULD happen... probabilities. And... well, they spent a lot of energy trying to decide what was the most likely scenario for the future. Their's and [[Humans\|ours]]." It seems to be a much more accurate assessment of them than Jupiter's comment.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:37, May 8, 2015 (UTC)