Talk:Aquila - Revision history

imported>RebeccaAWB: Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T13:47:08Z

Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	== Pirates versus ninja ==		== Pirates versus ninja ==

imported>The Crimson Eagle: There's no need to add to any of these discussions.

2014-05-12T17:17:11Z

There's no need to add to any of these discussions.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 12 May 2014
Line 172:		Line 172:

	I really believe they have something planned for it with the DLC; why would they make pay that much money for it if you're only going to be able to play a handful of missions with it? Ubisoft has to be smarter than that![[Special:Contributions/24.22.124.18\|24.22.124.18]] 00:28, November 6, 2012 (UTC)		I really believe they have something planned for it with the DLC; why would they make pay that much money for it if you're only going to be able to play a handful of missions with it? Ubisoft has to be smarter than that![[Special:Contributions/24.22.124.18\|24.22.124.18]] 00:28, November 6, 2012 (UTC)



	Yes [http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/Philippe_Bergeron Philippe Bergeron] Claimed that we'd be able to free roam between missions. I think they might have then gone back on their word since they planned on having free roam sailing in AC4, which was started before AC3 came out. Still, pissed me off because to fulfill my urge to do pirate talk with my friend when I'm sailing the Aquila , I have to keep replaying the last side quest involving the ship. The Giant and the Storm or something.[[User:Richard Grimes\|Richard Grimes]] ([[User talk:Richard Grimes\|talk]]) 16:38, May 12, 2014 (UTC)

	==Pronoun==		==Pronoun==
Line 181:		Line 177:

	:I've seen ten [http://drbj.hubpages.com/hub/Why-is-Ship-Called-She] different reasons for the practice, most of which mention that it's because it costs so much to keep ships in "paint and powder" (the practice is REALLY old, mind you), but it is a European and American exclusive practice. Russia and Arab Asia tend to refer to their ships as "he". [[User:Zero-G Mako\|Zero-G Mako]] ([[User talk:Zero-G Mako\|talk]]) 19:59, December 7, 2012 (UTC)		:I've seen ten [http://drbj.hubpages.com/hub/Why-is-Ship-Called-She] different reasons for the practice, most of which mention that it's because it costs so much to keep ships in "paint and powder" (the practice is REALLY old, mind you), but it is a European and American exclusive practice. Russia and Arab Asia tend to refer to their ships as "he". [[User:Zero-G Mako\|Zero-G Mako]] ([[User talk:Zero-G Mako\|talk]]) 19:59, December 7, 2012 (UTC)

	:The Captain of the German battleship Bismarck told his crew that the ship was too powerful to be called a "she" so it would be called a "he". [[User:Richard Grimes\|Richard Grimes]] ([[User talk:Richard Grimes\|talk]]) 16:40, May 12, 2014 (UTC)

	==Aquila chased Providence==		==Aquila chased Providence==
Line 189:		Line 183:

	:it [[Talk:Aquila#How_It_got_wrecked\|may]] be somewhat known [[User:Zero-G Mako\|Zero-G Mako]] ([[User talk:Zero-G Mako\|talk]]) 20:02, December 7, 2012 (UTC)		:it [[Talk:Aquila#How_It_got_wrecked\|may]] be somewhat known [[User:Zero-G Mako\|Zero-G Mako]] ([[User talk:Zero-G Mako\|talk]]) 20:02, December 7, 2012 (UTC)

	:It exclusively says that the Assassins spread false word that the Aquila was badly damaged chasing the Providence.[[User:Richard Grimes\|Richard Grimes]] ([[User talk:Richard Grimes\|talk]]) 16:41, May 12, 2014 (UTC)

	==Source for the pursuit of ''Providence''==		==Source for the pursuit of ''Providence''==

imported>Richard Grimes: /* Aquila chased Providence */

2014-05-12T16:41:33Z

Aquila chased Providence

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 12 May 2014
Line 189:		Line 189:

	:it [[Talk:Aquila#How_It_got_wrecked\|may]] be somewhat known [[User:Zero-G Mako\|Zero-G Mako]] ([[User talk:Zero-G Mako\|talk]]) 20:02, December 7, 2012 (UTC)		:it [[Talk:Aquila#How_It_got_wrecked\|may]] be somewhat known [[User:Zero-G Mako\|Zero-G Mako]] ([[User talk:Zero-G Mako\|talk]]) 20:02, December 7, 2012 (UTC)

			:It exclusively says that the Assassins spread false word that the Aquila was badly damaged chasing the Providence.[[User:Richard Grimes\|Richard Grimes]] ([[User talk:Richard Grimes\|talk]]) 16:41, May 12, 2014 (UTC)

	==Source for the pursuit of ''Providence''==		==Source for the pursuit of ''Providence''==

imported>Richard Grimes: /* Pronoun */

2014-05-12T16:40:03Z

Pronoun

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:40, 12 May 2014
Line 181:		Line 181:

	:I've seen ten [http://drbj.hubpages.com/hub/Why-is-Ship-Called-She] different reasons for the practice, most of which mention that it's because it costs so much to keep ships in "paint and powder" (the practice is REALLY old, mind you), but it is a European and American exclusive practice. Russia and Arab Asia tend to refer to their ships as "he". [[User:Zero-G Mako\|Zero-G Mako]] ([[User talk:Zero-G Mako\|talk]]) 19:59, December 7, 2012 (UTC)		:I've seen ten [http://drbj.hubpages.com/hub/Why-is-Ship-Called-She] different reasons for the practice, most of which mention that it's because it costs so much to keep ships in "paint and powder" (the practice is REALLY old, mind you), but it is a European and American exclusive practice. Russia and Arab Asia tend to refer to their ships as "he". [[User:Zero-G Mako\|Zero-G Mako]] ([[User talk:Zero-G Mako\|talk]]) 19:59, December 7, 2012 (UTC)

			:The Captain of the German battleship Bismarck told his crew that the ship was too powerful to be called a "she" so it would be called a "he". [[User:Richard Grimes\|Richard Grimes]] ([[User talk:Richard Grimes\|talk]]) 16:40, May 12, 2014 (UTC)

	==Aquila chased Providence==		==Aquila chased Providence==

imported>Richard Grimes: /* No free roam? */

2014-05-12T16:38:17Z

No free roam?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:38, 12 May 2014
Line 172:		Line 172:

	I really believe they have something planned for it with the DLC; why would they make pay that much money for it if you're only going to be able to play a handful of missions with it? Ubisoft has to be smarter than that![[Special:Contributions/24.22.124.18\|24.22.124.18]] 00:28, November 6, 2012 (UTC)		I really believe they have something planned for it with the DLC; why would they make pay that much money for it if you're only going to be able to play a handful of missions with it? Ubisoft has to be smarter than that![[Special:Contributions/24.22.124.18\|24.22.124.18]] 00:28, November 6, 2012 (UTC)



			Yes [http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/wiki/Philippe_Bergeron Philippe Bergeron] Claimed that we'd be able to free roam between missions. I think they might have then gone back on their word since they planned on having free roam sailing in AC4, which was started before AC3 came out. Still, pissed me off because to fulfill my urge to do pirate talk with my friend when I'm sailing the Aquila , I have to keep replaying the last side quest involving the ship. The Giant and the Storm or something.[[User:Richard Grimes\|Richard Grimes]] ([[User talk:Richard Grimes\|talk]]) 16:38, May 12, 2014 (UTC)

	==Pronoun==		==Pronoun==

imported>Stormbeast: Reverted edits by 98.250.218.196 (talk | block) to last version by Altaïr Skywalker 47

2013-09-25T19:56:35Z

Reverted edits by 98.250.218.196 (talk | block) to last version by Altaïr Skywalker 47

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, 25 September 2013
Line 192:		Line 192:

	:::Because 1 and 1 make 2, and you don't need to be told that you're eating an apple to know you're eating an apple. And, frankly, there really would not have been a lot of instances of Assassin ships following Templar ships into a storm in the year 1754, and those Assassin ships being damaged. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 22:05, May 3, 2013 (UTC)		:::Because 1 and 1 make 2, and you don't need to be told that you're eating an apple to know you're eating an apple. And, frankly, there really would not have been a lot of instances of Assassin ships following Templar ships into a storm in the year 1754, and those Assassin ships being damaged. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 22:05, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

			== The Aquila and the Providence ==

			So let me get this straight, the ship that chased the Providence was the Aquila? I always thought it was just some privateer ship. So that means Weems was a good guy? [[User:PatriotJager150\|PatriotJager150]] ([[User talk:PatriotJager150\|talk]]) 03:31, June 14, 2013 (UTC)PatriotJager150

			== Aquila vs. Jackdaw ==

			Hey, if the Aquila went to do so many Privateer Contracts in the Carribbean, how come the Aquila and Jackdaw never met? [[Special:Contributions/98.250.218.196\|98.250.218.196]] 00:25, June 26, 2013 (UTC)PatriotJager150

			:Because both are Assassin vessels for one, and secondly Ed's been dead for at least three to four decades before Connor took over captaincy of the Aquila and did the privateer contracts. --[[User:Kainzorus Prime\|<font color="#7575DB" face="OCR A" size="3">Kainzorus Prime</font>]] [[User talk:Kainzorus Prime\|<font color="#4C99A6"><sup>Walkie-talkie</sup></font>]] 00:50, June 26, 2013 (UTC)

	== Northeast passage ==		== Northeast passage ==

98.250.218.196 at 19:45, 25 September 2013

2013-09-25T19:45:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 25 September 2013
Line 192:		Line 192:

	:::Because 1 and 1 make 2, and you don't need to be told that you're eating an apple to know you're eating an apple. And, frankly, there really would not have been a lot of instances of Assassin ships following Templar ships into a storm in the year 1754, and those Assassin ships being damaged. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 22:05, May 3, 2013 (UTC)		:::Because 1 and 1 make 2, and you don't need to be told that you're eating an apple to know you're eating an apple. And, frankly, there really would not have been a lot of instances of Assassin ships following Templar ships into a storm in the year 1754, and those Assassin ships being damaged. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 22:05, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

	~~== The Aquila and the Providence ==~~

	So let me get this straight, the ship that chased the Providence was the Aquila? I always thought it was just some privateer ship. So that means Weems was a good guy? [[User:PatriotJager150\|PatriotJager150]] ([[User talk:PatriotJager150\|talk]]) 03:31, June 14, 2013 (UTC)PatriotJager150

	== Northeast passage ==		== Northeast passage ==

98.250.218.196 at 19:45, 25 September 2013

2013-09-25T19:45:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 25 September 2013
Line 196:		Line 196:

	So let me get this straight, the ship that chased the Providence was the Aquila? I always thought it was just some privateer ship. So that means Weems was a good guy? [[User:PatriotJager150\|PatriotJager150]] ([[User talk:PatriotJager150\|talk]]) 03:31, June 14, 2013 (UTC)PatriotJager150		So let me get this straight, the ship that chased the Providence was the Aquila? I always thought it was just some privateer ship. So that means Weems was a good guy? [[User:PatriotJager150\|PatriotJager150]] ([[User talk:PatriotJager150\|talk]]) 03:31, June 14, 2013 (UTC)PatriotJager150

	~~== Aquila vs. Jackdaw ==~~

	Hey, if the Aquila went to do so many Privateer Contracts in the Carribbean, how come the Aquila and Jackdaw never met? [[Special:Contributions/98.250.218.196\|98.250.218.196]] 00:25, June 26, 2013 (UTC)PatriotJager150

	:Because both are Assassin vessels for one, and secondly Ed's been dead for at least three to four decades before Connor took over captaincy of the Aquila and did the privateer contracts. --[[User:Kainzorus Prime\|<font color="#7575DB" face="OCR A" size="3">Kainzorus Prime</font>]] [[User talk:Kainzorus Prime\|<font color="#4C99A6"><sup>Walkie-talkie</sup></font>]] 00:50, June 26, 2013 (UTC)

	== Northeast passage ==		== Northeast passage ==

imported>Altaïr Skywalker 47: /* Northeast passage */

2013-07-30T11:34:13Z

Northeast passage

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 30 July 2013
Line 229:		Line 229:

	:::The amount of time taken is not mentioned in the game or his article. See [[Ratonhnhaké:ton#Finding Kidd's treasure\|here]]. And finally, I have to agree with Primus. I find your signature is strange and confusing. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 11:28, July 30, 2013 (UTC)		:::The amount of time taken is not mentioned in the game or his article. See [[Ratonhnhaké:ton#Finding Kidd's treasure\|here]]. And finally, I have to agree with Primus. I find your signature is strange and confusing. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 11:28, July 30, 2013 (UTC)

			::::Okay, I just asked it out of curiosity. Well then, I don't think even ''Forsaken'' doesn't mention the time. Better not to talk about the sig. story. <small>—Preceding [[Help:Signature\|unsigned]] comment was added by {{User\|Altaïr Skywalker 47}}</small> 11:34, July 30, 2013 (UTC)

imported>The Crimson Eagle: /* Northeast passage */

2013-07-30T11:28:31Z

Northeast passage

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 30 July 2013
Line 225:		Line 225:

	<small>—Preceding [[Help:Signature\|unsigned]] comment was added by {{User\|Altaïr Skywalker 47}}</small> 11:17, July 30, 2013 (UTC)		<small>—Preceding [[Help:Signature\|unsigned]] comment was added by {{User\|Altaïr Skywalker 47}}</small> 11:17, July 30, 2013 (UTC)

			:::Why not just say "the ''Aquila''? I'd forgotten that it was nicknamed the "Ghost of the North Seas" and couldn't answer your question when it was asked.

			:::The amount of time taken is not mentioned in the game or his article. See [[Ratonhnhaké:ton#Finding Kidd's treasure\|here]]. And finally, I have to agree with Primus. I find your signature is strange and confusing. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 11:28, July 30, 2013 (UTC)