Talk:Antonin Scalia - Revision history

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Correspondence */

2024-07-15T06:31:26Z

Correspondence

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 15 July 2024
Line 8:		Line 8:

	== Correspondence ==		== Correspondence ==
			{{OpenTalk}}
	{{~~Opentalk~~}}
	Do we know who the S. is in the letter from Scalia we see during the glyph/rift puzzles? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 06:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)		Do we know who the S. is in the letter from Scalia we see during the glyph/rift puzzles? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 06:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Correspondence */ new section

2024-07-15T06:30:53Z

Correspondence: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:30, 15 July 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	In Scalia's letter, he writes, "Soon, our hopes will be realized. Government will no longer derive it's authority from the people, but from us, their protectors." Doesn't that imply that Scalia is aware of the Order's existance, rather than being a manipulated puppet? If you ask me, he's at the least an ally, at the most a Templar. [[User:AllianceScoutAiothai\|AllianceScoutAiothai]] ([[User talk:AllianceScoutAiothai\|talk]]) 08:50, July 10, 2015 (UTC)		In Scalia's letter, he writes, "Soon, our hopes will be realized. Government will no longer derive it's authority from the people, but from us, their protectors." Doesn't that imply that Scalia is aware of the Order's existance, rather than being a manipulated puppet? If you ask me, he's at the least an ally, at the most a Templar. [[User:AllianceScoutAiothai\|AllianceScoutAiothai]] ([[User talk:AllianceScoutAiothai\|talk]]) 08:50, July 10, 2015 (UTC)

			== Correspondence ==

			{{Opentalk}}
			Do we know who the S. is in the letter from Scalia we see during the glyph/rift puzzles? [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 06:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

imported>RebeccaAWB: Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T13:46:18Z

Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	==Possible Letter Issues==		==Possible Letter Issues==
	The letter written by Scalia is dated as 2000, just after the issues w/the election were settled and [[George W. Bush\|Bush]] declared the winner. What I find odd is that he's saying that he's convince Sandra Day O'Connor to retire so that [[John Roberts\|Roberts]] can be appointed by Bush. However, O'Connor announced her retirement in 2005, ''after'' the 2004 election. Thoughts? — [[User:M.C.Tales\|M.C.Tales]] 16:44, February 22, 2011 (UTC)		The letter written by Scalia is dated as 2000, just after the issues w/the election were settled and [[George W. Bush\|Bush]] declared the winner. What I find odd is that he's saying that he's convince Sandra Day O'Connor to retire so that [[John Roberts\|Roberts]] can be appointed by Bush. However, O'Connor announced her retirement in 2005, ''after'' the 2004 election. Thoughts? — [[User:M.C.Tales\|M.C.Tales]] 16:44, February 22, 2011 (UTC)

imported>AllianceScoutAiothai: /* "Puppet"? */ new section

2015-07-10T08:50:00Z

"Puppet"?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 10 July 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Possible Letter Issues==		==Possible Letter Issues==
	The letter written by Scalia is dated as 2000, just after the issues w/the election were settled and [[George W. Bush\|Bush]] declared the winner. What I find odd is that he's saying that he's convince Sandra Day O'Connor to retire so that [[John Roberts\|Roberts]] can be appointed by Bush. However, O'Connor announced her retirement in 2005, ''after'' the 2004 election. Thoughts? — [[User:M.C.Tales\|M.C.Tales]] 16:44, February 22, 2011 (UTC)		The letter written by Scalia is dated as 2000, just after the issues w/the election were settled and [[George W. Bush\|Bush]] declared the winner. What I find odd is that he's saying that he's convince Sandra Day O'Connor to retire so that [[John Roberts\|Roberts]] can be appointed by Bush. However, O'Connor announced her retirement in 2005, ''after'' the 2004 election. Thoughts? — [[User:M.C.Tales\|M.C.Tales]] 16:44, February 22, 2011 (UTC)

			== "Puppet"? ==

			In Scalia's letter, he writes, "Soon, our hopes will be realized. Government will no longer derive it's authority from the people, but from us, their protectors." Doesn't that imply that Scalia is aware of the Order's existance, rather than being a manipulated puppet? If you ask me, he's at the least an ally, at the most a Templar. [[User:AllianceScoutAiothai\|AllianceScoutAiothai]] ([[User talk:AllianceScoutAiothai\|talk]]) 08:50, July 10, 2015 (UTC)

imported>M.C.Tales: Created page with "==Possible Letter Issues== The letter written by Scalia is dated as 2000, just after the issues w/the election were settled and Bush declared the winner. What ..."

2011-02-22T16:44:12Z

Created page with "==Possible Letter Issues== The letter written by Scalia is dated as 2000, just after the issues w/the election were settled and Bush declared the winner. What ..."

Páàjì titun

==Possible Letter Issues==
The letter written by Scalia is dated as 2000, just after the issues w/the election were settled and [[George W. Bush|Bush]] declared the winner. What I find odd is that he's saying that he's convince Sandra Day O'Connor to retire so that [[John Roberts|Roberts]] can be appointed by Bush. However, O'Connor announced her retirement in 2005, ''after'' the 2004 election. Thoughts? — [[User:M.C.Tales|M.C.Tales]] 16:44, February 22, 2011 (UTC)