Talk:Ankh - Revision history

Soranin: Text replacement - "Gentek" to "[https://prototype.fandom.com/wiki/ Gentek]"

2026-05-10T18:13:45Z

Text replacement - "Gentek" to "[https://prototype.fandom.com/wiki/ Gentek]"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 10 May 2026
Line 17:		Line 17:
	you read the comics in French Assassin's Creed Accipiter[[User:Inconnu-dark\|Inconnu-dark]] 01:45, January 15, 2012 (UTC)		you read the comics in French Assassin's Creed Accipiter[[User:Inconnu-dark\|Inconnu-dark]] 01:45, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

	:Desmond's story from the french comic is non-canon. And it stays out of the articles.. --[[User:Vatsa1708\|<tt>'''Vatsa'''</tt>]] (<small>[[User talk:Vatsa1708\|talk]] • [~~[w::c~~:prototype\|Gentek]]</small>) 04:37, January 15, 2012 (UTC)		:Desmond's story from the french comic is non-canon. And it stays out of the articles.. --[[User:Vatsa1708\|<tt>'''Vatsa'''</tt>]] (<small>[[User talk:Vatsa1708\|talk]] • [https://prototype.fandom.com/wiki/ Gentek]</small>) 04:37, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

	== Rename? ==		== Rename? ==

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Mark of the Messenger */ new section

2024-07-21T09:59:38Z

Mark of the Messenger: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 21 July 2024
Line 44:		Line 44:
	Due to the Resurrection Plot with Gamal's knowledge of Isis' use of it and the story, is it now canon or just still unconfirmed? [[User:Batfan13\|Batfan13]] ([[User talk:Batfan13\|talk]]) 14:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)		Due to the Resurrection Plot with Gamal's knowledge of Isis' use of it and the story, is it now canon or just still unconfirmed? [[User:Batfan13\|Batfan13]] ([[User talk:Batfan13\|talk]]) 14:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
	:Until we have an actual Isu source or pov confirm it any thing supposed by humans is just that, supposition. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 02:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)		:Until we have an actual Isu source or pov confirm it any thing supposed by humans is just that, supposition. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 02:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

			== Mark of the Messenger ==

			{{OpenTalk}}
			Does anyone know if this is supposed to be a specific reference to something? I don't know about Egyptian mythology but Abrahamic has a lot of "messengers" in the form of angels or prophets (particularly Muhammad (pbuh)). The DYL video for Lukas Zurburg shows a depiction of the astrological Aquarios right after mentioning the "Mark of the Messenger" and I have no idea what that is for. Love to be able to link this to something. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 09:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: since there is only one response to the original inquiry

2024-07-15T06:06:11Z

since there is only one response to the original inquiry

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:06, 15 July 2024
Line 40:		Line 40:
	:Agreed, there is already a [[Thread:212867\|thread]] for this topic, so if anything else needs to be said about it, it should be said there. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 19:42, August 10, 2017 (UTC)		:Agreed, there is already a [[Thread:212867\|thread]] for this topic, so if anything else needs to be said about it, it should be said there. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 19:42, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

	== Canon? ==		==Canon?==
			{{OpenTalk}}
	Due to the Resurrection Plot with Gamal's knowledge of Isis' use of it and the story, is it now canon or just still unconfirmed? [[User:Batfan13\|Batfan13]] ([[User talk:Batfan13\|talk]]) 14:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)		Due to the Resurrection Plot with Gamal's knowledge of Isis' use of it and the story, is it now canon or just still unconfirmed? [[User:Batfan13\|Batfan13]] ([[User talk:Batfan13\|talk]]) 14:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
	:Until we have an actual Isu source or pov confirm it any thing supposed by humans is just that, supposition. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 02:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)		:Until we have an actual Isu source or pov confirm it any thing supposed by humans is just that, supposition. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 02:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Canon? */

2023-07-23T02:31:01Z

Canon?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:31, 23 July 2023
Line 43:		Line 43:

	Due to the Resurrection Plot with Gamal's knowledge of Isis' use of it and the story, is it now canon or just still unconfirmed? [[User:Batfan13\|Batfan13]] ([[User talk:Batfan13\|talk]]) 14:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)		Due to the Resurrection Plot with Gamal's knowledge of Isis' use of it and the story, is it now canon or just still unconfirmed? [[User:Batfan13\|Batfan13]] ([[User talk:Batfan13\|talk]]) 14:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
			:Until we have an actual Isu source or pov confirm it any thing supposed by humans is just that, supposition. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 02:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

imported>Batfan13: /* Canon? */ new section

2023-07-22T14:32:57Z

Canon?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:32, 22 July 2023
Line 39:		Line 39:
	This type of discussion is best located in the forums section. Article talk pages are supposed to be used to discuss changes to an article. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 17:35, August 10, 2017 (UTC)		This type of discussion is best located in the forums section. Article talk pages are supposed to be used to discuss changes to an article. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 17:35, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
	:Agreed, there is already a [[Thread:212867\|thread]] for this topic, so if anything else needs to be said about it, it should be said there. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 19:42, August 10, 2017 (UTC)		:Agreed, there is already a [[Thread:212867\|thread]] for this topic, so if anything else needs to be said about it, it should be said there. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 19:42, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

			== Canon? ==

			Due to the Resurrection Plot with Gamal's knowledge of Isis' use of it and the story, is it now canon or just still unconfirmed? [[User:Batfan13\|Batfan13]] ([[User talk:Batfan13\|talk]]) 14:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

imported>RebeccaAWB: Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T13:45:55Z

Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	==The Ankh and the Shroud==		==The Ankh and the Shroud==
	They seem to be the same thing, they can both temporarily resurrect the dead and heal the user. Does the Ankh have the side effects that the shroud has? [[User:RomanEagle\|RomanEagle]] 13:19, December 28, 2011 (UTC)		They seem to be the same thing, they can both temporarily resurrect the dead and heal the user. Does the Ankh have the side effects that the shroud has? [[User:RomanEagle\|RomanEagle]] 13:19, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

imported>The Wikia Editor at 17:42, 10 August 2017

2017-08-10T17:42:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 10 August 2017
Line 37:		Line 37:

	This type of discussion is best located in the forums section. Article talk pages are supposed to be used to discuss changes to an article. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 17:35, August 10, 2017 (UTC)		This type of discussion is best located in the forums section. Article talk pages are supposed to be used to discuss changes to an article. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 17:35, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
			:Agreed, there is already a [[Thread:212867\|thread]] for this topic, so if anything else needs to be said about it, it should be said there. [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 19:42, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

imported>The Crimson Eagle: /* The Ankh isn't considered canon right? */ oops

2017-08-10T17:41:27Z

The Ankh isn't considered canon right?: oops

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:41, 10 August 2017
Line 36:		Line 36:
	:::<span style="font-size:12px;">"Ubisoft's official stance is that the comics' modern day storyline isn't canon, but the historical parts are" </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">Well ... Aymar is the highest authority over the canon. </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">[[User:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:red;">'''Spanish assassin'''</span>]] [[File:NEVADO BANNER.png\|20px\|]]([[User Talk:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:no;">Talk</span>]]) 12:03, August 10, 2017 (UTC)</span>		:::<span style="font-size:12px;">"Ubisoft's official stance is that the comics' modern day storyline isn't canon, but the historical parts are" </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">Well ... Aymar is the highest authority over the canon. </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">[[User:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:red;">'''Spanish assassin'''</span>]] [[File:NEVADO BANNER.png\|20px\|]]([[User Talk:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:no;">Talk</span>]]) 12:03, August 10, 2017 (UTC)</span>

	This type of discussion is best located in the forums section. Article talk pages are supposed to be used discuss changes to an article. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 17:35, August 10, 2017 (UTC)		This type of discussion is best located in the forums section. Article talk pages are supposed to be used to discuss changes to an article. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 17:35, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

imported>The Crimson Eagle: /* The Ankh isn't considered canon right? */

2017-08-10T17:35:08Z

The Ankh isn't considered canon right?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 10 August 2017
Line 35:		Line 35:
	::: Understood,thanks[[User:Qwert1225\|Qwert1225]] ([[User talk:Qwert1225\|talk]]) 17:09, August 9, 2017 (UTC)		::: Understood,thanks[[User:Qwert1225\|Qwert1225]] ([[User talk:Qwert1225\|talk]]) 17:09, August 9, 2017 (UTC)
	:::<span style="font-size:12px;">"Ubisoft's official stance is that the comics' modern day storyline isn't canon, but the historical parts are" </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">Well ... Aymar is the highest authority over the canon. </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">[[User:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:red;">'''Spanish assassin'''</span>]] [[File:NEVADO BANNER.png\|20px\|]]([[User Talk:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:no;">Talk</span>]]) 12:03, August 10, 2017 (UTC)</span>		:::<span style="font-size:12px;">"Ubisoft's official stance is that the comics' modern day storyline isn't canon, but the historical parts are" </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">Well ... Aymar is the highest authority over the canon. </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">[[User:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:red;">'''Spanish assassin'''</span>]] [[File:NEVADO BANNER.png\|20px\|]]([[User Talk:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:no;">Talk</span>]]) 12:03, August 10, 2017 (UTC)</span>

			This type of discussion is best located in the forums section. Article talk pages are supposed to be used discuss changes to an article. --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 17:35, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

imported>Spanish assassin: /* The Ankh isn't considered canon right? */

2017-08-10T12:03:50Z

The Ankh isn't considered canon right?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 10 August 2017
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:::They're decent, I suppose. Not really all that important though. It's unfortunate that they didn't bring back more elements and characters from the comics' non-canon modern day. Jonathan Hawk's storyline is pretty fun and it would be nice if he's brought into canon at some point in the future . [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 19:07, August 9, 2017 (UTC)		:::They're decent, I suppose. Not really all that important though. It's unfortunate that they didn't bring back more elements and characters from the comics' non-canon modern day. Jonathan Hawk's storyline is pretty fun and it would be nice if he's brought into canon at some point in the future . [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 19:07, August 9, 2017 (UTC)
	::: Understood,thanks[[User:Qwert1225\|Qwert1225]] ([[User talk:Qwert1225\|talk]]) 17:09, August 9, 2017 (UTC)		::: Understood,thanks[[User:Qwert1225\|Qwert1225]] ([[User talk:Qwert1225\|talk]]) 17:09, August 9, 2017 (UTC)
			:::<span style="font-size:12px;">"Ubisoft's official stance is that the comics' modern day storyline isn't canon, but the historical parts are" </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">Well ... Aymar is the highest authority over the canon. </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">[[User:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:red;">'''Spanish assassin'''</span>]] [[File:NEVADO BANNER.png\|20px\|]]([[User Talk:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:no;">Talk</span>]]) 12:03, August 10, 2017 (UTC)</span>

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 10 August 2017
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:::They're decent, I suppose. Not really all that important though. It's unfortunate that they didn't bring back more elements and characters from the comics' non-canon modern day. Jonathan Hawk's storyline is pretty fun and it would be nice if he's brought into canon at some point in the future . [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 19:07, August 9, 2017 (UTC)		:::They're decent, I suppose. Not really all that important though. It's unfortunate that they didn't bring back more elements and characters from the comics' non-canon modern day. Jonathan Hawk's storyline is pretty fun and it would be nice if he's brought into canon at some point in the future . [[User:The Wikia Editor\|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor\|talk]]) 19:07, August 9, 2017 (UTC)
	::: Understood,thanks[[User:Qwert1225\|Qwert1225]] ([[User talk:Qwert1225\|talk]]) 17:09, August 9, 2017 (UTC)		::: Understood,thanks[[User:Qwert1225\|Qwert1225]] ([[User talk:Qwert1225\|talk]]) 17:09, August 9, 2017 (UTC)
			:::<span style="font-size:12px;">"Ubisoft's official stance is that the comics' modern day storyline isn't canon, but the historical parts are" </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">Well ... Aymar is the highest authority over the canon. </span><span style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(255,255,255);">[[User:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:red;">'''Spanish assassin'''</span>]] [[File:NEVADO BANNER.png\|20px\|]]([[User Talk:Spanish assassin\|<span style="color:no;">Talk</span>]]) 12:03, August 10, 2017 (UTC)</span>