Talk:American Civil War - Revision history

imported>Lacrossedeamon at 05:15, 1 July 2024

2024-07-01T05:15:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:15, 1 July 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talkheader}}		{{Talkheader}}
			==Referencing==
	Can we reference AC2 as well? I know that some of the glyphs dealt with Booth and Lincoln. I would add the reference myself, but I don't know how just yet. [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 16:57, December 5, 2013 (UTC)		Can we reference AC2 as well? I know that some of the glyphs dealt with Booth and Lincoln. I would add the reference myself, but I don't know how just yet. [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 16:57, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

imported>RebeccaAWB: /* top */Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T13:44:46Z

top: Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	Can we reference AC2 as well? I know that some of the glyphs dealt with Booth and Lincoln. I would add the reference myself, but I don't know how just yet. [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 16:57, December 5, 2013 (UTC)		Can we reference AC2 as well? I know that some of the glyphs dealt with Booth and Lincoln. I would add the reference myself, but I don't know how just yet. [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 16:57, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

imported>Jasca Ducato: /* Timeline */

2013-12-13T10:29:35Z

Timeline

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:29, 13 December 2013
Line 15:		Line 15:

	I would like it to be. Can we somehow do that, or is it something only the admins can do? [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 05:14, December 13, 2013 (UTC)		I would like it to be. Can we somehow do that, or is it something only the admins can do? [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 05:14, December 13, 2013 (UTC)
			:Why? Besides a couple of characters apparently having a distant relative alive during the conflict, it has absolutely no standing whatsoever in AC canon. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 10:29, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

imported>MasterKenway: /* Timeline */

2013-12-13T05:14:43Z

Timeline

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:14, 13 December 2013
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Timeline==		==Timeline==
	Shouldnt this be a timeline article? --[[User:The Forgotten Fragment\|<span style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold;font-size:16px;color:#A3E3ED;">Fragment</span>]] [[User talk:The Forgotten Fragment\|<sup><span style="font-family:times new roman;color:orange;">-Animus-</span></sup>]] 04:50, December 13, 2013 (UTC)		Shouldnt this be a timeline article? --[[User:The Forgotten Fragment\|<span style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold;font-size:16px;color:#A3E3ED;">Fragment</span>]] [[User talk:The Forgotten Fragment\|<sup><span style="font-family:times new roman;color:orange;">-Animus-</span></sup>]] 04:50, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

			I would like it to be. Can we somehow do that, or is it something only the admins can do? [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 05:14, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

imported>The Forgotten Fragment at 04:50, 13 December 2013

2013-12-13T04:50:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:50, 13 December 2013
Line 10:		Line 10:

	My thoughts, as well. Thanks. [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 17:33, December 5, 2013 (UTC)		My thoughts, as well. Thanks. [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 17:33, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

			==Timeline==
			Shouldnt this be a timeline article? --[[User:The Forgotten Fragment\|<span style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold;font-size:16px;color:#A3E3ED;">Fragment</span>]] [[User talk:The Forgotten Fragment\|<sup><span style="font-family:times new roman;color:orange;">-Animus-</span></sup>]] 04:50, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

imported>MasterKenway at 17:33, 5 December 2013

2013-12-05T17:33:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 5 December 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Speculation, especially intentional, is a large offense - it goes into direct conflict with our goal of being an accurate database of the ''Assassin's Creed'' universe. Please do refrain from it in the future. And I doubt we would see it any time soon as a setting for a game, unless Ubisoft decides to stretch the Kenway lineage to another 2 to 3 games. It'd be too similar to the American Revolutionary War to release it so soon after ''Assassin's Creed III''. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 17:28, December 5, 2013 (UTC)		Speculation, especially intentional, is a large offense - it goes into direct conflict with our goal of being an accurate database of the ''Assassin's Creed'' universe. Please do refrain from it in the future. And I doubt we would see it any time soon as a setting for a game, unless Ubisoft decides to stretch the Kenway lineage to another 2 to 3 games. It'd be too similar to the American Revolutionary War to release it so soon after ''Assassin's Creed III''. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 17:28, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

			My thoughts, as well. Thanks. [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 17:33, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

imported>Master Sima Yi at 17:28, 5 December 2013

2013-12-05T17:28:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 5 December 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:

	On an unrelated note, do you think the Civil War would be a possibility for a future game? [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 17:21, December 5, 2013 (UTC)		On an unrelated note, do you think the Civil War would be a possibility for a future game? [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 17:21, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

			Speculation, especially intentional, is a large offense - it goes into direct conflict with our goal of being an accurate database of the ''Assassin's Creed'' universe. Please do refrain from it in the future. And I doubt we would see it any time soon as a setting for a game, unless Ubisoft decides to stretch the Kenway lineage to another 2 to 3 games. It'd be too similar to the American Revolutionary War to release it so soon after ''Assassin's Creed III''. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 17:28, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

imported>MasterKenway at 17:21, 5 December 2013

2013-12-05T17:21:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 5 December 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I've added them. I have to ask where you got the idea from that the Templars orchestrated the war, though. And just because Booth was killed by the Assassins, does not mean he was a Templar - in the very same Glyph, it shows Tomás de Torquemada and Cleopatra as well, who weren't actual Templars but were killed by the Assassins. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 17:11, December 5, 2013 (UTC)		I've added them. I have to ask where you got the idea from that the Templars orchestrated the war, though. And just because Booth was killed by the Assassins, does not mean he was a Templar - in the very same Glyph, it shows Tomás de Torquemada and Cleopatra as well, who weren't actual Templars but were killed by the Assassins. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 17:11, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

			It seemed logical. I know, I know, it's just speculation on my part, but it made sense, what with Templars orchestrating other wars. I'll try to avoid making assumptions in the future, it's not to kind of thing that you can just put on a wiki without proof. And thanks for the reference, it's one of the things I haven't figure out yet.

			On an unrelated note, do you think the Civil War would be a possibility for a future game? [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 17:21, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

imported>Master Sima Yi at 17:11, 5 December 2013

2013-12-05T17:11:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 5 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can we reference AC2 as well? I know that some of the glyphs dealt with Booth and Lincoln. I would add the reference myself, but I don't know how just yet. [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 16:57, December 5, 2013 (UTC)		Can we reference AC2 as well? I know that some of the glyphs dealt with Booth and Lincoln. I would add the reference myself, but I don't know how just yet. [[User:MasterKenway\|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway\|talk]]) 16:57, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

			I've added them. I have to ask where you got the idea from that the Templars orchestrated the war, though. And just because Booth was killed by the Assassins, does not mean he was a Templar - in the very same Glyph, it shows Tomás de Torquemada and Cleopatra as well, who weren't actual Templars but were killed by the Assassins. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 17:11, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

imported>MasterKenway: Created page with "Can we reference AC2 as well? I know that some of the glyphs dealt with Booth and Lincoln. I would add the reference myself, but I don't know how just yet. ~~~~"

2013-12-05T16:57:38Z

Created page with "Can we reference AC2 as well? I know that some of the glyphs dealt with Booth and Lincoln. I would add the reference myself, but I don't know how just yet. ~~~~"

Páàjì titun

Can we reference AC2 as well? I know that some of the glyphs dealt with Booth and Lincoln. I would add the reference myself, but I don't know how just yet. [[User:MasterKenway|MasterKenway]] ([[User talk:MasterKenway|talk]]) 16:57, December 5, 2013 (UTC)