Talk:Al Mualim - Revision history

imported>Lacrossedeamon at 08:54, 29 June 2024

2024-06-29T08:54:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:54, 29 June 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talkheader}}		{{Talkheader}}
			==Rashid ad-Din Sinan==
	This person may be intended to be be Rashid ad-Din Sinan, leader of the Hashshashin from 1162 to 1192 and "Master of the Syrian assassins", which matches what is said in the game. Moreover, the time of his death roughly matches the one of Al Mualim's.		This person may be intended to be be Rashid ad-Din Sinan, leader of the Hashshashin from 1162 to 1192 and "Master of the Syrian assassins", which matches what is said in the game. Moreover, the time of his death roughly matches the one of Al Mualim's.

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Templar */

2023-01-02T05:15:55Z

Templar

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:15, 2 January 2023
Line 201:		Line 201:

	He was never a templar, he was only an ally to them at most. Dunno why this page claims he was a templar. [[User:MedievalVibes\|MedievalVibes]] ([[User talk:MedievalVibes\|talk]])		He was never a templar, he was only an ally to them at most. Dunno why this page claims he was a templar. [[User:MedievalVibes\|MedievalVibes]] ([[User talk:MedievalVibes\|talk]])
	:People used to use the "Affiliations" field in the character infobox to indicate alliances as well. So, editors included "Templar" for Al Mualim's affiliations because he cooperated with Templars. They did this with Arno as well. I have said before this is confusing and misleading for our readers, so I have corrected it here as well. Thanks for bringing it to ~~your~~ attention. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 05:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)		:People used to use the "Affiliations" field in the character infobox to indicate alliances as well. So, editors included "Templar" for Al Mualim's affiliations because he cooperated with Templars. They did this with Arno as well. I have said before that this is confusing and misleading for our readers, so I have corrected it here as well. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 05:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Templar */

2023-01-02T05:15:25Z

Templar

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:15, 2 January 2023
Line 201:		Line 201:

	He was never a templar, he was only an ally to them at most. Dunno why this page claims he was a templar. [[User:MedievalVibes\|MedievalVibes]] ([[User talk:MedievalVibes\|talk]])		He was never a templar, he was only an ally to them at most. Dunno why this page claims he was a templar. [[User:MedievalVibes\|MedievalVibes]] ([[User talk:MedievalVibes\|talk]])
			:People used to use the "Affiliations" field in the character infobox to indicate alliances as well. So, editors included "Templar" for Al Mualim's affiliations because he cooperated with Templars. They did this with Arno as well. I have said before this is confusing and misleading for our readers, so I have corrected it here as well. Thanks for bringing it to your attention. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 05:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

imported>Anonymous 672cfdac582961.68403778: /* Templar */ new section

2023-01-02T04:45:20Z

Templar: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:45, 2 January 2023
Line 197:		Line 197:

	The only reason he nearly killed him was because he wielded the Apple of Eden. Though skilled, he was still an old man, and he was not as strong as he used to be. [[User:Toolen\|Toolen]] ([[User talk:Toolen\|talk]]) 03:18, August 24, 2015 (UTC)		The only reason he nearly killed him was because he wielded the Apple of Eden. Though skilled, he was still an old man, and he was not as strong as he used to be. [[User:Toolen\|Toolen]] ([[User talk:Toolen\|talk]]) 03:18, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

			== Templar ==

			He was never a templar, he was only an ally to them at most. Dunno why this page claims he was a templar. [[User:MedievalVibes\|MedievalVibes]] ([[User talk:MedievalVibes\|talk]])

imported>RebeccaAWB: /* top */Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T13:42:57Z

top: Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	This person may be intended to be be Rashid ad-Din Sinan, leader of the Hashshashin from 1162 to 1192 and "Master of the Syrian assassins", which matches what is said in the game. Moreover, the time of his death roughly matches the one of Al Mualim's.		This person may be intended to be be Rashid ad-Din Sinan, leader of the Hashshashin from 1162 to 1192 and "Master of the Syrian assassins", which matches what is said in the game. Moreover, the time of his death roughly matches the one of Al Mualim's.

imported>Vetinari: /* Name */

2017-01-25T00:17:53Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 25 January 2017
Line 90:		Line 90:

	:Even if the game does say that he is called Rashid ad-Din Sinan, he is known by most AC fans as Al Mualim. Frankly, This topic has been discussed before and I frankly don't really see the point in going over it again. {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 22:19, January 24, 2017 (UTC)		:Even if the game does say that he is called Rashid ad-Din Sinan, he is known by most AC fans as Al Mualim. Frankly, This topic has been discussed before and I frankly don't really see the point in going over it again. {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 22:19, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

			::Has it been discussed since the request to "move the page back by a Ubisoft representative" as that's the only reason the page is back under his title? (I'm not familiar with the portable games, is Altair's Chronicles the same as the mobile AC?) [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 00:17, January 25, 2017 (UTC)

	== Last Words ==		== Last Words ==

imported>Crookandcharlatan: /* Name */

2017-01-24T22:19:56Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:19, 25 January 2017
Line 88:		Line 88:
	If "Al Mualim's name was confirmed in the mobile version of ''Assassin's Creed''" is a fact, shouldn't he be called that in the article regardless of whatever this copyright business is? [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 20:31, January 24, 2017 (UTC)		If "Al Mualim's name was confirmed in the mobile version of ''Assassin's Creed''" is a fact, shouldn't he be called that in the article regardless of whatever this copyright business is? [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 20:31, January 24, 2017 (UTC)
	:I have been pretty much the sole editor for all our articles from the AC1 mobile game ''Altaïr's Chronicles'' (or at least the one who revamped them all, almost all were incomplete), replaying the game no less than 30x, and I do not recall Al-Mualim ever being called Sinan once. Maybe I just suck. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:11, January 24, 2017 (UTC)		:I have been pretty much the sole editor for all our articles from the AC1 mobile game ''Altaïr's Chronicles'' (or at least the one who revamped them all, almost all were incomplete), replaying the game no less than 30x, and I do not recall Al-Mualim ever being called Sinan once. Maybe I just suck. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:11, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

			:Even if the game does say that he is called Rashid ad-Din Sinan, he is known by most AC fans as Al Mualim. Frankly, This topic has been discussed before and I frankly don't really see the point in going over it again. {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 22:19, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

	== Last Words ==		== Last Words ==

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Name */

2017-01-24T21:11:39Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 24 January 2017
Line 87:		Line 87:

	If "Al Mualim's name was confirmed in the mobile version of ''Assassin's Creed''" is a fact, shouldn't he be called that in the article regardless of whatever this copyright business is? [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 20:31, January 24, 2017 (UTC)		If "Al Mualim's name was confirmed in the mobile version of ''Assassin's Creed''" is a fact, shouldn't he be called that in the article regardless of whatever this copyright business is? [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 20:31, January 24, 2017 (UTC)
			:I have been pretty much the sole editor for all our articles from the AC1 mobile game ''Altaïr's Chronicles'' (or at least the one who revamped them all, almost all were incomplete), replaying the game no less than 30x, and I do not recall Al-Mualim ever being called Sinan once. Maybe I just suck. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 21:11, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

	== Last Words ==		== Last Words ==

imported>Vetinari: /* Name */

2017-01-24T20:31:22Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 24 January 2017
Line 85:		Line 85:

	:Rashid ad-Din Sinan is his real name, Al Mualim translates to "The master" or "The mentor", which is his title. [[User:Amnestyyy\|<span style="font-family:Blackadder ITC;font-size:19px;color:#FF033E;">'''Nesty'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Amnestyyy\|<sup><span style="font-family:FlamencoD;color:#9966CC;">Contact me!</span></sup>]] 18:34, December 12, 2011 (UTC)		:Rashid ad-Din Sinan is his real name, Al Mualim translates to "The master" or "The mentor", which is his title. [[User:Amnestyyy\|<span style="font-family:Blackadder ITC;font-size:19px;color:#FF033E;">'''Nesty'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:Amnestyyy\|<sup><span style="font-family:FlamencoD;color:#9966CC;">Contact me!</span></sup>]] 18:34, December 12, 2011 (UTC)

			If "Al Mualim's name was confirmed in the mobile version of ''Assassin's Creed''" is a fact, shouldn't he be called that in the article regardless of whatever this copyright business is? [[User:Vetinari\|<b><span style="color: black">Vetinari</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Vetinari\|(Appointment)]]</sup> 20:31, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

	== Last Words ==		== Last Words ==

imported>Master Sima Yi: Master Sima Yi moved page Talk:Rashid ad-Din Sinan to Talk:Al Mualim over redirect: The reason he's not called Rashid ad-Din Sinan is because of a copyright. I've been asked to move the page back by a Ubisoft representative.

2016-10-23T12:08:28Z

Master Sima Yi moved page Talk:Rashid ad-Din Sinan to Talk:Al Mualim over redirect: The reason he's not called Rashid ad-Din Sinan is because of a copyright. I've been asked to move the page back by a Ubisoft representative.

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:08, 23 October 2016
(No difference)