Talk:Al Gore - Revision history

imported>RebeccaAWB: Adding {{Talkheader}}

2019-07-02T13:42:55Z

Adding {{Talkheader}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 2 July 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
	== Historical character ==		== Historical character ==

99.42.6.228: /* Historical character */

2013-02-20T03:06:17Z

Historical character

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:06, 20 February 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Supporting someone does not make them your pupper, however controlling them does. That is the reason for the different choice in words. The assassins probably only supported Gore through background events, where as Bush may have been given direct orders.[[Special:Contributions/67.162.47.138\|67.162.47.138]] 21:57, August 15, 2012 (UTC)		Supporting someone does not make them your pupper, however controlling them does. That is the reason for the different choice in words. The assassins probably only supported Gore through background events, where as Bush may have been given direct orders.[[Special:Contributions/67.162.47.138\|67.162.47.138]] 21:57, August 15, 2012 (UTC)

			I'm puzzled why Gore was supported by the Assassins. If you look what the man believes, he is more in line with the Templars. Just recently he said “I think, first of all, scientists now know that there is, in human nature, a divide between what we sometimes call ‘liberals’ and ‘conservatives,’ and it gives an advantage, you can speculate, to the human species to have some people who are temperamentally inclined to try to change the future, experiment with new things, and others who are temperamentally inclined to say, ‘Wait a minute, not too fast, let’s make sure we don’t do anything rash here.’” This is eugenics he is talking about! Link: http://bcove.me/qcfew5jp [[Special:Contributions/99.42.6.228\|99.42.6.228]] 03:06, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

67.162.47.138: /* Historical character */

2012-08-15T21:57:57Z

Historical character

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 15 August 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I don't disagree with you, however I would like to point out that the article is pretty long for a modern individual. Also it's sort of biased. I mean I don't have any sort of political affiliations but if Bush was a "Templar Puppet" then shouldn't Gore be an "Assassin Puppet"? The whole article paints him as a nice guy with no real faults which, for this series, is a little odd. The assassins aren't above political manipulation, I mean they did support the Medicis.[[Special:Contributions/69.150.209.24\|69.150.209.24]] 00:20, November 9, 2011 (UTC)		I don't disagree with you, however I would like to point out that the article is pretty long for a modern individual. Also it's sort of biased. I mean I don't have any sort of political affiliations but if Bush was a "Templar Puppet" then shouldn't Gore be an "Assassin Puppet"? The whole article paints him as a nice guy with no real faults which, for this series, is a little odd. The assassins aren't above political manipulation, I mean they did support the Medicis.[[Special:Contributions/69.150.209.24\|69.150.209.24]] 00:20, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

			Supporting someone does not make them your pupper, however controlling them does. That is the reason for the different choice in words. The assassins probably only supported Gore through background events, where as Bush may have been given direct orders.[[Special:Contributions/67.162.47.138\|67.162.47.138]] 21:57, August 15, 2012 (UTC)

imported>VatsaAWB: Cleaning wanted pages list

2012-05-03T09:07:57Z

Cleaning wanted pages list

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 3 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Historical character ==		== Historical character ==

	You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "Historical characters". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], {{Wiki\|Dick Cheney}}. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC)		You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "Historical characters". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], {{Wiki\|Condoleezza Rice}}, {{Wiki\|Dick Cheney}}. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC)



	I don't disagree with you, however I would like to point out that the article is pretty long for a modern individual. Also it's sort of biased. I mean I don't have any sort of political affiliations but if Bush was a "Templar Puppet" then shouldn't Gore be an "Assassin Puppet"? The whole article paints him as a nice guy with no real faults which, for this series, is a little odd. The assassins aren't above political manipulation, I mean they did support the Medicis.[[Special:Contributions/69.150.209.24\|69.150.209.24]] 00:20, November 9, 2011 (UTC)		I don't disagree with you, however I would like to point out that the article is pretty long for a modern individual. Also it's sort of biased. I mean I don't have any sort of political affiliations but if Bush was a "Templar Puppet" then shouldn't Gore be an "Assassin Puppet"? The whole article paints him as a nice guy with no real faults which, for this series, is a little odd. The assassins aren't above political manipulation, I mean they did support the Medicis.[[Special:Contributions/69.150.209.24\|69.150.209.24]] 00:20, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

imported>VatsaAWB: AWB Edit

2012-05-03T08:51:10Z

AWB Edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, 3 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Historical character ==		== Historical character ==

	You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "Historical characters". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[Dick Cheney]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC)		You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "Historical characters". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], {{Wiki\|Dick Cheney}}. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC)



	I don't disagree with you, however I would like to point out that the article is pretty long for a modern individual. Also it's sort of biased. I mean I don't have any sort of political affiliations but if Bush was a "Templar Puppet" then shouldn't Gore be an "Assassin Puppet"? The whole article paints him as a nice guy with no real faults which, for this series, is a little odd. The assassins aren't above political manipulation, I mean they did support the Medicis.[[Special:Contributions/69.150.209.24\|69.150.209.24]] 00:20, November 9, 2011 (UTC)		I don't disagree with you, however I would like to point out that the article is pretty long for a modern individual. Also it's sort of biased. I mean I don't have any sort of political affiliations but if Bush was a "Templar Puppet" then shouldn't Gore be an "Assassin Puppet"? The whole article paints him as a nice guy with no real faults which, for this series, is a little odd. The assassins aren't above political manipulation, I mean they did support the Medicis.[[Special:Contributions/69.150.209.24\|69.150.209.24]] 00:20, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

imported>VatsaAWB: AWB Edit

2012-02-21T13:52:18Z

AWB Edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:52, 21 February 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Historical character ==		== Historical character ==

	You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "[[Historical characters]]". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[Dick Cheney]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC)		You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "Historical characters". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[Dick Cheney]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC)



	I don't disagree with you, however I would like to point out that the article is pretty long for a modern individual. Also it's sort of biased. I mean I don't have any sort of political affiliations but if Bush was a "Templar Puppet" then shouldn't Gore be an "Assassin Puppet"? The whole article paints him as a nice guy with no real faults which, for this series, is a little odd. The assassins aren't above political manipulation, I mean they did support the Medicis.[[Special:Contributions/69.150.209.24\|69.150.209.24]] 00:20, November 9, 2011 (UTC)		I don't disagree with you, however I would like to point out that the article is pretty long for a modern individual. Also it's sort of biased. I mean I don't have any sort of political affiliations but if Bush was a "Templar Puppet" then shouldn't Gore be an "Assassin Puppet"? The whole article paints him as a nice guy with no real faults which, for this series, is a little odd. The assassins aren't above political manipulation, I mean they did support the Medicis.[[Special:Contributions/69.150.209.24\|69.150.209.24]] 00:20, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

69.150.209.24: /* Historical character */

2011-11-09T00:20:34Z

Historical character

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 9 November 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "[[Historical characters]]". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[Dick Cheney]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC)		You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "[[Historical characters]]". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[Dick Cheney]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30\|98.192.42.30]] 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC)



			I don't disagree with you, however I would like to point out that the article is pretty long for a modern individual. Also it's sort of biased. I mean I don't have any sort of political affiliations but if Bush was a "Templar Puppet" then shouldn't Gore be an "Assassin Puppet"? The whole article paints him as a nice guy with no real faults which, for this series, is a little odd. The assassins aren't above political manipulation, I mean they did support the Medicis.[[Special:Contributions/69.150.209.24\|69.150.209.24]] 00:20, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

98.192.42.30: Historical character

2011-04-20T04:08:06Z

Historical character

Páàjì titun

== Historical character ==

You do realize that recent history still counts as history, right? I would most definately list this under "[[Historical characters]]". If you disagree, I would like to know why. Same goes for the rest of these: [[George W. Bush]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[John Roberts]], [[Henry Kissinger]], [[Al Gore]], [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[Dick Cheney]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.192.42.30|98.192.42.30]] 04:08, April 20, 2011 (UTC)