Category talk:Templar Rites - Revision history

imported>Darman36: /Highly debatable Rites/ New section

2025-09-30T00:10:19Z

Highly debatable Rites: New section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:10, 30 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== English Rite and Italian Rite? ==		{{Talkheader}}
			==English Rite and Italian Rite?==
	I'm not entirely certain, but should there be Rites for the English Templars (under Birch), the Italian ones (under the [[House of Borgia]]), and the Turkish ones (under Ahmet)? I ask this because only some of the groups have been named, but the Italian Templars in particular have had a bigger focus than most besides the [[Colonial Rite of the Templar Order]], having been present in two games on top of other media. I can, again, very easily be wrong.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:25, December 23, 2014 (UTC)		I'm not entirely certain, but should there be Rites for the English Templars (under Birch), the Italian ones (under the [[House of Borgia]]), and the Turkish ones (under Ahmet)? I ask this because only some of the groups have been named, but the Italian Templars in particular have had a bigger focus than most besides the [[Colonial Rite of the Templar Order]], having been present in two games on top of other media. I can, again, very easily be wrong.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:25, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
			:Probably, but we haven't gotten round to it yet. Although i'm not sure if the Italian Templars are a "rite". I know there's a British Rite of the Templar Order, though.--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 19:29, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
			::I only said as a Rite because they do seem organized that way. With a [[Grand Master]] and his underlings. I can easily be wrong about that. Is it the British Rite or the English Rite? Or even the London Rite? I can't tell.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:32, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
			:::Shaun talks about a "London Rite" led by [[Reginald Birch]], but in ''Rogue'', it's called the "British Rite", so we should probably go for "British Rite of the Templar Order".--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 19:36, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
			::::Got it. What should we do about the Italians, though? Namely, the sect including the [[House of Pazzi]], the [[House of Borgia]], and the [[House of Pazzi]]. It seems a well-defined enough group to be given a label, but I'm not entirely certain.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 23:36, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

	~~Probably, but we haven't gotten round~~ to ~~it yet. Although i'm not sure if~~ the ~~Italian Templars are a "rite". I know there's a British Rite of~~ the ~~Templar Order, though.--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]~~) ~~19:29~~, ~~December 23, 2014 (UTC)~~		==Knights Templar vs Templars?==
			Due to the fact that the Levantine Assassins (the original Hashashin) have their own entry, and that the official Knights Templar were extremely prominent from their inception to their nominal dissolution in the 1300s, should we make a Templar Rite page for them as well? Members would include the targets in Assassin's Creed I, Bloodlines, Altaïr's Chronicles, those in the prologue of Unity, and any others that were affiliated with the official knightly order, not just the Templars as a conspiratorial organization spanning the millennia.
	~~I only said as a Rite because they do seem organized that way. With a [[Grand Master]]~~ and ~~his underlings. I can easily be wrong about~~ that~~. Is it~~ the ~~British Rite or~~ the ~~English~~ Rite? ~~Or even~~ the ~~London Rite?~~ I ~~can't tell.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:32~~, ~~December 23~~, ~~2014 (UTC)~~

	~~Shaun talks about a "London Rite" led by [[Reginald Birch]], but in ''Rogue'', it~~'s ~~called the "British Rite", so we should probably go for "British Rite of the Templar Order".--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 19:36, December 23, 2014 (UTC)~~

	~~Got it. What should we do about the Italians, though? Namely~~, the ~~sect including the [[House~~ of ~~Pazzi]]~~, the ~~[[House of Borgia]]~~, ~~and~~ the ~~[[House of Pazzi]]. It seems~~ a ~~well-defined enough group to be given a label, but I'm not entirely certain~~.~~[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 23:36, December 29, 2014 (UTC)~~

	~~== Knights Templar vs Templars? ==~~

	~~Due to the fact that the~~ [[~~Levantine Assassins~~]] (~~the original Hashashin~~) ~~have their own entry~~, ~~and that the official Knights Templar were extremely prominent from their inception to their nominal dissolution in the 1300s~~, should we make a Templar Rite page for them as well? Members would include the targets in Assassin's Creed I, Bloodlines, Altaïr's Chronicles, those in the prologue of Unity, and any others that were affiliated with the official knightly order, not just the Templars as a conspiratorial organization spanning the millennia.		This is just an idea. Any thoughts? [[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 20:46, January 16, 2015 (UTC)

	~~This~~ is just ~~an idea~~. ~~Any thoughts?~~[[User:~~GZilla311~~\|~~GZilla311~~]] ([[User talk:~~GZilla311~~\|talk]]) 20:~~46, January 16~~, ~~2015~~ (UTC)		==Highly debatable Rites==
			{{OpenTalk}}
			How many of the "Rites" actually qualify? As with the Algerian Rite, I feel that the [[Tunisian Rite of the Templar Order\|Tunisian]] and [[Libyan Rite of the Templar Order\|Libyan]] groups—but also the [[Tunisian Brotherhood of Assassins\|Tunisian Assassins]]—also have insufficient information to be proper Rites. Given that we do not even know a single member's name for any of them, I feel it means "Templars of [insert country demonym] nationality" and is instead just general Templar activity in the region rather than a collective. – [[User:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;font-size:15px;color:#">Darman</span>]] ([[User talk:Darman36\|<span style="font-family:Viner Hand ITC;color:#">talk</span>]]) 00:10, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

imported>GZilla311: /* Knights Templar vs Templars? */ new section

2015-01-16T20:46:21Z

Knights Templar vs Templars?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 16 January 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Got it. What should we do about the Italians, though? Namely, the sect including the [[House of Pazzi]], the [[House of Borgia]], and the [[House of Pazzi]]. It seems a well-defined enough group to be given a label, but I'm not entirely certain.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 23:36, December 29, 2014 (UTC)		Got it. What should we do about the Italians, though? Namely, the sect including the [[House of Pazzi]], the [[House of Borgia]], and the [[House of Pazzi]]. It seems a well-defined enough group to be given a label, but I'm not entirely certain.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 23:36, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

			== Knights Templar vs Templars? ==

			Due to the fact that the [[Levantine Assassins]] (the original Hashashin) have their own entry, and that the official Knights Templar were extremely prominent from their inception to their nominal dissolution in the 1300s, should we make a Templar Rite page for them as well? Members would include the targets in Assassin's Creed I, Bloodlines, Altaïr's Chronicles, those in the prologue of Unity, and any others that were affiliated with the official knightly order, not just the Templars as a conspiratorial organization spanning the millennia.

			This is just an idea. Any thoughts?[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 20:46, January 16, 2015 (UTC)

imported>GZilla311: /* English Rite and Italian Rite? */

2014-12-29T23:36:54Z

English Rite and Italian Rite?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:36, 30 December 2014
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Shaun talks about a "London Rite" led by [[Reginald Birch]], but in ''Rogue'', it's called the "British Rite", so we should probably go for "British Rite of the Templar Order".--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 19:36, December 23, 2014 (UTC)		Shaun talks about a "London Rite" led by [[Reginald Birch]], but in ''Rogue'', it's called the "British Rite", so we should probably go for "British Rite of the Templar Order".--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 19:36, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

			Got it. What should we do about the Italians, though? Namely, the sect including the [[House of Pazzi]], the [[House of Borgia]], and the [[House of Pazzi]]. It seems a well-defined enough group to be given a label, but I'm not entirely certain.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 23:36, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

imported>Bovkaffe: /* English Rite and Italian Rite? */

2014-12-23T19:36:42Z

English Rite and Italian Rite?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 23 December 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I only said as a Rite because they do seem organized that way. With a [[Grand Master]] and his underlings. I can easily be wrong about that. Is it the British Rite or the English Rite? Or even the London Rite? I can't tell.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:32, December 23, 2014 (UTC)		I only said as a Rite because they do seem organized that way. With a [[Grand Master]] and his underlings. I can easily be wrong about that. Is it the British Rite or the English Rite? Or even the London Rite? I can't tell.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:32, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

			Shaun talks about a "London Rite" led by [[Reginald Birch]], but in ''Rogue'', it's called the "British Rite", so we should probably go for "British Rite of the Templar Order".--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 19:36, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

imported>GZilla311 at 19:32, 23 December 2014

2014-12-23T19:32:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:32, 23 December 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Probably, but we haven't gotten round to it yet. Although i'm not sure if the Italian Templars are a "rite". I know there's a British Rite of the Templar Order, though.--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 19:29, December 23, 2014 (UTC)		Probably, but we haven't gotten round to it yet. Although i'm not sure if the Italian Templars are a "rite". I know there's a British Rite of the Templar Order, though.--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 19:29, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

			I only said as a Rite because they do seem organized that way. With a [[Grand Master]] and his underlings. I can easily be wrong about that. Is it the British Rite or the English Rite? Or even the London Rite? I can't tell.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:32, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

imported>Bovkaffe at 19:29, 23 December 2014

2014-12-23T19:29:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 23 December 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I'm not entirely certain, but should there be Rites for the English Templars (under Birch), the Italian ones (under the [[House of Borgia]]), and the Turkish ones (under Ahmet)? I ask this because only some of the groups have been named, but the Italian Templars in particular have had a bigger focus than most besides the [[Colonial Rite of the Templar Order]], having been present in two games on top of other media. I can, again, very easily be wrong.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:25, December 23, 2014 (UTC)		I'm not entirely certain, but should there be Rites for the English Templars (under Birch), the Italian ones (under the [[House of Borgia]]), and the Turkish ones (under Ahmet)? I ask this because only some of the groups have been named, but the Italian Templars in particular have had a bigger focus than most besides the [[Colonial Rite of the Templar Order]], having been present in two games on top of other media. I can, again, very easily be wrong.[[User:GZilla311\|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311\|talk]]) 19:25, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

			Probably, but we haven't gotten round to it yet. Although i'm not sure if the Italian Templars are a "rite". I know there's a British Rite of the Templar Order, though.--[[User:Bovkaffe\|Bovkaffe]] ([[User talk:Bovkaffe\|talk]]) 19:29, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

imported>GZilla311: /* English Rite and Italian Rite? */ new section

2014-12-23T19:25:51Z

English Rite and Italian Rite?: new section

Páàjì titun

== English Rite and Italian Rite? ==

I'm not entirely certain, but should there be Rites for the English Templars (under Birch), the Italian ones (under the [[House of Borgia]]), and the Turkish ones (under Ahmet)? I ask this because only some of the groups have been named, but the Italian Templars in particular have had a bigger focus than most besides the [[Colonial Rite of the Templar Order]], having been present in two games on top of other media. I can, again, very easily be wrong.[[User:GZilla311|GZilla311]] ([[User talk:GZilla311|talk]]) 19:25, December 23, 2014 (UTC)