Category talk:Historically attested individuals - Revision history

imported>Soranin at 13:13, 30 April 2023

2023-04-30T13:13:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 30 April 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~Talkheader~~}}		{{ArchivedTalk}}
	==Deletion proposal==		==Deletion proposal==
	I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC)		I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC)

imported>Godzillavkk at 20:52, 18 October 2018

2018-10-18T20:52:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 18 October 2018
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC)		I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC)
	:While I agree that everyone in AC is historical within this universe I don’t see that as being equal to historically attested or within public records. I think this is a really interesting category to have but the issue is presenting in an in universe manner which led me to use the word choice that I did. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 02:35, October 17, 2018 (UTC)		:While I agree that everyone in AC is historical within this universe I don’t see that as being equal to historically attested or within public records. I think this is a really interesting category to have but the issue is presenting in an in universe manner which led me to use the word choice that I did. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 02:35, October 17, 2018 (UTC)
			:
			:Well ultimatly, Assassins Creed is still fictional. What having a page for real people incorporated into Assassins Creed lore could do, is show how real history and the fictional aspects made up for the games and other sources interract with eachother. Of course, if this is deleted I won't fuss. But I've made my case. [[User:Godzillavkk]] 15:52, October 18, 2018

imported>Sol Pacificus: Please remember to create a new section when you add a message, even if the talk page is blank.

2018-10-17T02:56:10Z

Please remember to create a new section when you add a message, even if the talk page is blank.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:56, 17 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Talkheader}}
			==Deletion proposal==
	I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC)		I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC)
	:While I agree that everyone in AC is historical within this universe I don’t see that as being equal to historically attested or within public records. I think this is a really interesting category to have but the issue is presenting in an in universe manner which led me to use the word choice that I did. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 02:35, October 17, 2018 (UTC)		:While I agree that everyone in AC is historical within this universe I don’t see that as being equal to historically attested or within public records. I think this is a really interesting category to have but the issue is presenting in an in universe manner which led me to use the word choice that I did. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 02:35, October 17, 2018 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon at 02:35, 17 October 2018

2018-10-17T02:35:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:35, 17 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC)		I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC)
			:While I agree that everyone in AC is historical within this universe I don’t see that as being equal to historically attested or within public records. I think this is a really interesting category to have but the issue is presenting in an in universe manner which led me to use the word choice that I did. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 02:35, October 17, 2018 (UTC)

imported>The Crimson Eagle: Created page with "I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. I..."

2018-10-16T14:09:00Z

Created page with "I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. I..."

Páàjì titun

I have to say I agree with the motion to delete this. We had "Historical characters" in the past and deleted it, as it was OOU, and I don't see this as being much different. In the context of ''Assassin's Creed'', everyone is "historically attested". The Animus is a better source than a history book. Is there any particular reason we should have this? --{{User:The Crimson Eagle/sig}} 14:09, October 16, 2018 (UTC)