Category talk:Cultists of Kosmos - Revision history

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Adepts of Kosmos */

2019-10-16T22:32:45Z

Adepts of Kosmos

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 17 October 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Mm I definitely would feel more comfortable confirming this with the wider community. Personally, I understand the rationale to disambiguate between non-Assassin assassins and Assassins, but I don't think the format with "members" necessarily needs to be carried onto all other pages where the demonyms are clear. Also, I remember raising this up before, but I don't think we should have a category for non-Assassin assassins at all. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 20:36, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		::Mm I definitely would feel more comfortable confirming this with the wider community. Personally, I understand the rationale to disambiguate between non-Assassin assassins and Assassins, but I don't think the format with "members" necessarily needs to be carried onto all other pages where the demonyms are clear. Also, I remember raising this up before, but I don't think we should have a category for non-Assassin assassins at all. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 20:36, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
	:I agree with getting more input on the issue. I also understand that the "members of ..." format is unwieldy but like having a set standard with no exceptions if possible. I don’t agree with doing away with assassins as an occupational capacity unless a sufficient synonym can be found to replace it. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 22:23, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		:I agree with getting more input on the issue. I also understand that the "members of ..." format is unwieldy but like having a set standard with no exceptions if possible. I don’t agree with doing away with assassins as an occupational capacity unless a sufficient synonym can be found to replace it. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 22:23, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
			::Can you explain what is the necessity for having non-Assassin "assassins" as a category? Growing up, I've always known the term "assassin" to be used even in the event of a failed assassination. Hence, an assassin is anyone who attempts an assassination, not necessarily one who has (successfully) committed an assassination. But the entire series is filled with assassination attempts after assassination attempts after murder attempts after assassination attempts by all kinds of peoples, all kinds of henchmen, many in side missions, from a wide range of different factions. It is for this reason, that I find the category for non-Assassin assassins to be too broad and insignificant. It can a vast multitude of random minor characters. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:32, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Adepts of Kosmos */

2019-10-16T22:23:10Z

Adepts of Kosmos

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:23, 17 October 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:The main issue was with Assassins as it refers to both members of the Brotherhood and not (ie John Wilkes Boothe) so to distinguish between the two occupational assassins got categorized as "assassins" while organizational assassins became "members of the Assassins Brotherhoods". Jasca argued that we carry that format over for all organizations which I actually support. Previously I was suggesting "adepts of the cult" to differentiate from cultists that weren't sages nor the ghost. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:58, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		:The main issue was with Assassins as it refers to both members of the Brotherhood and not (ie John Wilkes Boothe) so to distinguish between the two occupational assassins got categorized as "assassins" while organizational assassins became "members of the Assassins Brotherhoods". Jasca argued that we carry that format over for all organizations which I actually support. Previously I was suggesting "adepts of the cult" to differentiate from cultists that weren't sages nor the ghost. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:58, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
	::Mm I definitely would feel more comfortable confirming this with the wider community. Personally, I understand the rationale to disambiguate between non-Assassin assassins and Assassins, but I don't think the format with "members" necessarily needs to be carried onto all other pages where the demonyms are clear. Also, I remember raising this up before, but I don't think we should have a category for non-Assassin assassins at all. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 20:36, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		::Mm I definitely would feel more comfortable confirming this with the wider community. Personally, I understand the rationale to disambiguate between non-Assassin assassins and Assassins, but I don't think the format with "members" necessarily needs to be carried onto all other pages where the demonyms are clear. Also, I remember raising this up before, but I don't think we should have a category for non-Assassin assassins at all. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 20:36, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
			:I agree with getting more input on the issue. I also understand that the "members of ..." format is unwieldy but like having a set standard with no exceptions if possible. I don’t agree with doing away with assassins as an occupational capacity unless a sufficient synonym can be found to replace it. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 22:23, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus: /* Adepts of Kosmos */

2019-10-16T20:36:18Z

Adepts of Kosmos

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 16 October 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	To this moment, I am still confused over the argument for using "members of" instead of a more concise demonym like "Cultist". [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:24, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		To this moment, I am still confused over the argument for using "members of" instead of a more concise demonym like "Cultist". [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:24, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
	:The main issue was with Assassins as it refers to both members of the Brotherhood and not (ie John Wilkes Boothe) so to distinguish between the two occupational assassins got categorized as "assassins" while organizational assassins became "members of the Assassins Brotherhoods". Jasca argued that we carry that format over for all organizations which I actually support. Previously I was suggesting "adepts of the cult" to differentiate from cultists that weren't sages nor the ghost. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:58, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		:The main issue was with Assassins as it refers to both members of the Brotherhood and not (ie John Wilkes Boothe) so to distinguish between the two occupational assassins got categorized as "assassins" while organizational assassins became "members of the Assassins Brotherhoods". Jasca argued that we carry that format over for all organizations which I actually support. Previously I was suggesting "adepts of the cult" to differentiate from cultists that weren't sages nor the ghost. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:58, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
			::Mm I definitely would feel more comfortable confirming this with the wider community. Personally, I understand the rationale to disambiguate between non-Assassin assassins and Assassins, but I don't think the format with "members" necessarily needs to be carried onto all other pages where the demonyms are clear. Also, I remember raising this up before, but I don't think we should have a category for non-Assassin assassins at all. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 20:36, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: /* Adepts of Kosmos */

2019-10-16T19:58:30Z

Adepts of Kosmos

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 16 October 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:If we're going to have this category it would be better to call it "Members of the Cult of Kosmos," since we're going to have to create counterpart categories for every other organisation and we'll need to maintain a level of consistency in naming format. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:25, January 23, 2019 (UTC)		:If we're going to have this category it would be better to call it "Members of the Cult of Kosmos," since we're going to have to create counterpart categories for every other organisation and we'll need to maintain a level of consistency in naming format. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:25, January 23, 2019 (UTC)
	To this moment, I am still confused over the argument for using "members of" instead of a more concise demonym like "Cultist". [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:24, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		To this moment, I am still confused over the argument for using "members of" instead of a more concise demonym like "Cultist". [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:24, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
			:The main issue was with Assassins as it refers to both members of the Brotherhood and not (ie John Wilkes Boothe) so to distinguish between the two occupational assassins got categorized as "assassins" while organizational assassins became "members of the Assassins Brotherhoods". Jasca argued that we carry that format over for all organizations which I actually support. Previously I was suggesting "adepts of the cult" to differentiate from cultists that weren't sages nor the ghost. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:58, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

imported>Sol Pacificus at 17:24, 16 October 2019

2019-10-16T17:24:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 16 October 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Adepts of Kosmos===		{{Talkheader}}
			==Adepts of Kosmos==
	They are also called this which might be a better cat name in order to distinguish them from the regular henchmen. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 05:43, January 23, 2019 (UTC)		They are also called this which might be a better cat name in order to distinguish them from the regular henchmen. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 05:43, January 23, 2019 (UTC)
	:If we're going to have this category it would be better to call it "Members of the Cult of Kosmos," since we're going to have to create counterpart categories for every other organisation and we'll need to maintain a level of consistency in naming format. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:25, January 23, 2019 (UTC)		:If we're going to have this category it would be better to call it "Members of the Cult of Kosmos," since we're going to have to create counterpart categories for every other organisation and we'll need to maintain a level of consistency in naming format. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:25, January 23, 2019 (UTC)
			To this moment, I am still confused over the argument for using "members of" instead of a more concise demonym like "Cultist". [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:24, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

imported>Jasca Ducato at 09:25, 23 January 2019

2019-01-23T09:25:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:25, 23 January 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Adepts of Kosmos===		===Adepts of Kosmos===
	They are also called this which might be a better cat name in order to distinguish them from the regular henchmen. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 05:43, January 23, 2019 (UTC)		They are also called this which might be a better cat name in order to distinguish them from the regular henchmen. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 05:43, January 23, 2019 (UTC)
			:If we're going to have this category it would be better to call it "Members of the Cult of Kosmos," since we're going to have to create counterpart categories for every other organisation and we'll need to maintain a level of consistency in naming format. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:25, January 23, 2019 (UTC)

imported>Lacrossedeamon: Created page with "===Adepts of Kosmos=== They are also called this which might be a better cat name in order to distinguish them from the regular henchmen. ~~~~"

2019-01-23T05:43:40Z

Created page with "===Adepts of Kosmos=== They are also called this which might be a better cat name in order to distinguish them from the regular henchmen. ~~~~"

Páàjì titun

===Adepts of Kosmos===
They are also called this which might be a better cat name in order to distinguish them from the regular henchmen. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 05:43, January 23, 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 17 October 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Mm I definitely would feel more comfortable confirming this with the wider community. Personally, I understand the rationale to disambiguate between non-Assassin assassins and Assassins, but I don't think the format with "members" necessarily needs to be carried onto all other pages where the demonyms are clear. Also, I remember raising this up before, but I don't think we should have a category for non-Assassin assassins at all. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 20:36, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		::Mm I definitely would feel more comfortable confirming this with the wider community. Personally, I understand the rationale to disambiguate between non-Assassin assassins and Assassins, but I don't think the format with "members" necessarily needs to be carried onto all other pages where the demonyms are clear. Also, I remember raising this up before, but I don't think we should have a category for non-Assassin assassins at all. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 20:36, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
	:I agree with getting more input on the issue. I also understand that the "members of ..." format is unwieldy but like having a set standard with no exceptions if possible. I don’t agree with doing away with assassins as an occupational capacity unless a sufficient synonym can be found to replace it. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 22:23, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		:I agree with getting more input on the issue. I also understand that the "members of ..." format is unwieldy but like having a set standard with no exceptions if possible. I don’t agree with doing away with assassins as an occupational capacity unless a sufficient synonym can be found to replace it. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 22:23, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
			::Can you explain what is the necessity for having non-Assassin "assassins" as a category? Growing up, I've always known the term "assassin" to be used even in the event of a failed assassination. Hence, an assassin is anyone who attempts an assassination, not necessarily one who has (successfully) committed an assassination. But the entire series is filled with assassination attempts after assassination attempts after murder attempts after assassination attempts by all kinds of peoples, all kinds of henchmen, many in side missions, from a wide range of different factions. It is for this reason, that I find the category for non-Assassin assassins to be too broad and insignificant. It can a vast multitude of random minor characters. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 22:32, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:23, 17 October 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:The main issue was with Assassins as it refers to both members of the Brotherhood and not (ie John Wilkes Boothe) so to distinguish between the two occupational assassins got categorized as "assassins" while organizational assassins became "members of the Assassins Brotherhoods". Jasca argued that we carry that format over for all organizations which I actually support. Previously I was suggesting "adepts of the cult" to differentiate from cultists that weren't sages nor the ghost. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:58, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		:The main issue was with Assassins as it refers to both members of the Brotherhood and not (ie John Wilkes Boothe) so to distinguish between the two occupational assassins got categorized as "assassins" while organizational assassins became "members of the Assassins Brotherhoods". Jasca argued that we carry that format over for all organizations which I actually support. Previously I was suggesting "adepts of the cult" to differentiate from cultists that weren't sages nor the ghost. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:58, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
	::Mm I definitely would feel more comfortable confirming this with the wider community. Personally, I understand the rationale to disambiguate between non-Assassin assassins and Assassins, but I don't think the format with "members" necessarily needs to be carried onto all other pages where the demonyms are clear. Also, I remember raising this up before, but I don't think we should have a category for non-Assassin assassins at all. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 20:36, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		::Mm I definitely would feel more comfortable confirming this with the wider community. Personally, I understand the rationale to disambiguate between non-Assassin assassins and Assassins, but I don't think the format with "members" necessarily needs to be carried onto all other pages where the demonyms are clear. Also, I remember raising this up before, but I don't think we should have a category for non-Assassin assassins at all. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 20:36, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
			:I agree with getting more input on the issue. I also understand that the "members of ..." format is unwieldy but like having a set standard with no exceptions if possible. I don’t agree with doing away with assassins as an occupational capacity unless a sufficient synonym can be found to replace it. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 22:23, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 16 October 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	To this moment, I am still confused over the argument for using "members of" instead of a more concise demonym like "Cultist". [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:24, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		To this moment, I am still confused over the argument for using "members of" instead of a more concise demonym like "Cultist". [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:24, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
	:The main issue was with Assassins as it refers to both members of the Brotherhood and not (ie John Wilkes Boothe) so to distinguish between the two occupational assassins got categorized as "assassins" while organizational assassins became "members of the Assassins Brotherhoods". Jasca argued that we carry that format over for all organizations which I actually support. Previously I was suggesting "adepts of the cult" to differentiate from cultists that weren't sages nor the ghost. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:58, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		:The main issue was with Assassins as it refers to both members of the Brotherhood and not (ie John Wilkes Boothe) so to distinguish between the two occupational assassins got categorized as "assassins" while organizational assassins became "members of the Assassins Brotherhoods". Jasca argued that we carry that format over for all organizations which I actually support. Previously I was suggesting "adepts of the cult" to differentiate from cultists that weren't sages nor the ghost. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:58, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
			::Mm I definitely would feel more comfortable confirming this with the wider community. Personally, I understand the rationale to disambiguate between non-Assassin assassins and Assassins, but I don't think the format with "members" necessarily needs to be carried onto all other pages where the demonyms are clear. Also, I remember raising this up before, but I don't think we should have a category for non-Assassin assassins at all. [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 20:36, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 16 October 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:If we're going to have this category it would be better to call it "Members of the Cult of Kosmos," since we're going to have to create counterpart categories for every other organisation and we'll need to maintain a level of consistency in naming format. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:25, January 23, 2019 (UTC)		:If we're going to have this category it would be better to call it "Members of the Cult of Kosmos," since we're going to have to create counterpart categories for every other organisation and we'll need to maintain a level of consistency in naming format. --'''''[[User:Jasca Ducato\|Jasca Ducato]]''''' <small>([[User talk:Jasca Ducato\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato\|contributions]])</small> 09:25, January 23, 2019 (UTC)
	To this moment, I am still confused over the argument for using "members of" instead of a more concise demonym like "Cultist". [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:24, October 16, 2019 (UTC)		To this moment, I am still confused over the argument for using "members of" instead of a more concise demonym like "Cultist". [[User:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#990000;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:17px">'''Sol Pacificus'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sol Pacificus\|<span style="color:#D4AF37;font-family:Californian FB;font-size:11px">(Cyfiero)</span>]]</sup> 17:24, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
			:The main issue was with Assassins as it refers to both members of the Brotherhood and not (ie John Wilkes Boothe) so to distinguish between the two occupational assassins got categorized as "assassins" while organizational assassins became "members of the Assassins Brotherhoods". Jasca argued that we carry that format over for all organizations which I actually support. Previously I was suggesting "adepts of the cult" to differentiate from cultists that weren't sages nor the ghost. [[User:Lacrossedeamon\|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon\|talk]]) 19:58, October 16, 2019 (UTC)