Category talk:Assassin's Creed III weapons - Revision history

imported>VatsaAWB: VatsaAWB moved page Category talk:Assassin's Creed III Weapons to Category talk:Assassin's Creed III weapons: Re-categorisation

2012-10-04T14:39:14Z

VatsaAWB moved page Category talk:Assassin's Creed III Weapons to Category talk:Assassin's Creed III weapons: Re-categorisation

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:39, 4 October 2012
(No difference)

imported>RogwelTarune at 10:41, 8 April 2012

2012-04-08T10:41:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 8 April 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Assumption==		==Assumption==
	Isn't this category based on assumption and not any facts so therefore it should be deleted? Even though it's unlikely that either of the weapons in this category won't return, we don't know if they will for sure. [[User:Campbell430\|Campbell430]] 00:12, December 17, 2011 (UTC)		Isn't this category based on assumption and not any facts so therefore it should be deleted? Even though it's unlikely that either of the weapons in this category won't return, we don't know if they will for sure. [[User:Campbell430\|Campbell430]] 00:12, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

			Please add the hidden gun here. Ubisoft confirmed it during PAX East 2012.

imported>Sidspyker at 05:34, 3 March 2012

2012-03-03T05:34:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:34, 3 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Assumption==		==Assumption==
	Isn't this category based on assumption and not any facts so therefore it should be deleted? Even though it's unlikely that either of the weapons in this category won't return, we don't know if they will for sure. [[User:Campbell430\|Campbell430]] 00:12, December 17, 2011 (UTC)		Isn't this category based on assumption and not any facts so therefore it should be deleted? Even though it's unlikely that either of the weapons in this category won't return, we don't know if they will for sure. [[User:Campbell430\|Campbell430]] 00:12, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

	~~I don't think so, so far we know we have~~

	~~Tomahawk~~
	~~Longbow~~
	~~Blunderbuss Pistols~~
	~~Muskets~~
	~~Duel-wield able Secondary weapons like Dagger~~

	~~[[User:Sidspyker\|My computer can defeat me in chess, but not in Assassin's Creed.]] 05:31, March 3, 2012 (UTC)~~

imported>Sidspyker at 05:31, 3 March 2012

2012-03-03T05:31:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:31, 3 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Assumption==		==Assumption==
	Isn't this category based on assumption and not any facts so therefore it should be deleted? Even though it's unlikely that either of the weapons in this category won't return, we don't know if they will for sure. [[User:Campbell430\|Campbell430]] 00:12, December 17, 2011 (UTC)		Isn't this category based on assumption and not any facts so therefore it should be deleted? Even though it's unlikely that either of the weapons in this category won't return, we don't know if they will for sure. [[User:Campbell430\|Campbell430]] 00:12, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

			I don't think so, so far we know we have

			Tomahawk
			Longbow
			Blunderbuss Pistols
			Muskets
			Duel-wield able Secondary weapons like Dagger

			[[User:Sidspyker\|My computer can defeat me in chess, but not in Assassin's Creed.]] 05:31, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

imported>Campbell430: Created page with "==Assumption== Isn't this category based on assumption and not any facts so therefore it should be deleted? Even though it's unlikely that either of the weapons in this category ..."

2011-12-17T00:12:20Z

Created page with "==Assumption== Isn't this category based on assumption and not any facts so therefore it should be deleted? Even though it's unlikely that either of the weapons in this category ..."

Páàjì titun

==Assumption==
Isn't this category based on assumption and not any facts so therefore it should be deleted? Even though it's unlikely that either of the weapons in this category won't return, we don't know if they will for sure. [[User:Campbell430|Campbell430]] 00:12, December 17, 2011 (UTC)