imported>Sol Pacificus at 23:48, 25 January 2017

2017-01-25T23:48:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 26 January 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I'm all down for this. It's worked very well for Wookieepedia for its entire history. Yes, I keep referencing Wookieepedia, but that's because I think it's already been through most of these issues and questions and have long since solved them.		I'm all down for this. It's worked very well for Wookieepedia for its entire history. Yes, I keep referencing Wookieepedia, but that's because I think it's already been through most of these issues and questions and have long since solved them.

			Another thing is that if a subject of an article only appears in one source/media, we still list that appearance, and for the references we still do citations rather than using the references like a an appearance section which we have been doing for articles with only a single-source/appearance.

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "
Roger Murtaugh wrote: Are there any new thoughts about this idea?
I was just checking in on the status of this idea as I would like to see it go thr..."

2017-01-25T23:47:22Z

Created page with "<div class="quote"> Roger Murtaugh wrote: Are there any new thoughts about this idea? </div> I was just checking in on the status of this idea as I would like to see it go thr..."

Páàjì titun

<div class="quote">
Roger Murtaugh wrote:
Are there any new thoughts about this idea?
</div>
I was just checking in on the status of this idea as I would like to see it go through, and I haven't heard from it in a bit.

Let me summarize:
Appearances for every article, and then for media there will also be appearances, though obviously this is going to take the form of a whole box of everything that ''appears'' in that specific work whereas for those individual articles, like characters, it will be about ''which'' works they've appeared in.

I'm all down for this. It's worked very well for Wookieepedia for its entire history. Yes, I keep referencing Wookieepedia, but that's because I think it's already been through most of these issues and questions and have long since solved them.

Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-84037-20170106215439/@comment-18014300-20170125234722 - Revision history

imported>Sol Pacificus at 23:48, 25 January 2017

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with " Roger Murtaugh wrote: Are there any new thoughts about this idea? I was just checking in on the status of this idea as I would like to see it go thr..."

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "
Roger Murtaugh wrote: Are there any new thoughts about this idea?
I was just checking in on the status of this idea as I would like to see it go thr..."