Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-5019018-20170811014154/@comment-18014300-20170817030152 - Revision history

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:56, 17 August 2017

2017-08-17T03:56:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 17 August 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter be removed not the actual section.		The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter be removed not the actual section.

	If the eras exclusively served the function of listing appearances, then the problem that Crimson Eagle brought up with too many icons would only be exacerbated. You'd just have a long list of icons for every last thing, and there are also many subjects whose only "appearance" is only being mentioned in a particular work, but then the question would arise whether that ~~mean~~ other subjects who receive just as slight mentions in other works should be included, and it will become a huge arbitrary mess.		If the eras exclusively served the function of listing appearances, then the problem that Crimson Eagle brought up with too many icons would only be exacerbated. You'd just have a long list of icons for every last thing, and there are also many subjects whose only "appearance" is only being mentioned in a particular work, but then the question would arise whether that means other subjects who receive just as slight mentions in other works should be included, and it will become a huge arbitrary mess.

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:55, 17 August 2017

2017-08-17T03:55:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:55, 17 August 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter be removed not the actual section.		The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter be removed not the actual section.

	If the eras exclusively served the function of listing appearances, then the problem that Crimson Eagle brought up with too many icons would only be exacerbated.		If the eras exclusively served the function of listing appearances, then the problem that Crimson Eagle brought up with too many icons would only be exacerbated. You'd just have a long list of icons for every last thing, and there are also many subjects whose only "appearance" is only being mentioned in a particular work, but then the question would arise whether that mean other subjects who receive just as slight mentions in other works should be included, and it will become a huge arbitrary mess.

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:10, 17 August 2017

2017-08-17T03:10:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:10, 17 August 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:
	</div>		</div>
	The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter be removed not the actual section.		The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter be removed not the actual section.

			If the eras exclusively served the function of listing appearances, then the problem that Crimson Eagle brought up with too many icons would only be exacerbated.

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:04, 17 August 2017

2017-08-17T03:04:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, 17 August 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Second that. Eras also look better and take less space than a new section on a page to liste the appearances that already is listed by the era icons and the titles linked in info boxes. Why do we need 3 ways to liste the appearances on a page anyway? I personally think it's too much.		Second that. Eras also look better and take less space than a new section on a page to liste the appearances that already is listed by the era icons and the titles linked in info boxes. Why do we need 3 ways to liste the appearances on a page anyway? I personally think it's too much.
	</div>		</div>
	The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter is removed not the actual section.		The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter be removed not the actual section.

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:04, 17 August 2017

2017-08-17T03:04:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, 17 August 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Second that. Eras also look better and take less space than a new section on a page to liste the appearances that already is listed by the era icons and the titles linked in info boxes. Why do we need 3 ways to liste the appearances on a page anyway? I personally think it's too much.		Second that. Eras also look better and take less space than a new section on a page to liste the appearances that already is listed by the era icons and the titles linked in info boxes. Why do we need 3 ways to liste the appearances on a page anyway? I personally think it's too much.
	</div>		</div>
	The point should be that eras should be changed ~~to correspond~~ to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter is removed not the actual section.		The point should be that eras should be changed to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter is removed not the actual section.

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:03, 17 August 2017

2017-08-17T03:03:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 17 August 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Second that. Eras also look better and take less space than a new section on a page to liste the appearances that already is listed by the era icons and the titles linked in info boxes. Why do we need 3 ways to liste the appearances on a page anyway? I personally think it's too much.		Second that. Eras also look better and take less space than a new section on a page to liste the appearances that already is listed by the era icons and the titles linked in info boxes. Why do we need 3 ways to liste the appearances on a page anyway? I personally think it's too much.
	</div>		</div>
	The point should be that eras should be changed to correspond to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance ~~parameters~~ in infoboxes ~~are~~ only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter is removed not the actual ~~seciton~~.		The point should be that eras should be changed to correspond to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameter in infoboxes is only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter is removed not the actual section.

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:03, 17 August 2017

2017-08-17T03:03:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 17 August 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Second that. Eras also look better and take less space than a new section on a page to liste the appearances that already is listed by the era icons and the titles linked in info boxes. Why do we need 3 ways to liste the appearances on a page anyway? I personally think it's too much.		Second that. Eras also look better and take less space than a new section on a page to liste the appearances that already is listed by the era icons and the titles linked in info boxes. Why do we need 3 ways to liste the appearances on a page anyway? I personally think it's too much.
	</div>		</div>
	The point should be that eras should be changed to correspond to ~~actual~~ eras ~~of play~~ not the Appearances section.		The point should be that eras should be changed to correspond to reflect eras and settings not the Appearances section. The Appearance parameters in infoboxes are only present for characters, and if that should be changed, it makes more sense that the infobox parameter is removed not the actual seciton.

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "
ACsenior wrote:
The Crimson Eagle wrote: I'd still say that just getting rid of them is the most straightforward solution, but I'd rath..."

2017-08-17T03:01:52Z

Created page with "<div class="quote"> ACsenior wrote: <div class="quote"> The Crimson Eagle wrote: I'd still say that just getting rid of them is the most straightforward solution, but I'd rath..."

Páàjì titun

<div class="quote">
ACsenior wrote:
<div class="quote">
The Crimson Eagle wrote:
I'd still say that just getting rid of them is the most straightforward solution, but I'd rather use eras than appearances, to be honest.
</div>

Second that. Eras also look better and take less space than a new section on a page to liste the appearances that already is listed by the era icons and the titles linked in info boxes. Why do we need 3 ways to liste the appearances on a page anyway? I personally think it's too much.
</div>
The point should be that eras should be changed to correspond to actual eras of play not the Appearances section.

Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-5019018-20170811014154/@comment-18014300-20170817030152 - Revision history

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:56, 17 August 2017

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:55, 17 August 2017

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:10, 17 August 2017

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:04, 17 August 2017

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:04, 17 August 2017

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:03, 17 August 2017

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:03, 17 August 2017

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with " ACsenior wrote: The Crimson Eagle wrote: I'd still say that just getting rid of them is the most straightforward solution, but I'd rath..."

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "
ACsenior wrote:
The Crimson Eagle wrote: I'd still say that just getting rid of them is the most straightforward solution, but I'd rath..."