imported>Sol Pacificus at 15:01, 14 February 2020

2020-02-14T15:01:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 14 February 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	However, I'm admittedly just used to doing things the Wookieepedia way circa ten years ago. Just having a bot change all Trivia sections to Behind the scenes would be easier on my eyes. ;)		However, I'm admittedly just used to doing things the Wookieepedia way circa ten years ago. Just having a bot change all Trivia sections to Behind the scenes would be easier on my eyes. ;)
	</div>		</div>
	I fully agree with Vetinari here. That aside, I want to reassure Nanomat that of course we're not going to remove all the work you have done identifying the real-world models for the weapons throughout ''Assassin's Creed'' games and their anachronisms. After all, it is, in my opinion, noteworthy when Ubisoft takes an Indian sword from a museum, puts it in game, and calls it a Viking sword, and I asked you for a lot of help on identifying these cases. As Vilka said, such information can be transferred to the BtS section just fine, so no worries. :)		I fully agree with Vetinari here.
			That aside, I want to reassure Nanomat that of course we're not going to remove all the work you have done identifying the real-world models for the weapons throughout ''Assassin's Creed'' games and their anachronisms. After all, it is, in my opinion, noteworthy when Ubisoft takes an Indian sword from a museum, puts it in game, and calls it a Viking sword, and I asked you for a lot of help on identifying these cases. As Vilka said, such information can be transferred to the BtS section just fine, so no worries. :)

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "
Vetinari wrote:
I wasn't aware that Fandom encouraged trivia sections to invite edits but, for me, there's little in those that can't be incorporated i..."

2020-02-14T15:01:42Z

Created page with "<div class="quote">Vetinari wrote:<br />I wasn't aware that Fandom encouraged trivia sections to invite edits but, for me, there's little in those that can't be incorporated i..."

Páàjì titun

<div class="quote">Vetinari wrote:<br />I wasn't aware that Fandom encouraged trivia sections to invite edits but, for me, there's little in those that can't be incorporated into the main article or expanded on as background. Names are often important in AC whether or not the characters are conscious of the significance.

I don't much see the point of "The movie was released exactly four years after Desmond Miles' death in Assassin's Creed III." in the AC film page although I'd rather Development and Marketing were subsections of a greater Behind the scenes section and the rest of the 'trivia' on there can be shifted to Development and Continuity subsections.

However, I'm admittedly just used to doing things the Wookieepedia way circa ten years ago. Just having a bot change all Trivia sections to Behind the scenes would be easier on my eyes. ;)
</div>
I fully agree with Vetinari here. That aside, I want to reassure Nanomat that of course we're not going to remove all the work you have done identifying the real-world models for the weapons throughout ''Assassin's Creed'' games and their anachronisms. After all, it is, in my opinion, noteworthy when Ubisoft takes an Indian sword from a museum, puts it in game, and calls it a Viking sword, and I asked you for a lot of help on identifying these cases. As Vilka said, such information can be transferred to the BtS section just fine, so no worries. :)

Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-30719293-20200209231618/@comment-18014300-20200214150142 - Revision history

imported>Sol Pacificus at 15:01, 14 February 2020

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "Vetinari wrote:I wasn't aware that Fandom encouraged trivia sections to invite edits but, for me, there's little in those that can't be incorporated i..."

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "
Vetinari wrote:
I wasn't aware that Fandom encouraged trivia sections to invite edits but, for me, there's little in those that can't be incorporated i..."