imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:15, 12 February 2020

2020-02-12T03:15:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 12 February 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:
	(C) We can have both BtS & Trivia sections, but they are mutually exclusive. Articles which have one, should not have the other. BtS sections should be used when there is enough information to warrant them.		(C) We can have both BtS & Trivia sections, but they are mutually exclusive. Articles which have one, should not have the other. BtS sections should be used when there is enough information to warrant them.

	I just realized that in my above response, I didn't distinguish between these options before us. My plan hitherto had been (C), but I think Lacrosse is proposing (A), and I think it would probably work better as long as you guys don't think it is one too many sections. I think editors on other wikis tend to scoff and think that Trivia sections are not necessary once a wiki has advanced into developing BtS sections though.		I just realized that in my above response, I didn't distinguish between these options before us. My plan hitherto had been (C), but I think Lacrosse is proposing (A), and I think (A) would probably work better as long as you guys don't think it is one too many sections. I think editors on other wikis tend to scoff and think that Trivia sections are not necessary once a wiki has advanced into developing BtS sections though.

	What do you guys think?		What do you guys think?

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "Just wanted to add that I see two options we can go for at the moment: (A) Articles can have both BtS and Trivia sections at the same time, with the former containing specific..."

2020-02-12T03:15:01Z

Created page with "Just wanted to add that I see two options we can go for at the moment: (A) Articles can have both BtS and Trivia sections at the same time, with the former containing specific..."

Páàjì titun

Just wanted to add that I see two options we can go for at the moment:
(A) Articles can have both BtS and Trivia sections at the same time, with the former containing specifically OOU information and the latter IU facts that have yet to be incorporated into the article.
(B) BtS and Trivia sections are mutually exclusive. We should be gradually phasing out Trivia sections with BtS sections for OOU content. We don't need a place to note IU facts that have yet to be incorporated into the article.
(C) We can have both BtS & Trivia sections, but they are mutually exclusive. Articles which have one, should not have the other. BtS sections should be used when there is enough information to warrant them.

I just realized that in my above response, I didn't distinguish between these options before us. My plan hitherto had been (C), but I think Lacrosse is proposing (A), and I think it would probably work better as long as you guys don't think it is one too many sections. I think editors on other wikis tend to scoff and think that Trivia sections are not necessary once a wiki has advanced into developing BtS sections though.

What do you guys think?

Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-30719293-20200209231618/@comment-18014300-20200212031501 - Revision history

imported>Sol Pacificus at 03:15, 12 February 2020

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "Just wanted to add that I see two options we can go for at the moment: (A) Articles can have both BtS and Trivia sections at the same time, with the former containing specific..."