Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-18014300-20200504004330/@comment-4801149-20200509000041 - Revision history

imported>RShepard227 at 00:24, 9 May 2020

2020-05-09T00:24:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:24, 9 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Cris's closing question ~~summarizes~~ my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic. Though I understand the issues with actually getting them to come down and talk to us.		Cris's closing question speaks to my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic. Though I understand the issues with actually getting them to come down and talk to us.

	As for Kassandra being an Assassin, proto- or otherwise; if the Essential Guide states that fighting against the Order of Ancients is sufficient enough, then she counts. That's what I meant by a "lore master." It would be a writer or an officially licensed documentation by the writers.		As for Kassandra being an Assassin, proto- or otherwise; if the Essential Guide states that fighting against the Order of Ancients is sufficient enough, then she counts. That's what I meant by a "lore master." It would be a writer or an officially licensed documentation by the writers.

imported>RShepard227 at 00:13, 9 May 2020

2020-05-09T00:13:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 9 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to ~~be lazy and~~ "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic. Though I understand the issues with actually getting them to come down and talk to us. The impression I've gotten is they're able to have it their way on all fronts—use our speculation to fill in their own blanks, provide no guidance in return, and then point fingers at us if other fan groups have problems with it.		Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic. Though I understand the issues with actually getting them to come down and talk to us.

	As for Kassandra being an Assassin, proto- or otherwise; if the Essential Guide states that fighting against the Order of Ancients is sufficient enough, then she counts. That's what I meant by a "lore master." It would be a writer or an officially licensed documentation by the writers.		As for Kassandra being an Assassin, proto- or otherwise; if the Essential Guide states that fighting against the Order of Ancients is sufficient enough, then she counts. That's what I meant by a "lore master." It would be a writer or an officially licensed documentation by the writers.

imported>RShepard227 at 00:11, 9 May 2020

2020-05-09T00:11:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:11, 9 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to be lazy and "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic. Though I understand the issues with actually getting them to come down and talk to us. ~~Seems like~~ they're able to have it their way on all fronts—use our speculation to fill in their own blanks, provide no guidance in return, and then point fingers at us if other fan groups have problems with it.		Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to be lazy and "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic. Though I understand the issues with actually getting them to come down and talk to us. The impression I've gotten is they're able to have it their way on all fronts—use our speculation to fill in their own blanks, provide no guidance in return, and then point fingers at us if other fan groups have problems with it.

	As for Kassandra being an Assassin, proto- or otherwise; if the Essential Guide states that fighting against the Order of Ancients is sufficient enough, then she counts. That's what I meant by a "lore master." It would be a writer or an officially licensed documentation by the writers.		As for Kassandra being an Assassin, proto- or otherwise; if the Essential Guide states that fighting against the Order of Ancients is sufficient enough, then she counts. That's what I meant by a "lore master." It would be a writer or an officially licensed documentation by the writers.

imported>RShepard227 at 00:09, 9 May 2020

2020-05-09T00:09:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:09, 9 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to be lazy and "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic. Though I understand the issues with actually getting them to come down and talk to us. Seems like they're able to have it their way on all fronts—use our speculation to fill in their own blanks, provide no guidance in return, and then point fingers at us if other fan groups have problems with it.		Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to be lazy and "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic. Though I understand the issues with actually getting them to come down and talk to us. Seems like they're able to have it their way on all fronts—use our speculation to fill in their own blanks, provide no guidance in return, and then point fingers at us if other fan groups have problems with it.

			As for Kassandra being an Assassin, proto- or otherwise; if the Essential Guide states that fighting against the Order of Ancients is sufficient enough, then she counts. That's what I meant by a "lore master." It would be a writer or an officially licensed documentation by the writers.

imported>RShepard227 at 00:06, 9 May 2020

2020-05-09T00:06:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 9 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to be lazy and "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic. Though I understand the issues with actually getting them to come down and talk to us. Seems like they're able to have it their way on all fronts—use our speculation to fill in their own blanks, provide no guidance in return, and then point fingers at us if other ~~fans~~ have problems with it.		Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to be lazy and "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic. Though I understand the issues with actually getting them to come down and talk to us. Seems like they're able to have it their way on all fronts—use our speculation to fill in their own blanks, provide no guidance in return, and then point fingers at us if other fan groups have problems with it.

imported>RShepard227 at 00:05, 9 May 2020

2020-05-09T00:05:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 9 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to be lazy and "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic.		Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to be lazy and "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic. Though I understand the issues with actually getting them to come down and talk to us. Seems like they're able to have it their way on all fronts—use our speculation to fill in their own blanks, provide no guidance in return, and then point fingers at us if other fans have problems with it.

imported>RShepard227: Created page with "Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we ..."

2020-05-09T00:00:41Z

Created page with "Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we ..."

Páàjì titun

Cris's closing question summarizes my own thoughts on the matter: How well have the true arbiters of canon thought this through? Have they considered this as carefully as we have, or are they simply repeating what they've read here on the wiki as "canon," mistakenly-written or otherwise, which leaves us simply self-fulfilling our own interpretations of the lore? Sol intimated that the latter has already happened in his opening post. If Ubisoft wants to be lazy and "outsource" the lore-keeping to this wiki, that's on them, but at the same time, we shouldn't be giving them that option. If it's at all possible, the writers are welcome to and should weigh in on this topic.