Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-18014300-20190429201344/@comment-18014300-20190430000007 - Revision history

imported>Sol Pacificus at 00:10, 30 April 2019

2019-04-30T00:10:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:10, 30 April 2019
Line 13:		Line 13:
	The first sentence should ''define'' the term. For example, the first sentence of [[Florentine Falchion]] reads "The Florentine Falchion was a sword obtainable by Ezio Auditore da Firenze during the 15th and 16th centuries". This is wrong because the Florentine Falchion isn't ''defined'' as a sword which could be acquired by Ezio. It is defined as a [[falchion]] of [[Florence\|Florentine]] origin.		The first sentence should ''define'' the term. For example, the first sentence of [[Florentine Falchion]] reads "The Florentine Falchion was a sword obtainable by Ezio Auditore da Firenze during the 15th and 16th centuries". This is wrong because the Florentine Falchion isn't ''defined'' as a sword which could be acquired by Ezio. It is defined as a [[falchion]] of [[Florence\|Florentine]] origin.

	Another example is [[Herakles' Mace]]. The first sentence reads "Herakles' Mace was a legendary club obtained by the misthios Kassandra during the Peloponnesian War". This is incorrect again because the defining detail about Herakles' Mace is that it is alleged to be the legendary club of Herakles, not that it is a club that Kassandra ~~got~~. That Kassandra gets it later is an important detail that should be stated afterwards, like in the second or third sentence, but not in the first.		Another example is [[Herakles' Mace]]. The first sentence reads "Herakles' Mace was a legendary club obtained by the misthios Kassandra during the Peloponnesian War". This is incorrect again because the defining detail about Herakles' Mace is that it is alleged to be the legendary club of Herakles, not that it is a club that Kassandra gets. That Kassandra gets it later is an important detail that should be stated afterwards, like in the second or third sentence, but not in the first.

	I hope this is clearer. I apologize for the language barrier. What is your native or dominant language?		I hope this is clearer. I apologize for the language barrier. What is your native or dominant language?

imported>Sol Pacificus at 00:10, 30 April 2019

2019-04-30T00:10:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:10, 30 April 2019
Line 12:		Line 12:

	The first sentence should ''define'' the term. For example, the first sentence of [[Florentine Falchion]] reads "The Florentine Falchion was a sword obtainable by Ezio Auditore da Firenze during the 15th and 16th centuries". This is wrong because the Florentine Falchion isn't ''defined'' as a sword which could be acquired by Ezio. It is defined as a [[falchion]] of [[Florence\|Florentine]] origin.		The first sentence should ''define'' the term. For example, the first sentence of [[Florentine Falchion]] reads "The Florentine Falchion was a sword obtainable by Ezio Auditore da Firenze during the 15th and 16th centuries". This is wrong because the Florentine Falchion isn't ''defined'' as a sword which could be acquired by Ezio. It is defined as a [[falchion]] of [[Florence\|Florentine]] origin.

			Another example is [[Herakles' Mace]]. The first sentence reads "Herakles' Mace was a legendary club obtained by the misthios Kassandra during the Peloponnesian War". This is incorrect again because the defining detail about Herakles' Mace is that it is alleged to be the legendary club of Herakles, not that it is a club that Kassandra got. That Kassandra gets it later is an important detail that should be stated afterwards, like in the second or third sentence, but not in the first.

	I hope this is clearer. I apologize for the language barrier. What is your native or dominant language?		I hope this is clearer. I apologize for the language barrier. What is your native or dominant language?

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "
Kennyannydenny wrote:
Wow those tables on Persian Shamshir and Syrian Sabre are so incredibly ugly. The one on pages like Sword and Mace is 1000 times ..."

2019-04-30T00:00:07Z

Created page with "<div class="quote">Kennyannydenny wrote:<br />Wow those tables on Persian Shamshir and Syrian Sabre are so incredibly ugly. The one on pages like Sword and Mace is 1000 times ..."

Páàjì titun

<div class="quote">Kennyannydenny wrote:<br />Wow those tables on Persian Shamshir and Syrian Sabre are so incredibly ugly. The one on pages like Sword and Mace is 1000 times better imho.

Just to get this straight, so the table on [[Agamemnon's Helmet]] is now correct and [[Master Assassin's Hood]] isn't right?

I don't think I actually understand what you mean with the lead sentences part, it's probably the language barrier. What I understand is that in case of for example the [[Pilos Helmet]] the whole sentence about Kassandra should be removed? Or...?
</div>
Yes, the table at [[Agamemnon's Helmet]] is correct while the table at [[Master Assassin's Hood]] is incorrect. I'm sorry that you find it extremely ugly. I wonder if you can describe in more detail what is it about it that's ugly to you. Personally, I think it looks cleaner and easier on the eyes.

I also want to clarify that I wasn't the one who decided on the table style for these articles, which was decided by older editors years before I became a contributor here myself. It's just that it stands to reason to be consistent across all our articles. I suppose if you guys really have problems with the older table styles, we can all discuss changing it, but only if many of you guys really hate it.

The sentence about Kassandra at [[Pilos Helmet]]... it maybe should be removed or maybe can stay. Because it's in the ''second paragraph'', I think it might be okay. The main point is that it shouldn't be describing it in relation to Kassandra in the ''first sentence'' or paragraph.

The first sentence should ''define'' the term. For example, the first sentence of [[Florentine Falchion]] reads "The Florentine Falchion was a sword obtainable by Ezio Auditore da Firenze during the 15th and 16th centuries". This is wrong because the Florentine Falchion isn't ''defined'' as a sword which could be acquired by Ezio. It is defined as a [[falchion]] of [[Florence|Florentine]] origin.

I hope this is clearer. I apologize for the language barrier. What is your native or dominant language?

Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-18014300-20190429201344/@comment-18014300-20190430000007 - Revision history

imported>Sol Pacificus at 00:10, 30 April 2019

imported>Sol Pacificus at 00:10, 30 April 2019

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "Kennyannydenny wrote:Wow those tables on Persian Shamshir and Syrian Sabre are so incredibly ugly. The one on pages like Sword and Mace is 1000 times ..."

imported>Sol Pacificus: Created page with "
Kennyannydenny wrote:
Wow those tables on Persian Shamshir and Syrian Sabre are so incredibly ugly. The one on pages like Sword and Mace is 1000 times ..."